John 5:15-47: The Authority of the Son

Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript

From the Pulpit

Commentary

16 So, because Jesus was doing these things on the Sabbath, the Jewish leaders began to persecute him. 

  1. Historic Context of Sabbath Observance
    1. The Jewish leaders are acting the way they are because of the history of the Jewish people. The Sabbath is one of the Ten Commandments, and the Old Testament penalty for breaking it was death (Exo. 31:14-15 and 35:2)
    2. Israel’s failure to keep the Sabbath contributed to their 70 years in exile (2 Chron. 36:20-21, Lev. 26:33-35, Jer. 25:11-12)
    3. The exile ended about 500  years before the time of Christ, but it was a massive event in Israelite history.  A significant part of their communal self-understanding was wrapped up in that period of exile.
    4. This led to taking the law so seriously that they created a series of laws concerning what activities were allowable and which ones weren’t that were so complex that they even dictated what could and couldn’t carry on the Sabbath.
      1. In the Babylonian Talmud (b. Shabbat 94b), there is a series of laws concerning Muktzeh (laws concerning whether items should be handled at all) and Hotza’ah (laws concerning the carrying of items) on the Sabbath. Some items, like a hoe, are Muktzeh (translated: set aside) because they are tools of labor and have no Sabbath-appropriate purpose. Other items, like a sleeping mat, are permitted for use but are subject to Hotza’ah laws, which prevent you from moving the items from a private dwelling into a public area. The mat had a Sabbath-appropriate purpose (sitting or lying down), but the man was carrying it in the streets, so it was a violation of law.

17 In his defense Jesus said to them, “My Father is always at his work to this very day, and I too am working.” 18 For this reason they tried all the more to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.

  1. “My Father is always at his work to this very day, and I too am working.”
    1. Jesus equates himself to God with this statement, which the leaders recognize and are infuriated by.
  2. not only was he breaking the Sabbath,
    1. Jesus consistently taught the Sabbath’s purpose was misunderstood. 
      1. His disciples plucking grain on the Sabbath (Matthew 12:3-8).
      2. Teaching that one would rescue a child or a donkey from a well on the Sabbath (Luke 14:5).
      3. Jesus teaches, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath,” and that He is the “Lord of the Sabbath.” (Mark 2:27-28)
    2. The Sabbath is a means to draw closer to God, not an end. It was established at creation to teach humans to rest in God.
  3. Christian Sabbath (Sunday)
    1. The Christian Sabbath moved from Saturday to Sunday, as seen in Acts 20:7.
    2. The logic: the old Sabbath represented rest in the old creation, while Sunday—the day of Jesus’s resurrection—signifies the start of the new creation.
    3. Modern Christians are more at risk of neglecting the Sabbath than of taking it too seriously.  Many have redefined Sabbath away from a particular day or to include any sort of rest, rather than rest specifically intended to grow closer to God.
    4. There’s an opportunity to value the Sabbath not just as a brief moment of rest in a busy day or a random vacation, but as a day that God intended for us as a tool and means for our benefit—a day of worshipful rest in God.

19 Jesus gave them this answer: “Very truly I tell you, the Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees his Father doing, because whatever the Father does the Son also does. 20 For the Father loves the Son and shows him all he does. Yes, and he will show him even greater works than these, so that you will be amazed. 21 For just as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, even so the Son gives life to whom he is pleased to give it. 22 Moreover, the Father judges no one, but has entrusted all judgment to the Son, 23 that all may honor the Son just as they honor the Father. Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father, who sent him.

  1. After the Sabbath conflict, Jesus explains His relationship with God the Father.
    1. This section uses a large amount of classic Trinitarian language, affirming that Jesus and the Father are distinct persons yet one being—both are God.  To honor one is to honor both.
    2. “To believe and love the Trinity is to possess the key of theology.” -Charles Spurgeon, “Bread Enough and to Spare,” July 16, 1871.

24 “Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life. 25 Very truly I tell you, a time is coming and has now come when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God and those who hear will live. 26 For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself. 27 And he has given him authority to judge because he is the Son of Man.

  1. And he has given him authority…
    1. Jesus asserts His authority in response to earthly authorities challenging Him. He speaks with perfect judgment and discernment as God.
    2. When we encounter teachings or actions of Jesus we don’t understand or prefer, we must remember His divine authority. Our disagreement is our problem, not His.

28 “Do not be amazed at this, for a time is coming when all who are in their graves will hear his voice 29 and come out—those who have done what is good will rise to live, and those who have done what is evil will rise to be condemned. 30 By myself I can do nothing; I judge only as I hear, and my judgment is just, for I seek not to please myself but him who sent me.

31 “If I testify about myself, my testimony is not true. 32 There is another who testifies in my favor, and I know that his testimony about me is true.

33 “You have sent to John and he has testified to the truth. 34 Not that I accept human testimony; but I mention it that you may be saved. 35 John was a lamp that burned and gave light, and you chose for a time to enjoy his light.

36 “I have testimony weightier than that of John. For the works that the Father has given me to finish—the very works that I am doing—testify that the Father has sent me. 37 And the Father who sent me has himself testified concerning me. You have never heard his voice nor seen his form, 38 nor does his word dwell in you, for you do not believe the one he sent. 39 You study[c] the Scriptures diligently because you think that in them you have eternal life. These are the very Scriptures that testify about me, 40 yet you refuse to come to me to have life.

  1. “If I testify about myself, my testimony is not true…”
    1. Jesus admits that His own testimony would not be sufficient to prove anything, so he points to external witnesses.
      1. Deut. 19:15 and Num. 35:30 require two or three witnesses to establish any charge or execute judgment. 
  2. “I have testimony weightier than that of John…”
    1. John the Baptist testified to the truth, which was helpful, but Jesus relies on a weightier testimony: God Himself.  God’s testimony is expressed in two ways:
      1. Miracles: Jesus’s works, given by the Father, testify that the Father sent Him.
      2. Scripture: The Old Testament points to Jesus constantly.
  3. Jesus tells scripture experts that they study diligently thinking they have eternal life, but miss the point.
  4. “These are the very scriptures that testify about me…”
    1. “Again, we are taught by this passage, that if we wish to obtain the knowledge of Christ, we must seek it from the Scriptures; for they who imagine whatever they choose concerning Christ will ultimately have nothing instead of him but a shadowy phantom.” -John Calvin, Calvin’s Commentary on John  
    2. Scripture is a means to an end (knowing God), not an end in itself. The words matter, like in a love letter, but their value lies in pointing to the author, God.
  5. There are many people that claim to know a lot about Scripture, but they haven’t found God in spite of all of their so-called knowledge.
    1. Bart Ehrman is a famous professor and atheist that uses his knowledge of early Christian documents to try to debunk Christianity.
    2. Amy Jill-Levine is a professor of the New Testament that is Jewish and does not believe in Jesus.  In spite of that, she produces resources about Jesus to be used in churches.
    3. People inside the church today can also miss the point by treating scripture reading as a checklist item.
    4. When opening scripture, expect to encounter God, regardless of feelings. The goal is to seek God through it.

41 “I do not accept glory from human beings, 42 but I know you. I know that you do not have the love of God in your hearts. 43 I have come in my Father’s name, and you do not accept me; but if someone else comes in his own name, you will accept him. 44 How can you believe since you accept glory from one another but do not seek the glory that comes from the only God[d]?

45 “But do not think I will accuse you before the Father. Your accuser is Moses, on whom your hopes are set. 46 If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me. 47 But since you do not believe what he wrote, how are you going to believe what I say?”

  1. God is the intended endpoint of everything we see.
    1. “I know that you do not have the love of God in your hearts…”
      1. Everything in our lives is intended to point us to God, whether it be prayer, a walk in the park, or time with a friend.  God is the ultimate end of everything that’s created.  It’s should draw our attention to Him.
    2. “How can you believe since you accept glory from one another but do not seek the glory that comes from the only God?”
      1. We are called to be means through which others see God’s goodness.  Just as everything should draw our attention to God, we should draw other people’s attention to God, not to ourselves.
      2. “Our hearts are restless until they rest in you” -Augustine of Hippo, Confessions, Bk. 1.
  2. “…for he wrote about me.”
    1. “Indeed had they attended to His words, they ought and would have tried to learn from Him, what the things were which Moses had written of Him. But they are silent. For it is the nature of wickedness to defy persuasion. Do what you will, it retains its venom to the last.” -John Chrysostom, Hom. xli. 2.

Full Transcript

It is critically important to recognize the difference between ends in and of themselves and means to ends. An end is something that is good on its own terms; it doesn’t lead to anything else. It is the baseline of what you are seeking—a good thing that you can rest in. On the other hand, a means to an end is something that gets you closer to the end that you’re looking for. That’s a bit of an abstract definition, so it’s much easier to speak using examples.

My favorite example is a love letter. A love letter is a means to an end, and I don’t mean that in a sinister way. If you think about it, when someone receives a love letter—and people have since the beginning of time—they treasure it. They read it again and again, soaking in every word and every letter. Why do they do that? It’s not because they’re really big fans of the genre of love letters. They love the letter not for its own sake, but because of the person who wrote it. It’s just a means to an end, which is a relationship between two people. When they look at the letter, they remember the person that loves them, how good they are, how gracious they are, and how beautiful they are. That’s the point of a love letter.

Can you imagine if someone read a love letter and thought of it as an end in and of itself? How absurd and weird it would be. Imagine seeing one of your friends reading a handwritten love letter and you say, “Ooh, looks like someone’s got something special going on.” They respond, “What? Oh, no, I found this in the Walmart parking lot blowing around. I have no idea who wrote it, but man, it’s beautiful! I’ve read it every day for the past two weeks.” Yikes! That’s not a good thing. You would probably think your friend needs to get out more because they seem lonely. That’s the thing: when we treat means to an end as ends in and of themselves, it makes us weird. Our affections are disordered.

That’s what Jesus is going to talk about today. He’s going to talk about how we humans have this habit of looking at these means to seek a greater thing and turning them into ends in and of themselves.

We begin in verse fifteen, which is a bit of a bridge verse. It takes us from where we were last week to where we are this week. You’ll remember last week Jesus healed someone who had been paralyzed for thirty-eight years. The man was paralyzed, Jesus healed him, and then he got up and started walking around. The authorities saw him and they were upset: “What are you doing moving around on the Sabbath like that? You shouldn’t pick up your mat and walk. You should stop that. And who healed you, by the way? That’s not okay.” The man said, “I don’t know, I have no idea what the guy’s name was.” Later on, he runs into Jesus and learns His name. Then, in verse fifteen, the man went away and told the Jewish leaders that it was Jesus who had made him well.

Why did he do this? We could speculate endlessly. Maybe he was afraid of them, or maybe he wasn’t too bright and didn’t really think it through. Who knows what his logic was? But I think it’s just a good reminder that sometimes even when you do a good thing, you don’t get anything out of it; it might even actively cause you trouble. You don’t do a good thing because you expect to be rewarded or because you think someone will help you out in return. You do a good thing because it’s the right thing to do. That’s what Jesus does. He helps this man, and this man turns around and makes life difficult for Him. That’s just how it is, and if it was that way for Jesus, sometimes it’s going to be like that for us. We can’t expect people to turn around and do us favors when things get difficult. Good things must be done because they are good in and of themselves.

Verse sixteen: “So because Jesus was doing these things on the Sabbath, the Jewish leaders began to persecute him. In his defense, Jesus said to them, ‘My Father is always at his work to this very day, and I too am working.’ For this reason, they tried all the more to kill him, not only because he was breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.” We could look at some of this Trinitarian language—we haven’t seen that in a hot minute, though there was a lot of that in John 1. We’ll come back around to that in a second.

I want us to think about the logic of the Sabbath here because that’s what they’re angry about. They’re angry that Jesus healed on a Sabbath. It would be reasonable to assume some of them are insincere and just see Jesus as a troublemaker, but it would be crazy to assume they are all insincere. Some of them genuinely believe this and are upset. The Sabbath was serious. It wasn’t a recommendation from God; it’s one of the Ten Commandments. “Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy.” If you look throughout the Old Testament, the recommended penalty for someone who did not keep the Sabbath was death. It was carried out in certain instances where people were going about business as usual on a Saturday trying to get ahead.

Especially during the time of the two kingdoms, as you see the Israelite kings rising and falling, you can see the consistent fall away of the Israelites from God’s ways. You start with King David, who was a great king, then King Solomon, who was pretty good, and then you just got a bunch of stinkers. Over time, they broke God’s law more and more. One of the listed things they were doing wrong was not keeping the Sabbath. This is one of the reasons God got angry and they were sent into exile. Their land was taken from them and they were sent across the continent because they broke God’s law and refused His ways. It was only about five hundred years before this that they were allowed to come back to their lands. Part of their history is that they fell away from God’s law so severely that they lost their home. You can imagine why they might take the law pretty seriously—so seriously that they’re making up “bonus” laws. There is nothing actually in the rules about the Sabbath that says miracles cannot happen on Saturdays, or that homeless people can’t pick up mats. They just added that stuff because they thought bonus laws were better than not enough laws.

Jesus has a different perspective. In Matthew 12, His disciples pluck grain from a field because they’re hungry. The authorities get angry, and Jesus says, “That’s not the point. You are missing it.” In Luke 14, they get angry at Jesus for doing good things on a Saturday again, and Jesus says, “If you had a kid that fell into a well or a donkey that fell into a hole on a Sabbath, wouldn’t you get him out?” Probably His clearest statement of what the Sabbath is supposed to be is in Mark 2:27-28. He says, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath,” and He says that He is the Lord of the Sabbath.

The Sabbath is a means, not an end. That doesn’t mean it’s not a good or important means, but the Sabbath exists to help us grow closer to God. It doesn’t exist in and of itself for itself. All the way back to creation, God made everything in six days and rested on the seventh. He didn’t rest because He was tired; God doesn’t get “tuckered out.” He did it for us, to teach us how to exist well. On that Sabbath day, we rest in Him.

Some people get confused about why Christians have Sunday as their Sabbath instead of Saturday. You can see in Acts 20:7 that the early Christians moved their Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday. The logic was that the Sabbath was the day God rested in the old creation—it was the end of the old way—but now Jesus has come and was resurrected on a Sunday. This is the beginning of something new. We don’t belong to the old world anymore; we belong to this new creation that Jesus made. We’ve been doing it that way since the beginning.

The real point here is that Jesus sees the Sabbath not as an end in and of itself. He says they’re going about it all wrong. The goal is to grow closer to God through the Sabbath. To be fair, I doubt very many Americans today are at risk of taking the Sabbath too seriously. Culturally, we’re more likely to not recognize that it has any value at all. It’s mostly the “bad” weekend day. Saturday is the good one because you have the fun stuff, and Sunday is the one where you have to go to church and have work the next day. I think we have a lot to learn about the Sabbath and a real opportunity to take it more seriously as a valuable tool intended for our benefit. I don’t say that as someone who has it all figured out; my wife and I have had conversations this past year about how we can make this a more worshipful day where we really rest in God.

We pick up now where we get into more of that Trinitarian language.

“Jesus gave them this answer: ‘Very truly I tell you, the Son can do nothing by himself; he can only do what he sees his Father doing, because whatever the Father does the Son also does. For the Father loves the Son and shows him all he does. He will show him even greater works than these, so that you will be amazed. For just as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, even so the Son gives life to whom he is pleased to give it. Moreover, the Father judges no one, but has entrusted all judgment to the Son, that they all may honor the Son just as they honor the Father. Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent him. Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life. Very truly I tell you, a time is coming and has now come when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God and those who hear will live. For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself. And he has given him authority to judge because he is the Son of Man. Do not be amazed at this, for a time is coming when all who are in their graves will hear his voice and come out—those who have done what is good will rise to live, and those who have done what is evil will rise to be condemned. By myself I can do nothing; I judge only as I hear, and my judgment is just, for I seek not to please myself but him who sent me.'”

Massive section here. You can think about the creed we said earlier and how much of it finds its roots right here. Jesus is repeatedly saying, “Me and the Father do the same stuff.” We are in the same boat, we have the same strength. We are different persons, but we are one being on the same tier. We’re both God. But we could spend a lot of time on that. Instead, I would rather take this time to think about why He’s saying this. What’s the point? Why is He telling us that He has this authority and has been given this life unto itself? Why is He saying all of this?

He’s showing that His authority is real. When the authorities on this earth challenge Him and say, “Hey man, you are doing the Sabbath wrong,” He responds, “No, I have the authority to speak on this. I would know.” I’m not just guessing about this stuff. I have been given perfect judgment. I have been given perfect discernment. I am God. I am at one with the Father.

When we see Jesus in the scripture, I think this is a serious challenge. Sometimes we see Him do stuff that you wonder about. It’s not what you would have done, or maybe it’s not what you would have preferred Him to do. You think to yourself, “What’s He doing?” Sometimes people even theorize, “Well, here Jesus made a little bit of a mistake.” That’s not His deal. If we don’t like what He does, that’s our problem. Jesus is God. That’s the whole point when He does things or teaches us things; He acts with authority—not as someone who’s a random guesser or someone who’s got an intriguing theory for us to mull over, but as someone who has all due discernment, judgment, and authority.

He continues on looking at another “means” that people are failing to see as a means to a good end. Verse thirty-one: “If I testify about myself, my testimony is not true. There is another who testifies in my favor, and I know that his testimony about me is true. You have sent to John and he has testified to the truth. Not that I accept human testimony, but I mention it that you may be saved. John was a lamp that burned and gave light, and you chose for a time to enjoy his light. I have testimony weightier than that of John. For the works that the Father has given me to finish, the very works I am doing testify that the Father has sent me. And the Father who has sent me has himself testified concerning me. You have never heard his voice nor seen his form.”

In other words, what He’s saying here is, “I am not the one telling you that I am great.” I could do that, but it wouldn’t be particularly legitimate. You can’t be a reference for yourself; that’s not how it works. He says John told you—taking us all the way back to chapter one—and John was right, and that was helpful for you. But I am not relying on John’s testimony because he’s just another person, and people get it wrong sometimes. I have a better witness than that: God. Check the scriptures. That’s about me. If you are curious if I am legit, look at the scriptures and look at what I am doing. I am fulfilling the scriptures. I am the answer to the scriptures. I am what you’ve been waiting for. That book is about me.

Verse thirty-eight: “Nor does his word dwell in you, for you do not believe the one he sent. You study the scriptures diligently because you think that in them you have eternal life. These are the very scriptures that testify about me, yet you refuse to come to me to have life. I do not accept glory from human beings, but I know you. I know that you do not have the love of God in your hearts. I have come in my Father’s name, but you do not accept me; but if someone else comes in his own name, you will accept him. How can you believe, since you accept glory from one another, but do not seek the glory that comes from the only God? Do not think I will accuse you before the Father. Your accuser is Moses, on whom your hopes are set. If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me. But since you do not believe what he wrote, how are you going to believe what I say?”

This is a whole section about scripture because He’s talking to people who are supposed to be experts on scripture. These are people who spent their whole lives studying it, and He says, “You are supposed to know Him, but you don’t know me. You are missing the point.” This is not an end in and of itself; it is a means to an end.

By no means do I suggest that the words of scripture are not important. I think that’s a way people could mishear that. But think about the love letter again. A love letter is a means, and aren’t the words in a love letter important? They make a big difference. The words are important, but you don’t read the words for their own sake; you read them because of the person who wrote them. The scriptures are not an end in and of themselves. They are something intended to bring us closer to God. That’s their whole purpose. We read the scriptures to encounter God.

Yet, you can see all kinds of instances where people know the scriptures incredibly well but don’t know God. I think especially of Bart Ehrman. Bart Ehrman is a professor who specializes in early Christian documents, and he is an atheist. His whole deal is that he has studied all of these scriptures, and he uses what he knows to try to debunk Christianity. He has written book after book talking about why he thinks it’s illegitimate. He’s someone we’re going to talk about a little bit in the Advent study because a lot of his challenges, once you understand his methodology, are not so hard to take on. Nonetheless, he has been determined his whole life to debunk Christianity. He has studied the scriptures, but he doesn’t believe in God.

While looking him up, I ended up on his blog and saw one of his more recent Christmas posts. He was frustrated. He was frustrated at the way non-religious people act. He wrote, “Why do religious people give so much more of their possessions and of themselves than secular people? Why do religious people so much more frequently commit themselves to the good of others than secular people do? Why are so many secular people so obsessed with the fleeting pleasures of the flesh and the superficial enjoyments that the media crams down our throats? It is one of my perennial puzzles and concerns.”

How absurd! He spent his whole life convincing people not to believe in Jesus, and then he’s angry that some people don’t believe in Jesus and act like it. What did you think was going to happen, Bart? You goober. But taking him seriously, this is someone who recognizes that what he’s doing is unfulfilling. He is creating a world that he doesn’t want. Why? Because he’s an expert on the scriptures but doesn’t know God, so he’s missed the entire point.

There are other examples. I remember before I left the UMC, I saw a lot of stuff from Cokesbury. They were pushing one particular author for studies; they wanted everyone to buy her work. Her big selling point was that she’s Jewish, but an expert on the New Testament. Because she’s Jewish, she knows the cultural stuff, so you should do her studies to learn new things. You want me to learn about Jesus from someone who doesn’t believe in Jesus? You are missing the point. The point of Jesus is not that He’s this interesting cultural figure you might get some cool historical ideas about. The point is that He’s Lord. If you’ve spent your time studying the scriptures and you don’t believe, there is no reason to study them; it’s a total waste of your time.

It’s easy to see people outside the church that study the scriptures and yet have missed the point. But it happens in the church too. How often do we open the scriptures just because we’re “supposed to” that day, just checking a box? When we open the scriptures, we should expect to encounter God. That’s the point. They don’t exist as an item to check off on a checklist.

I’m not saying when we expect to encounter God, we should necessarily feel like we encountered God. Sometimes people expect a certain feeling or a level of enthusiasm to prove that God is there, but that’s wrong thinking. Feelings are fleeting. Sometimes you wake up on the wrong side of the bed. It’s not anything you did or anything wrong with the day; you’re just in a bad mood. Sometimes you feel close to God, and maybe sometimes you don’t. Feelings come and go. We should expect to encounter God regardless of what we feel. The goal of the scriptures is to seek God; it is a means to an end.

It’s true with so many things in the Christian life. Prayer is not an end in and of itself; it’s a means to an end, and that end is God. Coming to church is not an end in and of itself; it is a means to build our relationship with God. The goal of the whole Christian journey is to grow our relationship with God. When we start to see these individual things as their own ends, we get twisted up.

It’s not just the religious stuff that is intended to be a means to the end of growing our relationship with God. Think about all the other ways we could do that. Going outside and enjoying creation—creation exists to reflect the glory of God. By seeing that, we can grow closer to Him. When we spend time with a friend who is especially kind, we have the opportunity to see the kindness and mercy of God through them. We ourselves are means to the end of finding God. We are expected to behave in such a way that people see God’s goodness and mercy in us.

Really, the only true end is God. Everything is intended to draw us to Him, to help us to see Him better, to see His glory and His goodness. As we go about this holiday season, I’m sure you’re going to be stressed. You’ll be running around dealing with family and a million events. Whatever you’re wrestling with, remember to ask yourself that question: Is this an end in and of itself, or is it a means to an end? When you recognize that it is a means, ask yourself, “How can I see God in this?”

We will all constantly feel restless, frustrated, and confused until we find that one true end. We will be restless until we rest in God. Amen.

John 5:1-14: The Healing at the Pool of Bethesda

Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript

Video Teaching

Commentary

5 Some time later, Jesus went up to Jerusalem for one of the Jewish festivals. 

  1. Christians disagree on which unnamed festival Jesus was going to Jerusalem for in this instance.  Passover or Shavuot tend to be the ones most gravitate towards.
    1. If it was Passover (which Jesus also goes up for in John 2:13, 6:4, and 11:55) it would reasonably fit into Jesus’s 3.5 year period of public ministry.  Symbolically, healing during Passover would show that Jesus is liberating people today, just as Moses liberated in the past, painting him as the greater Moses.
    2. Passover happened at harvest, but John 4:35 says harvest was still four months away.  Shavuot was a festival that happened around that time.  It was a celebration of Moses receiving the law at Sinai.  Symbolically, healing on the Sabbath (a violation of the law, strictly interpreted) and then lecturing the Jewish leaders about the law afterwards would be fitting for a festival about God’s law.

2 Now there is in Jerusalem near the Sheep Gate a pool, which in Aramaic is called Bethesda and which is surrounded by five covered colonnades. 3 Here a great number of disabled people used to lie—the blind, the lame, the paralyzed.

  1. The pool was located in Jerusalem near the Sheep Gate, a gate used primarily for moving sheep and other livestock in and out of the city.
  2. The covered colonnades were a beautiful work of Roman architecture, but here it had been essentially turned into a homelessness camp by the poor and desperate who were hoping to find healing in the waters.  This was a place of immense suffering.
  3. The pool of Bethesda was a local legend, not widely known throughout the empire. It was almost forgotten by history until archaeologists found it. Its modern remembrance is primarily because Jesus visited it.

—and they waited for the moving of the waters. 4 From time to time an angel of the Lord would come down and stir up the waters. The first one into the pool after each such disturbance would be cured of whatever disease they had.

  1. This addition to verse three and the entirety of verse four is subject to scholarly debate.  It does not appear in some of the earliest version of the text.  It may have been a scribe’s explanatory note that was later incorporated into the text.
  2. Regardless of its scriptural authenticity, the verse is helpful because it explains that people were waiting and watching for the water to bubble, at which point there would be a “mad dash” to be the first one in.
  3. This intense focus on the pool caused the people to miss Jesus, a great healer, when He came.
  4. “Their eyes were fixed on the water, expecting it to be troubled; they were so taken up with their own chosen way that the true way was neglected.” -Charles Spurgeon, “Jesus at Bethesda; or, Waiting Changed for Believing”, April 7 1867.

 5 One who was there had been an invalid for thirty-eight years. 6 When Jesus saw him lying there and learned that he had been in this condition for a long time, he asked him, “Do you want to get well?”

  1. The man Jesus approached had been an invalid for 38 years.  His whole life defined by his condition.
  2. When Jesus asks him, “Do you want to get well,” it is not a silly question.  Being healed would be hard!  It would completely change the man’s life. He would lose his means of getting charity, have to find a trade, and possibly lose the community he knew by the pool.

