John 8:12-30 The Light of the World

Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript

From the Pulpit

Commentary

12 When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.”

  1. “I am the light of the world….”
    1. “As they had brought Galilee as an objection against Him, and doubted His being one of the Prophets, as if that was all He claimed to be, He wished to shew that He was not one of the Prophets, but the Lord of the whole earth: Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the Light of the world: not of Galilee, or of Palestine, or of Judæa.” -Chrysostom, Hom. lii. 2.

    2. The Significance of Light

      1. Light is Self-Evident: Light in a room isn’t subtle; it’s obvious.  In that same way, the existence of God is self-evident (Romans 1:19-20). The reason many people don’t “see” Him is not because He is hidden, but because sin has blinded humanity. Jesus’s miracles of restoring sight are a physical picture of our spiritual reality: he heals our spiritual blindness so we can see God.

      2. Light Illuminates Everything Else: In a dark room, you can’t really do much. Light allows you to see the world, make sense of your surroundings, and act reasonably. Similarly, through the light of God, we can understand the world and act well within it.

      3. Light Reveals Us: You can’t see your own hand in a pitch-black room. The light of God is what allows us to truly understand ourselves. Without knowing our origin, destination, and purpose (which are only knowable through God) we can’t fully know who we are.

  1. “Whoever follows me… will have the light of life…”
    1. The world is full of darkness, but darkness is just the absence of light.

    2. When we follow Jesus, we receive the “light of life.” We don’t have to fear the darkness; we carry the light with us and illuminate the dark places we enter.

13 The Pharisees challenged him, “Here you are, appearing as your own witness; your testimony is not valid.”

  1. “These wasps were always stinging him; when he drove them away once, they quickly returned to attack him again: ‘The Pharisees’” -Spurgeon, Spurgeon’s Verse Expositions of John

  2. They invoke the legal principle requiring two witnesses to validate a claim (Deuteronomy 19:15). They argue Jesus has insufficient evidence for His grand claims.

  3. There’s some real irony in their response.  Jesus says he is the light, and their response is, “I don’t see it.” They’re like a person with their eyes closed on a sunny day demanding evidence of the sun. Their spiritual blindness is self-imposed.

14 Jesus answered, “Even if I testify on my own behalf, my testimony is valid, for I know where I came from and where I am going. But you have no idea where I come from or where I am going. 15 You judge by human standards; I pass judgment on no one. 16 But if I do judge, my decisions are true, because I am not alone. I stand with the Father, who sent me. 17 In your own Law it is written that the testimony of two witnesses is true. 18 I am one who testifies for myself; my other witness is the Father, who sent me.”

  1. “Even if I testify on my own behalf, my testimony is valid…”
    1. Unique Knowledge: Jesus says his testimony is valid because he is the only one with complete authority to speak on these topics.  He was present at creation.  He has seen both Heaven and Hell.  Nobody else could verify these things, but he can speak with complete understanding.

    2. “I know whence I came. By these words he declares that his origin is not from the world, but that he proceeded from God, and therefore that it would be unjust and unreasonable that his doctrine, which is Divine, should be subjected to the laws of men. But as he was at that time clothed with the form of a servant, in consequence of which they despised him on account of the mean condition of the flesh, he sends them away to the future glory of his resurrection, from which his Divinity, formerly hidden and unknown, received a clear demonstration.” -Calvin, Commentary on John 
  1. “You judge by human standards; I pass judgment on no one…”

    1. Different Standards of Judgment: The Pharisees judged with worldly standards (education, prestige, outward acts) and hearts of stone. Jesus did not come to bring more judgment.  The world was already under condemnation for sin. He came as an instrument of mercy and salvation.

  2. “…I am not alone. I stand with the Father…”

    1. The Father as the Second Witness: Jesus affirms the two-witness rule from Scripture and says he’ll play by it. He testifies for Himself, and His other witness is “the Father who sent me.” He’s not appealing to a vague, abstract, warm-and-fuzzy feeling. The Father’s testimony is objectively available in the Scriptures (the Old Testament), which are filled with prophecies about Jesus (Isa. 7:14, Mic. 5:2, Gen. 12:3, etc). He is telling them to “look it up” and check His claims in the Word of God.

19 Then they asked him, “Where is your father?”

“You do not know me or my Father,” Jesus replied. “If you knew me, you would know my Father also.” 20 He spoke these words while teaching in the temple courts near the place where the offerings were put. Yet no one seized him, because his hour had not yet come.

21 Once more Jesus said to them, “I am going away, and you will look for me, and you will die in your sin. Where I go, you cannot come.”

  1. “Where is your father?”
    1. Jesus used the word “father,” giving the Pharisees an opening. They’re not asking a sincere question; they are invoking the scandalous rumors surrounding Jesus’s birth (that He was born out of wedlock to a Roman soldier or another man). It’s a deeply personal and humiliating taunt: “Do you even know who your own dad is?”

  1. Jesus’s Response

    1. Jesus refuses to engage with rumors that are both false and distract from the truth he’s trying to share. He stays on message: “You do not know me or my Father. If you knew me, you would know my Father also.”

    2. He immediately connects their ignorance to its eternal consequence: “I am going away… and you will die in your sin. Where I go, you cannot come.”

    3. “Oh, what a terrible sentence is that! I pray that the Lord may never say that to any of us, “Whither I go, ye cannot come.” That would be the death-knell of all our hopes and would make our life one long banishment. Blessed be his name, we who have sought him, and have found him, know that; we shall not die in our sins; and whither he has gone, we shall go also.” -Spurgeon, Spurgeon’s Verse Expositions of John

22 This made the Jews ask, “Will he kill himself? Is that why he says, ‘Where I go, you cannot come’?”

23 But he continued, “You are from below; I am from above. You are of this world; I am not of this world. 24 I told you that you would die in your sins; if you do not believe that I am he, you will indeed die in your sins.”

  1. “Will he kill himself?”
    1. In first-century Judaism, suicide was considered an unforgivable sin that led directly to Hell. By suggesting this, the Pharisees are making a radically insulting suggestion that Jesus is going to Hell, which is why they cannot follow Him.

    2. While different theologians, especially in the past, have wondered if suicide is unforgivable, note that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is the only unforgivable sin in the Bible (Mark 3:29, Lk. 12:10), broadly interpreted as the unwillingness to recognize the urging of the Spirit to recognize that Jesus Christ is Lord.

    3. We are saved by our faith, not our works.  If dying while having done ANY sin was a guaranteed trip to Hell, we would almost inevitably all end up in Hell.  There’s no amount of confessing on a deathbed that could stop even a stray errant thought at the last minute!  Trust Christ, not your acts.

  1. “ …if you do not believe that I am he, you will indeed die in your sins…”

    1. Jesus’s language is intense here, but it’s important to note that he’s trying to snap the Pharisees out of their stupor.  There are real consequences to disbelief, and he doesn’t want them to suffer those consequences.

    2. “What an awful thing it will be to die in your sins! What cerements for your eternal burial! What a robe of fire in which to lie down for your long sleep, and then to find no sleep because of it! “Ye shall die in your sins.” I should like this short, stern sentence to ring in the ears of every unbeliever. This is not my word, but Christ’s own word, — the word of the most loving and tender Saviour: ‘If ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins.’” -Spurgeon, Spurgeon’s Verse Expositions of John

  2. “…I am he…”

    1. “He says, that I am he, to show his eternity. For in all things that begin, there is a certain mutability, and a potency to nonexistence; thus we can discern in them a past and a future, and so they do not have true existence of themselves.”-Aquinas, Commentary on John, C8, L 3, 1179.

25 “Who are you?” they asked.

“Just what I have been telling you from the beginning,” Jesus replied. 26 “I have much to say in judgment of you. But he who sent me is trustworthy, and what I have heard from him I tell the world.”

27 They did not understand that he was telling them about his Father. 28 So Jesus said, “When you have lifted up the Son of Man, then you will know that I am he and that I do nothing on my own but speak just what the Father has taught me. 29 The one who sent me is with me; he has not left me alone, for I always do what pleases him.” 30 Even as he spoke, many believed in him.

  1. “Who are you?”
    1. How sad to end on this question.  Jesus has been answering this exact question from the very beginning, but their questions were never intended to gain knowledge, only to embarrass.

  1. “Just what I have been telling you from the beginning…”
     
    1. Church fathers often translated this verse differently.  The translation seems inaccurate, but still paints a vivid picture of how people imagined Christ’s revelations in this conversation that especially resonates with Christ’s claim in Revelation, “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end,” (Rev. 1:8).

    2. “In some [biblical manuscripts] we find, “Who also speak to you;” but it is more consistent to read “for” (quia), not, “who” (qui): in which case the meaning is: Believe Me to be the beginning, for for your sakes have I condescended to these words.” -The Venerable Bede as found in Thomas Aquinas, Catena Aurea

    3. “Who are you, that we may believe? He answered The Beginning. Here is the existence that [always] is. The beginning cannot be changed: the beginning is self-abiding and all-originating.” -Augustine, Tractate on John 38, 11.

  2. “When you have lifted up the Son of Man,  then you will know that I am he…”

    1. “Lifting up the Son of Man” refers to his crucifixion. The cross is what brings ultimate clarity to everything.

    2. When we face pointed, accusatory questions, from others or from our own minds, the answer to all of them is found at the cross.

      1. Who is Jesus? Look at the cross. It is the clearest evidence of God’s love, mercy, and care.

      2. What is the logic of the world? Look at the cross. It explains everything you need to know about the human condition and God’s plan.

      3. Who are you? Look at the cross. You may be a sinner, but you are a sinner redeemed by the blood of Christ, bought back by the grace of God. The cross is the definitive answer to every question.

  3. “Even as he spoke, many believed in him.”

    1. The Pharisees’ goal was to humiliate Jesus and make the crowd lose faith. The opposite happened over the course of the conversation.

Full Transcript

All right, so we continue on. Last week we saw after the Festival of Tabernacles, Jesus came back to the temple where he kept teaching, and some people from throughout the Roman Empire didn’t leave at the end of the festival; they came back to learn from him. And the Pharisees decided to lay a trap for Jesus, a legal trap that would get him in trouble. They found a woman who had been caught in adultery, and they brought her to him. And they said, “Okay, well, according to the law, she should be stoned, right? So, do you want us to do that?”

Now, this was a problem because on one hand, Jesus could obey Mosaic law and break Roman law, because only a Roman judge could call for the death penalty. So that was one option. The other option was, of course, to deny Mosaic law and to obey Roman law and to say, “Hey, I don’t know if it’s that big a deal. I wouldn’t worry about it.” And of course, if he did that, the whole crowd would see that this law that he claims to take so seriously, he doesn’t actually take it all that seriously after all.

You see, this is a problem not only legally, but it’s a problem for his legacy. Jesus built himself up as this man who is both merciful and just. He keeps the law better than the Pharisees do, and he cares about the people. Well, the Pharisees threatened to split that. Which are you really? Do you want this woman saved? In which case, everyone will know you’re a lawbreaker just like anybody else. Or do you want to condemn this woman? In which case, everyone will know you take the law seriously, but you are not their friend. If they step out of line, you’ll get them just as much as anyone else would. And of course, Jesus, in classic Jesus fashion, gets two options and he creates a third and takes that instead: “Whoever is without sin may throw the first stone.” And everybody leaves one at a time. And eventually, Jesus encourages her to go and not sin anymore.