7 “Sir,” the invalid replied, “I have no one to help me into the pool when the water is stirred. While I am trying to get in, someone else goes down ahead of me.”

8 Then Jesus said to him, “Get up! Pick up your mat and walk.” 9 At once the man was cured; he picked up his mat and walked.

  1. The man responded with an excuse, explaining that he has no one to help him into the pool. Jesus doesn’t ask for or need an explanation or justification.
  2. Jesus commands him, “Get up. Pick up your mat and walk.” This healing requires the man to take initiative and trust Jesus, even though it may have seemed irrational or been physically difficult.
  3. If you want to be healed from the unhealthy things in your life,pick up your mat and walk, trusting that Jesus’s power, mercy, and grace are available if you take the initiative.

The day on which this took place was a Sabbath, 10 and so the Jewish leaders said to the man who had been healed, “It is the Sabbath; the law forbids you to carry your mat.”

11 But he replied, “The man who made me well said to me, ‘Pick up your mat and walk.’ ”

12 So they asked him, “Who is this fellow who told you to pick it up and walk?”

13 The man who was healed had no idea who it was, for Jesus had slipped away into the crowd that was there.

  1. After being healed, the man is confronted by authorities who are upset that he is carrying his mat on the Sabbath. They want him to preserve the status quo and effectively “go back where he came from.”
  2. When we experience healing in Christ, some people may be frustrated and want to drag us back to our old, unhealthy ways.

14 Later Jesus found him at the temple and said to him, “See, you are well again. Stop sinning or something worse may happen to you.” 

  1. Healing is not a “one and done” event. One must continually choose to live as a new creation and not slip back into sin or brokenness.

Full Transcript

A buddy of mine told me about a little church that he once served. It was a tiny country church, about twenty-five people in attendance on the average Sunday, and they were older—significantly older. They recognized that if they didn’t do something to start reaching out to younger people, they didn’t have that much time left, so they decided to have a meeting to come up with ways that they could reach out to younger generations. The pastor was quite pleased with this. He himself was younger and he recognized that, truth be told, this was something they probably should have talked about well before now, but late is better than never. They all came together and had this meeting.

There wasn’t a lot of energy in the room. People didn’t really seem to know what to do. They didn’t really know any young people or what they might like, so it was awkward stumbling for that first while. The pastor spoke up and tried to give them some direction. He said, “Most of you have children, and a lot of your children live in this community. They come sometimes on Christmas. Have you ever asked them what stops them from coming more regularly? That’d be a good starting place to give us a place to start working from.”

People started to say things. One woman said, “My son doesn’t like the music.” Another person said, “My daughter says there’s too much drama, that this community has too much politics, and so she just doesn’t want to be involved.” Another person spoke up, “Well, my grandkids have ball games on Sunday, and they don’t want to miss the ball games.” Then a woman stood up and she said, “This is ridiculous. I’m tired of this. What are we doing? Why are we sitting around trying to come up with ideas on how we need to change? They’re the ones that need to change. It’s not us, it’s the young people! They need to change!”

Then the room got cooking. People loved what she said. They spent the next thirty minutes talking about what was wrong with young people today. I wonder why there weren’t any young people in their church. Go figure.

After a full thirty minutes, they were coming near the close of the meeting and realized they had not come up with any ideas about how they might reach out to young people. They decided, “Let’s just wait on that. Let’s give it some time. You never know. We’ll look again next year.”

Change is hard. Change is really, really hard. Even when we recognize that we are not healthy—that there are things actively wrong with us—it is really hard to look a problem in the face and change our behaviors. A lot of times, it’s easier to just deal with the problem, to learn to live around it, and just be content with being unhealthy rather than face the terror of a new world in which we actually address the problems in our lives. Sometimes we cloak that by saying, “Oh, we’re just going to wait. Let’s just wait a little longer. Let’s see what happens. Maybe it’ll just solve itself.”

It is easy to see that with this little dysfunctional church, but I think most of us can relate to that. Most of us have something in our lives that we know isn’t healthy—whether it be pride or negativity or lust or rage—something that we know means we’re not living our best life. Every so often we trot it out and think about it. We say, “Man, maybe we should do something.” But sometimes we decide not to because change is hard and change is scary. We tell ourselves, “It’s a really busy time of the year. The holidays are coming up. We’ll look at it again in January. Really, who knows? Maybe it’ll be gone by then. Maybe a miracle will just drop out of the sky and solve all of our problems.”

The passage we’re looking at this morning is about someone who had lived with a problem for thirty-eight years. His whole life had been defined by a problem until one day Jesus came to him and asked him, “Do you want to be healed?”

We’re at John chapter five, verse one. By the way, we are almost to the end of the five chapters of John that we set out to look at, so I’d like you all to do something. I’m giving you homework this week. I want you to go home and look back on the five chapters that we looked at and just see what you learned. Start with the pre-incarnate Word. Read through the story of John the Baptist, the story of Nicodemus, and all of these stories to see what stuck with you. What is one thing you want to remember that you think was important?

It doesn’t have to be something that I said. Maybe it’s just a certain verse that stood out to you differently because of your life circumstances this time around. Maybe there was a particular song in worship that brought out a dimension of this scripture that you hadn’t seen before. Maybe it was another pastor you were reading that struck you. I don’t care where you learned something, but I want to know what you learned. I think it is so important as we come to the end of a project to take a minute and look back, because if we don’t intentionally think about what we want to remember, there is a good chance we’re not going to remember anything. Next week, I am going to include a little slip of paper in your bulletins and ask you to write down one thing that you learned.

The week after that, I want to share what you guys learned. I think there are so many things that people learn that can build each other up just by seeing what God has taught us across a period of time. You don’t have to sign them, so you don’t have to be worried about doing “good enough” that people are impressed with you. That’s not what this is about. Just think about something that would benefit this community—something you learned in the book of John that you’d be willing to share. You’ve been warned: next week, papers.

John chapter five, verse one: “Sometime later Jesus went up to Jerusalem for one of the Jewish festivals. Now there is in Jerusalem near the Sheep Gate a pool, which in Aramaic is called Bethesda and which is surrounded by five covered colonnades. Here, a great number of disabled people used to lie—the blind, the lame, the paralyzed.”

When we’re at a miraculous site, sometimes it can be easy to assume that this place was somehow more dignified than others, that somehow God’s grace just shone through a little clearer in this place. This is not the case with Bethesda. Bethesda was an ugly place. This was not the kind of place you would be delighted to spend a lot of time in, and you can see it in the details. First off, the pool of Bethesda is near the Sheep Gate. You can guess how the Sheep Gate got its name; it is a gate that was used predominantly for sheep. If you had sheep that you needed to get in and out of Jerusalem, that’s the gate you took them through. Occasionally some other livestock might come through, but this is primarily an area for animals.

There is a pool by the gate for animals. It would be incredibly reasonable to think that sheep might have stopped to drink from it if they were thirsty on the way in. It’s a place for animals, and yet people are here—some of the people who are most vulnerable, who are hurting, paralyzed, can’t walk, blind. All of these people are scattered around.

I think the NIV does a bit of a disservice here by saying there are “covered colonnades.” It’s a fine translation, but I don’t use that phrase in my regular speech. The King James Version perhaps does it better by just calling them “porches.” There are five porches. Another way to think about these structures might be shelter houses. These are not nice places to spend time. “Colonnade” suggests they’re somehow a beautiful ancient ruin just because the word is fancy, but these were not fancy. These are just buildings with no walls. They are makeshift structures to protect people from the sun and the rain. Essentially, what we’re coming across here is a pool surrounded by a homelessness camp. It is not beautiful. There is a lot of suffering by this pool.

The pool itself doesn’t have great storied legends. Don’t think that we remember this place because it was just so uniquely special. As a matter of fact, the Bible is pretty much the only source that references Bethesda. There was a period of time where archaeologists started to think that Bethesda didn’t exist, and maybe the person who wrote the Bible was wrong or mixing stories because they just couldn’t find a pool in the place where it was described. Sure enough, they found it given time, but that’s the thing—this place was almost forgotten about. It did not have this vast legend that people all over the empire knew about; it was a local legend.

The reason we remember this place today is because it is a place that Jesus graced with His presence. That’s what made it memorable. As ugly as it might have been, when you think about how Jesus graced it with His presence, it can be tempting to think, “Man, I wish I were there so I could see Jesus heal someone.” Heartbreaking though it may have been, I wish I could see that. But Jesus repeatedly assures us throughout the scriptures that He is with us. He says, “Where two or more are gathered, there I am.” He says, “I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” Jesus is with us in Walnut Grove. If you want to see Jesus heal someone, go to Him.

Now we have the mystery of verse four. Depending on what translation you are using, you may or may not have verse four in the text proper. If you are using the NIV like me, you will notice it is not in the text; it is a footnote. It reads: “From time to time, an angel of the Lord would come down and stir up the waters. The first one into the pool after each such disturbance would be cured of whatever disease they had.” It’s an explanation of how the pool worked.

Some of the older versions of John that have been found do not contain this verse. There is a debate: was this actually intended to be scripture, or did some well-meaning scribe add this note as just a little piece of commentary explaining how this particular area worked? As people copied the gospel again and again by hand, did they start to accidentally think that this piece of commentary was actually a part of the scripture itself? I read up a little bit on it and it is complicated. There are really good arguments to be made in either direction, and I cannot say that I feel comfortable weighing in definitively. Either way, whether it is a piece of commentary that has snuck in or is intended to be a part of the scripture proper, I think it’s helpful. It tells us what’s going on at this place—how it functions and what the people are doing.

All these people who have gathered there and are staying by the pool are waiting and watching for a miracle. They are waiting and watching for those bubbles to come out, and the second the water starts to bubble, there’s a mad dash because the first one in the water is healed. You can imagine that’s where all of the attention is wrapped. If you are waiting there for years, you don’t want to miss it because you weren’t paying attention for a minute. This is the focal point of these people’s lives: waiting and hoping for a miracle from this pool.

Even when Jesus comes—a great healer—no one seems to recognize Him. We see already in the book of John that Jesus has become something of a local legend. People know Him and seek His healing, and yet a whole camp of people waiting on healing don’t recognize Him. I think Charles Spurgeon put it really well. He says, “The blindness had come over the people at this pool. There they were, and there was Christ who could heal them, but not a single one of them sought Him. Their eyes were so fixed on the water, expecting it to be troubled; they were so taken up with their own chosen way, that the true way was neglected.”

All of us, to some extent, have that same potential. Instead of seeing problems and addressing them and taking them to Jesus, trusting that He can help, sometimes we wait. We just wait on it, kind of like that church. “Let’s give it another year. Let’s wait a little longer. Who knows what’ll happen? Maybe there’ll be some grand miracle and the problem will just go away.” It is easy to want to wait and not have to face the problem properly—not to take it to the infinitely better source that we know is there. We know we can take our problems to Jesus. We know He is a much better solution than waiting for a random miracle. Because, let’s be honest, what are the odds of a random miracle, right?  Occasionally you hear stories about people who have random, totally out-of-the-blue miracles that change their lives. Occasionally you’ll hear a story about someone who led a really rough life—a lot of drugs, a lot of crime. They end up in prison and, lo and behold, they have a vision from God out of nowhere. God says, “Hey, I have plans for you. Get it together.” Their life is changed, and everything is different from that moment onward.

It does happen; you can find these stories. There is a chance that a random miracle just plops out of the sky, but that doesn’t happen for most people, does it? You can see that even at this pool. There are tons of people in need waiting by the pool, and how many are healed when those bubbles come around? One.

There are a lot of people who are stuck waiting forever. Random miracles are not common. They are not a normative, expected way that we should expect our problems to go away. We need to take them to Jesus.

Continuing on, we see the story of one particular man who had been an invalid for thirty-eight years. When Jesus saw him lying there and learned that he had been in this condition for a long time, he asked him, “Do you want to get well?” That might seem like a silly question. Surely no one wants to be paralyzed; of course he wants to be healed. But imagine what it would be like to be him. Imagine if you were this guy for thirty-eight years. You’ve been living by that pool and your whole life is defined by that. You’ve learned how to get food by staying there. Your friends are all people you met while you were there. You don’t even know what’s down the street.

Can you imagine how his life would change if he were healed? It would change, and it would be terrifying. No one would give him charity anymore; no one is going to give a healthy man charity. He is going to have to find a trade. He is going to have to go into town and figure out how to live, and he has no experience with that. A lot of his friends are probably going to say, “What are you doing here, man? You can’t hang out by the pool anymore. It’s weird. Move on.” There are all kinds of reasons not to want to be healed. Being healed is infinitely harder in the short term than just sitting and languishing. So Jesus asks, because if you don’t want to be healed, it’s not going to work out.

He asked the man, “Do you want to be healed?” The man responds, “Sir, I have no one to help me into the pool when the water is stirred. While I am trying to get in, someone else goes down ahead of me.” He gives an explanation as to why he’s there—an excuse. To be fair, I don’t think this is a bad excuse; I think it is a great excuse. He is prevented from being better. He has been stuck there for a fair reason. I am not going to fault the guy; I can’t imagine what else he would have done. But Jesus does not want an explanation. He did not ask for one, and he’s not seeking one. This man doesn’t have to justify why he is where he is to be worthy of healing. Jesus doesn’t care how we got there. Do you want to be healed now?

Yes, life is unfair. Yes, wrong things happen. There is a very good chance that you are here and you had nothing to do with it. But even if you are the cause of your own problems, Jesus asks, “Do you want to be healed?” No explanation is necessary. Jesus responds to the man, “Get up. Pick up your mat and walk.” The way He heals in this particular situation, He gives the man His power and His grace. All of it is right there at his fingertips. If you want to change your life, take it. But you have to take it. You have to stand up. You have to take initiative.

Think about how hard that would have been for that guy to think this was rational. He has been there for thirty-eight years; he doesn’t even know who Jesus is. This stranger comes up and says, “Stand up. Pick up your mat. Go.” That would have seemed laughable. We don’t know how hard it would have been to stand, either. We don’t know the details of this particular miracle. Had his legs atrophied? Could he remember what it was like to walk? Was it easy? Was it painful? Was he afraid it would be painful? There are all kinds of reasons not to do it, just as there are all kinds of reasons not to change. There are always ways you can convince yourself not to take initiative, but Jesus’s power is there. His grace is there. His mercy is there. All the man has to do is trust Him—trust that He can heal in the way that He’s claimed.

The man does it. As the story goes on, people come around and they’re frustrated with this guy. Authorities come around and they come up with this goofy reason to be upset: “You picked up your mat on a Sabbath. Can’t do that.” This man who has been paralyzed for years can stand, and rather than celebrating that with him, they want him to go back where he came from. They want to stop this because he is upsetting the status quo. The status quo was good. They don’t care if he is healed or better; they just want to live in the status quo. They need him to put back that mat where it came from and get right back next to that pool.

It’s absurd, and it’s true in real life. When we experience the healing and health that Jesus makes available to us, sometimes there are people who are frustrated because they liked things the way they were. They want to drag us right back to where we were, to our unhealthy ways.

But what does Jesus say? Jesus sees this man in the temple and He says, “See, you are well again. Stop sinning, or something worse may happen to you.” You are well again. Stop sinning. Don’t go back to being defined by brokenness or by hurt. Don’t go back to a bad way, even if it’s a different bad way. The man can’t literally go back to being paralyzed without a bizarre instance, but there are all kinds of ways he could slip back into a different sin, into a different way of being that was not what God created him to be. Jesus has given this man healing. He has made him closer to what he was made to be.

If we want to be changed by Jesus, it’s not a “one and done.” You have to continually make the choice to live into that healed self, to be the new creation He made us to be, rather than slipping right back down just because we solved one problem. If we want to be a new creation, we have to choose to stop living in unhealthy ways and live into the life that He’s made available to us.

I would bet a lot of us have problems or unhealthy things in our lives that we know are wrong—ways of living that are not good that we have trotted out before and said to ourselves, “This isn’t the time. Maybe later we’ll address it.” We tell ourselves this is not the time to take this to Jesus. Maybe we’re comfortable being unhealthy. Maybe that just seems like the way we are, and there is nothing we can do to change that. Or maybe we’re just hoping a random miracle plops down out of the sky and makes things easier for us.

Jesus asks us, “Do you want to be healed?” We don’t have to live that way. Do you want to be healed? If the answer is yes, pick up your mat and walk. Trust that His power, His mercy, and His grace are available. All we have to do is take initiative. He will help us every step of the way. Pick up your mat and walk. We are invited to trust that Jesus is the healer He says He is. Amen.

John 4:43-55 Jesus Heals an Official’s Son

Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript

Video Teaching

Verse-by-Verse Commentary

43 After the two days he left for Galilee. 44 (Now Jesus himself had pointed out that a prophet has no honor in his own country.) 

45 When he arrived in Galilee, the Galileans welcomed him. They had seen all that he had done in Jerusalem at the Passover Festival, for they also had been there.

  1. “no honor in his own country.”
     
    1. Jesus grew up in Galilee.   The people who live there are excited to see him again!  They’ve heard about his miracles and teachings!  They’ve seen the impact he’s making on the world!  They want to talk to him, but not to know him.  They think they already know him.  He’s Joseph’s boy!  What’s left to know?  They’re interested in what he does and what he offers, but they aren’t interested in him.

  2. A lot of people approach God with imperfect motives.  They often want good things (community, relationships, moral guidance, structure) that aren’t the best thing.  These searches for little goods can lead to the greatest good: God himself and eternal life with Him.

  3. Cyril of Jerusalem, a great teacher of the Church, told a group of people that were hoping to join the Church: “[You may have] come on another pretext. It is possible that a man is wishing to pay court to a woman, and came hither on that account. The remark applies in like manner to women also in their turn. A slave also perhaps wishes to please his master, and a friend his friend. I accept this bait for the hook, and welcome you, though you came with an evil purpose, yet as one to be saved by a good hope. Perhaps you knew not whither you were coming, nor in what kind of net you are taken. You have come within the Church’s nets : be taken alive, flee not: for Jesus is angling for you.”  -Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lectures, Prologue

46 Once more he visited Cana in Galilee, where he had turned the water into wine. And there was a certain royal official whose son lay sick at Capernaum. 47 When this man heard that Jesus had arrived in Galilee from Judea, he went to him and begged him to come and heal his son, who was close to death.

  1. This is an official that is a part of Herod’s royal court.  He would have been powerful and very wealthy.  He would certainly have had ample opportunity to see any doctors and miracle workers that he could have wanted.  He likely had seen others already!  In spite of all that the world has given him, here he begs at the feet of Jesus.

48 “Unless you people see signs and wonders,” Jesus told him, “you will never believe.”

  1. The official’s motivation is good (he is a good father that wants to save his son) but just like the others, he’s more interested in Jesus’s power than on Jesus himself.

  2. Jesus first replies with a seeming rebuke: “Unless you people see signs and wonders, you will never believe.” This targets the crowd’s (and the official’s) desire for miracles over genuine relationship.

  3. Jesus also does not act with the urgency the man expects. Is it any surprise that the one who created life is not going to be bothered over something little like death? Is it any surprise that the Lord over all of eternity is not bothered by something like time? Jesus isn’t concerned because he’s in control.

  4. In our lives as well, God works on His own schedule. God’s goal is to make us holy, though not necessarily happy.  Things can be long and uncomfortable, even if we’d prefer otherwise.  Sometimes we need to be melted down to be forged into something beautiful.

49 The royal official said, “Sir, come down before my child dies.”

  1. In spite of his power, the official offers real sincerity here.  There’s no threat or bribe.  He sets himself aside and gives an honest, sincere, heartbreaking plea to help his child.

  2. “He thought it possible that his son could be freed from sickness and disease, but not that he could be raised up after he was dead; and therefore he urges Christ to make haste, that his son’s recovery may not be prevented by his death. Accordingly, when Christ pardons both, we may conclude from it how highly he values even a small measure of faith.”  -Calvin’s Commentary, John 4

50 “Go,” Jesus replied, “your son will live.”

The man took Jesus at his word and departed.

  1. Jesus tests the man’s faith by telling him, “Go. Your son will live,” rather than accompanying him to his house to do the healing.

  2. By healing in this way, the man has to trust that Jesus is who he says he is over the pure spectacle of a live miracle.  He has to give up his control and give total control over to Jesus.

  3. This man came for a miracle, but stumbles onto something (shockingly) even better.

    1. He came with nothing but hope, but he leaves with faith in Christ.

    2. He came wanting the life of someone else, but he is going to stumble into his own eternal life.

    3. He came to protect a relationship with someone that he helped create, and he is about to gain a relationship with the One who created him.

51 While he was still on the way, his servants met him with the news that his boy was living. 52 When he inquired as to the time when his son got better, they said to him, “Yesterday, at one in the afternoon, the fever left him.”

53 Then the father realized that this was the exact time at which Jesus had said to him, “Your son will live.” So he and his whole household believed.

  1. The journey from Cana to Capernaum is about 25 miles, roughly an 8-hour walk.   He could have arrived home in the evening the same day he spoke to Jesus, but instead, he finds the servant on the road the next day!  He believed so strongly that Jesus was who He said He was that he chose to sleep at an inn along the way.

  2. As a result, the official and his “whole household believed.” This took courage for someone who worked for King Herod, who was instrumental in Jesus’s crucifixion.  It likely cost him socially and professionally. He arrived with faith in one king (Herod) and departed with faith in a new King (Jesus).

54 This was the second sign Jesus performed after coming from Judea to Galilee.

  1. “The second miracle, he says markedly. The Jews had not come to the more perfect faith of the Samaritans, who saw no miracle.” – John Chrysostom, Homily 36, 1.

  2. “His teachings were the explanation of his doings his doings confirmations of his teachings. Jesus Christ had never occasion to any, ‘Do as I say, but not as I do.’ His words and his actions were in perfect harmony with one another. You might be sure that he was honest in what he said, because what he did forced that conviction upon your mind.” -Charles Spurgeon, “Characteristics of Faith,” May 27th, 1860.

Full Transcript

A few churches back, I was leading a confirmation class. I asked the lay leader, a man by the name of Dale, to come in and talk to the kids one day. I wanted him to explain what got him showing up to that church and why he was passionate about it, and he agreed. Good guy, so he came in. He sat down in front of those teens and he said, “I was about your age when I started coming to church regularly, and it was confirmation when I really started coming regularly. Before then, I had been a member at the Lutheran church downtown. Me and my whole family, we didn’t really go that often—once in a blue moon, you know, Christmas, Easter, that kind of thing—but once confirmation came around, I went to my mom and I begged her to let me go to confirmation class at the Methodist church.”

He promised her, “If you let me go to confirmation there, I will go there every single Sunday.” She said, “Sure, yeah.” So he started coming, and he came every Sunday, just like he said he would. Do you know why he did that? The girls at the Methodist church were a lot prettier than the ones at the Lutheran church.

That was Dale. Dale was a spitfire, and he was honest. I don’t doubt it for a second. There are a lot of things people come to church looking for that are not quite God for His own sake. That has been true since the very beginning of Christianity. You have a little quote from Cyril of Jerusalem in your bulletin, and this guy was in the first five hundred years of Christianity—old—but I think it captures that same spirit of what Dale was saying.  Cyril was leading this class of people that wanted to be baptized, trying to teach them a little bit about the Christian faith. He told them all one morning right before the class began, “Some of you have come to these baptism classes for less than ideal reasons. Some of you men are here because you want to impress a cute Christian girl, and some of you women are hoping to snag a good Christian man. Others want to impress the Christian boss at their job, and others still want to spend time with a friend. I accept this, knowing full well that the fisher of men has used excellent bait. You have been caught in the net of the church. Don’t try to escape. Let Jesus pull you in.”

So often we come to church seeking something that’s good, right? It’s not a bad thing. Let’s take Dale for example. What made Dale start going to church? He wanted to meet a good woman, and he did actually; he met his wife at that church. But while he was there, he got more than he bargained for. While seeking one good thing, he received something even greater.

There are a lot of reasons that people might seek God. For example, maybe people are coming to church because they’re lonely, and they think to themselves, “Maybe I can meet some friends if I just start going to church regularly.” Maybe they have kids, and they want to teach their kids the difference between right and wrong, so they want their kids to participate in children’s ministry. Or maybe they just have a chaotic life, and going to church gives them this little piece of structure in a chaotic world. None of those are bad things. Every one of those things is good, and no one would argue against any of those. But if you do, you’ll find that it’s not so easy to get back into the rhythm of your spiritual life. By seeking one good thing, people all too often stumble across something even better—something that is greater than health or wealth or fame or any of the rest of that stuff. People stumble onto eternal life.

That’s what we’re going to see today. This story that we’re looking at is about a guy who came seeking something good that brought him before Jesus. He wanted to see his son healed; his son was very sick. He was a good father who wanted to try to help his son, and who could fault him for that? There is not a soul that would say, “Shame on this man because he wanted to help his son.” No, it’s great. Good for him. Way to be a good dad. He was seeking one good thing, but while he was there, he stumbled onto eternal life.

It’s been a minute since we last were here in the book of John. Looking at verse forty-three: “After two days, Jesus left for Galilee.” Let’s take a minute and remember what all has gotten him here. Two days where? He was in Jerusalem, and while he was there, he turned the tables at the temple and gave the Pharisees a piece of his mind. Then he went back to Galilee where he’s from. Jesus is a Galilean. On the way there, he went through the Samaritans’ territory, Samaria, which usually people avoid. Most Jews went around Samaria. They thought Samaritans were the wrong kind of people, sketchy people, and you never knew what might happen if you went through that territory. They thought they were people best avoided.

Jesus did not avoid the Samaritans. To the contrary, he went through their territory and he stopped and talked with them. He talked with a woman who he could tell was thirsty for something more. Sure enough, this woman came to recognize Jesus as Messiah. Not only did she do that, but she ran back into town and got a bunch of her friends, and all of her friends came out and begged Jesus to stay and to teach them. And so he did. It is an incredible reminder that sometimes it’s the people that you know are the “wrong sorts” of people that are the thirstiest for God. The people that others assume would have nothing to do with church or with Jesus are sometimes the very people seeking Him the most desperately.