So now here we are. Jesus is back at the temple. He’s teaching on a different day. And now the Pharisees are back at it, and they have a different tactic. If they can’t shut Jesus up with legal threats, with taking advantage of the court system, they are going to do things differently. They’re going to show up and heckle him. They are going to ask pointed, rude questions in an effort to just make him look bad in front of all of the people there. And so that’s what you’re going to see them do. They’re going to show up, they’re going to ask these pointed questions, and Jesus is going to respond with total confidence. He is not shaken by any of this.

And I think in the process we’re going to see how to handle these pointed, humiliating questions. Because we hear those sometimes, right? Whether it’s from a person that does not share our faith—I know before I was a Christian, I asked those kind of questions. I had a whole book of questions, questions that were pointed and intended to show religious people just how silly they were. Were they sincere? Not really. What do you do when you get those kind of questions? And sometimes it’s not even questions that we get from another person. Sometimes it’s those questions that just sneak into your ear in the dark hours of the night, right? Those questions that enter in—just little things like, “Do you really believe that? You know you’re wasting your life, right? You know that can’0t possibly be true.” It’s those whispers from the devil, and this is how we can respond boldly. We’re going to see that modeled by Jesus.

Let’s begin at verse 12. When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.” So he’s teaching, and you can see he’s teaching about himself, about who he is. Jesus did not just teach morality. Sometimes people imagine that Jesus was just this wise teacher of how to act well, but Jesus’s teachings were not only about morality in a physical sense; they were also about identity. Who is He? What is the world? What’s the nature of everything? Jesus spoke at length on that, and notice as He speaks about His identity, about who He is, He’s going to say one thing again and again and again. He begins with it, and this is going to be the drumbeat in this conversation: “I am.” You’re going to see that time and time again.

And you know—what was it? Help me out. When Moses asked God for His name at the burning bush, what did God respond with? “I am.” The name that God responded with was “I am.” So you’re going to see that time and time again, Jesus is invoking that name as he speaks. “I am, I am, I am.” All the while, he’s saying who he is, he’s invoking that divine name.

Jesus begins, “I am the light of the world.” And that comparison of God to light is one that you can find throughout the Bible, and it is especially poignant, I think, because, well, first off, light is self-evident, isn’t it? If you walk into a room and there’s a light on, you’re going to see it. That’s just how it works. In that same way, God is self-evident. God is obvious.

You may disagree with that. You may think to yourself, “Well, hold on. If God was so obvious, why are there so many people that don’t believe in Him?” Well, the Bible tells us that. The Bible says the problem is the blindness that has been brought on all of humanity by sin. It’s not that God is hidden somewhere. It’s not that He’s trying to confuse us. God is obvious. His presence in the world is everywhere, but we can’t see it. We’ve been blinded, or some of us just have our eyes closed, right? That’s one of the reasons that those miracles, where Jesus comes to restore people’s sight, are especially important—because Jesus heals our sight so we can see again. We are no longer blinded by sin. Jesus is the light. He is that self-evident light that everyone should be able to see. And as you look around the world, you can see all the evidence of God. You can see the mountains and the hills, you can see the fields that are His handiwork, you can see God at work among people.

The light is self-evident, and it also helps not only us to see itself; it helps us to see everything else. If you’re in a room that’s dark, you’re not going to be able to do very much. You can’t walk. You don’t know what’s in the way. You’re going to bang up your shins. You can’t interact with things. You can’t see anything if the room’s dark. But if a light is on, suddenly you can start to make sense of things. You can act in reasonable ways. You can interact with the things around you. Not only does the world around you make sense if you’ve got light, but you can even start to see yourself, can’t you? If the room’s dark enough, you can’t see your own hand in front of your face. When the light is on, you can see your hands. You can see yourself.

That’s true about God too. If we know God, we know ourselves. Sometimes we imagine that we are the masters of our own self-understanding, that we know ourselves better than anyone. Not always true. If you don’t know where you’re from, if you don’t know where you’re going, if you don’t know what you were made to do—all of which is only knowable through God—you’re missing a great deal of information. You can only really understand yourself by the light of God. Jesus says He is the light. Through Him, you can see His self-evident glory. You can understand God. You can understand the world. You can understand yourself.

And He continues, saying, “Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.” And isn’t there enough darkness in the world? I mean, you can’t get through a week without seeing darkness of one kind or another. Especially in election season, you see plenty of darkness. It’s on your screens all the time. There is plenty of darkness in this world, but darkness is not an equal opposite to the light. Darkness is just an absence of light. If we follow Jesus, He gives us the light. We can walk into the darkness without fear, because we carry that light with us. It can’t withstand us. If anything, us walking into that darkness is going to light it up.

The Pharisees—they have been listening. They are here and they are ready to ridicule Jesus. They begin with their first challenge: “Here you are, appearing as your own witness. Your testimony is not valid.” In other words, yeah, you can say all this about yourself. Well, that’s easy enough. A person can say anything about themselves. But in the law, you’re supposed to have two witnesses to something. If you don’t have a witness, how can anybody trust you? You’ve given us insufficient evidence.

And that two-witness rule makes a good deal of sense, right? If I told you, believe it or not, I am one of the best basketball players you will ever see. I am amazing. You should see me on that court. I do magic out there. Would you believe it? Probably not. I hope you wouldn’t; I wouldn’t believe myself if I said that. But if I said that and then Jim followed up by saying, “No, seriously, I’ve seen him. It is weird how good at basketball he is,” suddenly it seems a little more credible, right? Someone else is affirming that, so the rule makes sense. Generally, if you’re looking to see if something is true, if two people are both able to confirm it, it’s a little more credible. That is exactly what they’re saying about Jesus: you’ve not given us credible evidence. You have these ridiculous claims that don’t meet the minimum standard of something that is reasonable.

I do find the objection just a little bit ironic, isn’t it? Jesus says, “I am the light,” and they say, “I don’t see it. Give me more evidence.” Which, I mean, can you imagine going outside on a bright sunny day, and there’s someone there with their eyes closed, and you say, “Man, it’s bright out,” and they say, “I don’t see it. I refuse to acknowledge that; you’ve not given me sufficient evidence.” Well, open your eyes and look! It’s bright. “I’m not going to do that, please give me evidence.” We’re seeing the blindness of the Pharisees here. They don’t see the light.

Now Jesus responds to them questioning His evidence. He says, “Even if I testify on my own behalf, my testimony is valid, for I know where I came from and where I’m going. But you have no idea where I come from or where I’m going.” In other words, it makes sense to have two people—pretty reasonable most of the time. However, I am the only one who can testify about these kinds of things. I’m the only one who knows. None of you know where you’re from or where you’re going. You don’t know things like that. You’ve not seen heaven or hell. You theorize it; you hear about it. I’ve seen it. I was there in the beginning when the heavens and the earth were created. I was there when the plants were formed. I was there when humans were still just the dust of the earth before the breath of God. I have seen all of this. I am the only one who can speak with authority because I know genuinely where I’m from and where I am going. How could any of you verify that? You are all ignorant on that front. I’m the only one that can say these kinds of things with confidence because I’m the only one that knows it.

He continues, “You judge by human standards. I pass judgment on no one.” And we’ve seen the Pharisees repeatedly judge, right? That’s what they do. They show up and they judge people, and their standards are often based on more earthly things, right? The Pharisees are proud of their education. They’re proud of their jobs. They’re proud of the prestige that they have. They’re proud that they get to work in the temple. They’re proud that they publicly keep different acts of the law. They’re proud because they’re impressive people. But as impressive as they are, we can repeatedly see that they don’t really keep a fair understanding of the law. They keep a worldly understanding of the law. They want to look good, they want to be impressive, but we see that their hearts aren’t in the right place. They’re often cruel. They often look down on people that are trying very hard. Their hearts are stone. The Pharisees have a very earthly understanding of what it means to be good.

On the other hand, Jesus—He’s come not to judge people based on earthly standards. The earth already was judged at the very beginning. There was no shortage of condemnation for humanity when sin entered into the world. There was no shortage of wrath on God’s behalf. Jesus didn’t come because the world needed more judgment; that was taken care of. Jesus came to save us. He’s not an instrument of judgment; He’s an instrument of mercy. He’s the opposite of the Pharisees.

“But if I do judge, my decisions are true, because I am not alone. I stand with the Father who sent me. In your own Law it is written that the testimony of two witnesses is true. I am one who testifies for myself; my other witness is the Father who sent me.” And this, I think, sometimes it can sound a little abstract—Jesus saying, “Yeah, there are two witnesses. There’s me, and then there’s my Father.” At different points, I imagine, well, how are they supposed to hear from His Father? Jesus uses that word to talk about His heavenly Father, to talk about God, and how on earth are they supposed to know? Are they supposed to go into a prayer room and just be real quiet, and then they will feel the affirmation that Jesus is indeed the Son of God? It’s a little simpler than that, and it’s a little more objective. Remember, they had the Old Testament; the Word of God was available. When Jesus says, “There’s another witness, it’s my Father,” they can go and verify using the Word of God, which is full of prophecies about Jesus. The Old Testament is all about Him. He said that in no uncertain terms. So when Jesus says, “I have a second witness, it’s the Father,” this is a reference to the Scriptures. Go and verify. You don’t just have to take my word for it—look it up.

So Jesus has clearly shown them, “You don’t think my evidence is sufficient? I have sufficient evidence.” But they respond because He’s used a word that they are delighted to hear. Keep in mind, they’ve heard Jesus on a few occasions now, so they know some of the things He tends to bring up, and they’ve got these questions that are perfectly designed to try to humiliate Him. Jesus used the word “Father,” right? Father. Well, isn’t there a scandal about Jesus’s birth? Now today we believe, of course, rightly, that Jesus was born of the Virgin Mary. That’s something that Scripture clearly teaches. It’s something that the Church has taught from its earliest days. The apostles themselves taught it. But in those days, you got to remember, no one believed Jesus was the Son of God—or at least very, very few, right? The Pharisees didn’t believe that Jesus was born of the Virgin Mary, and there were all kinds of rumors about His birth: rumors that it was a Roman soldier or some other guy that Mary had on the side—all kinds of theories about who’s Jesus’s real dad, many of which continue to this day. That’s what they’re invoking. They’re invoking the rumor mill here. “Oh, Jesus, you want to talk about your Father? Where is your Father, huh? We’ve heard some stories about him. Do you even know who your own dad is? You who were born out of wedlock—we know the dates don’t line up. We know it doesn’t make sense. We know something’s amiss here, Jesus, and you know it too.”

He responds, “You do not know me or my Father. If you knew me, you would know my Father also.” He spoke these words while teaching in the temple courts near the place where the offerings were put. Yet no one seized Him, because His hour had not yet come.

He continues, “I am going away, and you will look for me, and you will die in your sin. Where I go, you cannot come.” Jesus doesn’t beat around the bush engaging with their attempts to create scandalous rumors. He stays right on message. You don’t know my Father because you don’t know me. You don’t know God. That is a problem, because you’re not listening. And He immediately shows the relevance of that too: “I am going to go, and where I go, you cannot follow. You are going to die in your sin.” Crystal clear as to why this matters. He’s not going to play into these rumors. He’s not going to spend time arguing things on their terms. He’s just going to clearly and concisely represent the truth and remind them why it matters.

Now, again, He said something that the Pharisees are ready for—something that He said in the past: “Where I go, you cannot follow.” They’ve got something for that too. They respond, “Will he kill himself? Is that why he says, ‘Where I go, you cannot come’?” Now, in this time frame, in the first century, the commonly held belief in Judaism was that if you kill yourself, that is a one-way ticket to hell, because you have denied the greatest gift that God gave you: life itself. You kill yourself—boom, hell, done. It was considered an unforgivable sin. That’s not what the Bible says. The Bible has one unforgivable sin listed, and that is denying the lordship of Jesus Christ. That’s the unforgivable sin. Despite the witness that He lived, despite the witness of the Holy Spirit, denying Him—well, that’s the greatest unforgivable sin because accepting Him will forgive all other sins.

Now, the logic of it—because it’s not only first-century Judaism, but at different points in church history, people have held that belief that suicide is an unforgivable sin. And here’s the logic of it a little bit, just so you understand why people have held that at different points. The logic goes something like this: Okay, so if you do something wrong, you should ask God for forgiveness, right? Yeah, that makes sense. You should ask God for forgiveness. Okay, great. And is suicide a sin? Yeah, suicide is a sin. It’s wrong, it’s bad. Makes sense. Okay, so if your last act is a sin, how are you going to ask for forgiveness for it? You can’t. You’re dying in unrepented sin. How on earth can you possibly get to heaven like that?

But this logic is a little flawed, and someone else pointed it out to me once. They said, “Okay, so dying in unrepented sin—that’s horrible, you can’t recover from that, right? Okay, sure. So let’s say you are on your deathbed, and you pray for forgiveness, and then you live ten more minutes. Any chance you’re going to sin during those ten minutes? Sure. I mean, sin is not just what you do; it’s thought, word, and deed. It’s what you do, and it’s what you don’t do. It’s not so hard to sin. Most of us are experts at it. Is there any chance you can sin in ten minutes? Sure, definitely. Okay, well, what about five minutes? Yeah, I could pull that off. What about one minute? Is it possible to sin in just one minute? Yeah. Okay, so then the only way to die, if you have to ask forgiveness for all the things—and you don’t even know when you’re going to die, right?—so you would have to perpetually be asking forgiveness every second of every day, just in case something went wrong. Otherwise, you might die in unrepentant sin.”

Does that make sense? Is that the witness of the people we see in Scripture? Well, no, it’s not. The reason God forgives us is because we’ve been redeemed by the blood of Christ. That’s the grace of God. God doesn’t forgive us because we are particularly good askers of forgiveness; He forgives us because of His grace, because of what He did on the cross. Now, does He ask us to ask forgiveness when we sin? Yeah, definitely, because we love God. We love our Father, and when we mess up, we ask for forgiveness. At the same time, the way that works—it’s not this legalistic weapon to be wielded. Our salvation is through grace, not because we are perpetually asking for more forgiveness. That’s my take on the matter.

But you got to keep in mind, the Pharisees did not think that way. That would not have been normative for the time. The norm for them would have been—why are they saying everything they’re saying? Well, they’re implying Jesus is going to go right to hell. That’s why they’re saying, “Oh, where you go, no one can follow, because you’re going to kill yourself. You’re going straight to hell. That’s what you’re doing, Jesus.”

And Jesus responds, “You are from below; I am from above. You are of this world; I am not of this world. I told you that you would die in your sins; if you do not believe that I am He, you will indeed die in your sins.” Again, you can see they keep trying to get Him off track, and Jesus just stays right on track. He keeps affirming who He is and why it matters. And here, it’s almost like He’s pleading with them: “If you do not believe, you will indeed die in your sins.” He wishes they would see. Why can’t you see? Open your eyes and see, you Pharisees! Look!

And they respond, “Who are you?” Who do you think you are, Mr. Hotshot, Mr. Big Deal, Mr. Guy who can forgive every sin? Who do you think you are? Who are you? Who are you? A deeply ironic question to end on, because that’s exactly what Jesus has been saying from the beginning. Every single time He has opened His mouth here, He is saying who He is. That drumbeat of “I am, I am, I am”—every answer to every question is about who He is. That has been Jesus’s teaching from the beginning. It is all about who He is and why it makes a difference. And they have asked question after question, but the questions weren’t designed to know anything more; they were designed to embarrass. After all those questions, they still don’t know.

Jesus responds, “Just as I have been telling you from the beginning. I have much to say in judgment of you. But He who sent me is trustworthy, and what I have heard from Him I tell the world.” They did not understand that He was telling them about His Father. So Jesus said, “When you have lifted up the Son of Man, then you will know that I am He and that I do nothing on my own but speak just what the Father has taught me. The one who sent me is with me; He has not left me alone, for I always do what pleases Him.” Even as He spoke, many believed in Him.

So here we’ve had this whole exchange, and what was the goal of it the whole time? To humiliate Jesus, to embarrass Him, to heckle Him so much that the crowd loses their faith in Him. And what happened? Just the opposite. People have come to faith because of the incident.

And what Jesus said at the end there: “When you have lifted up the Son of Man, then you will know I am He.” This is all going to make sense when you have lifted up the Son of Man. He’s referring to the cross, to His own crucifixion. That brings clarity to every question. It’s good to remember that when we get those questions, right? When we get those pointed questions—whether they come from someone who doesn’t know God like we do, someone who has really pointed, rude questions to ask about how we can possibly believe any of this; whether it’s those questions in the odd hours of the night that sneak into our minds about Jesus: “You know it can’t possibly be real, don’t you? You don’t actually believe that stuff.” Whether it’s about the world: “You know things do not work the way the Bible presents. You know that’s ridiculous, right?” Or whether it’s even about yourself: “You’re going to keep praying? You know how absurd that is. Do you know how many times you’ve sinned? It’s insane. You’re going to ask Him for forgiveness for the same things over again? Don’t you think He’s tired of you? Don’t you know how fruitless this is? You know you don’t even believe this. Give it up.”

All of those accusatory questions that come up? Everything makes sense when you look at the cross. It explains every question crystal clear. You want to know who Jesus really is? You look at the cross. There is no clearer evidence of God’s love, of His mercy, of His caring than Jesus on that cross. You want to know the underpinning logic of the world? Look at the cross. That explains everything you need to know about the world. You want to know who you are? Look at the cross. You might be a sinner, you might have sinned a million times, but you are a sinner redeemed by the blood of Christ, bought back by the grace of God. You want the answer to every question? It’ll all be clear. Look at the cross. Amen.

John 7:53-8:1-11 Jesus and The Adulteress

Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript

From the Pulpit

Commentary

Background of John 7:53–8:11

  1. The Controversy

    1. This story of the woman caught in adultery is absent in some of the oldest Greek manuscripts of the New Testament.

    2. In other ancient manuscripts, it appears elsewhere, such as in Luke or later in John (chapter 21).

    3. Some churches feel concerned that addressing these “academic” issues with biblical manuscripts are a waste of time.  People should focus on applying the Scripture to their lives!  But in the era of social media, stumbling onto misinformation about passages like this is a key possibility, and it touches on major questions about the Bible: is the Bible untrustworthy?  Is this something that disproves the faith?

    4. It’s important to understand why this Scripture is here so that we can have full faith in the Scriptures before us.

  2. Understanding Textual Variances

    1. The original handwritten New Testament documents no longer exist; they were penned on perishable materials about 2,000 years ago and did not survive due to climate, frequent handling, and suppression by non-Christian authorities.

    2. The Bible is among the most copied works in history, with thousands of ancient manuscripts available.

    3. Scholars compare manuscripts to reconstruct the most likely original text.

    4. Textual variants arose during manual copying before printing.

    5. Over 99% of variants are minor, like typos or substituting “he” for “Jesus.”

    6. Fewer than 1% are significant textual variants; the beginning of John 8 is one of these.

  3. Historical and Scholarly Resolution

    1. The issue with this stretch of text isn’t new; it is ancient; Christian leaders discussed it as early as the fourth century, when reliable records increased after Christianity’s legalization in the Roman Empire.

    2. Early church leaders and most orthodox, traditional biblical scholars today affirm the passage’s place in Scripture, commonly in its current location in John 8.

    3. Two criteria especially guided the inclusion of this passage:

      1. Apostolicity: This appears to be written by someone who knew Jesus and carried the first-generation authority of an apostle.

      2. Inspiration: Christians throughout the generations have acknowledged the Holy Spirit’s original inspiration and continuing power present in the passage.

  4. Dominant Theories on Omission and Inclusion

    1. Theory 1 (Written by John, later omitted): John wrote the story, but some scribes in certain regions excluded it as too scandalous due to its portrayal of forgiveness for an adulterous woman; it was retained elsewhere, producing variations.

    2. Theory 2 (Apostolic tradition, later added): A true apostolic-era account not in John’s original draft was added later by an authorized figure. Individuals like Simeon or Jude, the second and third bishops of Jerusalem, who lived long and knew Jesus, could have placed it where it fit best.

  5. Main Takeaway on the Textual Variances

    1. There is no translator conspiracy; questions about the text need not cause suspicion or fear.

    2. Faithful compilers did extensive research to ensure Scripture is trustworthy and inspired.

    3. Faith should remain steady; scholars have rigorously examined these issues for centuries.

53 Then they all went home,

1 but Jesus went to the Mount of Olives.

2 At dawn he appeared again in the temple courts, where all the people gathered around him, and he sat down to teach them. 3 The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group 4 and said to Jesus, “Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery. 

  1. “…Jesus went to the Mount of Olives.”

    1. “[U]nto the fruitful mount, unto the mount of ointment, unto the mount of chrism. For where, indeed, but on mount Olivet did it become the Christ to teach? For the name of Christ is from chrism; χρισμα in the Greek, is called in Latin unctio, an anointing. And He has anointed us for this reason, because He has made us wrestlers against the devil.” -Augustine, Tractate 33, 3.

  2. “…he sat down to teach them.”

    1. “His sitting down is the humility of the Incarnation, through which he shows mercy and teaches.” -Glossa Ordinaria, John 8.

  3. “They made her stand before the group…”

    1. “When the Evangelist says that the scribes brought to him a woman, he means that it was done by an agreement among them, in order to lay traps for Christ.” -Calvin, Calvin’s Commentary on John, 8.3.
    2. The woman evokes both pity and guilt: she is mistreated and humiliated, drawing our compassion.

    3. It’s more than understandable to identify with her.  Just like her, we wandered away from the one who loved us.  We fell short of our obligations and need mercy.

    4. It’s also worth noting that she definitively sinned.  She was caught in the act of adultery.  There was a family that was devastated by what she did.  Sympathizing is good, but remembering that her sin was serious (just like ours is) is important too.

5 In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?” 6 They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.

  1.  “They were using this question as a trap…”

    1. They asked, “In the law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?”

    2. The trap set conflicting legal demands at odds with each other:

      1. The Mosaic law clearly orders that someone that is caught in adultery be stoned (Lev. 20:10, Deut. 22:22-24).  If Jesus ignores this, he is a hypocrite the ignores the law he claims to teach.