That’s where we pick up. It’s been two days, and now we begin in verse forty-three: “Now after two days with the Samaritans, Jesus left for Galilee.” Verse forty-four: “Now Jesus himself had pointed out that a prophet has no honor in his own country. When he arrived in Galilee, the Galileans welcomed him. They had seen all that he had done in Jerusalem at the Passover festival, for they had also been there.” These people welcome Jesus. The Galileans are excited to see Jesus. Why are they excited? Because they’ve seen what he did. They’re not deaf; they’re not blind. They’ve seen him flipping tables and heard about him giving the Pharisees a piece of his mind. They know the reputation that he’s gaining, and that’s exciting. They’re excited about the things that Jesus is doing, and so they welcome him.

Jesus is less than thrilled about the circumstances. Why is that? He says it is because a prophet has no honor in his own country. These people are excited about what Jesus has done, but they’re not really that interested in him. The Samaritans were eager to know Jesus for his own sake to recognize him as Messiah, but the people in his home area—his region where he’s from—like what he does but aren’t really interested in getting to know him any differently. They know him well enough. “Oh yeah, that’s Jesus. That’s Joseph’s kid. Grew up over there, played tag over there. A hometown boy.” They’re excited for his reputation. While they’re excited by what he does, they’re less interested in who he really is. That’s what’s frustrating Jesus.

Verse forty-six: “Once more, he visited Cana in Galilee, where he had turned the water into wine. And there was a certain royal official whose son lay sick at Capernaum. When this man heard that Jesus had arrived in Galilee from Judea, he went to him and begged him to come and heal his son who was close to death.” Now we meet this royal official. We know so little about him, but we do know that he’s one of Herod’s guys—King Herod, one of the guys who plays a role in crucifying Christ. He is the king over this territory underneath the Romans, and if you were a royal official of Herod, you would enjoy an incredible amount of power and wealth. You would be someone that was dignified, and yet this dignified official is now begging at the feet of a troublemaking Galilean.

You have to wonder what got him to this place. In spite of all of his money and power, here he is because his son is sick. How many doctors from across the Roman Empire did he speak with about the condition of his son, desperately hoping that they would be able to do something, only to be told, “There’s nothing we can do”? How many supposed miracle workers from all over the region did he speak with in the hopes that they could do something, only to find out their reputation was illegitimate? There are so many different avenues that someone of this level of power would have had, and yet, in spite of all of that, here he is. This is someone who’s desperate, someone who has tried it all. This is one last Hail Mary: maybe this Jesus guy can do something. Maybe he can work a miracle. He’s been everywhere else, so why not? What’s the worst that can happen?

Jesus’s response at first can be a little puzzling: “Unless you people see signs and wonders, you will never believe.” It’s a little bit of a scolding. I think there are a couple reasons why this might come off wrongly to us: first because of the tone. We can see this man’s desperation and how he’s hurting, yet he comes to Jesus and Jesus scolds him. Why? When we think it through, there is some real logic to this. We can start to understand why Jesus might feel the way he does, because this man’s not really interested in Jesus; he’s just interested in his power. He’s heard that Jesus can do things, and so he has shown up in hopes of begging Jesus for a miracle, but he’s not really interested in Jesus apart from that. He’s not interested in getting to know Jesus. Just like the other people in this region, he likes what Jesus does, but he doesn’t care who Jesus is.

It kind of reminds me: how many of you have known a parent who had a kid and that kid only contacts them when they want something? It’s sad to know that every time this parent picks up their phone and sees their kid’s number calling, they know they’re not calling because they want to know how their day was. They’re not calling to invite them to lunch. They’re calling because they want something, and they’re missing out on a relationship. That’s how Jesus has to be feeling. This is a person that doesn’t want to know him at all, isn’t really interested in a relationship with him, and just wants his stuff. He has heard that Jesus has power and he wants it for himself. How frustrating.

Not only is that the case, but I think we can also be put off a little by the speed. This man is desperate. He comes to Jesus and says, “I need your help! Please help me! My son is dying.” And what is the response? Jesus doesn’t act with urgency; he takes his time. He takes his time responding. We wonder why you do not move immediately, Jesus? Why do you not go to this kid now?

Is it any surprise that the one who created life is not going to be bothered over something little like death? Is it any surprise that the Lord over all of eternity is not bothered by something like time? Jesus isn’t concerned because he’s in control. There is nothing that is seriously threatening the plans that Jesus has laid out. This guy wants Jesus to work on his schedule, but this is a simple thing that we all understand: God rarely works on our schedules. God works on His schedule. Sometimes our schedules happen to align, but very often, God works at a pace that’s much slower than we would prefer. We wish that God would work on our schedule. We wish that uncomfortable things would pass quickly and that God would fix everything the moment it goes wrong, but sometimes God doesn’t. Sometimes he takes his time. God never promised we’re going to be happy and comfortable; he told us he wants to make us holy. That can be a painful process. Metal has to be melted down before it can be forged into something valuable. Much like that, sometimes we need to be melted down. Moments of discomfort, anguish, and frustration are necessary for us to become what God designed us to be. God does not work on this guy’s schedule; Jesus works on His own schedule, and if He moves a little slower, it’s for this guy’s benefit. We are about to see Jesus do something. He is going to help this guy grow. This man came for one thing—he came because he wanted something—but before he leaves, he is going to find something even greater. He came just wanting stuff, but he is going to leave with faith in Christ. He came wanting the life of someone else, but he is going to stumble into his own eternal life. He came to protect a relationship with someone that he helped create, and he is about to gain a relationship with the One who created him.

Jesus is going to help this guy grow. He came seeking one good thing, and he’s about to get something he didn’t even bargain for. Continuing right there in verse forty-nine, the royal official said, “Sir, come down before my child dies.”

Jesus has scolded this guy a little bit, but the guy doesn’t leave, nor does he make the sort of argument that you might expect from a royal official. Think of all the avenues he could have taken. This guy is a big deal; he works for Herod. He could have tried to threaten Jesus: “Do you know who I am? I can be a very valuable friend, and I can be a very troubling enemy. You choose what you want. But if my son dies, I will make sure your life is as painful as mine is.” He could have said that, or he could have tried to bribe Jesus: “Jesus, I understand your time is worth a lot and you have a mission. I would be happy to compensate you in whatever way you see fit for the time that you spend helping me.”

He doesn’t argue based on his wealth or his worth. Instead, he just submits: “Please help my son.” He doesn’t go anywhere; he stays right at the feet of Jesus. Now Jesus gives him this invitation to move from faith in stuff to faith in Him. Jesus says, “Go. Your son will live.”

“Go. Your son will live.” This guy has said, “Jesus, please come with me and heal my son.” Now Jesus says, “Go ahead; it’s taken care of.” For this guy to leave, think of all the things that have to happen. He has to believe that Jesus has power that stretches over any distance. He has to believe that Jesus will actually do what He said He was going to do. If he does this definitively, it takes him out of the seat of control. As long as he is the one traveling home with Jesus, he maintains a level of control over it. He can always say, “Jesus, this isn’t working. Let’s try something else. Jesus, do you know any friends? Jesus, what can you do if things go south?” But if he leaves, what if Jesus is just trying to get rid of him? What if Jesus has to perform some kind of ritual and he forgets to do it? There are a million and one things that might not go right and are out of his control the second he leaves, but that’s what Jesus invites him to do. Jesus says, “Go!” Will this man trust that Jesus is who He says He is?

He will not have a hesitant sort of faith. One might imagine that he leaves begrudgingly, hoping for the best and hoping that Jesus is what He says He is. To the contrary, he believes so strongly in Jesus—well, you’ll see how it plays out. I shouldn’t get ahead of myself.

Verse fifty: Jesus says, “Go, your son will live.” The man took Jesus at His word and departed. While he was still on the way, his servants met him with the news that his boy was living. He inquired about the time when his son got better. They said to him, “Yesterday at one in the afternoon, the fever left him.” The father realized that this was the exact time that Jesus had said to him, “Your son will live.”

Did you catch that? Yesterday. The road between Cana and Capernaum by foot is about eight hours—less if you’re traveling via an animal. You can check that on Google Maps; it’s right there. That would have been the same in the ancient world. It’s about twenty-five miles. You can get that done at a walking pace in around eight hours, and again, if you are running or mounted, it’s even faster. This was done at one yesterday. This guy did not run home. He could have made it home sometime around nine that night. But this tired father, afraid for the life of his son, once Jesus told him “Go, your son is healed,” believed so strongly that Jesus was who He said He was that he slept. He went home much slower than he could have. He found peace and rest in Jesus’s assurance that it was taken care of.

The next day, as he traveled home, he met his servants on the road. He didn’t even make it all the way home before his faith was put in the right man. Jesus is who He says He is, so he and his whole household believed. Someone in Herod’s royal court believed in Jesus. That took some bravery. This is a court that helped crucify Jesus, but someone in it believed in the upstart Galilean, the guy that flipped tables. It would not have gained this man anything to have faith in Jesus; to the contrary, it would have cost him something, and he was willing to pay that cost knowing that Jesus was who He said He was. He came with faith in one king and left with faith in a new King. This man came seeking something good, and he left with something even better.

I don’t know what got all of you in here today. I have no idea. Maybe you’re here out of familial obligation and you think to yourselves, “It keeps my folks happy, sure, I’ll go once in a while.” Maybe some of you see it as a way to connect with your roots. Maybe some of you are lonely and you want to make friends. Maybe some of you just thought, “Hey, maybe it’s just going to be this little place of peace.” I don’t know what good thing you might be seeking, but if you are seeking something other than the greatest thing—God for His own sake—I accept it. I know that the Fisher of Men has used excellent bait. You have been caught in the net of the church. Relax and let Jesus pull you in. Amen.

John 4:27-42 Reap!

Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript

Video Teaching

Verse-by-Verse Commentary

27 Just then his disciples returned and were surprised to find him talking with a woman. But no one asked, “What do you want?” or “Why are you talking with her?”

  1. The disciples return to find Jesus speaking with a Samaritan woman, which was socially unacceptable and potentially scandalous, but there’s no interrogation.  Instead, they trust that Jesus is up to something, and they can learn.
    1. We have to trust people that we hope to learn from.  A student learning algebra might be baffled at the sudden appearance of letters in a math equation, but if they accuse the teacher of making a mistake, they’ll miss an opportunity to learn.
    2. God knows everything and is the ultimate teacher, but how often do we really trust him when our life differs from what we expect?  If we accuse Him, we will miss what he’s doing. 

28 Then, leaving her water jar, the woman went back to the town and said to the people, 29 “Come, see a man who told me everything I ever did. Could this be the Messiah?” 30 They came out of the town and made their way toward him.

  1. Notice that she’s excited that he knew what she did, even though the knowledge he had was about how she had fallen short and failed to find what she wanted.  This potential messiah knew what she did, but still wanted to talk to her.  He was not only powerful, but he was merciful.
  2. It’s likely the town knew her history well.  There’s no way she could have kept her messy marriages secret.  Drawing attention to herself in this way was a risk, but she’s willing to take it because of what Jesus means to her.
  3. “The woman is almost turned into an Apostle. So forcible are His words, that she leaves her waterpot to go to the city, and tell her townsmen of them. The woman then left her waterpot, i. e. gave up low bodily cares, for the sake of benefitting others. Let us do the same. Let us leave off caring for things of the body, and impart to others of our own.” -Origen

31 Meanwhile his disciples urged him, “Rabbi, eat something.”

32 But he said to them, “I have food to eat that you know nothing about.”

33 Then his disciples said to each other, “Could someone have brought him food?”

34 “My food,” said Jesus, “is to do the will of him who sent me and to finish his work. 

  1. We’ve seen this from Jesus earlier in this chapter.  For the woman who was new to God, he took the example of water, something physical that she knew, to talk about what she was really thirsty for: a relationship with God.  Now, he talks to the disciples in a similar way about food.
    1. Water was eternal life, but food is doing the will of God and joining in that mission in the day to day.
    2. Many people think that metaphorical water is enough for their journey with God.  They KNOW that Jesus died for them, but then they don’t apply that knowledge to their daily life.  Life seems meaningless, trapped in routines, waiting for Jesus to come.  God invites us to daily mission and purpose to fill our hunger for meaning in this world.
  2. “What wonder that the woman did not understand about the water? Lo, the disciples do not understand about the food!” -Augustine

35 Don’t you have a saying, ‘It’s still four months until harvest’? I tell you, open your eyes and look at the fields! They are ripe for harvest. 36 Even now the one who reaps draws a wage and harvests a crop for eternal life, so that the sower and the reaper may be glad together. 37 Thus the saying ‘One sows and another reaps’ is true. 38 I sent you to reap what you have not worked for. Others have done the hard work, and you have reaped the benefits of their labor.”

  1. To a person who has done little farming, harvest might seem like the payoff at the end.  This is the chance to finally get the fruits of your labor!  But remember that the harvest season is one of the most labor-intensive parts of farming.  Farmers spend a lot of time rushing against the clock, working in the fields during harvest.
  2. ‘One sows and another reaps’
    1. “This was a common proverb, by which he showed that many men frequently receive the fruit of the labor of others, though there was this difference, that he who has labored is displeased at seeing the fruit carried away by another, whereas the Apostles have the Prophets for the companions of their joy.” -John Calvin
  3. This truth is not only true individually, but corporately.  Think about all the people at your local church that planted seeds so that you could harvest!  Decades of people worked hard so you can stand where you are.

39 Many of the Samaritans from that town believed in him because of the woman’s testimony, “He told me everything I ever did.” 40 So when the Samaritans came to him, they urged him to stay with them, and he stayed two days. 41 And because of his words many more became believers.

42 They said to the woman, “We no longer believe just because of what you said; now we have heard for ourselves, and we know that this man really is the Savior of the world.”

  1. The least likely people in the least likely place provide the first real example of people being excited and hungry for what Jesus is doing.
  2. When we feel discouraged, we sometimes assume that Christ has done his best work in the past and there is nothing left to look forward to.  If Jesus can cause such a stir in Samaria through a woman with little social capital, what can he do in our lives?

Full Transcript

I am delighted to have the opportunity to preach on these particular verses to all of you today. I think it’s so hopeful. It is something that is so needed, I think, for so many. One thing I run across with theologically orthodox Christians is this: there’s just this heaviness about them; this world weariness, this sense that there’s nothing good to look forward to in this world. The church has lost so much of its cultural power. Christianity is no longer the force that it once was on the political stage, the cultural stage, and consequently, what good is there? It’s just this slow dying of an empire that’s left to watch this almost hopeless situation that no one can do anything about. That is grim. That is sad. There’s not much joy in that.

To some extent, I don’t want to pretend that some of those fears aren’t grounded in something. I think it’s well worth noting: yes, Christianity is no longer the cultural force that it once was in the United States. No longer is Christian thought something that you can just count on as normative in any group of people. No longer can you count on the fact that kids are just going to naturally grow up and become Christian. That’s just what they do.

I think, yes, churches in a lot of cases are shrinking, but I don’t think the correct response to all of this, the biblical response, is to just give up hope and say, “Well, there’s nothing to do. It just is what it is, and we can all be sad forever.” God has a response to the things going on in the world. It’s not hopelessness. Let’s dig in. We’ll get to it as we go.

Verse 27, and by the way, we’re opening halfway through a story. Last week we saw Jesus at the well of Jacob. He met this woman, this Samaritan—a group that is historically enemies of the Jewish people. Men didn’t speak to women in public without a husband or a brother being present. It’s to show that everything’s legitimate, no funny business. She’s also someone that came to the well at noon. She came at the hottest portion of the day. Normally, the women of the household would go get water in the morning. Yet this woman has gone at the least convenient time, when no one’s going to be there. I suggested that we can kind of see why she might have done that if we look at her life. She’s been married to five men; she’s living with a sixth. This is someone that today would likely be someone who gets gossiped about, and if it’s true today, it’s infinitely more true in first-century Israel. That would have been a big deal. That would have been huge, juicy gossip. She probably would have been ostracized. That would be very, very normal for almost any first-century Middle Eastern community. She would be an outcast. There’s this conversation happening between Jesus and this person who’s just not the kind of person that you’re supposed to talk to.

Jesus talks to her. He notices this thirst she has for something more in life, that she’s been looking for a point, and she has not found it in the places that she’s been seeking it. He introduces himself to her as Messiah, and that’s where we stopped. We didn’t see her reaction. I think I kind of implied it was positive, so apologies for giving a spoiler. But you can see here in verse 27, now we get to see her response.

First, we see the disciples coming back. They went to go get food; now they’re coming back. Verse 27: just then, his disciples returned and were surprised to find him talking with a woman. But no one asked, “What do you want?” or “Why are you talking with her?” Notice that the disciples find him having this bizarre, kind of sketchy conversation with someone. But what’s their response? Trust. They trust Jesus even though he’s doing something that normally it would be reasonable to interrogate someone about—why are you doing that? What on earth are you doing? They don’t stop and interrogate him. They trust that their teacher knows something that they don’t, and maybe if they just wait, they will learn. You have to be able to trust teachers if you really want to learn from them. There’s so much that we don’t understand.  That’s the whole thing about teachers. They’re trying to teach us what we don’t know. If every time they do something that is unexpected, we start interrogating them, we’re never going to get anywhere.

Can you imagine if a middle schooler walks into math class for the first day in a new school year, and a teacher goes to the board, and lo and behold, they start writing letters next to the numbers? The student stands up outraged and says, “What are you doing? Everyone knows letters are for English and numbers are for math. I don’t trust you anymore. You need to explain yourself. I’m going to bring in the principal, and we’re going to have a talk about this because I don’t think you know what you’re talking about.” That student would never learn anything. They don’t understand algebra yet, so they have to sit and trust the teacher, even when the teacher does things they certainly don’t expect.

The same is true for us. We have to trust teachers. When we find a teacher that we really want to learn from, we have to be willing to trust them, even when they surprise us sometimes. If that’s true about earthly teachers, how much more true is that about God? God, who knows everything, seeks to teach us things over the course of our lives. If we don’t trust him, we’re not going to learn what he’s trying to teach us. 

Just think about it. How many times in your life have you wound up in a place that you did not expect to be in? How many times have you not gotten what you expected to get or just been frustrated at where you ended up? How often have you been tempted to say, “God, what are you doing? Come on! This isn’t the way this was supposed to go?” We know that we don’t know everything and that God does, but it is so tempting to just assume that he ought to be doing the kind of things we expect, and when he doesn’t, to try to interrogate him about what on earth is going on.

If we want to learn, we have to trust God. We have to accept that sometimes he’s going to do the unexpected. If we’re wise, we’ll keep our mouths shut and we’ll learn from it. That’s what the disciples do. They come back, they see this teacher of theirs doing something unexpected, but they trust him enough that rather than interrogating, they wait and expect that they can learn something.

Verse 28: “Then leaving her water jar, the woman went back to the town and said to the people, ‘Come see a man who told me everything I ever did. Could this be the Messiah?’” This is her big pitch to them: come, see the man who told me everything I ever did.

On its face, that seems primarily excited about Jesus’s ability to know things he shouldn’t be able to know. That’s certainly a big part of it. Jesus knew things about her that he had no way of knowing. That is pretty impressive. If we didn’t know the context, that would be enough. We would get the gist of it. But there is more to it, because we know the kinds of things Jesus told her. He didn’t just point out random details about her life. He didn’t even point out good things or neutral things. He pointed out ways in which she had done things that were not according to God’s law. He pointed out the very thing that probably ostracized her in the eyes of others in the city—the fact that she had five husbands and was living with a sixth man, even though she was not married. That’s what Jesus talked to her about. This wasn’t just any kind of knowledge that he had about her. It was knowledge of the ways in which she had fallen short. Certainly he convicted her. These were not the sorts of things she ought to be doing. This was a thirst for something more in life.

At the same time, what’s the most exciting thing for her about it? This guy knew the things that she had done wrong, and he still wanted to talk to her. What makes him the Messiah is not just his knowledge, but the fact that he still wants a relationship despite knowing the ways in which she had fallen short. He still wants the best for her. He still sees her as valuable and important. That’s exciting. Not just the knowledge of God, but the mercy of God.

Think about that. Think about the things that you have done wrong—the worst things imaginable. Think about the things that you may not have ever spoken to a single soul about, the things you don’t like to think about because you’re ashamed. God knows. God knows those things like you did them right in front of his eyes, because you pretty much did. But here’s the thing: God still loves you. He still wants what’s best for you. He is still constantly reaching out to us in spite of whatever we have done. The delight of God, knowing the things that we have done, is not just that he’s all-knowing, but that he’s so merciful that in spite of the ways in which we fall short, he continues not to give up on us. He continues to reach out to us. He continues to seek ways to help us find what is good.

That’s why this is so exciting to this woman: God’s knowledge and God’s mercy. She goes around and tells everyone in town. This woman, who would be the subject of gossip, does not cease telling anyone she meets about the wonders of this person she met at the well.

She puts herself on the line. There’s no way you secretly marry five different men. That’s not a secret. Everyone would know. Those are the kinds of things that would make her the subject of gossip. But she’s not ashamed of where she’s at in life if that’s going to help people engage with Jesus. Jesus was the one who talked to her, even though she was not the kind of person that most people would bother talking to. He reached out to her when no one else would. Now there is nothing she wouldn’t do for him.

We see all that going on, and then we return to the disciples. Here they are: “Meanwhile, the disciples urged him, ‘Rabbi, eat something.’” Remember, they went into town to get something to eat. That was the whole point. They went out, got some food for Jesus, and brought it back. He’s not eating. What’s going on? Maybe he’s reflecting on what happened. “Jesus, why don’t you eat something?” 

Jesus responds, “I have food to eat that you know nothing about.” It’s the same thing he did earlier. Jesus used what the woman knew to talk about what she didn’t fully understand. He talked about physical thirst to begin addressing the spiritual thirst he knew she had. Now he’s doing the same thing with the disciples. He starts with physical hunger and moves to spiritual hunger. They don’t pick up on it immediately. They wonder if someone brought him food. Did someone sneak Jesus a burger? What’s going on?

Jesus makes it clear. Verse 34: “My food is to do the will of him who sent me and to finish his work.” Spiritual thirst is what we dealt with in the first half—the desire to understand who you are in the world, to understand the point of life. That’s good. The woman wanted more, and she encountered the Messiah. That’s good. But that alone is not enough. Just knowing who Jesus is, that you’re saved, that someday you might go to heaven, that’s good, but it doesn’t solve the problem of the day in and day out. Tomorrow morning is just another day, and you still have to get through it. In the long run, if the big picture is all you have, it can make the day-to-day feel dull. You’re just killing time—just killing time until everything gets to the good part.

You need something more than just a basic understanding of the fact that there’s a meaning to life. You need to understand how day in, day out makes a difference, how every minute of your day is something worth looking forward to. That’s what Jesus is pointing to. He has pointed to spiritual hunger. You have the thirst to know why the world is meaningful and a hunger to live out that meaning every second of the day. Jesus says, here’s the thing. God has work set out for you. When you wake up in the morning, God has work that he wants you to do. How exciting is that? How often do you wake up in the morning and think to yourself, man, I am going to go do the will of God today? I don’t know. I know very often I start out with a list of stuff. The list of stuff you have to do, the meetings you have to get through, the paperwork that needs done, the chores you got to get through. That’s dull. Deadly dull. That’s not to say things like that don’t need done, but unless you put it in some kind of meaningful context, it’s just blah. It’s so pointless. 

But here’s the thing: every day we wake up, Jesus says God has put this hunger in us to do meaningful work every day. He’s set work before us for Him. My food is to do the will of him who sent me and to finish his work. Verse 35, don’t you have a saying, it’s still four months until harvest? I tell you, open your eyes and look at the fields. They are ripe for a harvest. So he points to this piece of folk wisdom. They say, “Oh, it’s still four months till harvest.” A phrase that kind of meant, “Hey, don’t worry too much about it. Don’t worry too much. Things take a long time. Don’t get bent out of shape about it. No reason getting excitable. There’s always tomorrow.” Jesus says, “Here is the thing: the fields are ready for a harvest right now. Open your eyes and look.” I think this is exciting. Remember, in the beginning, I talked a little about how it’s not uncommon to find theologically orthodox Christians that just feel bummed, that feel cynical, that feel tired because they feel like the world is changing in a way that’s frustrating, and they don’t know what to do about it. What can they do except watch this once Christian Empire slowly crumble? Here’s what God says. God says, ‘Hey, you look out there and you don’t see anything. I’m telling you the fields are ripe for harvest. There is so much in this world to be doing right now.’ The answer is not oh just give up and feel sad. The answer is get out there and recognize the thirst that people have for the good news that you carry. Recognize all of the ways that you can bring glory to God in this world around you. Think about all the people that are wondering what the point is. Think about all the people that are wrestling with who they are, all the people that are frustrated and depressed and anxious. Think about all the people that commit suicide in a given week. Think about all the people, there is so much frustration and confusion in the world. And we have this message of joy. The field is ripe for harvest. 

You know, now that I’ve lived in Kenton here for coming up on four months. I know a little something more about harvest than I used to. See, as a non-farmer, I grew up next to some cornfields but I didn’t farm anything. I saw the combines go by every so often, but I didn’t know a lot about it. But now I have learned. See, I even know cool insider lingo from watching all of you. I know, for example, that saying “Oh they are harvesting” No, rookie move. What is it? Let’s see if I can get it. Shelling corn? And is it taking down beans? Am I getting that? What is it? Combining, there’s another one. See, I’m still learning. I’m going to get the insider lingo sooner or later. But nonetheless, I think previously, there would have been this sense in my mind that maybe a temptation to suggest: harvest, that’s the easy part. That’s the good part. You just go out and get the stuff. All of the hard work has been done. You just go out and get the good stuff. But for the past few weeks I’ve seen all of you harvesting, and it is not easy work! The farmers among us well know, as some of you have told me, stories of how long you’ve been in your fields. Harvesting is hard work! It takes extra work, if anything. But here’s the thing: it’s not that it’s grim work to be in harvest season. There is extra work, but there is also this tangible reward at the end. 

That’s what God sees. God is not inviting us to just take it easy and pluck the fruits of our labor simply and gracefully because we don’t even have to try because it’s harvest season. If it’s harvests, there is still work to be done. But God knows that there is this obvious tangible benefit waiting at the end of it. Our work is not something that we will never see any fruit from. It’s right there! All we have to do is put in the work. 