      2. Roman law demands that the death penalty only be issued by a Roman judge, and Roman law usually handled the matter with divorce, exile or property loss.  Enacting Mosaic law meant ignoring Roman law.

    3. The trap also threatened his popularity and legacy, forcing a choice between being just (and harsh) or merciful (and someone who ignored the Scriptures).  Either way, the people could turn on him.

But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger. 7 When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.” 8 Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.

9 At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there. 10 Jesus straightened up and asked her, “Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?”

11 “No one, sir,” she said.

“Then neither do I condemn you,” Jesus declared. “Go now and leave your life of sin.”

  1. “But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground…”

    1. Scripture doesn’t reveal what he wrote; the act itself is what matters.

      1. Jesus bent down and wrote on the ground instead of answering immediately, resisting their pressure and heightening tension.

      2. He stooped again to write after he spoke, refusing to intimidate them into doing what he wanted, leaving the decision to their consciences.

    2. This response affirms the law yet introduces a higher standard: justice must be administered by the just.

    3. This particular act has been interpreted in a variety of ways since the dawn of Christianity.  For more information on interpretive history, check out this article where I give a broad view of how interpreters have pondered why it tells us Jesus wrote without telling us what he wrote.
  2. “At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time…”

    1. One by one, they left, starting with the older first—perhaps recognizing their own sin more quickly through age and experience.

    2. Their departure was a silent confession, leaving Jesus alone with the woman.’

    3.  “I suppose that woman was the more terrified when she had heard it said by the Lord, He that is without sin of you, let him first cast a stone at her. But they, turning their thought to themselves, and by that very withdrawal having confessed concerning themselves, had left the woman with her great sin to Him who was without sin. And because she had heard this, He that is without sin let him first cast a stone at her, she expected to be punished by Him in whom sin could not be found.” -Augustine, Tractate 33, 6.
  3. “Go now and leave your life of sin.”

    1. Jesus forgives her for her sin, literally forgiving something worthy of death according to the Scriptures.  He also warns her that she needs to change.  This isn’t cheap grace.  There is abundant grace, but it asks everything.

    2. Christ’s character is like that wonderful meeting of truth and love in Ps 85:10: “Mercy and truth are met together; righteousness and peace have kissed each other.” (KJV)

    3. Jesus did not judge her that day, but not because he’s unwilling to judge.  Scripture teaches he will return to judge the living and the dead (2 Timothy 4:1). He is merciful and patient, awaiting repentance, yet a day of final judgment will come.

    4. Ultimately, each of us will stand before Jesus alone to hear the final verdict. Jesus is merciful, but he’s just.  He asks all of us to go and leave our life of sin.

Full Transcript

Here is your cleaned transcript. I have removed the timestamps, speaker tags, stutters, false starts, filler words, and transcription artifacts, while carefully preserving the speaker’s original wording, cadence, and sentence structure.

So we’re in John chapter 8 now. We just wrapped up John chapter 7. We have that one little passage, John chapter 7 verse 53, and well this particular passage there’s some controversy around it. And I was wondering months in advance, should I talk about this? Is this something that should be in Sunday morning worship? Because basically the thing of it is, here is a passage that’s got a bit of a history. It doesn’t appear in some of the oldest Greek manuscripts of the New Testament that we have, and in other ancient manuscripts it’s in a different place. Sometimes it’s in the book of Luke, sometimes it’s later on in John. What’s the deal? And this really is a matter of biblical scholarship, so I wondered for a while, do I even really need to bring it up on a Sunday morning? Or is this something we just get to the story as it is, and we don’t worry about that kind of thing?

I had actually resolved to just ignore it and move on until one of you, just a few weeks ago, asked me a question about textual variation in the New Testament. Now let me just tell you this: I have been in ministry for 10 years now, and in that 10 years, that is the first time someone has asked me a question like that, which to me is a very clear nudge from God. “Hey, you should talk about that. People need to know.” And I think it is important to talk about things like this together, because if we don’t talk about it in church, it doesn’t mean the knowledge isn’t out there. It just means the context that you might hear about it in might be a little more jarring than expected. I’ve met people that find out about textual variation and it shakes their faith because they say, “Well, I trust the Bible. There’s variation in it. What’s that about? Sounds like it’s not very trustworthy after all.”

Or sometimes people think that there’s some kind of conspiracy on the part of Bible translators to take out certain pieces that they don’t like or put in certain pieces that they do like. Now let me tell you, there are reputable Bible translators and translators that aren’t so reputable. I mean, this is a bit of a tricky area. There are some people that are good translators that sincerely want to get the word of God into your hands. But if we don’t know what they’re doing, we can’t really say for sure. So it does look like it could be a problem. But again, if we just follow the rules here, then we need to make sure that the translation is correct.

So then you know that John chapter 8, the earliest manuscripts don’t have that story. It was added later by the church. They didn’t tell you about that. I wonder why they want you to believe it, but don’t explain it to you. So you can see there’s good reasons to talk about this together.

So let’s talk about it. This story right here, this is a textual variance. And to explain that, you got to remember, we do not have the original gospel written by John with his own hands. We don’t have it. We don’t have any of the original New Testament documents. We don’t have any of Paul’s letters. We don’t have any of Peter’s writings. We just don’t have them—and not for any big wild crazy reason, it’s just they were written on paper. And things that are written on paper 2,000 years ago tend not to last 2,000 years. Trust me. I have a toddler in my house. There are some papers that don’t make it to the end of the week if I put them in the wrong place. Papers, and especially if you’re in a region that’s sometimes humid, if you’re dealing with documentation that is being handled often, or if you’re a part of a religious group that the authorities in the region are actively trying to suppress, your documents have a much lower chance of surviving all that long. So we don’t have them.

But the Bible is one of the most copied documents in all of history. And that’s true not only in the modern era but in the ancient era. We have thousands of manuscripts of the New Testament. What we do is we take those manuscripts that we have, and we compare them to one another to try to see what the original probably said. You have to keep in mind, they didn’t have printers back then. You couldn’t just print out a copy of the New Testament for someone. Let’s say I wanted to get a copy in the ancient world of the New Testament. Imagine copying the whole New Testament by hand. How often do you think, even if you’re being very, very careful—and we should assume that they were, right? This was Scripture. They took their job seriously. But how often during that process might you accidentally write something that’s a little different than what the original said? Nothing wild, but I don’t know. Have you ever made a typo? That’s what we’re talking about. That would count. Have you ever, maybe the original said Jesus did this and you just wrote he did this? That’s a textual variant. Any time someone did something a little different when they were copying it, that is a textual variant.

Now over 99% of textual variants we have from those ancient New Testament manuscripts aren’t really that big a deal. They’re not significant. For example, stuff like typos. Stuff like they said “he” instead of “Jesus.” The kind of thing that you can tell, we kind of get the story, someone made a mistake. Got it. Now less than 1% though are significant textual variance, and this is one of those. This story, like I said earlier, it doesn’t appear in the oldest Greek manuscripts that we have of the New Testament. And for that matter, in some of the other ones it appears in other places. Sometimes it appears in John chapter 21. Sometimes it appears in the book of Luke later on, sometimes it’s just in other places. Now where we have it in our Bibles today, this is the most common place for it to appear and by a pretty wide margin. But we do have these outliers, right? So what’s the deal? Was this a part of what John originally wrote or was it added later? Should we even consider this as part of the Bible?

And this is not a new question, by the way. Sometimes people think that we are so smart and so advanced today, we have found new things that no one knew about before. Not so. This is a question people have been asking since the fourth century. And you may wonder, well if they were talking about it in the fourth century, why not the first, second and third? The fourth century is when Christianity got legalized in the Roman Empire. It’s hard to get reliable records from before that point, because at any point, you might get killed and your papers burned. The fourth century is about the earliest you can reliably get really high quality Christian records. And sure enough, we can see a lot of people that were in the process of compiling scripture asking, “Where does this belong? Why do some of you have this in your Bibles and some of you don’t? And why is it in different places in some places? What’s the deal?”

And they ultimately decided that this did belong right where it’s at as a part of Scripture. And to this day, I would say the ultra majority, practically all of the Bible scholars that are orthodox, that are traditional, that are biblical agree with that. And here’s some of the reasons why they feel it’s that way. And the logic hasn’t changed wildly. Two of the things they really concern themselves with when it was the question, “Does this belong?” is first off, is it apostolic? And that just means did the person who wrote this actually know Jesus? Did this happen? Because there are a lot of people that wrote good Christian things. That doesn’t mean they’re scripture. Was this someone who was actually a part of that first generation of Christians that could write with the authority necessary to be in Scripture? And then, is it inspired by the Holy Spirit? And ultimately they determined that it was.

And here were some of the explanations they gave for why this belongs. I’ll give you two. These are different, but they both are, I think, sound explanations. So one popular theory is that this was written by John the apostle. This was written by his hand. The reason that certain very old documents don’t have it, especially Greek ones, is because in that region where it was being translated or copied, it was so scandalous that they didn’t want it written down! We get it. Jesus forgives sins. You don’t need to tell adulterous wives that they can get forgiven like that. We don’t need to write that one down. Let’s just leave that out and people will get the picture. That is one theory, that in certain regions, certain disloyal scribes and certain concerned powerful people got this one to not get copied in some of the documents we have. But ultimately it was copied in other regions, which is why eventually people noticed and ended up with a different version.

And added during the process of editing to the Gospel of John as they went through and were getting things ready. That’s why some of the earliest drafts of John may not have contained it, but that it was added later. There are people who would have had the authority necessary to do that without it being wildly controversial. For example, Simeon was the second bishop of Jerusalem. And Jude was the third bishop of Jerusalem. Both of them from the apostolic era, some of the longest living people from that era, who would have known Jesus and had that authority to say, “Hey, there’s a story that fits here.”

If you just want to know the story and you don’t need the story behind the story, you could have left this out. If that’s you, make this your takeaway: The Bible was written by people that were inspired by the Holy Spirit. The Bible was compiled by people who were incredibly faithful and asked the hard questions and did a lot of research to make sure that what they got into your hands is indeed good, inspired by the Holy Spirit, Scripture that can help you grow. If you ever hear about something getting snuck in and you don’t know how it got there, you don’t need to be afraid of asking questions, and you don’t need to be suspicious. People have asked all of these questions before. There is no grand conspiracy. There is no hope that people stay ignorant. To the contrary, there are many books written by people that if you wanted to know more, they would be delighted if you picked up and read. You don’t need to be afraid. Have faith. You never know when you run into these little instances what you might learn along the way.

But let me get to the story proper, right? And this is a story that is well loved. This is one that people really tend to know by heart. I think part of that being because it showcases Jesus’s mercy and his justice so well. Jesus is just and Jesus is merciful, and that’s kind of tough for us to wrap our minds around. We like things to fit entirely in one box or in another. We like things to be good or bad. We like things to be yes or a no. It’s really hard to hold two things that have some tension together. But Jesus was merciful and he was just, and this story is all about the Pharisees trying to get Jesus to pick: which are you really? Are you just or are you merciful? You can’t be both. And Jesus shows just how he is both.