We continue on in verse 36, ‘Even now the one who reaps draws a wage and harvests a crop for eternal life, so that the sower and the reaper may be glad together.’ Thus the saying one sows and another reaps is true.I have sent you to reap for what you have not worked for. Others have done the hard work, and you have reaped the benefits of their labor.” So here again, Jesus uses a piece of folk wisdom and kind of flips it upside down. “You’ve all heard this saying that one sows and another reaps.” In other words, one person puts in the work at the beginning of the process. But they’re not always the person that gets to see the benefit because someone else comes along and ends up benefiting near the end of the process. Jesus is saying, ‘Yeah, that’s true, but it’s a good thing.’ 

You’ll see here in your bulletin. I think John Calvin nailed this one. One of the reformers, he writes, “One sows and another reaps.’ This was something commonly said to point out how some people benefit from the hard work of others. But here we see something a little different. Normally, the person who labors would be frustrated that someone else is enjoying the fruit of their labor. But the prophets and the apostles that went before us are actually joyful that we’re reaping what they sowed.” In other words, all this work that has to be done, yes there was work that was done before it. But there have been people that came before us for generations and generations that sowed seeds for the glory of God.

All Saints Day is still a few weeks off, so I won’t pursue this to its fullest. But just think about all the people that were right here in this church that lived their entire lives to bring about the glory of God. And think about the people before them who set up a church here. And think about the people before them who moved to this area. And think about the people before them back in Europe, who moved to America to pursue a vision of religious liberty. And think about the people before them who had to bring the Christian witness to Europe. There have been thousands of years of people sowing seeds to bring about the glory of God. And today, we stand to reap finally what has been planted all these years ago. People have put in generations of work. We do not stand alone with our work. Others have put in the hard work, but we are the ones who will see the fruition of these seeds that were planted so many years ago. 

Now here at the end, we see the results of this woman, her evangelism. Verse 39: Many of the Samaritans from that town believed in him because of the woman’s testimony. He told me everything I ever did. So when the Samaritans came to him, they urged him to stay with them. He stayed for two days, and because of his words, many more became believers. They said to the woman, “We no longer believe just because of what you said. We have heard for ourselves, and we know that this man really is the Savior of the world.” Here at the end, this woman witnesses to all of her friends; they all come to Jesus.

We see this incredible thing, this region that no Jew would go to, Samaria. This region that people actively avoided because they were trouble. What happens there? It’s so rare to see people this excited about Jesus, this interested to sit and learn from him. But here, with what seemed to be the least likely people and in what seemed to be the least likely place, these people say, Jesus, please stay with us. Please teach us more. The least likely people are the ones that most want to hear more from Jesus. And why? Not just because of her witness, but because they are eager to see Jesus’s work in their lives. They want to hear from him personally. 

I think that’s another piece of that good news with all of the sense that oh, the world is changing and there’s just no hope anymore. So much of that assumes that the incredible things that we’ve seen God do in our lives are done. He won’t do those for other people. Not only are they not thirsty or hungry spiritually, but God’s done. He did stuff for us and now he’s done. That’s not the case. God is not finished. God is waiting to work in the lives of so many other people. God has not called us to just be a sad waning cultural force. God never said following him was going to be easy. God is not done! God is eager to do new work, to do incredible things in the lives of people that are thirsty and hungry, to do things in the lives of people that you wouldn’t expect. The field is ready for harvest! Open your eyes. All we have to do is go out, trust God, and reap. Amen.

John 4:1-26 The Samaritan Woman

Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript

Video Teaching

Verse-by-Verse Commentary

4 Now Jesus learned that the Pharisees had heard that he was gaining and baptizing more disciples than John— 2 although in fact it was not Jesus who baptized, but his disciples. 

  1. Note that the Bible explicitly clarifies that Jesus was not baptizing people.  Even though it was a part of his ministry, he didn’t personally do the baptizing.  He only oversaw the process.
  2. Why didn’t Jesus baptize?
    1. Some suggest that Jesus was more concerned with inspiring faith over baptizing each individual person, so he left the follow-up to the disciples.
    2. Some suggest Jesus prioritized inspiring faith over personally baptizing, leaving the act to disciples, though there’s not textual support for this.
    3. A stronger reason for Jesus’s reluctance to personally baptism is that He is the one who is supposed to baptize with the Holy Spirit (Acts 1:5).  Since the Holy Spirit had not yet been given by Jesus, the fullness of Christ’s baptism was not available.  This was more akin to John’s baptism for repentance, which only involved water.
  3. “The reason why He baptized not Himself, had been already declared by John, He shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire. (Luke 3:16) Now He had not yet given the Holy Spirit: it was therefore fitting that He should not baptize.” -John Chrysostom, Hom. xxxi. 1

3 So he left Judea and went back once more to Galilee.

  1. Jesus’s rising fame created tension with the Pharisees.  Rather than allowing his ministry to the “anti-Pharisee” ministry, Jesus moved on to continue focusing on the truth that he needed to share, rather than just arguing in an increasingly hostile environment.   HE wasn’t afraid of the Pharisees.  He would engage with them again later, but he refused to allow himself to be reduced to their opposition.
  2. “He was showing an example to them who were to believe in Him (that any one servant of God sins not if he retire into another place, when he sees, it may be, the rage of his persecutors, or of them that seek to bring his soul into evil; but if a servant of God did this he might appear to commit sin, had not the Lord led the way in doing it), that good Master did this to teach us, not because He feared it.” -Augustine of Hippo, Tractate 15 on John

4 Now he had to go through Samaria. 

  1. Jesus traveled from Judea to Galilee and “had to” go through Samaria. While the route made geographical sense (Samaria lies near Israel’s borders; Galilee is an outlying enclave), most Jews would have found a way around it.  There was severe tension between the Jews and the Samaritans.
  2. Sources of Tension between Israelites and Samaritans
    1. Similarity can create friction; groups that live in the same area with competing claims and identities often clash more easily than groups that are obviously different.
    2. Competing Religious Claims:
      1. Both the Jews and the Samaritans claimed to be true worshipers of God and the true Israel, considering the other’s claim illegitimate.
      2. The Samaritans only accepted the Pentateuch (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy) as Scripture, denying later prophetic books, which increased conflict with the Jews who affirmed other books as divinely inspired.
    3. Competing Identity Claims
      1. Samaritans said they were the true Israelites because they stayed in the land during the Assyrian exile.  Others were forced to leave because of the Assyrian policies, but the Samaritans found a way to stay and shepherd the area.
      2. The Israelites that returned after the exile saw the Samaritans as people who had compromised themselves by intermarrying and adopting Assyrian culture to appeal to the dominant culture, losing their real identity while others suffered exile for their faith. 

5 So he came to a town in Samaria called Sychar, near the plot of ground Jacob had given to his son Joseph.

 6 Jacob’s well was there, and Jesus, tired as he was from the journey, sat down by the well. It was about noon.

  1. “Jacob’s well was there,”
    1. Jacob’s well is not particularly famous.  There is nothing mentioned in Scripture about it.  Its importance comes from its owner, not any event that happened at it.  
    2. A modern equivalent might be something like “George Washington’s cornfield.”  Assuming such a place exists somewhere, nothing noteworthy happened there, but it’s notable because of the owner.
    3. “And what more proper place than Jacob’s well, for exposing the unlawful husband, i. e. the perverse law? For the Samaritan woman is meant to figure to us a soul, that has subjected itself to a hind of law of its own, not the divine law. And our Saviour wishes to marry her to a lawful husband, i. e. Himself; the Word of truth which was to rise from the dead, and never again to die.” -Origen, tom. xiii. c. 8
  2. “It was about noon.”
    1. In first century Israel, women typically drew water in the morning to avoid heat and to catch up with one another at the well.
    2. The Samaritan woman arriving at noon likely indicates that she’s avoiding others.  As Jesus unfolds her story in the coming verses, it becomes increasingly obvious that she may be a social outcast and subject of gossip.

7 When a Samaritan woman came to draw water, Jesus said to her, “Will you give me a drink?”8 (His disciples had gone into the town to buy food.)

9 The Samaritan woman said to him, “You are a Jew and I am a Samaritan woman. How can you ask me for a drink?” (For Jews do not associate with Samaritans.[a])

10 Jesus answered her, “If you knew the gift of God and who it is that asks you for a drink, you would have asked him and he would have given you living water.”

  1. “Jesus said to her, “Will you give me a drink?”
    1. Jesus spoke directly to her, which broke social norms on several levels.  Firstly, Jews didn’t associate with Samaritans.  Secondly, men didn’t tend to speak to women alone without a husband, father or brother present to witness the propriety of the interaction.
    2. He asks her for a drink—a deliberate request for a favor.  Sociologists say that this is a good way to build rapport in a new environment.  By asking for help, you show that you see value in the other person and are vulnerable, which prevents you from appearing as some sort of social threat.
  2. “living water”
    1. Jesus offers “living water,” a phrase carrying dual meanings in Greek: flowing, fresh water (spring/river) and spiritually vivifying water pointing to eternal life.
    2. English translations prefer “living water” to preserve the spiritual resonance; the woman initially interprets it as literal fresh water, focusing on convenience (not having to return to draw water).

11 “Sir,” the woman said, “you have nothing to draw with and the well is deep. Where can you get this living water? 12 Are you greater than our father Jacob, who gave us the well and drank from it himself, as did also his sons and his livestock?”

13 Jesus answered, “Everyone who drinks this water will be thirsty again, 14 but whoever drinks the water I give them will never thirst. Indeed, the water I give them will become in them a spring of water welling up to eternal life.”

15 The woman said to him, “Sir, give me this water so that I won’t get thirsty and have to keep coming here to draw water.”

16 He told her, “Go, call your husband and come back.”

17 “I have no husband,” she replied.

Jesus said to her, “You are right when you say you have no husband. 18 The fact is, you have had five husbands, and the man you now have is not your husband. What you have just said is quite true.”

  1. Transition from physical thirst to spiritual thirst
    1. Jesus contrasts water that only provides for earthly needs (“whoever drinks this water will be thirsty again”) with the spiritual benefit of the water he gives, which becomes “a spring of water welling up to eternal life.”
    2. He reveals awareness of her personal life: she has had five husbands and lives with a man who is not her husband. She’s been seeking fulfillment in relationships with men.  Not only has it not gone well, but it hasn’t quenched the thirst for meaning in her life.
    3. In the Jesus revolution of the 1970s, many young people that had sought their fulfillment in drugs or hippie counterculture found lasting fulfillment in Jesus.

19 “Sir,” the woman said, “I can see that you are a prophet. 20 Our ancestors worshiped on this mountain, but you Jews claim that the place where we must worship is in Jerusalem.”

21 “Woman,” Jesus replied, “believe me, a time is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem. 22 You Samaritans worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews. 23 Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. 24 God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.”

    1. “I can see that you are a prophet. Our ancestors worshiped on this mountain…”
      1. The woman shifts the whole conversation towards “religious” questions, shifting the tone from an honest conversation about her life to theoretical doctrinal debates.
      2. “From the truth which was becoming inconveniently personal she flew to that natural resort of the carnal mind, namely, to religions discourse upon points of outward observance”. -Spurgeon, Verse Expositions of the Bible
  • “true worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth”
    1. Jesus reframes the issue away from ethnicity, tradition, and location: “A time is coming…when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem.”
    2. He isn’t vague on doctrine.  He acknowledges “salvation is from the Jews” but moves towards that bigger picture that he’s inviting her to participate in where people “worship the Father in spirit and in truth,” because “God is spirit.”
    3. Ethnic lineage and traditional sites are not the path to God; the Holy Spirit’s indwelling and truth-seeking are essential. He invites her to abandon religious formalism and be honest about what she really needs.  He knows her thirst and how she longs for God in her life.

25 The woman said, “I know that Messiah” (called Christ) “is coming. When he comes, he will explain everything to us.”

26 Then Jesus declared, “I, the one speaking to you—I am he.”

  1. Conversion doesn’t come from superior religious theory being explained well or being so nice for so long that someone just goes with it.  Conversion comes from a person encountering Jesus and knowing his power and his person directly.
  2. This encounter gives us some key principles for evangelism.
    1. Talk to someone, even if it’s uncomfortable or seemingly strange.
    2. Build and honest rapport by letting yourself be vulnerable and seeing their gifts.
    3. Connect things that people know to what they don’t know yet.
    4. Lovingly help people see what they’re looking for can be found in Jesus.
    5. Avoid getting trapped in debates over little things.  Emphasize the big picture of what God is doing.
    6. Introduce people to Jesus personally.  His power is sufficient.

Full Transcript

We pick up in the Gospel of John at chapter four. You’ll remember last week, Jesus’ number of followers had eclipsed John the Baptist’s, and John had humbly okayed it. He said, “That’s a good thing. He’s the Messiah. I hope people go to him.” But he is not the only one wrestling with this. The Pharisees also noticed that Jesus has gained a considerable amount of fame, and Jesus had not endeared himself to the Pharisees.  You remember chapter two, what he did in the temple. Jesus and the Pharisees are not on good terms, and he has become more and more famous… and more and more of a target for Pharisee frustration. 

What does Jesus do? He leaves. Jesus did not allow his ministry to become the anti-Pharisee ministry. He’s not going to become the anti-Pharisee guy. That’s not his ministry. Yes, the Pharisees are wrong. Yes, he will disagree with them sometimes. But the wholeness of Jesus’ ministry is not just arguing against what is wrong. It is also saying what is right, what is true, what is good, what is beautiful. So rather than just dig in his heels and spend the rest of his time becoming the anti-Pharisee guy, he moves. He moves on. He’ll argue with them more later.

Also notice this really odd detail here: they heard that he was gaining and baptizing more disciples than John, although in fact it was not Jesus who baptized, but his disciples. What an odd little detail to include. It has now explicitly said twice that Jesus was baptizing people, but here it goes out of its way to say he baptized them, but not directly. He was not the one doing it himself. It was his disciples. He was kind of overseeing it. It was a part of his ministry, but he didn’t personally do the baptizing.  

I looked around to try to see why this detail was so important. I found a few kind of interesting takes. One was that some suggested Jesus did this because ultimately, yes, baptism is important—but having faith in Christ is the most important thing. So Jesus pursued inspiring faith in people and left the baptizing to his disciples. I thought that was interesting. Not necessarily correct. I don’t know that it’s really supported anywhere. Interesting. 

Another, I think a little more compelling, was the suggestion that why didn’t Jesus personally get involved? We saw back in John 1 that John the Baptist said Jesus is going to baptize people with the Holy Spirit. He’s going to introduce this new form of baptism. And we know that fullness of that hasn’t been unleashed on the world just yet, because Jesus says later in the Gospels that he is going to ascend into heaven so that the Holy Spirit can come. That’s when Christian baptism as we know it is really unleashed on the earth. So maybe Jesus not personally baptizing here is to show that the fullness of baptism is not here yet. The Holy Spirit will be unleashed, and he will baptize people with the Holy Spirit, but right now we still have just water baptism, the same kind of baptism that John practiced:the baptism for repentance. Eventually we will see the Holy Spirit get involved in that, and it’ll get crazy. But maybe this is just a hint: the fullness is not here yet.

Jesus leaves Judea and goes to Galilee, and in verse four it tells us that he had to go through Samaria.  Not surprising. If you look at a map, Samaria is practically inside the borders of Israel. Not completely, but it’s nestled up next to it on the northeast side, and Galilee is kind of this outlying enclave. So sometimes to get to the farthest portion of Israel, you have to cut through Samaria.

Most people avoid doing it. Samaria is not the kind of place you want to get caught in. There is a ton of tension between the Samaritans and the Israelites.  Some of it is just geography: two different people groups right up next to each other in a really inconvenient way. There’s always going to be tension as long as the geography is what it is.  But there are also other things that make it especially challenging. The Samaritans and the Jews had competing understandings of who they were and what the world was.

Sometimes when we’re next to people who are very different from us, it’s actually easier to have a conversation because we know we are not talking about the same things.  If, for example, the Samaritans were actually a group of Buddhists who had somehow come from China and settled in this area, it might actually be easier. Because they would know: you’re Buddhists, we’re Jewish. You’re from that place, we’re from this place. We may not agree on everything, but we know we’re different. At least we can agree on our disagreeing.  The Samaritans were much, much closer in terms of the way they thought about the world.

Both groups claimed to be worshippers of God and said the other was illegitimate. Both groups claimed to be the true Israel and said the other was illegitimate. For example, the Samaritans followed the God of the Old Testament very clearly, but they said Moses was the last prophet of God. They said there were only five books in the Bible: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy. Anything after that? Fake. Now that’s going to create tension with the Israelites, who say, “But there are a whole lot of prophets that came after that.” So both are competing for who are the true worshippers of God, who really understands who God is.

Not only that, but they also disagree on who they are. Both groups claim to be the true Israelites. The Samaritans say that in the Old Testament—you can read about it—the Assyrians come and destroy Israel and send all of the Jewish people into exile. The Samaritans claim that during that event, when everyone was scattered to different parts of the earth, they stayed. “We were here and they never moved us. So we are actually the true Israel who stayed here the whole time. If anyone’s legitimate, it’s us. You can’t trust the other people. They went all over the place! We are the ones who stayed.”

The rest of Israel responds, “You stayed because you were willing to work with the Assyrians. You intermarried with them. You took on their culture, you took on their way of life, and you want to call yourself Israelites? No. There is nothing Israelite about you anymore. You’re something else. We suffered because we stood true to what it means to be us. You gave it up. That’s why your life was easier.” A lot of division between these two groups. Very uncomfortable, very at odds.  But Jesus goes through Samaritan territory here.

Verse five: So he came to a plot of ground in Samaria called Sychar, near the plot of ground Jacob had given to his son Joseph. Jacob’s well was there.

The way it introduces Jacob’s well, you might almost think it’s this famous historical site—like, “Oh man, Jacob’s Well! Something important must have happened there.” Not really. This is the only mention of Jacob’s Well in the Bible, so is it famous? Kinda—but only because Jacob owned it. It’s less important in itself and more important because of who owned it.  Kind of like saying, “I went to George Washington’s cornfield.” Oh, that’s cool. Did something important happen there? No, not really, but George Washington owned it, and that’s something.  Same idea here. So don’t get caught up in the object itself. Think about the person it’s connected to: Jacob. Jesus is going to a place historically associated with one of the great patriarchs and someone God made multiple promises to.

Jesus, tired as he was from the journey, sat down by the well. It was about noon.  His disciples go into town.  It’s a little ways off—not super far, but far enough. Jesus takes a breather by the well.  It tells us it’s about noon, and that detail is not random. In the Middle East in this era, getting water for the day would be a task done by the women of the household. And if you were someone who had to go get water from a well outside of town, what time of day do you think you would do that?

Middle of the day? You’re going to be roasting. It gets hot out there. I would go at the beginning of the day, just because it’s a hot region. The longer you wait, the more you’re going to get toasted by that sun. So normally people would go in the morning. That would be the norm, and that’s when everyone would be going to get water. You go because you get to see your friends, you get to chat on the way there. But this woman is not going then. She has chosen to go in the middle of the day. On one hand, maybe it’s just her preference That’s possible. Maybe she’s just a middle-of-the-day kind of person. But I think there’s a very distinct possibility here. She chooses to go at the hottest time of the day, when no one else is going? There’s a very real possibility, and I think it’s supported by what we see later, that this is a woman who has led a dramatic life. The kind of life that would naturally lead to gossip, to her being ostracized, to her probably being picked on by other people in the community. So why does she go at the hottest part of the day to get water? Probably to avoid people. Probably because she’s an outcast. I think that’s a reasonable take.

Verse seven: “When a Samaritan woman came to draw water, Jesus said to her, ‘Will you give me a drink?’”

What we’re about to see unfold is this incredible example of evangelizing. Jesus is about to tell her that he is the Messiah. And evangelizing can be a challenge, but we see so much here in how he chooses to do it. First off, he talks to her, which is worth noting. I think sometimes we try to evangelize without actually talking to people. We come up with these really clever, and much more comfortable, strategies. “I’ll just be really nice, and then maybe someday they’ll want to talk to me about Jesus unprompted.” Probably not. Or, “Maybe I’ll give them a little trinket, and the trinket will excite them, and they’ll suddenly start asking me about Jesus.” If you want to talk to someone about something, the best way to do it is to start talking to them. And that’s what Jesus does.

He talks to her, and he’s not just addressing anyone. He’s talking to a Samaritan woman at the well at noon. We talked about how she’s likely an outcast. She’s also someone who would naturally be uncomfortable for a Jewish person to talk to.  But not only that: she’s also a woman. In this region, in this era, for a man to talk to a woman without her spouse being present, that’s not the sort of thing you do. That’s odd.

Normally, if a man wants to talk to a woman, you make sure that either her husband or her father is around. Why? Because you want everyone to know there’s nothing strange going on. You’re not trying to hit on her. This is not a weird conversation. Everything is normal, and other people can witness that. There’s a witness to your innocent intentions.

So this is not the kind of conversation that would normally happen. But Jesus is having a conversation that really shouldn’t be happening at all, at least not by the polite standards of the day. If he were worried about what people thought of him, he wouldn’t be having this conversation. But he risks it.

He doesn’t just talk to someone he’s not supposed to talk to, he also asks her for a favor. According to sociologists, that’s one of the best ways to get people to like you if you don’t know them very well: you ask them for a favor. It’s kind of counterintuitive. I don’t know about you, but normally if I want to be on good terms with someone, I try to show that I’m the kind of person you’d want to be friends with. I’m impressive. I know things. I can do things. “I’m the kind of person you want to be friends with—look at how great I am!” That’s a common instinct. It’s not a good instinct. Again, according to sociologists, that’s more likely to make you appear threatening, because you’re trying to come off as a big deal. People think, “Whoa, I don’t know about that person. They’re trying to get something out of me.” Meanwhile, if you ask for a favor, you’re being vulnerable. You’re recognizing their value and saying, “Hey, I see that you can do something. You’re important. I want your help.” Recognizing their value and showing your own vulnerability goes a long way toward building a relationship they actually want to invest in. So—wise of Jesus. Very wise.

She responds, shocked that he would do this. She says, “You are a Jew and I am a Samaritan woman. How can you ask me for a drink?” For Jews do not associate with Samaritans.

Jesus answers her: “If you knew the gift of God and who it is that asks you for a drink, you would have asked him, and he would have given you living water.” This is really playful. He takes it and flips it on its head. She says, “You’re asking me for a drink? That’s ridiculous.” And he’s like, “Yeah, now that I think about it, you should be asking me for a drink. You should be asking me for living water.”

“Living water” could also be translated “spring water.” In the Greek, those ideas overlap. It means moving water—water from a river, from a stream, not stagnant water. Obviously, that’s better than water that’s just been sitting there. I don’t know the last time you went shopping for bottled water, but “Old Desert Well” is not the name of any brand. It’s always “glacial spring,” “mountain river,” something that implies fresh, moving water.

So that’s the physical meaning, but most translators go with “living water” because there’s also a spiritual meaning—eternal life. It has this great double meaning in Greek. And you have to choose: do I emphasize the physical or the spiritual? They’ve chosen well. “Living water” makes it clear that Jesus is hinting at something deeper as the conversation unfolds. But in the moment, she probably just hears it as fresh water. “You should be asking me for better water.” That makes this sound even more ridiculous.

She responds, “Sir, you have nothing to draw with, and the well is deep. Where can you get this living water? Are you greater than our father Jacob, who gave us the well and drank from it himself, as did his sons and his livestock?”

He answers, “Everyone who drinks this water will be thirsty again, but whoever drinks the water I give them will never thirst. Indeed, the water I give them will become in them a spring of water welling up to eternal life.” So Jesus takes something she knows very well, physical thirst, and uses it to talk about something she doesn’t really want to talk about: spiritual thirst.

He starts talking about eternal life. “I know you’re physically thirsty, you’re here getting water, but I also know there’s another kind of thirst in your life. There’s a deeper thirst. A spiritual thirst. A longing for something more than the life you’re currently living.”

She shies away from that. She doesn’t seem very interested in the religious or theoretical side of the conversation. She responds without engaging the spiritual part at all: “Sir, give me this water so I won’t get thirsty and have to keep coming here to draw water.” She’s talking strictly about physical water. “Look, if you’ve got some kind of magic water, I’m in. But the deeper conversation? I’m not really interested.”

And Jesus responds: “Go, call your husband and come back.” Again, that would have been the social norm. At this point, the conversation has gone on long enough that for Jesus to say, “Go get your husband and come back,” would be polite. It would be mannerly. Go get your husband so everyone knows this conversation is legitimate. We’re not going to continue without it being clear that this is a normal, innocent interaction. But Jesus has a secondary motivation here.

She says, “I have no husband,” and he responds, “You’re right when you say you have no husband. The fact is, you have had five husbands, and the man you now have is not your husband. What you have said is quite true.” You’re acting like you’re not interested in this spiritual thirst. You don’t think you have any need for this “religious theory” about eternal life. And he responds, “No, I’m not just talking about theory. I’m talking about your life. Look at the life you’re living! I can see you’re thirsty. I know you are looking for something, and you’re not finding it.”

Clearly, in her case, she’s seeking it in relationships, and she can’t find one that fulfills her. She’s been with five men. She’s living with a sixth. They’re not married. That’s probably not going to work out. You’re not doing things right. Anyone can look at your life and see: you are thirsty. But you’re looking in all the wrong places. You’re looking for more than what you’re finding. And that is so common for all of us.

I just saw Jesus Revolution this past week—I know, I’m late to the party. That came out a couple years ago at this point. But I watched it, and I think it’s another great example. You have this hippie generation, and they want more. They are thirsty for more, but they’re looking in all the wrong places. Looking in drugs, in free love, in parties, and it’s not filling them. The more they drink from those wells, the thirstier they become.

A pastor I really admire, David Guzik, describes this process of searching for what you’re really thirsty for and looking in the wrong places as drinking salt water. You see something that looks like it will quench your thirst, so you drink—but the more you drink, the thirstier you get. I think that’s a really good picture. Specifically, this woman has been looking in relationships. She seems to think, “If I just find the right man, then everything will come together.” But it always falls apart.