And just as another minor note, I think it’s even interesting that the person that this is all about—the woman in question—even she evokes kind of this mix of is she in need of mercy or justice? Because ultimately we see someone who is very clearly being mistreated, that is in a situation that would be deeply humiliating, very publicly, that was nearly stoned. Our heart goes out to her and a lot of people read this as her being a stand-in for themselves, and I think that’s a good reading. We should do that because here’s the thing: that’s exactly what we are. We are indeed people who have not lived up to the covenant that we should have with God. We are people who have fallen short. We are every bit the same as this woman and every bit as in need of mercy. But I think it’s also important to remember this: she’s not innocent. They got her dead to rights. As much as she is worthy of mercy in these circumstances, remember, she tore her family apart. There is a spouse that she didn’t care about. There are kids that she wasn’t thinking about, and they have to deal with her mess. She may be worthy of mercy, but she’s also not innocent, much like us. We are guilty. Even if we hope that God will be merciful, we’re not perfect. We are worthy of punishment in many ways.

Let me dive in. So verse 53 of chapter 7, then they all went home, but Jesus went to the Mount of Olives. At dawn, he appeared again in the temple courts where all the people gathered around him, and he sat down to teach them. The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group and they said to Jesus, “Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery. In the law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?” They were using this as a trap in order to have a basis for accusing him.

Festival of Tabernacles is over. Jesus doesn’t go home; he instead goes just a little ways. He goes to the Mount of Olives. And the next day he comes back to Jerusalem, to the temple courts, where some of the people—not everyone left after the end of the festival—some people had been listening to what he was teaching. They liked it and they showed up again, because they were hoping he’d come and teach more. And sure enough, that’s exactly what Jesus did. He came back and he kept teaching those that wanted to be taught. And as he was teaching, he gets interrupted by the Pharisees and the teachers of the law. And they have this woman with them. They are dragging her with them. You got to imagine, this is the last place she wants to be. She doesn’t want to be there. She is being dragged in front of a crowd, being accused of adultery. There are some people that imagine that because it says she was caught in adultery, they propose, “Well how recently? Maybe she’s even disheveled looking. Maybe she’s even visually in a place that is humiliating.” The Bible doesn’t tell us whether that’s true or false. It’s possible, you’re welcome to think in terms of that if it helps you to kind of visualize it. But whether it’s true or false, who can say? All we really know is what the text gives us.

With the law of Moses, he could say, “You’re right. She should be stoned.” If he says that, he is guilty of breaking Roman law. Remember, Israel is under Roman occupation, and according to Roman law, no one can administer the death penalty except for Roman judges. That’s a big deal because it means that if Jesus were to say, “She’s guilty,” he would be guilty of violating Roman law and they could get him. But on the other hand, he has repeatedly publicly said that he is not violating the Law of the Land. So if they can get him to say that the law shouldn’t be kept, well, everyone can see this guy that says he’s so great, that says he keeps the law—you know what? He doesn’t actually do it. Not when it’s tough and not when it’s inconvenient. He only does it when he wants to. And now you can all see that he is a hypocrite. They’ve got him between two codes of law. Which one will he actually have loyalty for?

And this is more than just a legal problem. This is also about his legacy. Jesus is someone that so many people in the crowds have been able to relate to, someone that gets them. This is their guy! They trust him! This is a guy that is just and fair, every bit as just as you could hope. He keeps the law better than the Pharisees, but he also cares about them. He’s merciful, unlike them. He is right there with the people. Depending on how he answers this, now he has to choose: Are you just or are you merciful, Jesus? Are you going to show this crowd that you keep the law? Are you going to have this woman stoned? If so, they are going to remember forever that you had someone executed. You’re not so different from us. You’re just as harsh. You are just as rigorous. We don’t even do this, and we will do it because you told us to. You will be just, but you will be terrifying. Or, you can just shrug it off. You can say that we don’t need to do it. And everyone will see you are every bit the hypocrite that every other leader is, because being a leader is hard and sometimes you have to make tough decisions. And sometimes Jesus, when things get hard, makes bad decisions. Sometimes he’s not any better than the rest of us. He is merciful, sure. He’s got a big heart, but he’s not someone you can really trust to do what’s right when the time comes.

This is a legal problem and a problem for his legacy. And in true Jesus fashion, when he is given two choices and told, “You gotta pick one,” he picks a third option and takes that instead. It says, “Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger.” Can you imagine that? You are there. You are with a crowd. You have got people coming in, the Pharisees and the people that keep the law. They are demanding Jesus give an answer. You’ve got this woman who looks scared to death. Maybe she’s going to die today. She’s being held there. You’ve got a crowd sitting on the edge of their seats, waiting for Jesus to answer. He is interrupted in the middle of his teachings and he sits there, he looks up at them, and he just starts writing on the ground.

And people have wondered since the very beginning, what did he write? And I have heard every theory under the sun. And I am here to tell you the actual correct answer: We don’t know! The Bible doesn’t say that! It’s not in there! We can’t tell what he wrote. A lot of fanciful theories, but none of them are actually grounded in the Bible. The Bible only says that he was writing, not what he wrote. And that tells us something, right? It’s not what he wrote that mattered; it was the fact that he was writing. That’s the takeaway. What is Jesus showing by writing in the dirt at a moment like this? Certainly not a lot of respect for the Pharisees. “Jesus, we’re going to interrupt your teaching. You have to make a decision. Tell us what you want done.” He just goes off, kind of does his own thing, doesn’t look up. He does not answer to the Pharisees. They are not his boss!

And they get irritated by that, right? They don’t know what to do with him. They don’t let it go. Verse 7, “When they kept questioning…” They badger him. They came in here to make a power play, and now they’re the ones that look silly because they got to wait on him. “When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, ‘Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.'”

Justice should be administered, you’re right. But wouldn’t it be unjust to have someone that is not just administering justice? That would be ridiculous. We need to make sure that whoever executes this punishment is someone that doesn’t themselves need punished. So whoever it is that you’re absolutely confident that after this is done, we’re not going to have another thing where you yourself get in trouble, if that’s you, go for it. Administer justice.

And look, even after that, again he stooped down and wrote on the ground. Such an interesting detail because it kind of shows us Jesus is not eyeing down the crowd, right? This is not intimidation. He’s not up there saying, “He who is without sin throw the first stone.” That’s not what he’s doing. This is not a show of intimidation. He is going back to what he was doing. How the crowd responds is based entirely on them. What are they going to do?

One by one, they walk away. And it tells us that it is the older ones first. It’s just an interesting detail because not always, but often, older people have more experience in life and work. Sometimes the younger generation has new ideas and approaches—they know what’s supposed to be there, and they are often dissatisfied with the way things currently are. But sometimes in that pursuit of the ideal, they have not taken enough time to know the way the world is and why it got that way, and the details in all of it. There’s wisdom in knowing that, and that is why some of the older people, I would guess, are the first to recognize, “I’m sinful.” And they walk away. And one by one, people see their example and they also walk away. Their footsteps are their confession. Even the Pharisees walk away until it is just Jesus and this woman.

You got to wonder what she’s thinking, especially if she has heard what’s going on in Jerusalem lately, what happened just a few days before at the festival. In John chapter 7 verse 18, Jesus said, “Whoever speaks on their own does so to gain personal glory, but he who speaks for the glory of the one who sent him is a man of truth. There is nothing false about him. Has not Moses given you the law? Yet, not one of you keeps the law. Why are you trying to kill me?” He said in no uncertain terms before a crowd that could accuse him if he was wrong, “I am beyond reproach. You don’t keep the law; I do. There is no falsehood in me.” He said let he who is without sin throw the first stone. This is the man who claims to be without sin, and she is in front of him. Other people may not want to throw that stone, but if he wants to, he could. He reserves that right as the person who has not sinned. What’s he going to do?

Jesus straightened up and asked her, “Where are they? Has no one condemned you?”

“No one, sir.”

“Then neither do I condemn you,” Jesus declared.

There’s that mercy. There’s the mercy that we all crave to see from Jesus. Here is a woman—they’ve got her dead to rights. She has obliterated her family life. She has been trotted in front of leaders and the populace. We don’t know what kind of social outcast she is going to spend the future of her life as. She is someone who is so clearly guilty of something where the punishment in the law is death, and people seemed eager to administer it just moments ago, and Jesus has mercy on her. There is no sin that is so big that Jesus is done with us. We cannot sin so many times that it’s just a lost cause because at this point—come on, you said you were done 50 times ago, you come forward again, God’s not going to waste his time on you anymore. No.

The classic image of mercy: Jesus is the father in the parable of the prodigal son. God is waiting for us to return, even after we make mistake after mistake. God doesn’t give up on us. He waits. He waits for us to come home. God is merciful. He does not condemn her.

Yet he ends on a note of justice: “Go now and leave your life of sin.” Jesus doesn’t say it’s not that big a deal, people get bent out of shape about this kind of thing. He doesn’t say, “I get it, take your time to get to a comfortable place, I’m sure you’re going to figure this out as things go on.” Jesus says, “Go and sin no more.” It matters. It makes a big difference, what we do and the way we live our lives. God is merciful, but God is also just. He’s not just going to ignore the things that are uncomfortable. And ultimately, he may not have judged today, but even right there in the Scriptures, Second Timothy chapter 4 verse 1—this is what we say every week when we say the Apostles Creed, right?—Jesus will come back and judge the living and the dead. He will judge. He didn’t that day, but he will ultimately.

In our lives as we live them, there are so many people that want to give their two cents. They want to say what they think you should be doing. They want to say where you’re right and where you’re wrong. And sometimes they might be right and sometimes they might be wrong. Everybody’s got an opinion; there’s always a crowd. But in the end that crowd will diminish. And in the end, all of us will stand in front of Jesus awaiting the words, “Well done, my good and faithful servant,” or “Depart from me, I never knew you.” Jesus will judge. He did not judge this woman yet. He is merciful, he is longsuffering, he will wait day after day, year after year, sin after sin in the hopes that we will repent and return to him. But there does come a day where there are no more days left. There does come a time where there will be judgment.

I’ve done enough funerals lately that it seems especially obvious, the seriousness of life, the fact that we don’t have infinite chances. As much as we might sometimes like to see God as purely merciful, as purely delightful, as purely this big comfy guy that just says, “Don’t worry about it, you can wait till next week, it’s fine”—someday there’s not going to be a next week. Jesus is merciful, but he’s just. Go and leave your life of sin.

Amen.

John 7 Commentary

From the Pulpit—Video & Full Transcript

John 7:1-13 Preparing for the Festival of Tabernacles
John 7:14-36 Teaching at the Festival of Tabernacles
John 7:37-52 The Last Day of the Feast of Tabernacles

Commentary

7 After this, Jesus went around in Galilee. He did not want to go about in Judea because the Jewish leaders there were looking for a way to kill him. 2 But when the Jewish Festival of Tabernacles was near, 3 Jesus’ brothers said to him, “Leave Galilee and go to Judea, so that your disciples there may see the works you do. 4No one who wants to become a public figure acts in secret. Since you are doing these things, show yourself to the world.” 5For even his own brothers did not believe in him.

  1. “After this, Jesus went around in Galilee…”

    1. Jerusalem was an urban, high-population density area, but Galilee was a rural region.  The tendrils of the Jewish leaders were much less likely to strike at Jesus while he was in this peripheral area.

    2. Jesus didn’t go to this region out of cowardice.  To the contrary, he knew he was headed towards the cross, but it wasn’t time for that yet.  Jesus knew that God’s appointed timing (referred to as kairos in Greek) didn’t always follow the first given opportunity in linear, human time (chronos in Greek).  This is a strategic and obedient waiting, not a fearful retreat.

    3. “He withdrew too now to Galilee, because the hour of His passion was not yet come; and He thought it useless to stay in the midst of His enemies, when the effect would only have been to irritate them the more.” -Theophylact, Explanation on the Gospel of John, Ch. 7.

  2. “…the Jewish Festival of Tabernacles was near…”

    1. The Festival of Tabernacles, known in Hebrew as Sukkot, was one of the three great festivals where Jewish men were commanded to make a pilgrimage to Jerusalem. There are several important aspects to this festival:

      1. Harvest Celebration– It was a joyous harvest festival, occurring after the crops had been gathered. This timing meant people had the resources and the time to make the pilgrimage.

      2. Historical Commemoration– The festival commemorated the 40 years the Israelites spent wandering in the wilderness after the Exodus from Egypt. During this time, they were sustained directly by God’s provision, such as manna from heaven.

      3. Ritual Practices– To remember that time of wandering and reliance on God, participants would build and dwell in temporary booths (sukkot) for the duration of the festival. This act of “camping” was a tangible reminder of God’s faithfulness despite their disloyalty.

      4. These themes all give a symbolic backdrop as Jesus, the ultimate fulfillment of God’s presence and provision, has come.

    2. “At the present time… we acknowledge that we are journeying in the wilderness… What is it to be in the wilderness? In the desert waste. Why in the desert waste? Because in this world, we thirst in a way that no water could quench. But yet, let us still thirst that we may be filled. For, “Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after righteousness, for they shall be filled,” (Matthew 5:6). And our thirst is quenched from the rock in the wilderness: for the Rock was Christ, and it was smitten with a rod that the water might flow.” -Augustine, Tractate 28, 9.

  3. Jesus’s Family and Siblings

    1. John 7:3-5 shows Jesus had brothers who did not believe in him during his ministry. His most prominent brother was James, later author of the Epistle of James in the Bible.
    2. Protestants and Catholics read this section very differently.  Protestants say that Jesus had brothers, whereas Catholics say that they were only Jesus’s cousins.
      1. The Catholic Interpretation 
        1. Doctrinally, Catholics believe in the perpetual virginity of Mary.
        2. This doctrine was formed in the late-second to early-third century, partially to defend the virgin birth from people who insisted that Mary probably had relations with Joseph or other men to have Jesus.

        3. Some early Christian myths dating from the same timeframe assert that Joseph married Mary at God’s request specifically to defend her and take care of her.  He was much older than her and never actually consummated their marriage.

        4. Note that this interpretation evolved to counter the claims of non-Christians against the Bible, but it goes beyond the Bible’s claims to defend the Bible.

      2. Protestant Interpretation

        1. The Greek word used in this instance is adelphoi (ἀδελφοί ), literally “brothers.” Etymologically, the word comes from a (together with) and delphys (womb) to create a word that would literally be something like, “from the same womb.”

        2. While adelphoi can be metaphorical (Paul uses it in this sense throughout his epistles), the context here doesn’t fit a metaphor; these “brothers” taunt and doubt Jesus.  They certainly aren’t acting like comrades in any sense of the word.
        3. Another Greek word, anepsios (ἀνεψιός), specifically means “cousin.” It isn’t an uncommon word.  It appears in Colossians 4:10 (“Mark, the cousin of Barnabas”), in the Septuagint (Numbers 36:11), and in Josephus’s histories. If these men were Jesus’s cousins, John would have used that word to describe them.

      3. Theological Significance

        1. It matters whether Jesus had siblings because it shapes our understanding of holiness and Jesus’s life. Mary’s holiness is shown in being a normal wife and mother whom God used, ordinary people can be holy. You don’t need to go to a monastery and take a vow of celibacy to be holy.

        2. Jesus having unbelieving siblings who frustrated him means he experienced family conflict and can relate to those torn down by family rather than built up.

      4. [E]ven his brethren did not believe in him. Hence we infer how small is the value of carnal relationship…So much the more ridiculous is the superstition of Papists, who, disregarding everything else in the Virgin Mary, extol her only on the ground of relationship, bestowing on her the title of the Mother of God, as if Christ himself had not reproved the woman who exclaimed from the midst of the crowd, “‘Blessed is the womb that bore thee, and the breasts that suckled thee;’ for Christ replied, ‘Nay, rather, blessed are they who hear the word of God,’” (Luke 11:27-28)” -John Calvin, Commentary on John, John 7, 5.

6 Therefore Jesus told them, “My time is not yet here; for you any time will do. 7 The world cannot hate you, but it hates me because I testify that its works are evil. 8 You go to the festival. I am not going up to this festival, because my time has not yet fully come.” 9 After he had said this, he stayed in Galilee.

  1. “My time is not here yet…”

    1. Despite his brother’s taunting, Jesus prioritizes God’s timing over public or relational pressure.

    2. “[H]alf the power of: a Christian life depends upon its being timely. The bringing forth of fruit in due season is one of the marks of the tree planted by the rivers of water; and one of the signs of the Son of man, who delighted in the law of the Lord, was that he said, “My time is not yet full come.” When it did come, then he went.” -Charles Spurgeon, Spurgeon’s Verse Expositions on the Bible, John 7.

    3. Jesus’s response is unambiguous about the world’s evil and even implies that his brothers are complicit in it.  Why is he so fierce?  Because the conversation concerned his identity and work, which are critically important.

      1. Jesus models being both a “lamb” (gentle) and a “lion” (fierce and combative when necessary).

      2. Most of us naturally favor one role; we should learn from Jesus’s example to embody both.

10 However, after his brothers had left for the festival, he went also, not publicly, but in secret. 11 Now at the festival the Jewish leaders were watching for Jesus and asking, “Where is he?”

12 Among the crowds there was widespread whispering about him. Some said, “He is a good man.”

Others replied, “No, he deceives the people.” 13 But no one would say anything publicly about him for fear of the leaders.

  1. “…he went also, not publicly, but in secret…”
    1. Jesus chose to go to the festival secretly, but not because he was afraid.  He wanted to fulfill God’s command for devout Jews to go to Jerusalem, but he also wanted to honor God’s timing first and foremost.  Making a public statement to his brothers or to Jewish leadership would have pushed the timetable in an unhelpful way.

    2. By contrast, the crowds in Jerusalem are very afraid.  They whisper about Jesus, but they don’t dare to do it publicly because they’re worried about what the leaders might do.

    3. Do not let fear keep you from doing what God has commanded, but also don’t rush in recklessly.  If you feel unprepared, it may be a sign to wait for God’s timing.

    4. Pray, prepare, and gather the things that you need while you discern the right time to act.  Jesus didn’t ignore his mission while he waited on the Father’s timing.  He walked closely with the Father and understood when the time was right.

  1. “But who were those that did not speak of Him for fear of the Jews? Undoubtedly those who said, ‘He is a good man,’ not those who said, ‘He deceives the people.’ As for those who said ‘He deceives the people,’ their whispers were heard like the noise of dry leaves. ‘He deceives the people,’ they sounded more and more loudly.  ‘He is a good man,’ was whispered more and more quietly. But now, brothers, in spite of the fact that glory of Christ which will give us immortality has not yet come, but now I say, His Church so increases, He has clearly decided to spread his Gospel abroad throughout the whole world, so that it is now ‘He deceives the people,’ is only whispered, and and more and more loudly it sounds forth, ‘He is a good man.’” -Augustine, Tractate 28, 11.

14 Not until halfway through the festival did Jesus go up to the temple courts and begin to teach. 15The Jews there were amazed and asked, “How did this man get such learning without having been taught?”

  1. “Not until halfway through the festival…”

    1. Jesus came to the Festival of Tabernacles as a devout Jew following God’s commands, not as a public figure intending to do teachings or miracles, but he could not tolerate hearing falsehoods being taught.

    2. One can imagine all of the different sects of Judaism there that might have frustrated Jesus to the point that he had to speak up:

      1. The Sadducees and their denial of the afterlife.

      2. The Pharisees and their hyper-fixation on the law.

      3. The Essenes and their ritualistic apocalypticism.

      4. The Zealots and their anti-Roman fervor.

      5. Some would-be political messiah trying to drum up support.

    3. Truth was so important to Jesus that he had to speak, even when the world longed for him to be silent.

  2. “How did this man get such learning…”

    1. Jesus’s teachings were profound to the crowd.  Given their location, there’s no doubt that they had heard other highly-educated rabbis speak, but Jesus’s teachings seem to have made all others look like little children in comparison.

    2. Unlike other rabbis in his era like Rabbi Hillel and Rabbi Shammai, Jesus did not cite others at length.  He taught with authority because he was God, the ultimate source of truth.  Who could he have possibly quoted that would add even an ounce of authority to the divine “I am?”

    3. Some did seem concerned that Jesus did not possess a traditional rabbinic education.  Typically, there was a lengthy apprenticeship (up to ten years) under an established rabbi.

    4. There can be no doubt that education is valuable, but the purpose of any education is to find truth, which is more important than any formal credentials or accolades.  Jesus himself was the truth.  Nothing could add to what he already embodied.

16 Jesus answered, “My teaching is not my own. It comes from the one who sent me. 17 Anyone who chooses to do the will of God will find out whether my teaching comes from God or whether I speak on my own. 18 Whoever speaks on their own does so to gain personal glory, but he who seeks the glory of the one who sent him is a man of truth; there is nothing false about him. 19 Has not Moses given you the law? Yet not one of you keeps the law. Why are you trying to kill me?”

Jesus proves that his knowledge is legitimate in three different ways

  1. Scripture: “My teaching is not my own…”

    1. The Israelites had the word of God with them in the Old Testament Scriptures.  To verify Jesus’s teachings, they could literally check to see if Christ’s words were his own, or if they aligned with the word of God.

    2. Early Christians constantly pointed to the Old Testament for evidence of God’s coming work in Christ.

      1. In his famous Dialogue with Trypho, Justin Martyr (a Christian) debates a Jew named Trypho and uses the Old Testament extensively to persuade him of Christ’s divinity.

      2. “If I undertook to prove this by doctrines or arguments of man, you should not bear with me. But if I quote frequently Scriptures, and so many of them, referring to this point, and ask you to comprehend them, you are hard-hearted in the recognition of the mind and will of God.” -Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho, Ch. 68.

      3. The ultimate authority for teaching is Scripture, not any degree or certification

        1. “In the Bible we have a perfect library, and he who studies it thoroughly will be a better scholar than if he had devoured the Alexandrian Library entire”. -Charles Spurgeon, Lectures to my Students, Lecture XIII.
    1.  
  1. Action: “Anyone who chooses to do the will of God will find out whether my teaching comes from God.”

    1. He tied knowledge to lived experience, asserting real knowledge changes one’s life.  In embodying his teachings, you could feel the power of God.

    2. Many people carry strange pet conspiracy theories about the world, but these theories go unacted on.  They aren’t real enough to affect a life, and so they are not really real at all.”