That’s incredibly common. People think, “If I just have the right relationship with the right person, then everything will come together. Then I’ll be happy.” But that’s an unfair expectation. No person can fulfill us. There is one, but Jesus is the only one. No other person can do that. They’re just people. They have good days and bad days. They’re boring sometimes. They’re rude sometimes. People are people. They can never fulfill you. But now Jesus has shown her that this thirst—it’s not a theory. This is her life. “I see you are thirsty. I see you want more. Let’s talk about it.”

And the way she responds might seem baffling. She says, “I can see that you’re a prophet. Our ancestors worshiped on this mountain, but you Jews claim that the place where we must worship is in Jerusalem.”

That feels a little random—kind of out of left field. Who is right about proper worship? The Jews or the Samaritans? As a pastor, I think I can safely say what’s going on here: she has switched into religion mode. She knows she’s talking to someone with religious authority, so she starts saying the things she thinks she’s supposed to say, rather than being honest about her life and what she’s looking for. She’s uncomfortable, so she moves into safer territory—religious discussion. This happens to me sometimes. I’ll be talking with someone, they find out I’m a pastor, and suddenly the conversation shifts to baptism, prayer, the Catholic Church—things like that. And you can tell: “Okay, this is what you think pastors want to talk about.” You’ve gone into religion mode.

Jesus tells her she’s asking the wrong questions. “Woman, believe me, a time is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem. You Samaritans worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews. Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and in truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in spirit and in truth.” The questions she’s asking are about ethnicity and tradition. Who is more right? The traditions of the Samaritans or the traditions of the Jews?

Jesus says, “Look, you’re thinking by the wrong metrics. Who you’re related to—that’s never going to get you closer to God. That’s the wrong way to think. This is not about ethnicity. That’s always too far removed. You need the Holy Spirit in you—and that’s coming. There’s going to be a way of opening up and being closer to God than just being related to someone who was supposedly a prophet. You need something closer than what you’re thinking about in these traditions. You’re caught up in which set of traditions is right. You’re asking me who’s more right—their traditions or our traditions. Don’t think in terms of tradition. Think in terms of truth. Who are you, and what are you coming to God for? Be honest. Don’t go into religion mode on me. Talk about your life. What are you thirsty for? Be honest. Are you seeking God? Where are you seeking him? That’s what’s important.”

Now he’s got her right where he wants her. You can almost see throughout this conversation what’s familiar and what’s foreign constantly being intermixed—this playfulness as he talks with her. And finally she says, “I know that Messiah is coming. When he comes, he will explain everything to us.” The conversation has brought her to a place where she realizes: the only one who’s really going to solve this is God. God is going to send someone who can make sense of all of it—all these confusing questions about religion, about what I’m supposed to be doing, about how I’m supposed to find meaning. God’s going to send someone, and then it’s going to be fixed.

Jesus responds, “I, the one speaking to you… am he.” He reveals who he really is. And that’s the goal of all evangelism. It’s so interesting to watch how this conversation unfolds. Jesus does so many incredible things in it. But at the end of the day, the goal of evangelism is not building the best relationship, or having the best religious theory, or giving people what they need. Jesus does a little bit of all of those things. He talks about something they both understand—water. He builds a relationship you wouldn’t expect. He even engages with religious ideas, but none of those things is enough. The only thing that’s enough is introducing someone to Jesus and seeing him for who he is.

I don’t know how each of you came to faith, but I’m guessing, even if those elements were involved, none of you came to know Jesus because he was simply the best religious theory on the market. You weren’t just intellectually convinced and that was it. Or because someone was really nice to you one day and you thought, “Well, I’ll go along with it—they’re so polite.” Or even because someone gave you things and you thought, “These Christians seem pretty all right.” Those things might have played a role. But there’s really only one thing that makes a Christian—and that is encountering Jesus. Encountering a God who is more amazing than you could possibly understand. Encountering a Messiah who has entered in to solve the problems of meaning, of understanding, to bring the world to what it was meant to be.

I don’t know who God has placed in your life. I don’t know if there’s someone waiting to be introduced to Jesus as Messiah. Or maybe it’s you. Maybe you are someone who has never truly met Jesus as Messiah, never felt his power in your life, but this is good news. This is something we need to share. This is something that should fill us with joy and delight and make every day infinitely better. I hope we are able to share that good news with people as naturally, as joyfully, and as beautifully as Jesus does here.

Amen.

John 3:22-36 John’s Final Testimony

Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript

Video Teaching

Verse-by-Verse Commentary

22 After this, Jesus and his disciples went out into the Judean countryside, where he spent some time with them, and baptized. 

  1. Note that according to John 4:2, Jesus didn’t personally baptize anyone.  His disciples did it for him while he oversaw it.

23 Now John also was baptizing at Aenon near Salim, because there was plenty of water, and people were coming and being baptized. 24 (This was before John was put in prison.) 25 An argument developed between some of John’s disciples and a certain Jew over the matter of ceremonial washing. 26 They came to John and said to him, “Rabbi, that man who was with you on the other side of the Jordan—the one you testified about—look, he is baptizing, and everyone is going to him.”

  1. John’s disciples are worried that Jesus is now stealing John’s ministry!  Not only is he baptizing people, something that John literally has a title about, but he’s drawing bigger crowds!
  2. Ministries built on ego or a sense of territory do not reflect the kingdom of Heaven.  Many such “ministries” exist to this day, much to the sadness of God.

27 To this John replied, “A person can receive only what is given them from heaven. 28 You yourselves can testify that I said, ‘I am not the Messiah but am sent ahead of him.’ 29 The bride belongs to the bridegroom. The friend who attends the bridegroom waits and listens for him, and is full of joy when he hears the bridegroom’s voice. That joy is mine, and it is now complete. 30 He must become greater; I must become less.”

  1. In his response, John submits to the authority of Jesus.
    1. John’s response to his disciples reveals a fundamental truth about the prophets: prophets are people who submit.  
      1. The image of a prophet being a wild man standing at the edge of society, unwilling to submit to church authorities isn’t accurate.  They only refuse to submit to authorities who have abandoned God’s word.  
      2. When leaders stop submitting to God, they lose their authority, and prophets arise as God’s true spokesmen.
    2. Conversations about “submitting” to anyone in our culture can be very jarring and even offensive!  Submission seems as though it’s against our core expectations to live as free people in this world!
      1. Modernity tends to defines freedom via “negative freedom”–you’re free from external obligations when making choices.
      2. The Bible presents a definition of freedom that might be called positive or teleological freedom–you’re free to live well and be what you were made to be through the grace of God.
      3. We can only understand how submission can lead to freedom if we understand freedom on God’s terms.  Through modern expectations, submission to anyone would seem tyrannical, but on Biblical terms, freedom requires you to submit to God and to others in your life.
    3. The willingness to submit that John models is important for every Christian today as well.  The Bible speaks often about submission.  
      1. Colossians 3:20: “Children, obey your parents in everything, for this pleases the Lord,” 
        1. Notice that there is no age limit specified in the text.
      2. Colossians 3:18-19 reads “Wives, submit yourselves to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.  Husbands, love your wives and do not be harsh with them.”
        1. Uncomfortably enough, the passage doesn’t advocate for mutual submission.  The language for each gender is intentionally different.
        2. Ephesians 5 explains the husband’s role in greater detail: “Love your wives as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her.” This is servant leadership—putting his wife first, himself second. To exploit this authority is to abuse one’s spouse.
      3. Colossians 3:22: “Slaves, obey your earthly masters in everything… work at it with all your heart, as working for the Lord, not for human masters.”
        1. The idea of getting rid of slavery would have been ridiculous to most people in the ancient world.
        2. Athenaus’s comedy, “The Banqueting Sophists” includes a section where people theorize about a world without slaves, but it would require automata, or items that move themselves.  They imagine a world where you could just tell objects, “Table, lay yourself! … Cup, pour yourself!”
          1. Depressingly enough, this seems to be somewhat prophetic–slavery in our world mostly ended with the advent of the Industrial Revolution
        3. For Christian slaves, the question would have been, should we stage a violent uprising?  That’s what is being addressed in submission.  The answer is no.
        4. For Christian slaveholders, The Book of Philemon shows that slavery is incompatible with Christianity as Paul encourages a master to treat his runaway slave both as a brother, a partner, and as he would treat Paul himself (v. 16-17)
      4. Many other examples can be found throughout the Bible, in reference to civil authority, religious authority, and so forth.  If it does not disobey God to submit, Christians are encouraged to submit
  2. “He must become greater; I must become less.”
    1. This especially sums up the way John has completely submitted to God.  He knows that his authority must give way to Christ’s. He doesn’t sabotage Jesus–he makes room.
    2. As God becomes greater in us, we don’t become less ourselves but more truly ourselves, the people we were made to be, freed from sin’s distortion. This is good, though it may frighten us at first.
      1. “Imagine turning a tin soldier into a real little man. It would involve turning the tin into flesh. And suppose the tin soldier did not like it? He is not interested in flesh: all he sees is that the tin is being spoilt. He thinks you are killing him” -CS Lewis

31 The one who comes from above is above all; the one who is from the earth belongs to the earth, and speaks as one from the earth. The one who comes from heaven is above all. 32 He testifies to what he has seen and heard, but no one accepts his testimony. 33 Whoever has accepted it has certified that God is truthful. 

  1. John’s witness to Jesus affirms God’s truth; whoever accepts Jesus’s testimony isn’t doing anything wild!  They’re just certifying that God is doing exactly what he said he would do.
    1. Affirming God’s truthfulness in worship and Scripture reading is a daily opportunity.

34 For the one whom God has sent speaks the words of God, for God gives the Spirit without limit. 35 The Father loves the Son and has placed everything in his hands. 36 Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God’s wrath remains on them.

  1. Submission to the authorities we can see helps us submit to the authorities we can’t see until they’re fully revealed in their glory
    1. IfJesus entered the room, radiant with heavenly rays, wearing an otherworldly crown and the finest robes imaginable, the ONLY response would be to kneel and submit.  To do anything else would be absurd!  But if we don’t prepare our hearts for that moment, we’ll miss it.
  2. “[H]e who denies God the glory of redemption, in addition to his folly, has robbed the Lord of the choicest jewel of his regalia, and aimed a deadly blow at the divine honor. I may say of him who despises the great salvation, that, in despising Christ, he touches the apple of God’s eye. “This is my beloved Son,” saith God, “hear ye him.” Out of heaven he saith it, and yet men stop their ears and say, “We will not have him.” Nay, they wax wrath against the cross, and turn away from God’s salvation. Do you think that God will always bear this?” -Charles Spurgeon

Full Transcript

Submit. There is a word that appears in the Bible an uncomfortable amount of times—uncomfortable for anyone, but especially for us, who culturally value our individuality and autonomy so much. The amount of submitting isn’t just uncomfortable; it’s downright offensive. I mean, did you hear that first passage I read this morning? I hesitated before I chose that one. I actually asked my wife, “I’ve only been here three months. You think I can read that one?”

And she said, “It’s in the Bible. People have eyes.”

I said, “All right, I’ll go with it.”

But look at it—you can see why it’s controversial. We start right out in verse 18: “Wives, submit yourselves to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.” I have never been present in a church service where a pastor preached on that passage. But I was in a church where someone had that as a reading that the pastor didn’t touch. And while they were reading it, I looked around the room at people’s faces. Boy, was that an adventure. People had feelings. I saw quite a few women who were outraged, and I saw quite a few men who had the weirdest mix of a little bit of smugness combined with a lot of fear of what’s going to happen after church today.

Regardless of the feelings it evokes, there it is: “Wives, submit to your husbands.” And then you follow up in verse 19.  Wouldn’t it be more comfortable if it followed up with, “And husbands submit to your wives”? My goodness. Then I wouldn’t be sweating up here talking about it, because two submits practically cancel each other out. We’re good to go. But that’s not what it follows up with. Instead, it says, “Husbands, love your wives and do not be harsh with them.”

I think Ephesians goes into a little more depth on this general concept. Ephesians 5 talks about what kind of love the husband should have for the wife. It says, “Love your wives as Christ loved the church, giving himself up for her.” That’s intense. An intense responsibility. This leadership is not just so you can bask in the glory of yourself. It’s intended to serve her. You are supposed to be putting her first and yourself second. That’s what it’s supposed to be. If you’re not willing to give yourself up for her, if you’re not putting her first, there is a problem. You are not only abusing your position—you are abusing your spouse.

Then we continue on. Verse 20.  We’re still on that general theme of submission: “Children, obey your parents in everything, for this pleases the Lord.” Commandment number five, right there. And notice that there is no age limit on that. It doesn’t say, “until you are eighteen and then you’re good to go.” Obey your parents.

Then it goes right back to that leadership role of the head of the household. It says, “Fathers, do not embitter your children, or they will become discouraged.” Again, what is your goal here? You work for them. That’s your goal. As you discipline them, it’s not so you can have a nice quiet evening. If you need to discipline them, your goal is to guide them, to help them. If you are interacting with them in a way that’s making them permanently frustrated and warping them, you’re doing it wrong.

We’ve got a model of a household that would be controversial in a lot of places. But as we continue on, controversy of controversies, “slaves, obey your earthly masters in everything.” Obey your earthly masters in everything, and do it not only when their eye is on you and to curry their favor, but with sincerity of heart and reverence for the Lord. Whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working for the Lord, not for human masters, since you know that you will receive an inheritance from the Lord as a reward.

Now, there are some who have used verses like this to claim that the Bible supports and encourages slavery. This is not the case. Not only is it not the case, it betrays a lack of knowledge about the Bible. One need only look in the book of Philemon to see more about this.  The book of Philemon—short but important, near the end of your Bible—is a letter from the apostle Paul. Paul is writing to a Christian slave owner, and he says, “Hey, I found your runaway slave, and I’ve got good news for you. I’m sending him back. And whereas before you had him as a slave, good news—now you get to accept him as your brother. He used to be your servant, but now he’s your fellow worker for Christ. I know how excited you’re going to be about this. So I want you to receive him as though he were me.”  

I want you to treat him in the exact same way you would treat me, the apostle Paul.  In other words, slavery, if you’re really caring about your neighbor the way you’re supposed to be, is incompatible with Christianity. Now, there are still some who say Paul is not direct enough on that point. And while I think he’s pretty direct, it’s actually shocking to think that in the ancient world this would even appear anywhere. In the ancient world, slavery was not considered morally ambiguous. It was just a fact of life. It was normative.

If you look, for example, a couple hundred years after the New Testament was finished, there is a Greek writer named Athenaeus. He wrote comedies. He wrote one called The Banqueting Sophists, and it’s about rich people having a dinner party. At one point they say, “There are no more slaves. We’re done with slaves. Let’s enjoy dinner.” And then the table magically sets itself, the food magically cooks itself, and the wine magically serves itself.  The point is, it’s a joke. The idea that there could be no slaves is literally a joke played for comedic effect. It’s absurd. Who’s going to do the cooking?

Slavery continued to be the dominant system of labor in the world, in every culture, up until—grimly enough—the Industrial Revolution, when it became less economically viable. But it is a shame how little Christians often followed the clear words of Scripture. And they are clear enough. You can see, going all the way back to the ancient era, people understood Paul’s condemnation of slavery in Philemon.  They just didn’t always follow it.

Either way, wouldn’t it be more comfortable? Paul here is talking to Christians serving under non-Christian slave owners. He tells them to serve. Wouldn’t it be more comfortable if he said, “Take up arms and fight for your freedom”? That would be considered much more justifiable today. But instead, he says to serve as you would serve Christ.

And we could go on and on about this. We could go into detail about the ones presented here, or we could look at other instances. We could look in 1 Peter, where it tells us to submit to civil authorities. We could look in Hebrews, where it talks about submitting to your leaders more broadly. There are a lot of places we could continue to explore. We could even talk about Jesus—how He submits to God the Father and is crucified.

But I bring all of this up not because we have time to delve into each of these in their fullness today, but just to remind us how often submitting appears in the Bible, and how uncomfortable it is to think about. Submitting is shown as a normal part of Christian life, because if you can’t submit to what you can see, how on earth are you going to be able to submit to a God that you can’t see?  Learning to submit is an important part of Christian life. And today we are going to look at someone who submitted practically perfectly—not quite, but he’s up there. He is a master of submitting: John the Baptist.

As a prophetic figure, John the Baptist is not often considered for his ability to submit. The popular image of a biblical prophet is not someone who submits, but a madman standing at the edge of society, saying whatever he wants and doing whatever he wants because no one can tell him what to do.  That’s not actually true. If you look in the Bible, there are a lot of prophets who do a considerable amount of submitting—not only to God, but to other figures. How many Old Testament prophets end up delivering messages to evil kings? They do this knowing the king is going to do bad things. They do this knowing they will likely be punished for the message God has given them. And sometimes they are. And yet they submit.

Just about the only figure that prophets genuinely don’t submit to is religious authorities. Religious authorities in the eras when prophets arise have usually abandoned their true source of authority. Religious leader, your authority comes from God—from submitting to His Word. That’s what makes you a leader. The second you stop doing that, the second you abandon God’s Word and start doing your own thing, that’s the moment you don’t have any real authority left.

And so prophets are raised up as the true authorities. That’s why they appear in Scripture. The religious leaders of Israel in those eras fade because they abandoned their relationship with God and sought to say whatever they thought was best.  Bottom line: prophets do submit. And here we see John the Baptist showing us an amazing picture of submitting to God.

Go ahead and let’s look at it. Let’s go through it piece by piece—John chapter three. By the way, we said we were going to do the first five chapters of John together. We’re a little over halfway through this morning, so I encourage you to take a minute at some point today and look back on everything we’ve covered and think about what you’ve learned. It is so easy to deliberately go about learning things and then not take the time to reflect on them. That’s what helps you remember things long-term.  What have you learned? Something you heard in a sermon, something you found in your own private study, something you experienced. There will be a quiz on this at the end, because I want to hear from you. Not quite yet, though—you’ve got some time. Think about it.

Verse 22:

After this, Jesus and his disciples went out into the Judean countryside, where he spent some time with them and baptized. Jesus baptized people. I don’t think that’s something we think about all that often, but it happens. That’s one of the ways you see continuity between John the Baptist’s ministry and Jesus’s ministry. John the Baptist comes before, showing them this baptism of repentance, preparing the way for Jesus, and then Jesus comes along and also baptizes.

Now John also was baptizing at Aenon near Salim because there was plenty of water, and people were coming and being baptized. This was before John was put in prison. An argument developed between some of John’s disciples and a certain Jew over the matter of ceremonial washing. They came to John and said to him, “Rabbi, that man who was with you on the other side of the Jordan, the one you testified about—look, he’s baptizing, and everyone’s going to him.”

In other words, John, that Jesus guy is stealing your shtick. You’re the baptism guy. You came up with that. You gave him some credibility, and look how he’s repaid you. He’s turned around and he’s doing your thing, and now everybody’s going to him. We’ve got to find a way to get our people back. What are we going to do? We need something new to catch people’s attention.

And John responded, “A person can receive only what is given them from heaven.”

God is the one who brings people to his ministry, and if people move on, that’s all right. Any person—even just one—is a gift from God. I know a lot of you are involved in different ministries. Some of you have Bible studies at your house. Some of you are involved in programs. I know how passionate you are about serving God.

It can be really tempting to equate success with size. And if something doesn’t get big, it can be frustrating. But that’s thinking the way the world thinks. The world says bigger is better. The world says the more impressive, the more money coming in, the more people in seats—that proves success.

That’s not how God thinks. You can have a small ministry that is still a vital ministry. Think back to one of the first Bible studies I led. This was before I went to seminary. We began with six people, and we ended, by the grace of God, with five people. We actually lost one.

But when I look back on it, it’s amazing to think about each person in that study—the ways they grew and what they went on to do afterward. Even though it was small, it made a difference in people’s lives.

So don’t judge your ministries by, “Did I blow it up? Did I become the next massive thing everyone’s talking about?” God has given you the gift of even one person who wants to talk to Jesus with you. How exciting is that? That’s a blessing.

“A person can receive only what is given them from heaven.”

You yourselves testify that I said, “I am not the Messiah, but am sent ahead of him.” The bride belongs to the bridegroom. The friend who attends the bridegroom waits and listens for him and is full of joy when he hears the bridegroom’s voice.

This language of the bride and the bridegroom—we’d probably just say “groom” today—but it’s language you find throughout Scripture, both Old and New Testaments. Probably the clearest example is the Song of Songs, a whole book about the relationship between the bride and the bridegroom. But you also see it in Isaiah, Jeremiah, and several other places.

When you see that language, it’s talking about God. God is the groom, and God’s people—individually and corporately—are the bride. The bride prepares herself for the groom, and the groom waits with excitement for the bride. They are made for each other. This is our relationship with God.

So what John is saying here—remember, when he saw Jesus earlier, he said, “Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.” Now he uses even stronger language. Jesus is the groom; his people are the bride. It’s pretty unambiguously calling Jesus God.

The friend who attends the bridegroom waits and listens for him and is full of joy when he hears the bridegroom’s voice. That joy is mine, and it is now complete.

He must become greater; I must become less.

I think that can seem scary. I remember when I was a new Christian, when I first started attending church regularly and reading my Bible and praying. I was on fire for the Lord, and I remember feeling different—feeling the Holy Spirit inside me, changing me and making me something other than what I was.  That sounds really cool to us in church, but at the time it wasn’t cool. It was pretty freaky. I didn’t want anything to do with it. So I stopped reading the Bible and prayed a little less for a while because I didn’t want to become something other than what I was. The idea was terrifying.

But it shouldn’t be terrifying. When the Holy Spirit is at work in our lives, transforming us, it’s not making us less of ourselves. As God becomes greater in our lives and we become less, we actually become more of ourselves. The “us” we usually know is an “us” tainted by sin. It’s not what we were made to be.  As God becomes more present in our lives, we become more of the person we were made to be. It’s not something to be afraid of. Don’t back away from it. It’s a good thing.

Verse 31: “The one who comes from above is above all. The one who is from the earth belongs to the earth and speaks as one from the earth. The one who comes from heaven is above all.”

“Above all” has both a cosmic and a rank dimension. Jesus is literally from heaven, and he is above in authority. He is the One above all—the King of the universe, the divine ruler over everything.

He testifies to what he has seen and heard, but no one accepts his testimony. Whoever has accepted it has certified that God is truthful. We have the opportunity to do that every day. That’s what we’re doing right now in worship. When we read the Bible and affirm it, we are affirming that God is truthful. When we worship God, we are affirming that He is good.

So much of the Christian life is simply affirming what is true—responding rightly to what we know.

Imagine, for example, if King Jesus in all his glory walked into this room right now—heavenly light shining off him, an otherworldly crown, the finest robes imaginable. What would be the right response? To kneel. Maybe something like that. The natural response in the presence of one who is so clearly above all is to serve, to submit.

It continues: “For the one whom God has sent speaks the words of God, for God gives the Spirit without limit. The Father loves the Son and has placed everything in his hands. Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God’s wrath remains on them.”

We have the opportunity to affirm what is true, but we can also, unbelievably, deny it—even when it’s obvious.  Imagine Jesus in all that glory standing here, and someone says, “You’re not in charge. I don’t know who you are. You have no authority here. Get out.” In that moment, seeing something so clearly from heaven, how absurd would it be to deny what’s right in front of you?  And yet we can do that.  We can choose to deny the truth. There is no life in that.

I’m grateful that God brought this passage into my life, especially as I’m getting ready to go to one of our Global Methodist conferences. It’ll be my first one. I’m stepping into a new world—new leaders to submit to, new leadership to learn from, new rules to understand.

I won’t lie—it makes me a little nervous. I’ve seen some religious abuses of authority that I’m not going to forget anytime soon. It makes me a little skittish. But part of the Christian life is learning to submit to the leaders God has given you.  So as I go in, knowing these are people who have submitted themselves to Scripture, I have to learn to submit—even when it’s uncomfortable, even when it’s challenging.

I wonder where this intersects with your life. I don’t know what authorities God has placed in your life that you need to learn to submit to. And to be clear, this is always something people get nervous about, especially if they’ve seen abuses.  Remember: it is never true submission if it involves sin. If someone asks you to submit by doing something wrong, that’s out of the question. You can’t submit to a lesser authority and ignore a greater one. Submission never involves sinning.

But often, it’s not about being asked to do something blatantly sinful. Maybe you’ve seen abuses and don’t want to put yourself in that position. Maybe it’s pride—you think, “They may be in charge, but I’m better than them.” Maybe it’s vanity. There are a lot of reasons we can be skittish about authority. Some are legitimate; some are less so.

But the challenge as a Christian is to learn to submit well. Because if we can’t submit to the authorities we can see, how on earth are we going to submit to the Lord we don’t see?  Amen.

John 3:1-21 How Can I Be Born Again?

Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript

Video Teaching

Verse-by-Verse Commentary

3 Now there was a Pharisee, a man named Nicodemus who was a member of the Jewish ruling council.

  1. Profile of Nicodemus
    1. “A Pharisee”- Nicodemus was a Pharisee, part of a Jewish group that was known for zealous, legalistic teaching of God’s law, often missing its true meaning.
    2. “A member of the Jewish ruling council”- He was a member of the Sanhedrin, the Jewish ruling council.  There were traditionally only 71 scholars in the Sanhedrin, so his influence and power were exceptional.
    3. “Nicodemus”- His name is Greek, not Hebrew.  Jews with Greek names in this timeframe were influenced from the Greek culture that spread throughout the region during Alexander the Great’s reign.  Jews that spoke Greek were disproportionately likely to be from urban centers, have access to wealth and travel, and have had access to quality education.
    4. Given these details, Nicodemos was someone who likely thought he knew everything!  He had a good education on how to think incorrectly.  It’s very likely that he was arrogant, given how many worldly accolades he had.

 2 He came to Jesus at night and said, “Rabbi, we know that you are a teacher who has come from God. For no one could perform the signs you are doing if God were not with him.”

  1. Despite his background and influence, something compelled Nicodemus to seek Jesus.  There was something about this “Jesus” teacher that evaded him, and he had to know what it was.
  2. He met Jesus at night, indicating a desire for secrecy to protect his reputation.
  3. He addressed Jesus as “Rabbi,” a title he also held, approaching the meeting as a peer-to-peer discussion (“teacher to teacher”) to explore “finer points of religious philosophy.”