    3. Choosing to pray, to read Scripture, and to ask God for help are often significant moments where someone who is only theorizing about being a Chrisitan sees the power of God.  Living like a Chrisitan shows the power of God in your life.

    4. Wesley famously emphasized the value of living the will of God to understand it better.  In his commentary, he notes on this verse: “This is a universal rule, with regard to all persons and doctrines. He that is thoroughly willing to do it, shall certainly know what the will of God is.”

  2. Personal Witness- “He who seeks the glory of the one who sent him is a man of truth. There is nothing false about him.”

    1. Jesus’s motivations are selfless.  He’s putting himself at risk to teach, rather than others who taught for personal glory.

    2. Christ’s life was so blameless and obviously beyond reproach.  He’s so confident in this fact that he asks the crowd why they dare to attack him when they all break the law.

20“You are demon-possessed,” the crowd answered. “Who is trying to kill you?”

21 Jesus said to them, “I did one miracle, and you are all amazed. 22 Yet, because Moses gave you circumcision (though actually it did not come from Moses, but from the patriarchs), you circumcise a boy on the Sabbath. 23 Now if a boy can be circumcised on the Sabbath so that the law of Moses may not be broken, why are you angry with me for healing a man’s whole body on the Sabbath? 24 Stop judging by mere appearances, but instead judge correctly.”

  1. “You are demon-possessed…Who is trying to kill you?”
    1. In this particular instance of Scripture, “are you demon possessed,” might translate to something like, “Are you crazy?”  They’re saying that Jesus is wildly inconsistent with reality.

    2. In verse 13, they deliberately stayed quiet about Jesus because they were afraid of the leaders that wanted to kill him.  They know.

    3. The crowd would rather be comfortable than brave.  Openly admitting that the leaders are corrupt would be life-shattering, so they claim Jesus is crazy rather than affirming what their hearts know is true.

  1. “…you circumcise a boy on the Sabbath.”
    1. Circumcision is a ritual that does a small amount of damage to someone to keep the law of God.  This was allowable on a Sunday.

    2. Jesus healed someone on a Sunday and got in trouble.  If a small amount of pain is tolerable for God’s sake on the Sabbath, why is a miraculous healing inappropriate?  The logic is inconsistent.

    3. “By this example he defends his action, although he does not merely argue from what is similar, but draws a comparison between the greater and the less. There was this similarity between circumcision and the cure of the paralytic, that both were works of God; but Christ maintains that the latter is more excellent, because the benefit of it extends to the whole man. Now if he had merely cured the man of bodily disease, the comparison would not have been applicable; for circumcision would have greater excellence as to the cure of the soul. Christ, therefore, connects the spiritual advantage of the miracle with the outward benefit granted to the body; and on this account he justly prefers to circumcision the entire cure of a man.” -John Calvin, Commentary on John, Ch. 7, 188.

25 At that point some of the people of Jerusalem began to ask, “Isn’t this the man they are trying to kill? 26 Here he is, speaking publicly, and they are not saying a word to him. Have the authorities really concluded that he is the Messiah? 27 But we know where this man is from; when the Messiah comes, no one will know where he is from.”

28 Then Jesus, still teaching in the temple courts, cried out, “Yes, you know me, and you know where I am from. I am not here on my own authority, but he who sent me is true. You do not know him, 29 but I know him because I am from him and he sent me.”

30 At this they tried to seize him, but no one laid a hand on him, because his hour had not yet come. 31 Still, many in the crowd believed in him. They said, “When the Messiah comes, will he perform more signs than this man?”

  1. “Have the authorities really concluded that he is the Messiah?”

    1. Some in Jerusalem wondered if the authorities believed Jesus was the Messiah since he spoke publicly unhindered.

    2. They dismissed this based on a folk belief that the Messiah’s origin would be unknown, while they knew Jesus was born in Bethlehem, failing to search the Scriptures, which do prophesy his birthplace (Micah 5:2 )

  2. “Yes, you know me, and you know where I am from…”

    1. “Therefore Christ asks in a tone of sarcasm: “‘You know where I come from?  How well you know it!  For because you do not know him who sent me, how could you know me and know where I come from?  To be sure, you know that I was to come from Nazareth, from Galilee and Judea, and that is true; but that is not enough to know about my origin.’” -Martin Luther, The Fifth Sermon on John 7, (1531).

  3. “no one laid a hand on him, because his hour had not yet come.”

    1. When the crowd finally grasped beyond a doubt that Jesus was climbing to be the Son of God from Heaven, they dashed to seize him!  Their logic had failed at every turn, and so they resorted to force.  There was no room for convenient ignorance about his claimed title and purpose.

  4. “Still, many in the crowd believed in him.”

    1.  “There was a certain crowd of people which quickly saw its own sickness, and without delay recognized His remedy.” -Augustine of Hippo, Tractate 31, 7.

32 The Pharisees heard the crowd whispering such things about him. Then the chief priests and the Pharisees sent temple guards to arrest him.

33Jesus said, “I am with you for only a short time, and then I am going to the one who sent me. 34 You will look for me, but you will not find me; and where I am, you cannot come.”

35 The Jews said to one another, “Where does this man intend to go that we cannot find him? Will he go where our people live scattered among the Greeks, and teach the Greeks? 36What did he mean when he said, ‘You will look for me, but you will not find me,’ and ‘Where I am, you cannot come’?”

  1. “Will he go where our people live scattered among the Greeks…”

    1. The leaders ensure that willful ignorance returns to the crowd.  Despite Jesus talking about divine realms, they immediately pivot the conversation back to the earthly and interpret a meaning that isn’t at all rational in the conversation.
    2. “The Lord was indeed about to go to the Gentiles, not by His bodily presence, but still with His feet. What were His feet? Those which Saul desired to trample upon by persecution, when the Head cried out to him, ‘Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?’ (Acts 9:4).” -Augustine of Hippo, Tractate 31, 7.

37 On the last and greatest day of the festival, Jesus stood and said in a loud voice, “Let anyone who is thirsty come to me and drink. 

  1. The First Seven Days: Daily Water Libation Ritual

    1. During the Feast of Tabernacles, a water libation ritual was performed for the first seven days.

    2. A priest would carry a golden pitcher from the temple to the Pool of Siloam to fill it with water.  He would then go back to the temple, leading a celebratory procession on the way, and pour out the water on the temple’s altar alongside a little wine.

    3. The water symbolized gratitude for God’s provision in the past (especially how he provided for Israel during their time in the wilderness) and how he had provided the crops that they just harvested that year.

    4. The wine was a reminder that God had not just provided sustenance, but joy.

  2. The Last (Eighth) Day of the Feast

    1. On the eighth and final day, there is no water libation ritual.  Instead people pray for water for the coming year to nourish their crops.

    2. Jesus is standing up on a day that everyone is praying for water and using the metaphor of water to speak to people in a way that addresses exactly what they’re praying for.

    3. This is also the last day of the feast, so Jesus won’t have another opportunity to address this particular crowd of people.

    4. It’s easy to imagine how passionate his teaching would be on this particular date.  He’s like a pastor that’s giving one last heartfelt sermon to his congregation before he moves on.  “If there’s one thing to learn, here it is!  Please listen!”

    5. “On the last day. The first thing that ought to be observed here is, that no plots or intrigues of enemies terrified Christ, so as to cause him to desist from his duty; but, on the contrary, his courage rose with dangers, so that he persevered with greater firmness. This is proved by the circumstance of the time, the crowded assembly, and the freedom he used in exclaiming, while he knew that hands were stretched out on all sides to seize him; for it is probable that the officers were at that time ready to execute their commission.” -John Calvin, Commentary on John 7

  3. The Invitation: “Come to Me and Drink”

    1. “O blessed invitation, how sweet it should be to every thirsty soul! ‘If any man’ — prince or pauper, ‘any man’ — moral or utterly debauched, ‘if any man thirst, let him come unto me,’ — not to ordinances, nor to human priests, ‘let him come unto me, and drink,’ as much as he will “without money, and without price.” -Charles Spurgeon, Spurgeon’s Verse Expositions of the Bible, John 7.

    2. The invitation is broad and open to anyone.  It doesn’t matter how wealthy you are, or where you’re from, or what your heritage is.  There are a few prerequisites to answer the call, but it’s not about any of that.

    3. Prerequisite 1: Being Thirsty

      1. “The first prerequisite for a person to co me and drink is that they have to be thirsty.  In Scripture, thirst is commonly associated with a deep yearning for closeness with God: Ps 42:1-2, Psalm 63:1, Isaiah 55:1, Isa 65:13 etc.

      2. Sin has disrupted our relationship with God.  We aren’t in a good place with him naturally.  That’s why we yearn for the closeness that was lost at the dawn of humanity in Eden.

      3. Some people have been thirsty so long that they don’t even recognize it anymore.  They assume that deep emptiness is just normal, or they push it down by pursuing other things that will never fill the yearning in their heart, but might distract them and numb them for a time.

      4. There are many who call themselves Christians that still aren’t really thirsty for God.  They assume that a bit of church in their life or a spare prayer is enough God for them.   Jesus needs thirsty people to come and drink, not people who have had enough of him for now.

    4. Prerequisite 2: Taking Action

      1. If a person wants to come to Christ and drink, they have to actually act on that interest.  Even the thirstiest person stays thirsty if they sit by an oasis and refuse to drink.

      2. There is no amount of theorizing that can end in salvation.  Thinking can prime the pump, but until it is accompanied by action, it’s insufficient.

      3. Sometimes, we excuse delays in coming to Jesus.  Our life is too busy!  Too chaotic!  This just isn’t the right season for devotion.  We’ll get right with the Lord tomorrow.  There are a million excuses to delay action.

38 Whoever believes in me, as Scripture has said, rivers of living water will flow from within them.” 39 By this he meant the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were later to receive. Up to that time the Spirit had not been given, since Jesus had not yet been glorified.

  1. “Whoever believes in me, as Scripture has said, rivers of living water will flow from within them.”
    1. When John Wesley was banned from Anglican pulpits because of his “religious enthusiasm,”, he began field preaching and used this very verse to invite people to accept the gospel in his day.  His journal entry for April 8, 1739 reads: “About five thousand were in the afternoon at Rose Green (on the other side of Kingswood); among whom I stood and cried in the name of the Lord, “If any man thirst, let him come unto me and drink. He that believeth on me, as the Scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.”

  1. “…rivers of living water…”

    1. Those who “drink” of God’s grace become life-giving sources for others, helping quench spiritual thirst.

    2. Believers should ask how often they nourish others.  A true Christian doesn’t just take; they give to everyone freely.

  2. “By this he meant the Spirit…”

    1. “Yet we read of John the Baptist, He shall be filled with the Holy Ghost even from his mother’s womb. (Luke 1:15) And Zacharias was filled with the Holy Ghost, and prophesied. Mary was filled with the Holy Ghost, and prophesied of our Lord. And so were Simeon and Anna, that they might acknowledge the greatness of the infant Christ. We are to understand then that the giving of the Holy Spirit was to be certain, after Christ’s exaltation, in a way in which it never was before. It was to have a peculiarity at His coming, which it had not before. For we no where read of men under the influence of the Holy Spirit, speaking with tongues which they had never known, as then took place, when it was necessary to evidence His coming by sensible miracles.” (Augustine, De Trinitiate, iv. c. xx)

40 On hearing his words, some of the people said, “Surely this man is the Prophet.”

41 Others said, “He is the Messiah.”

Still others asked, “How can the Messiah come from Galilee? 42 Does not Scripture say that the Messiah will come from David’s descendants and from Bethlehem, the town where David lived?” 43 Thus the people were divided because of Jesus. 44 Some wanted to seize him, but no one laid a hand on him.