3 Jesus replied, “Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again.”

  1. In response to Nicodemus’s formal introduction, Jesus immediately and authoritatively declares, “Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they’re born again.”
    1. “Truly, truly” (amen amen) is a doubled emphatic in Greek—an exclamation, not filler.  Jesus isn’t theorizing!  He’s making a serious, decisive statement.
  2. Jesus’s directness is tailored to Nicodemus’s arrogant, know-it-all demeanor.  He wants to shake him out of his stupor!
  3. “Take away whatsoever seemeth thee good, reputation, fortune, friends, health, only give me this, to be born of the Spirit, to be received among the children of God!” -John Wesley

4 “How can someone be born when they are old?” Nicodemus asked. “Surely they cannot enter a second time into their mother’s womb to be born!”

  1. Nicodemus’s question isn’t sincere.  Metaphor long before Jesus’s time.  To ask this question in a way that implies that Jesus is literally demanding someone to go back into their mother’s womb is intentionally obtuse, misunderstanding on purpose to suggest that Jesus is being absurd.

5 Jesus answered, “Very truly I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless they are born of water and the Spirit. 

  1. Many interpreters assume that Jesus is referring to baptism, but Nicodemus wouldn’t have understood what Jesus meant if that was the intended analogy since Christian baptism doesn’t exist yet. Jesus’s words needed to be comprehensible, and they would have been to someone who knew Scripture as well as Nicodemos.  Water and the Spirit are both well-established symbolically throughout Scripture.
    1. Water: Symbolizes repentance and cleansing (Psalm 51:7: “Wash me and I will be whiter than snow”; Ezekiel 36:25: “I will sprinkle clean water on you and you shall be clean”).
    2. The Spirit: Represents God’s creative power at work in the world and in people (Genesis 1: Spirit hovering over the waters; Judges 6:34: Spirit coming upon Gideon; 2 Samuel 23:2: Spirit speaking through David).

6 Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit. 

7 You should not be surprised at my saying, ‘You must be born again.’ 8 The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit.”

  1. Jesus compares the Spirit’s work to the wind: “The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going.”
  2. This illustrates that one can experience and feel the effects of God’s Spirit without fully grasping the “finer points” of doctrine.

9 “How can this be?” Nicodemus asked.

10 “You are Israel’s teacher,” said Jesus, “and do you not understand these things? 11 Very truly I tell you, we speak of what we know, and we testify to what we have seen, but still you people do not accept our testimony. 12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things? 13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man. 14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the wilderness, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, 15 that everyone who believes may have eternal life in him.”

16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 

  1. This particular verse is an elemental part of the Christian faith.  It’s the most commonly-known verse in the entire  Bible.  Rather than approach it with the assumption that we know it, it’s good to think through it slowly.  Having come so far, do we still align with the very basics that we set out with?
    1. “For God”: In a world like ours, it is a bold claim to know something true about God.  Who can say what is true or false about God?  But the core of Christianity is to know who God is… and who he isn’t.
    2. “so loved”: God’s primary motive is love, not anger or sadness.
    3. “the world”: God’s love extends to all creation—plants, animals, and people—not just humanity.
      1. Dostoyevsky discussed true love for the world beautifully in his novel, The Brothers Karamazov: “Love all God’s creation, the whole of it and every grain of sand in it. Love every leaf, every ray of God’s light. Love the animals, love the plants, love everything. If you love everything, you will perceive the divine mystery in things. Once you have perceived it, you will begin to comprehend it better every day, and you will come at last to love the world with an all-embracing love…. Treasure this ecstasy, however absurd people may think it.” -Dostoyevsky
    4. “that he gave”: God has not begun this relationship with us by demanding anything, but by freely giving to us grace upon grace.
    5. “His one and only son”: his most precious possession.
    6. “that whoever”: A universal invitation open to anyone from a beggar in India to a bureaucrat in China and everyone in between
    7. “believes in Him”: Belief means full, trusting surrender of one’s life to Jesus, not just intellectual assent.
    8. “shall not perish”: God intervenes to save us from the perishing caused by our own sin.
    9. “but have eternal life”: New life that begins now, not only after death.
  2. “Men who love much will give much, and you may usually measure the truth of love by its self-denials and sacrifices. That love which spares nothing, but spends itself to help and bless its object, is love indeed, and not the mere name of it. Little love forgets to bring water for the feet, but great love breaks its box of alabaster and lavishes its precious ointment.  Consider, then, what this gift was that God gave.” -Charles Spurgeon

17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. 

  1. It can be uncomfortable to acknowledge that God openly condemns those who don’t believe in his Son, but we need to address this uncomfortable reality.  If we don’t acknowledge that we’re condemned without Jesus, how can he be a savior?  What is he saving us from? 
  2. Some people say God is stingy for not giving us multiple ways to be saved.  That isn’t reasonable.
    1. Imagine a person $5 million in debt who complains that a blank check from a benefactor requires them to walk a block to the bank.
    2. Or imagine a person falling off a cliff who criticizes their rescuer for offering a hand instead of a rope or a helicopter.
    3. In both cases, the one needing salvation is entitled; the savior is not stingy.

19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20 Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. 21 But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God.

  1. Evil-doers “hate the light” and avoid exposure. US Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis said, “Sunlight is the best disinfectant,” in reference to the simple fact that corruption grows where there is no visibility and accountability.
  2. Belief must be embodied in deeds; evidence of new birth should be visible.

Full Transcript

All right, so here we are back in the book of John, and we are picking up chapter 3, beginning in verse 1. This section has quite a bit. Jesus is going to talk about what it means to be born again, and we have the famous John 3:16, possibly the most succinct explanation of what Christianity is all about. Let’s just dive right in.

So verse 1: “Now there was a Pharisee, a man named Nicodemus, who was a member of the Jewish ruling council.” Right here, we get a surprising amount of information in just this one little verse. We understand quite a bit about Nicodemus just from this.

First off, he’s a Pharisee. This is the same Jewish sect that constantly causes Jesus trouble throughout the Gospels.  They are zealous for God’s law. They are teachers of God’s law. They are very legalistic. They know a lot of Scripture, but they don’t really understand any of it. Not only is this man a Pharisee, but he sits on the Jewish ruling council, the Sanhedrin. That’s big. He’s a big deal. He makes decisions that affect all of Israel. This guy is not just some random Pharisee.  He is a guy who makes things happen. 

And if we look at his name, Nicodemus, that’s not a Hebrew name; that’s a Greek name. Nicodemus comes from Greek. The Greeks had invaded Israel not that long before the Romans, in the grand scheme of things, and they took over for a while until the Israelites rose up and kicked them out. But people who had some level of Greek influence and were still in Israel—there were certain things that you could know about them.  For example, they were more likely to be from urban centers. They were more likely to be wealthy, and they were more likely to be educated and well-traveled. So hopefully that gives you a little taste of the kind of guy Nicodemus was. Were he around today, he would probably have multiple degrees.  He would have honors stacked up. He would be the kind of guy who thinks he knows everything. He would probably be a little arrogant. But truth be told, we’ve all met people like this. They have a fancy education, but they don’t really know what they’re talking about. That’s the thing about education: a good education based on wrong truths is worse than no education at all. That’s what Nicodemus has. He’s an expert in wrong thinking.

But for all of that, there is some good news. Clearly, there’s something about Nicodemus that makes him want to talk to Jesus. Something within him says, “This guy knows something. Go talk to him.” And he has—he’s gone to Jesus.

Verse 2 tells us that he went to Jesus at night. He wants to talk to Jesus, but not where he could actually be seen doing it. He doesn’t want to get caught in the temple in broad daylight talking to Jesus. Think of his reputation. But he has snuck out to see Jesus at night, and Jesus has been gracious enough to grant this audience.

He says: 

“Rabbi! We know that you are a teacher who has come from God, for no one could perform the signs you are doing if God were not with him.” 

A polite, formal introduction, showing, “I know you’re doing miracles. It’s very impressive. Clearly you know something.”

But notice how he talks to Jesus. How does he address him? Rabbi. As a Pharisee, Nicodemus is also a rabbi.  He’s also a teacher. He sees this as a meeting of the minds. He has come, teacher to teacher, to talk to Jesus. “Look, you know something that I don’t know. I’m a little interested. Let us discuss the finer points of religious philosophy. I’m interested. You’ve got my attention.”

How does Jesus respond? “Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again.” That’s an intense response.  Notice, “Very truly I tell you.” Jesus says this throughout. You might be tempted to think it’s just one of those transitional phrases we work into everyday conversation, something like “well” or “now that I think about it,” just buying a little time as you talk.  That’s not what this is. This is an exclamation point. Jesus is being decisive. He is absolutely saying this. If you look at the Greek, a very literal translation would be, “Truly, truly I tell you.” They repeat it for emphasis. It’s there twice so you know it’s extra serious.

Jesus isn’t wasting time. Nicodemus has come to have this polite conversation. Jesus comes in directly. He’s saying what he’s all about. He’s drawing a line. “Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again.”  That’s the thing about Jesus: He addresses people differently depending on who they are and what they need.  When he’s with someone who is wounded, he’s gentle. When he’s with an outcast, he’s friendly. When he’s talking to a hypocrite, he doesn’t put up with nonsense. And when he’s speaking to someone who thinks they know it all, who’s pretty arrogant, Jesus is not afraid to tell him like it is, to try to shake him out of his stupor and say, “I’m serious.”

Nicodemus kind of rebuffs him here. He responds:

“How can someone be born when they’re old? Surely they cannot enter into their mother’s womb to be born again.”

Now, some people think Nicodemus is truly baffled here. If he had just said, “What do you mean by ‘born again’?” that would show curiosity. But he follows it up with, “Surely you cannot crawl back into your mother’s womb to be born a second time.” Obviously Jesus was not talking about that.  Jesus did not invent metaphor. Nicodemus can clearly tell that’s not what Jesus is talking about, but he’s being intentionally obtuse. He is deliberately presenting what Jesus said as though it’s absurd.  Jesus is trying to bring something life-changing, and Nicodemus says, “No, that’s ridiculous.”

I think it can be easy to be like Nicodemus in that way. Sometimes we come to Jesus wanting something convenient and easy—just something to think about on the way to work, something to calm us for the day, something small to mull over, but sometimes Jesus isn’t going to give you a small thing. Sometimes he’s going to give you something life-changing, and we can’t shy away from that.

We can’t say, “I opened Scripture today, and what Jesus said is a little intense for my taste. Time to turn to something more comfortable.” We miss out when we try to escape intense Jesus. Sometimes he wants to change our lives.

Jesus answers Nicodemus again. You see it again: “Very truly I tell you.”

“No one can enter the kingdom of God unless they are born of water and the Spirit. Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit. You should not be surprised at my saying, ‘You must be born again.’ The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit.”

So first off, look at this beginning. He says, “You must be born by water and the Spirit.” Very commonly people say, “Well, that’s baptism. Jesus is talking about baptism here.” And I don’t think that’s wrong. I think that’s a good answer. It’s a very good answer. Water and the Spirit are the two elements most prominent in baptism, right? Fair enough.  But I don’t know if that’s what Jesus was necessarily saying when he was talking to Nicodemus. That’s us reading backwards, and I think that’s good. You can learn deeper dimensions within Scripture and find things that are certainly true—ways that Jesus was telling truth that people at the time may not have fully understood. But Jesus is talking to Nicodemus, an expert in the Old Testament, and Jesus has not baptized anyone yet. Why would he be referring to things that haven’t happened yet? That would be impossible to understand. But he suggests that Nicodemus should understand.

So I think what Jesus meant is comprehensible without referring necessarily to baptism that came afterward. Look at the symbolic elements of what Jesus is talking about. He says you must be born by water and the Spirit. Water is prominent throughout the Old Testament.  For repentance, the symbolic dimension of water is that you come dirty and you are washed and made clean. Just a few examples of that: Psalm 51:7, “Wash me and I will be whiter than snow,” or Ezekiel 36:25, “I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you shall be clean.” This is not obscure. I’ve just plucked these two out—they’re random examples—but you can find many. Water commonly represents repentance throughout Scripture.

And the Spirit—the Holy Spirit—is certainly understood better in the New Testament. There are dimensions we might not have understood before then, but the Spirit makes quite a few appearances in the Old Testament too. While Nicodemus might not have understood the fullness of the Holy Spirit, he certainly would have been able to understand some of it. Just look at these—these are prominent passages in the Old Testament.

How about Genesis? Genesis chapter 1: the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. Throughout the book of Judges, whenever a new judge is in charge, it says that the Spirit of the Lord comes on them. For example, Judges 6:34, “The Spirit of the Lord came upon Gideon.” Or 2 Samuel, at the end of King David’s life—the most prominent king of Israel—2 Samuel 23:2: “The Spirit of the Lord spoke by me.” Those are some of the last words King David says.

Repeatedly we see that the Spirit is comprehensible. It’s in the Old Testament, and it shows the different ways that God is active in the world. It shows God being active in creation. It shows God being active in a person’s life, God’s wisdom being bestowed on someone, God’s power being bestowed on someone. Consistently, that is what the Spirit of God is. It is God’s creative power at work in this world.

So all that to say, Nicodemus totally has all the elements necessary to understand what’s going on here. He has them laid out for him, but he doesn’t understand. Jesus doesn’t expect him to know all of it, but he expects him to understand the basics.  He even says, “Look, it’s like the wind. Do you know where the wind’s from? Do you know where the wind is going? No. You don’t understand the finer points of the wind, but you feel it.” That’s what the Spirit’s like. You can feel the Spirit of God in the world, even if you don’t know the finer points of every piece of that doctrine.

Nicodemus, however, does not seem to be catching on. Here we see Nicodemus again: “How can this be?” Why does he say that? Is he baffled because he’s confused, or because those Pharisaical teachings he had in his head are now at war with the words that Jesus is saying, and he doesn’t know where his heart is at? Who can say? But we know he’s not picking up what Jesus is laying down.

Jesus responds: “You are Israel’s teacher, and you do not understand these things. Very truly I tell you, we speak of what we know and testify to what we have seen, but still you people do not accept our testimony.”

Who’s “we”? Jesus is talking about everyone who has given testimony on behalf of God—all these people. Nicodemus is supposed to be an expert, but he has not accepted any of their testimony: not the prophets, not those who have lived this life of the Spirit and been changed by the Holy Spirit.

“I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe. How then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?”

“No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man. Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the wilderness, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes may have eternal life in him.”

This is an obscure reference to the book of Numbers, chapter 21. There’s a story in which the people of Israel start saying nasty things, and God sends venomous snakes to bite them. The way they are saved is that God tells Moses, “Make a snake out of bronze, put it on a pole, and lift it up.” Everyone who looks upon that bronze snake will be healed.  Look at the thing that wounded you, and when you look at it, you will be healed of it.

Why would Jesus want to be compared to a snake, though? Snakes are no good. Throughout the Bible, snakes are bad. A snake got us into this whole predicament to begin with. But remember what Jesus became on the cross. Jesus took on the sins of the world. He who did no sin became sin for us, as the Scriptures say.  On that cross, Jesus took on that which hurt us—sin. And so as we look up at him on that cross, in the same way that people looked upon snakes to be healed from snakes, we look upon the burden of sin to be freed from it.

And now we are at that famous passage: John 3:16. Whenever you get to one of those big passages, you have to slow down a little bit. You can go into cruise control and zip right by it without thinking. You’ve heard it a million times, so you assume you’ve got it—but then you miss it.  Usually, these well-known passages are well known for a reason. They’re big. They have depth you can explore and live in. What I like to do is stop and go word by word so that nothing sneaks by me.

Let’s break this down piece by piece. John 3:16: “For God.” First off, we start with “For.” This is an explanation. What is this an explanation for? Everything.

“For God.” To speak of God, to have God as the subject of a sentence—there are people who think that’s absurd. They think you can’t possibly know anything about God. There are too many differing beliefs. Surely not all of them are right, so you shouldn’t even bother talking about God. No one can really know anything—don’t be so bold as to claim that knowledge.  But that’s what John 3:16 does right from the beginning. It claims to know something about God.

“For God so loved…” the motive of God. Why has God done something? Not because he’s an angry, nasty God sitting around seething, wanting to zap people. Not because he’s a sad, weepy God who can’t go on any longer. He loves. He loves the world.  And it doesn’t just say people. Sometimes we imagine it says people, but it says the world—all of it. Every leaf, every blade of grass, plants, animals, people, even in their sin. Everything.

“For God so loved the world that he gave…” This God has already given us life, food, air—everything—and yet he gives again. That’s just the kind of God he is. He gives his most prized possession, his one and only Son. You cannot imagine something of higher value than that.

“That whoever…” That is the widest welcome imaginable. Whoever—you, me, a beggar in India, a bureaucrat in China—everyone. Everyone is included in that “whoever.”

And what do they need to do? “Believe in him.” Belief in Christ is not just intellectual assent. It’s not just wanting miracles. It is fully trusting him, fully giving our lives over to him.

“Shall not perish…” That’s where we were already headed. That was our doing. We were already on the path to that through our sin. God has intervened so that we do not perish.

“But have eternal life.” Eternal life—heaven, and eternal life now. It doesn’t say you have to die to begin it. It starts now: eternal joy, eternal hope.

That’s just me breaking down this verse. You should do it yourself. Walk through John 3:16 slowly and see what you uncover.

Verse 17: “For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already.”

There’s a lot of use of the word “condemned” here, especially next to a passage about God’s love. Some people want to remove those uncomfortable elements—references to judgment or hell—but you can’t really get rid of them.  Even philosophically, if you say, “There is no hell, I don’t like it,” then what did Jesus save us from? Remove the negative, and Jesus is no longer a Savior.  Uncomfortable though it may be, it’s essential to understanding.

We also see consistently: salvation is through Jesus Christ alone. That’s uncomfortable for some people. I remember a friend who said, “God has infinite power. Why only one path? That sounds stingy.”  But think about it. Imagine someone is $5 million in debt, with nothing. A wealthy person gives them a signed blank check and says, “Go to the bank and write whatever you need.” And the person responds, “This is inconsiderate. I didn’t want to walk to the bank. Why not cash? Why not a card?”  Or imagine someone hanging off a cliff, about to fall, and a hand reaches down to save them. And they say, “I don’t know where your hand has been. You should have brought a rope. Or a helicopter.”  Does that make the rescuer stingy, or the person in need entitled?

“This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil.” It doesn’t say they were confused. It says they loved the darkness.

“Everyone who does evil hates the light and will not come into it for fear that their deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light so it may be seen that what they have done has been done in the sight of God.”

Notice here at the end: we’ve talked a lot about belief, but now we see deeds—how you live. Belief is not just theoretical. It should be expressed in your life.

So as we come to the end of this passage—new birth, God’s love, genuine belief—we should ask: What kind of deeds have we done? What kind of life have we lived? Is there evidence that we are living out what Jesus is talking about? Have we truly experienced that new birth? Can people see it?  If not, why not? Why is our belief still theory and not practice?  Real belief changes our lives, not just some inner portion of our minds.

I just want to say a quick prayer. Let’s pray together. If you are recognizing that you are not living into that new birth, that your life is not lining up with what you say you believe, I’m going to leave some silence and ask you to ask God for help.  That’s what Jesus came to do. That’s what the Holy Spirit is for: to live by water and the Spirit, to repent and live by the Spirit’s power. Jesus came to enable that in our world.  Just ask him for help. He’ll give it.

John 2:1-12: Water into Wine

Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript

Video Teaching

Verse-by-Verse Commentary

Introduction

  1. Popular Misinterpretations and their Roots

    1. Sometimes, people use this passage to justify heavy drinking.  Jesus “partied,” so why shouldn’t we?  A counter-misreading claims that “wine” was actually grape juice.  Notice that no respectable translation uses that language.  Both of these readings have roots in the prohibition era.

    2. In the early 20th century, during Prohibition, the passage became a proof text against alcohol bans: “If I’m not supposed to have wine, why did Jesus give it to me?” Both temperance advocates and opponents crafted arguments that persist culturally.

    3. Earlier Christian tradition did not primarily read the story as about personal alcohol use.

  2. First-Century Context of Wine and Drinking

    1. Alcohol content and dilution practices

      1. Fermentation techniques in the first-century Mediterranean were less advanced; wine peaked around 11–14% alcohol, similar to lower-content wine today.

      2. The social norm was to mix wine with water; rabbinic literature indicates a usual ratio of three parts water to one part wine (Pesahim 108b, Shabbath 77a), which reduced the total alcohol content to around 2–3% ABV, roughly half of low-end beer in the United States.

    2. Drinking unmixed wine would have been gross and sad, kind of like ordering a full glass of vodka with your lunch at a restaurant today.
        
  3. Drunkenness and Judaism

    1. In first-century Israel, a respectable Jew did not get drunk; drunkenness was associated with Greeks and Romans (Dionysus, Bacchus), the oppressors!

    2. Public drunkenness suggested that you were taking on the culture of the oppressors and could brand you as a collaborator in a time of constant rebellions.

  4. Scripture on Wine and Drunkenness

    1. A lot of biblical references to wine are actually positive:

      1. Psalm 104:15: “God makes wine that gladdens human hearts.”

      2. Judges 9:13: “Should I give up my wine, which cheers both gods and humans?”

      3. Deuteronomy 14: Instructions for religious feasts include encouragement to buy wine if resources permit.

    2. Drunkenness, on the other hand, is consistently condemned

      1. Galatians 5:21: Paul warns gentile converts that those given to drunkenness will not inherit the kingdom of God.

      2. Proverbs 20: “Wine is a mocker and beer a brawler. Whoever is led astray by them is not wise.”

      3. In 1–2 Kings, bad kings are often characterized as drunks, but good kings are not.

2 On the third day a wedding took place at Cana in Galilee. Jesus’ mother was there, 

  1. Weddings were major, joyous feasts (see Song of Songs for more on the topic).  The presence of Jesus and his disciples implies they were joyful, welcomed guests who enhanced celebrations.

2 and Jesus and his disciples had also been invited to the wedding. 3 When the wine was gone, Jesus’ mother said to him, “They have no more wine.”

  1. The shortage threatened severe social embarrassment for the hosts: in a culture where weddings were grand, hospitality was important, and emotions ran high, guests could feel insulted if provisions fell short, harming the young couple’s social relationships and reputation.

4 “Woman, why do you involve me?” Jesus replied. “My hour has not yet come.”

  1. Jesus calls Mary “woman,” rather than “mom.”  There’s some distance here that’s appropriate for his public ministry.  He’s not about to do a chore for his mom!  He’s acting by the will of his heavenly Father.
     
  2. Jesus frames his timing (“my hour”) as divinely set.  The miracle will proceed on God’s terms, not anyone else’s.

5 His mother said to the servants, “Do whatever he tells you.”

  1. Mary tells the servants, “Do whatever he tells you,” showing her absolute confidence that Jesus will act.  It’s also good advice for discipleship today: do whatever Jesus tells you.

6 Nearby stood six stone water jars, the kind used by the Jews for ceremonial washing, each holding from twenty to thirty gallons.

7 Jesus said to the servants, “Fill the jars with water”; so they filled them to the brim.

  1. Notice that Jesus offers no explanation for what he’s asking for, but the servants still fill the jars to the brim!  Their faith is impressive, given that what Jesus is asking for appears to make no sense.

  2. Jesus involves the servants and water in this miracle, rather than producing wine ex nihilo (out of nothing) for spectacle; their actions and resources become the ordinary material he transforms into the extraordinary.  For the disciple, any action can be a part of the miraculous work of God.  Many are, if we pay attention.

8 Then he told them, “Now draw some out and take it to the master of the banquet.”

They did so, 9 and the master of the banquet tasted the water that had been turned into wine. He did not realize where it had come from, though the servants who had drawn the water knew. Then he called the bridegroom aside 10 and said, “Everyone brings out the choice wine first and then the cheaper wine after the guests have had too much to drink; but you have saved the best till now.”

  1. There is no singular “alakazam” moment where the water miraculously changes in a puff of smoke.  Instead, the miracle just happens without anyone quite being able to pinpoint the exact moment, much like the mercy of God is not always clear at first when it enters into our life, but it is not long before it is recognized.

  2. The first person to notice is the master of the banquet.  He is not a follower of Jesus, nor is he someone that Jesus seems to be particularly familiar yet, and yet he can verify the goodness of the miracle.  Real miracles don’t need to be hidden, nor do they require believers to see their goodness.  Their goodness is evidenced by all.

  3. Jesus ensures that joy does not run out.  As Fyodor Dostoevsky puts it in The Brothers Karamazov, “He has made himself like one of us and shares our joy and turns our water into wine, so that the joy of the guests shall not cease.”

11 What Jesus did here in Cana of Galilee was the first of the signs through which he revealed his glory; and his disciples believed in him.

12 After this he went down to Capernaum with his mother and brothers and his disciples. There they stayed for a few days.

  1. Wedding as metaphor for the soul’s relationship to God

    1. Throughout Scripture, weddings symbolize preparation, purity, and lifelong union with God; Cana’s setting connects Jesus’s mission to restoring and binding souls to God.

  2. Banquet as eschatological celebration

    1. Jesus often uses banquet imagery in parables to depict the grand celebration at the end of time when the faithful rejoice with God.

    2. Cana anticipates this eschatological joy: not dour or harsh, but celebratory.

  3. Wine as joy and Jesus’s gift

    1. Wine frequently symbolizes joy (Psalm 104:15; Judges 9:13). At Cana, Jesus ensures joy where circumstances were turning shameful.

    2. Jesus’s first miracle establishes him as the bringer of joy, transforming scarcity into abundance and elevating ordinary water into superior wine.

Full Transcript

So we’ve made it to chapter two, and here we see Jesus’s first miracle: turning water into wine. Unfortunately, this particular story in Scripture has some of the shallowest popular interpretations. I don’t know how many times I’ve heard someone use this story to show that Jesus was an awesome party guy. There was a party, they were running low on booze, and the party would be lame if someone didn’t intervene. Luckily, Jesus shows up and ensures that the booze keeps flowing. Much rejoicing.

Now obviously I’m exaggerating a little, but it is used to justify why one ought to drink readily and often and a lot. On the other hand, I have heard people read this story and try to explain why there’s actually no wine in the story at all—that it’s really just a mistranslation and ought to be grape juice. You can’t find a respectable translation out there that uses grape juice instead of wine, because it’s wine. Wine is wine.

Either way, you can see how both of those popular interpretations treat this as a metaphorical story intended to explain an individual person’s relationship to alcohol, which is a shame. For the vast majority of Christian history, that was not how people looked at this story. That’s something you only really see creeping in around the beginning of the 20th century, right around the time of Prohibition. This became an anti-prohibition proof text: “If I’m not supposed to have wine, why did Jesus give it to me?” Both sides then crafted their explanations from there, and the last vestiges of that haven’t quite fallen away yet.

So we have this cultural baggage that gives us a different understanding of the passage than people had for hundreds of years. When you put this passage into not our cultural context but the context of first-century Israel, you can see pretty quickly that it doesn’t even make sense for this to primarily be a story about an individual person’s relationship with alcohol.

First off, alcohol in the first century was not quite what it is today. If you really wanted to get drunk in first-century Israel, you would have a task in front of you. Fermentation techniques in the Mediterranean region were not as advanced as they are today. The highest alcohol content you could get in wine was somewhere between 11 and 14 percent, which puts it on par with lower-content wine today. That sounds reasonable until you learn that you didn’t drink wine without mixing it with water. That was considered gross.

It would be like going out to lunch with a friend, and the waiter asks for your drink order. Your friend says, “I’ll have a vodka.” The waiter hesitates—“a vodka cranberry? a vodka seltzer? a shot?”—and your friend replies, “No. Just a full glass of vodka.” That’s gross and sad. That’s how it would have been viewed in the first century if someone drank unmixed wine.

Rabbinic literature indicates a common mixture of three parts water to one part wine. That brings the alcohol content down to around two to three percent—about half of what low-end beer is in the United States today. So yes, it was wine, but very low-content wine. Could you get wild with it? Sure, but you’d really have some work ahead of you.

On top of that, there was a strong social stigma against drunkenness in first-century Israel. If you were a good Jew, you didn’t get drunk. That was something Greeks and Romans did—the outsiders, the oppressors. They had gods like Dionysus and Bacchus, with wild parties and excess. A good Jew did not do that.

So if your friends saw you getting drunk, they would think you were adopting the practices of your oppressors. In a time of frequent rebellion, that was not a label you wanted. You can see how, culturally, this wouldn’t even enter into the picture for the average listener of that time or the centuries that followed.

Scripture speaks about alcohol often enough that you don’t need this story to understand it. Wine is generally presented as a good thing—Psalm 104:15 says God gives wine to gladden human hearts. Judges 9:13 speaks of wine that cheers both gods and humans. Deuteronomy 14 even encourages buying wine for religious feasts if you have the means.

Drunkenness, on the other hand, is consistently condemned. Galatians 5:21 warns that those given to drunkenness will not inherit the kingdom of God. Proverbs 20 says, “Wine is a mocker and beer a brawler.” And in First and Second Kings, bad kings are often described as drunkards.

In other words: drinking, fine; drunkenness, bad. That’s consistent throughout.

So why spend time on this if that’s not what the story is about? Because people focus on it to the detriment of the true meaning. There is such depth in this miracle. It’s the first miracle of Jesus. It has so much to say about who he is, what he’s going to do, and how the miraculous works in the world. When we get hung up on the alcohol, we miss all of that.

So let’s approach the passage on its own terms. John chapter 2, beginning at verse 1:

On the third day a wedding took place at Cana in Galilee. Jesus’s mother was there, and Jesus and his disciples had also been invited to the wedding.

Weddings in first-century Israel were a big deal!  The happiest day of your life, a grand feast. Jesus’s mother is there, and Jesus and his disciples are invited. Imagine the honor: this random peasant wedding is attended by the King of Kings, and they don’t even know it.

It also tells us something about Jesus and his disciples. They were the kind of people you wanted at your party. They were joyful. They made the event better.  Then verse 3: 

When the wine was gone, Jesus’s mother said to him, ‘They have no more wine.’

Why is Mary concerned? Is she just wanting another glass? No. Weddings were social events with high expectations. Running out of wine would have been embarrassing, even insulting. It would damage relationships for a young couple just starting out. This isn’t a minor inconvenience; it’s a social disaster.

Jesus responds:

“Woman, why do you involve me? My hour has not yet come.”

It sounds strange to our ears, but he’s creating distance. At the beginning of his public ministry, he is making it clear that what he is about to do is not simply out of obligation to his earthly mother. He is about his Father’s work.

Mary’s response is remarkable. She turns to the servants and says, 

“Do whatever he tells you.” 

That’s some of the best advice in Scripture.

Nearby were six stone jars used for ceremonial washing, each holding twenty to thirty gallons. Jesus tells the servants, “Fill the jars with water,” and they fill them to the brim. He doesn’t explain himself. He simply gives the command, and they obey fully.

Then he says, “Now draw some out and take it to the master of the banquet.”

Notice, there’s no moment where it says the water turned to wine. As far as we know, the servants are carrying jars of water to their boss. That takes trust.  This tells us something about human participation in the miraculous. Jesus could have acted alone, but he involves them. Through their obedience, something extraordinary happens.

The master of the banquet tastes the water—now wine—and says, “Everyone brings out the choice wine first and then the cheaper wine after the guests have had too much to drink. But you have saved the best till now.”

Here we even have verification from someone outside the event. Real miracles don’t need to be hidden. They can be seen and experienced, even by those who don’t yet understand them.

Verse 11 says this was the first of the signs through which Jesus revealed his glory, and his disciples believed in him.

So how does this miracle reveal his glory?

Consider where it happens: at a wedding banquet. Throughout Scripture, weddings symbolize the relationship between God and his people. Banquets symbolize the final celebration in the kingdom of God. Jesus begins his ministry in a setting that points to the ultimate goal: union with God and eternal celebration.

And what does he do there? He provides wine—symbolically, joy. Psalm 104:15 speaks of wine that gladdens the heart. Jesus ensures that joy does not run out.  As Fyodor Dostoevsky puts it in The Brothers Karamazov, “He has made himself like one of us and shares our joy and turns our water into wine, so that the joy of the guests shall not cease.”

With all the serious, eternal work Jesus comes to do, he is not dour or joyless. The first thing he does is preserve joy.

I hope each of you experiences that joy to its fullest. Amen.

John 1:35-51: Reaching Out

Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript

Video Teaching

This particular sermon happened at a Church picnic, so apologies for the lack of picture and subpar sound quality.

Verse-by-Verse Commentary

Introduction

  1. These four stories all show different disciples being called into ministry by Christ:
    1. Andrew and Peter join Jesus through intellectual inquiry 
    2. Peter follows Jesus because of a personal invitation from someone he trusts
    3. Philip joins Philip abruptly because of his experience meeting Jesus
    4. Nathanael overcomes his skepticism after seeing a miracle
  2. The close proximity of the stories help illustrate the diverse ways that people come to faith in Christ

35 The next day John was there again with two of his disciples.

  1. In the ancient world, discipleship was immersive—students followed a teacher to observe how they lived and embodied their teachings. This approach emphasizes that profound truths should transform one’s whole life, not remain abstract. The speaker contrasts this with modern education’s focus on fact acquisition and suggests discipleship offers a valuable lesson in witnessing wisdom lived out.

36 When he saw Jesus passing by, he said, “Look, the Lamb of God!”

  1. John refrains from retaining disciples for personal benefit (labor, prestige). Instead, he directly points them to Jesus, modeling ministry that prioritizes others’ growth over personal gain.
  2. This contrasts with common tendencies of leaders to hoard followers; John advocates sending people to the best source for their development.

37 When the two disciples heard him say this, they followed Jesus. 38 Turning around, Jesus saw them following and asked, “What do you want?”

They said, “Rabbi” (which means “Teacher”), “where are you staying?”

39 “Come,” he replied, “and you will see.”

So they went and saw where he was staying, and they spent that day with him. It was about four in the afternoon.

  1. “It was about four in the afternoon” (verse forty) is a pretty specific detail.  This, along with the fact that John never names himself in his gospel and this particular disciple is unnamed, suggests this unnamed disciple was John.

40 Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother, was one of the two who heard what John had said and who had followed Jesus. 41 The first thing Andrew did was to find his brother Simon and tell him, “We have found the Messiah” (that is, the Christ). 

  1. In his book The Inviting Church, church growth expert Roy Oswald asked a number of congregants why they worshipped at the church they did if they weren’t raised there. 
    1. 86% started attending because a friend or family member invited them; 
    2. 6% came because of a program; 
    3. 6% were invited by a pastor, 
    4. 2% due to advertising.
  2. Peter’s journey is statistically common!  So many people relate to Peter, but the Church needs more Andrews to invite others.
  3. Peter (originally Simon) comes to Jesus through his brother Andrew’s invitation: “We have found the Messiah!” Andrew is only mentioned twelve times in the Bible, and four of those are just in lists!  Of the remaining eight narrative mentions of Andrew, he’s bringing people to Jesus in three of them. He has a gift for connection and evangelism. The Church needs its Peters and Pauls, but we also need our Andres!

42 And he brought him to Jesus.

Jesus looked at him and said, “You are Simon son of John. You will be called Cephas” (which, when translated, is Peter).

  1. Jesus renames Simon to Cephas (Aramaic for “stone”; translated into Greek and then English as “Peter”), signaling a break from old to new identity and commissioning him as a “rock” on which Jesus will build his ministry. This affirms Peter’s gifts and shows that Jesus is giving him meaningful work.
    1. Everyone wants to make a difference in the world!  We are not just called to sit in pews for Jesus, but change the world for Him.

43 The next day Jesus decided to leave for Galilee. Finding Philip, he said to him, “Follow me.”

  1. Philip’s calling is incredibly abrupt! Jesus says, “Follow me,” and Philip does just that. The abruptness suggests an immediate, vivid experience with Jesus that was enough to get Nathaniel to worship Jesus without a prior relationship.  For some, a direct encounter is decisive.

44 Philip, like Andrew and Peter, was from the town of Bethsaida. 45 Philip found Nathanael and told him, “We have found the one Moses wrote about in the Law, and about whom the prophets also wrote—Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.”

46 “Nazareth! Can anything good come from there?” Nathanael asked.

“Come and see,” said Philip.

  1. Nathanael resists at first, ignoring the ties that Philip makes to the prophets and Moses.  fixating on the detail that he’s from Nazareth, and that’s not a particularly reputable town.  Philip wisely avoids debating issues that don’t really matter and instead invites him to “come and see.”  His goal is not to win a debate, but to win Nathanael over to Christ by introducing them.

47 When Jesus saw Nathanael approaching, he said of him, “Here truly is an Israelite in whom there is no deceit.”

48 “How do you know me?” Nathanael asked.

Jesus answered, “I saw you while you were still under the fig tree before Philip called you.”

49 Then Nathanael declared, “Rabbi, you are the Son of God; you are the king of Israel.”

  1. Jesus greets Nathanael as “an Israelite in whom there is no deceit,” showing that he knows his character, and says that he saw him under the fig tree before Philip called him.  Given Nathanael’s reaction, obviously this wasn’t a mere overhearing of someone else’s conversation; it was miraculous!

50 Jesus said, “You believe because I told you I saw you under the fig tree. You will see greater things than that.” 51 He then added, “Very truly I tell you, you will see ‘heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending on’ the Son of Man.”

  1. In verse 51, Jesus is referencing Genesis 28 (Jacob’s ladder) to declare himself the bridge between Heaven and Earth.  If knowing a name is so impressive to Nathanael, he should be ready to see the full nature of the Son of Man, which is infinitely more miraculous.

 

Full Transcript

In this little passage this morning, we have various stories about apostles coming to faith in Christ and following Him. I love that we have all of them one right after the next, getting to see all the diversity in those stories packed together. I think it’s good to remember because we’re all passionate about following Jesus. We want to share our faith with others. It can be easy, when you want to evangelize, to remember the exact circumstances under which you started following Jesus and to try to recreate those in the lives of others. That doesn’t always work because they have different circumstances! They’re at a different place in life! You have no idea what they’re going through. There are so many different things that happen in different people’s lives that lead them to start following Jesus.  Let’s jump in.

We’re going to see the first of the four stories. We see Andrew make his decision to start following Jesus. It’s not just Andrew. It tells us that there are two people involved in this story. One is Andrew; he’s identified in verse forty, but there is also a second disciple who is never named. The majority belief is that this was probably the apostle John. There are a few reasons for that.

First, John never refers to himself directly in the Gospel that he wrote. He always refers indirectly, and there are different guesses as to why he did this. Some say it was because he was so humble that he did not want to put his name forward as though he were some great guy. He just wanted to share it without highlighting himself. Others say maybe it was a creative choice that he made so that people would have the opportunity to put themselves in his shoes as they read and feel like they were right there. Who knows? Regardless, he never refers to himself directly, and this disciple is strangely never directly mentioned. That’s a point in John’s favor.

Another thing that leads a lot of people to believe that this was probably John is that, in verse forty, there’s a level of detail that’s just uncommon. It says it was about four in the afternoon. That’s very specific, almost so specific that you wonder, were you there? Was that you? Do you know this personally? I think it was probably John, but we don’t need to double down on that. That’s not really the point. We know for certain that Andrew was one of these two.

We find that these are two people who come to start following Jesus because they are curious. They want to know more. Intellectual inquiry leads them to start following Jesus. I know we have some kids with us this morning. Kids, how are you doing? I know there is no children’s church this morning, so you’re going to have to help me out. How many of you are curious? Do you ask your parents a lot of questions? If you are a question asker, give me a hand. There we go. I see one. Maybe that’s a future Andrew right there.

So we’ve got these two, Andrew and probably John. They are question askers. They ask questions: Why am I here? Who is God? What am I doing? How do I live life well? They’re asking a lot of questions, and asking those questions leads them to seek a good teacher. They end up as disciples of John the Baptist.

It’s a good reminder that Jesus wasn’t the only one with disciples in the ancient world. In the ancient Mediterranean region, great teachers (if they were really good) ended up with disciples. The logic was that you can learn a lot by listening to a great teacher. Maybe you just go to their lectures and listen a little bit. But if you’re really serious about learning, you don’t just attend the lectures–you become a disciple. You follow them around. You see the way they live. You see the way they act.

If the truth they have is really that big a deal, it should change their whole lives. It shouldn’t just be this floating idea that you can hear and tuck away in your mind. It should be something that your whole life speaks to. So if you really want to learn what they are teaching, you become a disciple. You start following them. You watch how they live and how they embody the truth they’re talking about, and you learn to live according to that truth. It was very common for great thinkers in this era to have disciples, and here we see that John the Baptist has a couple of disciples in these two soon-to-be followers of Jesus. That’s where our story starts.

As an aside, isn’t it interesting how they thought about learning in that discipleship model? So much of our model for education is built on just learning facts. That’s good. I’m not anti-fact. But how much more important is it for people to see a wise life well led? I think that’s a model of education we could all learn from.

In any case, our story begins with these two disciples.  

The next day John was there again with two of his disciples. When he saw Jesus passing by, he said, “Look, the Lamb of God!” When the two disciples heard him say this, they followed Jesus.

That is so unselfish of John the Baptist. How rare is it to see someone actively point people toward opportunities that are good for them? It is so common to see people in positions of authority trying to keep everyone under them so they can get the most work and harvest their labor. John had every reason, personally and selfishly, to keep these men as his disciples. Disciples would help you do things. These are two people who are hands for the road; that’s helpful. They certainly bring him some prestige. It would have been tempting to say, “We’re going to point people to Jesus, but you personally don’t have to go. You’re going to help me get other people there.”

John is not like that. He is selfless when it comes to the cause of ministry. He’s thinking about the people with him and saying, “You could learn better over there. Your growth and development are with that man. Go to Him. Don’t waste time with me.” Incredibly unselfish.

When the two disciples heard him say this, they followed Jesus. Turning around, Jesus saw them following and asked, “What do you want?”  

That is a piercing question, one that I think all of us are asked as we come to Jesus today. What do you want? What brought you to worship this morning? Do you want to be happy? Do you want to be healed? Do you want money? What do you want?  Some answers to that question are better than others.  I think the apostles give one of the best answers there is. What do they want? Just time with Jesus. That’s all they want. They respond, 

“Rabbi,” which means Teacher, “where are You staying?” 

He replied, “Come, and you will see.” So they went and saw where He was staying, and they spent that day with Him. It was about four in the afternoon.

Right there we see these first two people start being followers of Christ. Whatever they saw in that conversation, whatever it was they were seeking to learn, they realized by just spending time with Jesus that this was the best teacher they could possibly have. This man knew things that were worth their time. They didn’t go back to John. They didn’t even think about it. This was the new path they had been set on.  That’s one story.

Now we move on to another. We get to see the moment when Peter the apostle decided to start following Jesus. Peter is one of the most popular Bible characters there is, and it’s easy to see why. He has a lot of stories because he gets a lot of things wrong. Peter is always trying his best, and he’s always messing up, and Jesus has to bail him out. That’s relatable. We all make mistakes. We all need Jesus to bail us out sometimes.  His name is not Peter to begin with; it’s Simon. Jesus is going to rename him in just a moment. Peter comes to faith not through intellectual inquiry, but because of a personal invitation. He’s invited by someone he trusts to start following Jesus. In this case, Andrew. Andrew gives him an invitation: “You have to come see Jesus. This is incredible.” That makes a difference to him.

Personal invitation makes such a difference. I saw a study the other day talking about why people attended the churches they did. If people were at a church they did not grow up in, this study asked them, “What made you start attending this church?” Eighty-six percent said it was because a friend or family member asked them to start attending. Eighty-six percent! Six percent said they started attending because of a program they thought was really good. Six percent said they started because a pastor invited them. Two percent said they started because of advertising.  Eighty-six percent! Personal invitation makes a difference. That is one of the most common ways people start actively following Jesus in their lives, and here that’s the way Peter comes to faith. 

Simon Peter’s brother, Andrew, was one of the two who heard what John had said and who had followed Jesus. 

The first thing Andrew did was find his brother Simon and tell him, “We have found the Messiah!” And he brought him to Christ.

The man from our first story immediately goes and finds Peter and brings him to Jesus. 

Andrew is not in the Bible a lot. He is named twelve times, and four of those twelve mentions are just in lists of the disciples. So he is only actually named in a story eight times. Of those eight, three are because he is bringing people to Jesus. That is something he seems to be good at. He is good at connecting people to Jesus. That is something he seems to be gifted to do, and this is one of those times. He brings Peter to Jesus.  He may not be in the Bible a lot, but he probably deserves a little more recognition. A lot of people want to be like Peter. A lot of people want to be like Paul. Maybe we need more Andrews in the world.

In any case, the first thing Andrew did was find his brother Simon and tell him, “We have found the Messiah.” 

He brought him to Jesus. Jesus looked at him and said, “You are Simon son of John. You will be called Cephas,” which, when translated, is Peter. 

That is the moment when Peter starts following Jesus.  It’s a little bit of an odd moment for a lot of us because we wonder, why is He renaming him? What is this about? Usually in Scripture that happens to show a break between the old self and the new self. You are so radically different that you need a new name because you’re that new.  Here He chooses the name Cephas, which is Aramaic for “stone.” That is the name Simon will go by from now on: Peter. Cephas, stone. In other words, this is a rock. “You are a rock on which I am going to build My ministry.” In that, He is really doing two things. Jesus has both built up Peter and put him to work.

He encounters Peter and does not treat him like any random man. He does not say, “Good to see you. Hope I see you around.” He knows him personally and sees the value in him. He is not just another name, not just another person in a crowd. He is uniquely gifted to do something important, and Jesus treats him that way.

At the same time, He puts him to work. He says, “You are the rock. You are solid. You are someone I am going to build My ministry on.” It may be a compliment, but it is not a compliment you get to live into by doing nothing. He is going to have to do some work to live up to the fullness of that compliment, and that is exciting for him.

Sometimes we forget how much people want to change the world. I’ve said this before, but I’ll say it again: one of the biggest reasons I find people leave the churches they are at is because they feel like they are just being asked to sit in a pew. No one wants to just sit in a pew. That’s boring! They want to change the world. That does not mean they necessarily need to do it through church programs. It means that wherever they are in their lives, whatever they are doing, they need to be equipped to make a difference. Jesus is offering Peter the opportunity to make a difference in the world, and Peter is all in. Peter starts following Jesus.

Now we have two down and two to go, two more apostles, two different stories. We have seen intellectual inquiry. We have seen personal invitation. Now we get to Philip’s story, which is so short that we will just look at it and then talk about it after.

The next day Jesus decided to leave for Galilee. Finding Philip, He said to him, “Follow Me.” 

That is it. That is the whole thing. Incredibly short. That is all we get. Jesus finds him and says, “Follow Me,” and he does.

When you look at different commentators thinking through this passage, one of the things people are curious about is whether Jesus knew him before this moment. Had they ever met? Sometimes Jesus knew people before offering them this formal invitation to discipleship. Is this one of those instances? Did Jesus already know Philip? Did He already have a relationship with him? Or was it totally out of the blue? Who can say? But the way the Bible tells the story, it seems intended to be abrupt. It does not say, “Jesus saw Philip, whom He had known for a long time and felt pretty good about.” It deliberately tells it in a way that emphasizes how jarringly fast this is. Out of nowhere, Philip is in.

That is how it goes for some people. There are people who have vivid personal experiences that are hard to put into words. Something about that moment, something about that experience, tells them, “I need to start following Jesus. This is it.” That appears to be the case with Philip. Whatever it was like, whatever the details were, he meets Jesus. Jesus says, “Follow Me,” and he is in. That experience with Jesus alone was enough for him to start following.

Now we come to the last person. This one has the longest story. We go from the shortest to the longest. This is Nathanael. Nathanael ends up being an apostle despite having no interest in it initially. He is the only one of the four who is actively resistant to the idea of buying into this whole Jesus thing at all.

Philip, like Andrew and Peter, was from the town of Bethsaida. Philip found Nathanael and told him, “We have found the one Moses wrote about in the Law, and about whom the prophets also wrote: Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.”

“Nazareth? Can anything good come from there?” Nathanael asked.

Think about all the things Philip said. “We have found the one Moses wrote about in the Law and about whom the prophets also wrote: Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.” There is a lot there that is exciting. The Nazareth detail is not really the point. It is just the town He is from. It is not the important part, and yet that is what Nathanael gets caught up on. He is not curious about the prophecy. He is not asking about the main things. He is caught up in details.  You could imagine a world in which Philip started debating those same details with him! Maybe they get caught up in a debate about whether anything good can come out of Nazareth. What a waste of time that would have been. This is not actually about Nazareth. Who cares about Nazareth?

Philip does not get caught up in the details. He does not waste time debating Nazareth. Instead, he invites Nathanael to see Jesus for himself. He is essentially saying, “Do not tell me who you think Jesus is, what you think He is going to be like, or how you imagine this is true or not true. Just come and see for yourself.” That is what he says: 

“Come and see.”

When Jesus saw Nathanael approaching, He said of him, “Here truly is an Israelite in whom there is no deceit.” 

In other words, this is an honest man. He is a straight shooter.

Nathanael is thrown off and says, 

“How do You know me?” Jesus answered, “I saw you while you were still under the fig tree before Philip called you.”

Nathanael declared, “Rabbi, You are the Son of God! You are the King of Israel!”

Occasionally you will hear someone try to read this passage in a way that removes the miraculous element. They suggest that maybe Jesus simply saw him under the fig tree from a distance. That does not make sense. If you read this without a miraculous element, you are reading against the grain.

Imagine you were standing under a tree behind us, and I saw you and later said, “I saw you over there.” Would you fall to your knees and say, “The Son of God has arrived”? Of course not. It is not impressive if the tree is right there. There is something impressive about this. You do not fall to your knees and declare someone to be the Son of God because they noticed you standing nearby.  Clearly, wherever this fig tree was, it was somewhere you could not see from where Jesus was standing. This is a man who has shown that He knows Nathanael’s character and knows things about him that He should not be able to know.

This man who was caught up in the details meets Jesus and sees that He is more than expected. He decides to start following Him. Nathanael declares, 

“Rabbi, You are the Son of God! You are the King of Israel!”

Jesus responds, “You believe because I saw you under the fig tree. You will see greater things than that.” Then He adds, “Very truly I tell you, you will see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending on the Son of Man.”

That is a reference to Genesis twenty-eight, to Jacob’s ladder. Jacob dreams of a ladder with angels ascending and descending, a bridge between heaven and earth. Here Jesus references that and says, in effect, “I am the bridge. I am the bridge between heaven and earth. You think it is impressive that I know details about your life? That is not even the most exciting thing. Stick around.”

Four different stories. Four different ways we see people start following Jesus.  I have seen in you a passion for evangelism. You are excited to share your faith, and that is good. It is helpful to see the diverse ways people come to faith because there is no one particular methodology that works. No one person is so clever, so witty, so good at talking, or so friendly that they can make someone come to faith.  No one comes to faith because of a method or a personality. The only essential person involved is Jesus. That is the common thread in all these stories. In each one, someone takes another person to Jesus so they can meet Him for themselves. Whether they have reservations, enthusiasm, or no prior interest at all, that personal encounter makes the difference. That is what matters.

As we think about evangelism and harness that passion, remember this: in this city alone there are about eight thousand people. Statistically, a little over half would identify as Christian, and about twenty-five percent would be active church attenders.  That means roughly six thousand people are not involved in a church family, and about four thousand may not be Christian at all, statistically speaking.

If we want to share our faith, the key is not you. You are not the key. You are not the thing that is going to change the world. You have been invited by Jesus to change the world with Him. The Savior is already here. You do not have to carry that burden. You do not have to feel clever enough, smart enough, or charismatic enough to convince anyone of anything.  All we have to do is invite people to come and get to know Jesus for themselves, regardless of what they think He is or where they are in life. Jesus will not disappoint.  If we want to be effective evangelists, the key is simply inviting people to come and see. Amen.

John 1:19-34: Jesus’s Baptism

Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript

Video Teaching

Verse-by-Verse Commentary

19 Now this was John’s testimony when the Jewish leaders in Jerusalem sent priests and Levites to ask him who he was. 20 He did not fail to confess, but confessed freely, “I am not the Messiah.”

  1. The narrative shifts back chronologically from the opening eighteen verses (which served as an overview of the Book of John) to the beginning of Jesus’s public ministry.

     

  2. What is happening to John in this verse is a public interrogation, not a respectful inquiry. Their goal was to discredit John. If he denied having authority, people might stop following him. If he claimed authority, they could report him to the Romans as a troublemaker. 

21 They asked him, “Then who are you? Are you Elijah?”

He said, “I am not.”

“Are you the Prophet?”

He answered, “No.”

  1. The authoritative figures that are being addressed here are all in Scripture.  The second coming of Elijah is in Malachi 4:5, the coming of the prophet is in Deuteronomy 18:15, and prophecies about the coming messiah are found throughout the Old Testament (especially Isaiah).

22 Finally they said, “Who are you? Give us an answer to take back to those who sent us. What do you say about yourself?”

  1. The Pharisees’ may be villains in these passages, but they were also people with real, legitimate concerns.

     

    1. The Roman-Jewish historian Josephus recorded four individuals in the first century who claimed to be the Messiah, raised armies, and fought the Romans, all of whom understood the Messiah as a military figure.

       

    2. A later false messiah, Simon Ben Kosiba, led a rebellion in the early second century that resulted in the Romans destroying Israel, renaming it Syria Palestine, and scattering the Jewish people. Israel did not reappear on maps until after World War II.

       

    3. The Pharisees were justifiably worried that a false messiah would bring destruction, but while trying to prevent this, they tragically overlooked the true Messiah.

23 John replied in the words of Isaiah the prophet, “I am the voice of one calling in the wilderness, ‘Make straight the way for the Lord.’”

  1. John seems surprisingly comfortable given the circumstances! He knew he wasn’t “the one.”  He was just there to point to the person who was.

     

    1. How often do we carry the burden of having to be “the one” rather than pointing to the person who genuinely is?

       

  2. He identifies himself using Isaiah’s words: “I am the voice of one calling in the wilderness: ‘Make straight the way for the Lord.’” (Isa. 40:3)

     

    1. Untying sandals was considered such a lowly task that even rabbis were forbidden from asking their disciples to do it (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Ketubot 96a)  John’s statement signifies his profound sense of unworthiness compared to the greatness of Jesus.

24 Now the Pharisees who had been sent 25 questioned him, “Why then do you baptize if you are not the Messiah, nor Elijah, nor the Prophet?”

26 “I baptize with water,” John replied, “but among you stands one you do not know. 27 He is the one who comes after me, the straps of whose sandals I am not worthy to untie.”

  1. The practice of baptism existed before John, rooted in Old Testament purification rituals, such as priests washing in a basin before approaching the altar in the tabernacle and later bathing in the temple.

     

  2. John brought this practice to the people, applying the principle of purification to prepare for God’s approach in the form of Jesus.

     

  3. John’s baptism was a symbolic act. He explicitly states, “I baptize with water,” indicating it was just water and held no special divine power. It was a good thing to do, encouraging people to recognize their sinfulness and need for God’s purification.

28 This all happened at Bethany on the other side of the Jordan, where John was baptizing.

29 The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, “Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world! 

  1. The title “Lamb of God” connects Jesus to a rich scriptural history of lambs being sacrificed so that others might live: the ram that died in Isaac’s place, the Passover lamb whose blood protected the Israelites, and the lambs sacrificed for forgiveness in the temple.

     

  2. John identifies Jesus as “the” ultimate Lamb who will provide the final sacrifice.

     

  3. The use of the singular “sin” (not “sins”) is significant. Sins are the symptoms (wrong actions), but “sin” is the underlying disease or “rot in our soul” that began with Adam and Eve. Jesus came to eliminate the root cause, not just the symptoms.

30 This is the one I meant when I said, ‘A man who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.’ 31 I myself did not know him, but the reason I came baptizing with water was that he might be revealed to Israel.”

  1. Why would the sinless Jesus need to be baptized? Common reasons for baptism (joining the church, receiving the Holy Spirit, washing away sin) do not apply to Him.  Surely Jesus could have revealed himself to John the Baptist in other ways.  Why was this way fitting?

     

    1. John’s baptism was purely symbolic, which means a lot of the answers (the bestowal of the Holy Spirit, joining the Body of Christ, etc.) don’t apply here.  It really is a matter of symbols: why would a sinless person symbolically ask for purification?

       

    2. The 18th-century monk Nikodemos of Athos speaks to this in his prayers: “Jesus, being God, had no need for purification, but he suffered purification for me,” (Prayers to Our Lord Jesus Christ).
    3. Jesus gained nothing from baptism; it was an act of humility. His glory is repeatedly revealed through such humble acts: the infinite God being born in a small human body, in a manger; and ultimately dying a humiliating death on a cross.

32 Then John gave this testimony: “I saw the Spirit come down from heaven as a dove and remain on him. 33 And I myself did not know him, but the one who sent me to baptize with water told me, ‘The man on whom you see the Spirit come down and remain is the one who will baptize with the Holy Spirit.’ 

  1. What was once a purely symbolic, natural act became more than natural, now carrying the power of the Holy Spirit to bestow grace, unite a person with the body of Christ, and wash away sin.

     

  2. Note that there is no reason to expect two baptisms.  Some traditions insist that you need one “water baptism” and one “baptism of the Spirit” (generally identified by strong feelings in the believer), but Ephesians 4 is explicit that there is only one baptism. Jesus has transformed baptism, not added a second baptism.

34 I have seen and I testify that this is God’s Chosen One.

  1. Matthew 11:11”Truly I tell you, among those born of women there has not risen anyone greater than John the Baptist; yet whoever is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.”

     

    1. John was the greatest of “those born of women,” or those born by purely natural means.

       

    2. Through baptism, believers are made part of the “Kingdom of Heaven” and are greater than John the Baptist

       

  2. Just as Jesus transformed water and a human body into something more than natural, He transforms believers into more than natural people by giving them the Holy Spirit.

Full Transcript

So, for those of you who thought last week was a little too abstract, good news: John gets concrete pretty quickly. Here in verse 19 onwards, we are going to see a comparison between two men, John, the Baptist and Jesus, and the different types of baptism that each of them offers : John’s baptism of repentance and Jesus’s baptism of the Holy Spirit. Now, often when you see comparisons between two things, one is good and one is bad. Right? There’s the good, the and the evil. The big and the small. The smart and the stupid. One is generally implied to be superior and one is implied to be inferior. This is not strictly the case, it’s a little different. Here you see something that’s good and something that’s better.  It’s got John the Baptist, the best this world has to offer, and Jesus, who is better. And, there’s a verse from Scripture that I think really helps explain the entirety of what we’re looking at today. Matthew 11:11: “Truly I tell you, Among those born of women, there has not risen anyone greater than John the Baptist. Yet whoever is least in the kingdom of heaven. Is greater than he.” So just keep that in the back of your mind. Think on that as we move forward and let’s dig in. 

So beginning at verse 19, 

19 Now this was John’s testimony when the Jewish leaders   in Jerusalem sent priests and Levites to ask him who he was. 20 He did not fail to confess, but confessed freely, “I am not the Messiah.”

21 They asked him, “Then who are you? Are you Elijah?”

He said, “I am not.”

“Are you the Prophet?”

He answered, “No.”

22 Finally they said, “Who are you? Give us an answer to take back to those who sent us. What do you say about yourself?”

23 John replied in the words of Isaiah the prophet, “I am the voice of one calling in the wilderness, ‘Make straight the way for the Lord.’”

Let’s just start with that. That’s a good chunk. So first off, You can see at the beginning of verse nineteen. Now this was John’s testimony when. We’re seeing that this is just a little indication that this doesn’t happen chronologically after what we had last week. Those first eighteen verses are essentially a summary of everything that happens in the book of John and a little before and a little afterwards. So we saw before Jesus was incarnate, and then we saw John the Baptist, and he was proclaiming the coming of Jesus.  And then we saw Jesus come and he was not received; he was rejected. And yet, he created a pathway to salvation. We saw all of this right there in the first eighteen verses. But now that we’re on to verse nineteen, we’re going back. We’re going back, and we’re getting a little more in detail in what was presented in the first eighteen verses as an overview. 

So, this is what happened when John, the Baptist was confronted by priests and Levites from Jerusalem, and, If you didn’t know any better, you’d think these priests thought pretty highly of him. Look at all the things they ask him : “Are you the Messiah? Are you the second coming of Elijah? Are you the prophet?” All three figures from Scripture: the Messiah since Genesis itself, this prophecy about a coming prophet from Deuteronomy, even the second coming of Elijah foretold in Malachi, all three big deals. And they’re asking John, are you this big deal? Are you that big deal? And each time, no. 

If you didn’t know any better, you might think they’re a little impressed with John. They are not. This is a public interrogation. They have cornered John the Baptist while he is doing his baptizing in front of a group of people. And what they’re trying to do is ask him if he is any of these great figures from Scripture. These would give him authority, and in their minds, this is a win-win. On one hand, he says he’s not and he has no authority. That’s great ; maybe people won’t follow him anymore and now he can’t cause any trouble. Big win! But on the other hand, maybe he says he is those figures. That’s a win too; then they can go right back. To the people in charge and the Romans, and tell them, “Hey, the guy we were wondering is he a troublemaker? Yup, troublemaker. He needs to be taken care of. ” 

I think it’s really easy to see these priests, Levites, and Pharisees as purely villainous figures. We see them harassing John the Baptist. We see them harassing Jesus. It’s easy to just say, “Uh oh.” To be fair, in this story they are villains, but I think it can be helpful to understand why they’re doing what they’re doing. Because they’re not one-dimensional, you know.  They had reasons for doing what they’re doing. The historian Josephus, a Roman historian specifically about Jewish people, tells us that in the first century alone, there were four different people who all claimed to be the Messiah and raised up an army in Israel and tried to fight the Romans. Four different people, all of them understood the Messiah to be a military figure—someone who would raise an army and kick out the Romans and restore Israel to its earthly glory as a phenomenal kingdom. Four times!  That’s one every twenty five years. There were a lot of people claiming to be the messiah. And Josephus only tells us that there were four who managed to put together an army to challenge the Romans. He doesn’t tell us how many people might have tried and never quite made it far enough to be historically noteworthy. 

Ultimately, it was a false messiah that would cause problems for Israel in the end. It’s a man named Simon Ben Kosiba, who was another person who claimed to be the messiah in the early second century.  And again, he put together an army and again he fought the Romans. And it didn’t, well, it went better than for a lot of others, but the Romans eventually put down this rebellion. And when they did, they were done. No more. No more of this. “How many times have we had to put down an insurrection in Israel? We’re done with it. I want that place ruined! I want it wiped off the face of the map! No more Israel. That is now Syria Palestine. No more kings of Israel. I want those people scattered to the four corners of the earth.” It was a false messiah who ultimately removed Israel from the map for over a thousand years. You don’t see Israel again on maps until after World War II, so there’s fair reason for people to be worried. They’re worried that a false messiah will cause problems, and they’re not wrong. Rather than seeing them as villainous, I guess I tend to see them as more tragic figures. All, this time trying to protect people from a false messiah, and in the end, they end up overlooking the real one in the process. But in any case, that’s why they’re doing what they’re doing. That’s why they’re interrogating John the Baptist: Is this guy going to cause trouble? Are people going to get hurt because of what he’s saying? 

You see the three different questions they asked, and John doesn’t seem particularly bothered by the questions. It says that he freely confessed that he was not the Messiah. So John’s not sweating bullets; he’s okay, he’s comfortable. Why? Because he knows he’s not the big deal that they’re worried about. He doesn’t even claim to be a big deal; he knows he’s just the guy who’s pointing people to the guy that matters, and there is a certain freedom that comes along with that. 

I wish all of us were as comfortable doing that sort of thing as John the Baptist; as free and easy pointing people to Jesus, rather than trying to point people to ourselves. That becomes very easy. All too often we try to prove to people that we are big shots, that we are the ones who can answer the questions, that we are the ones who get things done, that we are the people that they should be looking towards. When you get too used to that there’s a certain kind of anxiety that accompanies that because at the end of the day, we will never be the answer to every problem that people have. We are so limited; we just can’t do it all. Naturally, there will be anxiety.  What if they know that I am not the big deal that I claim to be? But if you point people to Jesus—if like John the Baptist, You point them to the one who is—the one who can take care of all of their problems—the anxiety is gone. You can freely confess, “I am not a big deal, but I know the one who is.” And John answers them with that exact answer in the end. They ask, “Are you this scriptural figure? Are you this scriptural figure?” He says, “I know the one that is,” he quotes from Scripture, the book of Isaiah. He says, “I am the voice calling in the wilderness: make straight the way for the Lord.” That’s the passage he chooses to identify himself. 

Now at this point, The Pharisees are annoyed. He seems to be claiming some sort of authority, and yet he will not admit it. And so they throw a curve ball at him. They say, “

“Why then do you baptize if you are not the Messiah, nor Elijah, nor the Prophet?”

“Why are you out here baptizing if you’re not a big shot?”

John the baptism did not invent baptism, by the way. Baptism had been around before John the Baptist. You’ll notice that the Bible never says, “and there was a guy named John who came up with this thing called baptism, and it was good.” Never says that. It just assumes that you probably know what baptism is. You can see the roots of baptism as early as Exodus. When the Israelites are in the tabernacle before they approach the altar, a priest is supposed to take a large basin of water and wash their hands and wash their feet to show, “I recognize that I am sinful. God, please forgive me and purify me as I approach you at your altar.”  Then when the temple is built, the practice gets a little more elaborate. The basin of water gets even bigger, and rather than just washing your hands and your feet, you bathe in the water. A priest would bathe before they approach the altar for the same reason: I know I am about to go towards God’s altar; I recognize I am sinful ; God, please purify me as I approach Your altar. What John has done is he has taken this practice of baptism, and he’s taken it to the people. Because they might not be approaching the altar, but here’s the thing: you might not be approaching God in that sense, but God is approaching us. Jesus is coming; you will want to be purified. Get baptized, repent of your sin, ask God to be made pure so when you see Him face to face, you’ll be ready. And it’s purely symbolic, right? That’s what John is doing. It’s a good thing; John is doing something that is unambiguously good.

It can’t be particularly prideful to tell people, “Hey, recognize that you are sinful and that you need to be made pure by God.” That’s it. And, yet the Pharisees are claiming that this humble practice that he is involved in is evidence of his pride. And we see that. We see that all over the world to this day. People, who are humbly trying to follow their God and others who use their humility as evidence of their pride. For example, if someone hears, “Oh yeah, I try to be in church every Sunday.” Ooh. Someone thinks they’re a pretty good person. Oh yeah, you don’t want any more drinks? Oh, you’re too good for us. Someone’s a good person. Watch out for them. Oh I can’t make it to the bachelor party this weekend. I’m not actually comfortable with the things that you guys are going to do.  Oh, okay. Okay, we got a saint over here. All too often, when people are trying to humbly do what God asked of them, others see that as evidence of pride. Totally untrue, but nonetheless a sad truth. 

How does John the Baptist handle it? He handles it by again reiterating I am not a big deal. I am not special. I just know someone who is. He responds, “I baptize with water.” Again, he’s saying, “Look, this baptism thing. I don’t have any divine special power. It’s just water on the head. That’s all I’m doing. It’s not such a big deal. I don’t claim to be special.  

But among you stands one who you do not know. He is the one who comes after me, the straps of whose sandals I am not worthy to untie.”

Now, how many of you remember when George Bush was in the Middle East and got a shoe chucked at him? He was giving a speech, and someone in the crowd did not think very highly of him and so they threw a shoe at his head. It’s a chuckle-worthy YouTube clip. If you haven’t seen it, it’s worth your time. But why did they do that? Because in the Middle East, that’s a sign that you don’t think too highly of someone. The foot is the grossest, dirtiest part of the body in popular imagination there, so to associate someone or something with a foot, you are saying that’s what I think of you. And here John is saying Jesus is so incredible. This guy I am preparing the way for, he’s so amazing. I am not even fit to touch the grossest, dirtiest part of his body. I can’t do the lowest of the low for him. Untying the sandal was considered so inglorious that he’s saying he’s not even worthy of that. 

When a rabbi was teaching a disciple, it was important to give them tasks so they could show that they were listening to their rabbi and that they were devout. And yet it was literally written, “But don’t have them untie your sandals. That’s too low. You can’t have them do that. Gotta let the guys have some dignity.” John is saying he is not even worthy of doing that. It’s not that he’s so great, it’s that he’s not even great enough to do that. 

So we’ve seen John the Baptist—the greatest man, according to Jesus, who ever walked this earth—the greatest man of the natural world there could possibly be. And we saw his baptism, often known as the baptism of repentance, a purely symbolic act to indicate God, “I am impure please make me pure.” Now, as we move towards this second half, we’re going to see the one who he’s being compared to. We’ve seen the best now let’s see better than the best. We’re going to look at Jesus. Verse 29: 

The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, “Look! The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world!” 

There’s so much in what he says right there when he sees Jesus. “Look! The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world!” That’s the first thing he says. And notice what he doesn’t say: “Look! A great philosopher who can teach us things about the world beyond.”  He doesn’t say that. He doesn’t say, “Look, a great teacher that can teach us how to act well in the world.” He doesn’t say, “Look, a self help guru that can teach us how to be better people.” No. He says, “Look! The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.” 

“The Lamb of God.” What does he mean by that? Well there’s lots of lambs in Scripture. We see lambs come up time and time again. For example, as early as Genesis, we have Isaac. Abraham was told to sacrifice his son Isaac. So he takes Isaac to the altar and right before he sacrifices him, there is a lamb: a lamb that dies in Isaac’s stead. And then we have Passover.  In the book of Exodus, the angel of death comes to Egypt to kill all of the firstborn. How do the Israelites make sure that their firstborns are safe? They kill a lamb and they put the blood of the lamb on their doorways so that the angel passes over their house. And at the temple, when they have done something wrong, when they wanted to be forgiven by God, what did they do? They sacrificed a lamb. Even the book of Isaiah talks about a lamb who will be sacrificed. So much lamb imagery: lambs that die so that others might live. 

John says, not just “Here is a lamb.” He says here is the lamb. This is the ultimate lamb. This is the one who has come to finish, and he says, this lamb will take away the sin of the world. He doesn’t say sins. He uses the singular, not the plural. Often we think about sins, plural, instead of sin, and that’s fine. You know, sins are the wrong things we do. Those are not good. But at the same time, it’s kind of like a symptom. Sins are a symptom of sin. Sin in the singular is more than just the wrong things we do. It’s like a disease. It’s like a blight in our hearts. It’s like rot in our soul. That is sin. And that’s why in Genesis, when Adam and Eve commit sins, the problem is not just that they have done individual wrong things. The problem is that they have caught this disease. This rot has taken root in them! Sin is the problem—not just the individual sins they have committed, but the greater sin that is now nested within them.  Jesus has come as the Lamb to eliminate the sin, not just the sins. He’s not just going to get rid of the symptom; he’s going to get rid of the cause itself. “Behold, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.” 

As we get towards this last section, this answers one of the questions that I had for the longest time. I always wondered. Why did Jesus get baptized? What did he get out of it? I wondered that for years. Why would Jesus need to get baptized? It doesn’t make any sense by a lot of metrics. When we talk about baptism, we think there’s a lot of ways of explaining it and they’re all true. For example, baptism is when we individually join the church which is the body of Christ. Baptism is when the Holy Spirit is bestowed on us. Baptism is the washing away of our sins. Baptism is a promise that we make to God to stay loyal. It’s all of these, and yet do any of those make sense for Jesus? Why would Jesus need to join the body of Christ when He. Himself is Christ? That doesn’t make any sense. Why would Jesus, part of the Trinity which is Father, Son and Holy Spirit always in communion with one another, need to have the Holy Spirit bestowed on him when he’s already in constant communion with it? Why would Jesus, a man that has no sin, need to be purified of sin? That doesn’t make any sense. And, why would he need to make a promise to God when he himself is God? All of the ways we describe baptism make no sense for Jesus.  So why did Jesus get baptized? 

Well, in this passage from John, first off, we see that a lot of those questions can be eliminated right off the bat because this is John’s baptism. He says it himself: it’s just symbolic. It’s just water. There is no divine power behind it. You’ve got to wait for Jesus to that to happen. So the only thing symbolically that’s happening here is Jesus is asking His Father, through baptism, to be purified of His sins. That’s a lot of our questions eliminated right off the bat, but we still have one: why would a sinless person need to ask to be purified from their sins? It doesn’t make sense. I wondered that for ages, and it wasn’t until I ran across the writings of a devotional author called Nikodemos of Athos. Nikodemos of Athos was a monk in 18th century Greece well known for his devotional writings. Among the many treasures he has left to the world, one of them is an acrostic series of prayers. It just takes you through the whole alphabet, and it’s got a different prayer for every letter of the alphabet. As you go through the alphabet, you go through the life of Christ thanking him for each and everything he did. They’re really lovely prayers. I was reading through them one day, and I got to the part about Jesus’ baptism. He had written “Jesus, being God, had no need for purification but he suffered purification for me.” I had never heard someone say that word “suffered” before, and yet it’s helped me start to make sense of it. 

What did Jesus get out of baptism? What did He stand to gain? Nothing. If anything, It’s inglorious for someone who is perfect to have to ask for purification from sins that He didn’t commit. It’s a little absurd, but He did it to be revealed to John the Baptist. He is revealed through his humility, and that’s something that happens throughout Scripture. We can jump back over to that other passage we were looking at this morning in Philippians. Philippians 2:5: “In your relationships with one another, have the same mindset as Christ Jesus, who being in very nature, God did not consider equality with God, something to be used to his own advantage; rather, he made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness and being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself by being obedient to death, even death on a cross.” 

Jesus is repeatedly found through acts of humility. He is glorious, and he absolutely could have just descended from the sky with glorious beams shooting off of him, a giant crown and a scepter or something. And yet he did not. Repeatedly we see him reveal his glory in his humility. God, the infinite God is born into the smallness of a human body? Unthinkable! God, the infinite God is born—not just born, but born in a manger. These are circumstances, which for the average person would be incredibly undignified. And yet this is how God reveals Himself. The pure asks for purification. Why? Unthinkable, undignified, And ultimately, Jesus dies on a cross, not just a death, but the most humiliating and painful death you could think of. All of this Jesus goes through so His glory is known through his humility. Here we see Jesus reveals himself, not by trying to prove he’s some kind of big shot. A real big shot doesn’t need to prove anything to anybody. They are a big shot simply by nature of what they are. God is glorious not because he needs to impress anybody, but because he can help anybody do anything just by nature of who He is. 

We see here it says verse 30. 

30 This is the one I meant when I said, ‘A man who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.’ 31 I myself did not know him, but the reason I came baptizing with water was that he might be revealed to Israel.”

32 Then John gave this testimony: “I saw the Spirit come down from heaven as a dove and remain on him. 33 And I myself did not know him, but the one who sent me to baptize with water told me, ‘The man on whom you see the Spirit come down and remain is the one who will baptize with the Holy Spirit.’ 34 I have seen and I testify that this is God’s Chosen One.”

The greatness of God is revealed in this humble moment in which the pure asks to be purified. And we see here that the second form of baptism, baptism by the Holy Spirit, is what Jesus will offer—something different, something better than what John has offered.  What John offered was good, but Jesus offers something that is greater than good. 

Now, some people get confused here. They think there’s actually two forms of baptism. They think you need to get baptized by water, and that’s like the baptism of John the Baptist, and then there’s a second bonus baptism that comes afterwards. That’s your baptism by the Holy Spirit. That is usually indicated, in their thinking, by a fierce feeling that you’re very close to God, and when you feel that that’s your second baptism, the baptism by the Holy Spirit. This appears nowhere in Scripture. Pentecostals often make this claim, but in the early church’s writings, you can find no one who thinks that there’s a second baptism that is indicated by strong feelings. Not only that, but in Scripture it says that there aren’t two baptisms. In Ephesians 4 it says that there is not two, but one baptism. 

Jesus did not offer this baptism by the Holy Spirit by some kind of different means. He didn’t come up with this new thing that people need after their first baptism. He took baptism in the same way that John the Baptist was doing it: water on the head, something that was purely symbolic, and he gave it divine power. No longer was it just a symbolic gesture. It had the power of the Holy Spirit behind it. That’s where we start to see all of those other meanings we were talking about earlier. Now, through the waters of baptism, the Spirit can be bestowed. Now, through the waters of baptism, a person can be united with the body of Christ. Now, there is so much more dimension because with John alone, we only have the natural—the best of the natural world—a great man who does great symbolic acts only through the power of man. With Jesus we have someone who is greater than just a human. He’s better than the best the natural world can offer, and His baptism—still water on the head—now carries infinitely more power, because the divine has transformed it from something merely natural into something more than natural, something that carries the power of the divine.  

Think back to that Scripture we started with, Matthew 11:11: “Truly I tell you, among those born of women there has not risen anyone greater than John the Baptist. Yet whoever is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.” He says, “among those born of women.”  What Jesus is saying is, among those who have purely been born by natural means there’s no one better than John the Baptist. He is the greatest the natural world alone can produce. And yet, in the kingdom of heaven, there is better.”

You were made a part of the Kingdom of Heaven through the waters of baptism. You are no longer just natural. Just as Jesus took the waters of baptism, just water, and transformed it into something greater than the natural world has.  In the same way He took a human body and made it greater than just a human body; He gave it the divine power of the Word. In that same way, Jesus took you, and now you are more than just a natural person.  You were made a part of the Kingdom of Heaven through the waters of baptism. You are no longer just natural. Just as Jesus took the waters of baptism (just water) and transformed it into something greater than the natural world has, in the same way He took a human body and made it greater than just a human body; He gave it the divine power of the Word. In that same way, Jesus took you, and you are more than just a natural person.You have the power of the Holy Spirit inside of you. You have been blessed with the power of the Holy Spirit. You, according to Scripture—the words of Jesus Himself—are greater than the greatest that the natural world has to offer.

I don’t know what you faced this week. I don’t know what you’re going to face in the coming weeks. I don’t know the challenges. I don’t know the frustrations. I don’t know the hurt. I don’t know what this world has for you. But we saw this morning John handle the incredible distress of being interrogated by some of the most powerful people in his region, and he stood up to that. If the greatest the natural world had to offer was a man so great, I wonder, what can God do through you, who is greater than him, who has the power of the Holy Spirit behind you? What will God do through you? Amen.