  1. “the people were divided because of Jesus.”

    1. Division appeared at every level: Jesus’ family (His brothers), the crowd, between leadership and the people, and within leadership itself (Nicodemus vs. other Pharisees).

    2. Jesus made it abundantly clear that he would not be a unifying force for the world.  To the contrary, he would divide it (Matthew 10:34-37).

    3. Unity within a group of people is no substitute for the real power of Christ being offered to us by him.  It can be complicated to determine when we need to come together, and when something demands that we act divisively to cling to Christ, but we’re called to that work.

    4. A very large church going through the United/Global Methodist split once said that regardless of what the denomination’s official stance on Scripture or same sex marriage was, they would not leave the denomination because, “Division is not a kingdom reality.”  One can only wish that they were around to correct Jesus’s divisiveness, much less Paul’s constant concern about churches following false doctrine  that draws them away from Christ (Acts 20:29-30, 2 Corinthians 11:4).

  2. “How can the Messiah come from Galilee?”

    1. Some people object that he can’t be the messiah because he’s not from Bethlehem (Micah 5:2) and not a descendant of David (Isaiah 11:1).  Jesus is both of these things, but they don’t bother to ask him to clarify.

    2. They use their concerns to keep a distance between themselves and Jesus, rather than recognizing them as an opportunity to seek the truth.

    3. “And how could they forget that Jesus was born [in Bethlehem]? Had not Herod given them terrible reason to remember it?” (John Wesley, Notes on the NT, John 7)

45 Finally the temple guards went back to the chief priests and the Pharisees, who asked them, “Why didn’t you bring him in?”

46 “No one ever spoke the way this man does,” the guards replied.

  1. “No one ever spoke the way this man does.”

    1. Temple guards, specifically loyal to the Sanhedrin, were sent earlier (Jn 7:32).  One must imagine that this was not the first man they’d ever arrested on the Sanhedrin’s orders!  But in spite of their loyalty, they can’t bring themselves to arrest Jesus.

    2. They were captivated by His words, which rang true.  They could not seize Him. God was at work in their hearts.

    3. “The Pharisees and Scribes profited nothing by seeing the miracles, and reading the Scriptures; but their officers, who had done neither, were captivated with once hearing Him; and they who went to take hold of Him, were themselves taken hold of by the miracle. Nor did they say, We could not because of the multitude: but made themselves proclaimers of Christ’s wisdom: The officers answered, Never man spake like this Man.” -John Chrysostom, Hom. lii. 1

47 “You mean he has deceived you also?” the Pharisees retorted. 48 “Have any of the rulers or of the Pharisees believed in him? 49 No! But this mob that knows nothing of the law—there is a curse on them.”

  1. The Pharisees’ Reaction

    1. The Pharisees answer with classism, calling the people a “stupid mob,” ignorant of the law and deceived.

    2. They argue none of the rulers or Pharisees believe in Jesus, which is is quickly proven false as Nicodemus is just about to speak in  his favor.

    3. They dismissed the guards’ experience, telling them to stop thinking and simply obey.

50 Nicodemus, who had gone to Jesus earlier and who was one of their own number, asked, 51 “Does our law condemn a man without first hearing him to find out what he has been doing?”

52 They replied, “Are you from Galilee, too? Look into it, and you will find that a prophet does not come out of Galilee.”

  1. “Does our law condemn a man without first hearing him to find out what he has been doing?”

    1. Nicodemus’s, who previously spoke with Jesus in John 3, speaks up to defend him.

    2. Nicodemos’s defense isn’t even particularly intense.  He asks only that others investigate Jesus before condemning him, as is required by law.

    3. The Pharisees mock him: “Are you from Galilee too?” implying he’s a country bumpkin like the others that favor Jesus and certainly not one of them.

    4. “Nicodemus indeed knew, or rather believed, that if only they were willing to give Him a patient hearing, they would perhaps become like those who were sent to take Him, but preferred to believe. They answered from the prejudice of their heart.” -Augustine, Tractate 33, 2.

  2. They claim, “a prophet does not come out of Galilee,” despite the fact that Jonah was a historical prophet that was indeed from Galilee.  Their bias prevents them from seeing obvious truths in front of them.
  1.  

John 6 Commentary

From the Pulpit—Video & Full Transcript

John 6:1-15: The Feeding of the Five Thousand
John 6:16-24 Jesus Walks on Water
John 6:25-40 The Bread of Life
John 6:41-71 Who Can Accept It?

Commentary

6 Some time after this, Jesus crossed to the far shore of the Sea of Galilee (that is, the Sea of Tiberias), 2 and a great crowd of people followed him because they saw the signs he had performed by healing the sick.

 3 Then Jesus went up on a mountainside and sat down with his disciples. 4 The Jewish Passover Festival was near.

  1. “a great crowd of people followed him”

    1. Notice that the crowd followed Jesus out into the wilderness without any food to begin with.  One can’t help but be impressed by their devotion.

    2. “Here we see, in the first place, how eager was the desire of the people to hear Christ, since all of them, forgetting themselves, take no concern about spending the night in a desert place. So much the less excusable is our indifference, or rather our sloth, when we are so far from preferring the heavenly doctrine to the gnawings of hunger, that the slightest interruptions immediately lead us away from meditation on the heavenly life.” -John Calvin, Calvin’s Commentary on John

  2. “The Jewish Passover Festival was near.”

    1. This detail adds another interesting dimension to the miracle.  Passover commemorates the freedom of the Hebrew people from Egypt, after which people journeyed into the wilderness to reach the promised land.  In the wilderness, the people were sustained by miraculous bread from God.  At the upcoming feeding of the five thousand, here we are again, with people going into the wilderness and getting sustained by miraculous bread from God.  What God did once long ago, he does again here.

5 When Jesus looked up and saw a great crowd coming toward him, he said to Philip, “Where shall we buy bread for these people to eat?” 6 He asked this only to test him, for he already had in mind what he was going to do.

  1. The feeding of the five thousand is the only miracle, besides the resurrection, found in all four Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John).

    1. “Therefore as to this miracle, since we have heard how great it is, let us also search how profound it is; let us not only be delighted with its surface, but let us also seek to know its depth. This miracle, which we admire on the outside, has something within.” -Augustine, Tractate 24 on John, 2.

  2. The Book of Luke tells us that Jesus also taught and healed while he was in the wilderness with the crowd.

  3. “…to test him…”

    1. Notice that Scripture explicitly says that Jesus was testing Philip.  There’s intentionality behind his choice to go into the wilderness without food.  This is no accident.

    2. “Or to shew others it. He was not ignorant of His disciple’s heart Himself.” -Theophylact’s Commentary on John 

7 Philip answered him, “It would take more than half a year’s wages[a] to buy enough bread for each one to have a bite!”

  1. Philip failed the test by relying on earthly calculations, estimating more than a year’s wages would barely suffice. He focused on his capacity instead of Jesus’s.

8 Another of his disciples, Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother, spoke up, 9 “Here is a boy with five small barley loaves and two small fish, but how far will they go among so many?”

  1. Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother, isn’t mentioned in Scripture a lot, but when he is, he’s consistently bringing people to Jesus.

    1. John 1:40–42 Andrew meets Jesus and then runs to Simon to introduce him to Jesus as well.

    2. John 12:20-22 A group of Greeks are in Jerusalem for the passover and want to meet Jesus.  Philip turns to Andrew to make that introduction.

  2. “…five small barley loaves and two small fish…”

    1. Notice that the word “small” is used twice to emphasize just how insufficient this particular meal is.

    2. Barley, the cheapest grain (about a third the value of wheat), was “peasant food.” The meal was meager.  If this happened today, it may well have been five slices of Wonder Bread and a tin of tuna.

10 Jesus said, “Have the people sit down.” There was plenty of grass in that place, and they sat down (about five thousand men were there). 11 Jesus then took the loaves, gave thanks, and distributed to those who were seated as much as they wanted. He did the same with the fish.

  1. “(about five thousand men were there)”

    1. The crowd numbered at least 5,000 men, not including women and children—possibly totaling 7,000 to 15,000.

  2. Notice the three steps that Jesus takes:

      1. Took: Jesus took the loaves and fish, signaling that God’s work often involves offering what we have to him. God desires human participation in his work.

      2. Gave Thanks: Jesus gives thanks for the tiny insufficient meal.  In his hands, it is more than enough.  Sometimes, we may feel insufficient, but the way God sees us is different.  In his hands, we are more than enough.

      3. Distributed: He distributed the food, and everyone ate “as much as they wanted.”  In God, there isn’t just enough.  There’s MORE than enough.

12 When they had all had enough to eat, he said to his disciples, “Gather the pieces that are left over. Let nothing be wasted.” 13 So they gathered them and filled twelve baskets with the pieces of the five barley loaves left over by those who had eaten.

  1. “…twelve baskets…”

    1. The miracle of Jesus doesn’t just give people enough; it gives them more than enough.

    2. “[W]hy did He give the fragments to His disciples to carry away, and not to the multitude? Because the disciples were to be the teachers of the world, and therefore it was most important that the truth should be impressed upon them.” – Chrysostom, Hom. xlii. 3

14 After the people saw the sign Jesus performed, they began to say, “Surely this is the Prophet who is to come into the world.”

 15 Jesus, knowing that they intended to come and make him king by force, withdrew again to a mountain by himself.

  1. “Surely this is the Prophet who is to come into the world.”

    1. “He was the Lord of the prophets, the fulfiller of the prophets, the sanctifier of the prophets, but yet a prophet also: for it was said to Moses, I will raise up for them a prophet like you. Like, according to the flesh, but not according to the majesty…. And the Lord says of Himself, A prophet is not without honor, except in his own country. (Jn 4:44)” -Augustine, Tractate 24 on John, 7.

  2. “…they intended to come and make him king by force…”
    1. They wanted to make Jesus an earthly king by force, likely expecting him to overthrow Romans and fix their economy.  They saw Jesus as a tool to achieve their goals.

    2. There are also many people today who want to harness God for their own personal gain.  Preachers of the “prosperity gospel” make all kinds of claims about how God will give people exactly what they want if they only respond in the way that the preacher is insisting they should.

    3. Rather than trying to make God follow our agenda, we need to serve His.

    4. Be hungry for the bread of life, not just a life of bread.

16 When evening came, his disciples went down to the lake, 17 where they got into a boat and set off across the lake for Capernaum. By now it was dark, and Jesus had not yet joined them. 18 A strong wind was blowing and the waters grew rough. 19 When they had rowed about three or four miles, 

  1. “…they got into a boat and set off…”

    1. Why did Jesus send his disciples away from the crowd while he went to the mountain? Knowing that the crowd had differed from Christ’s teachings so much that he had to remove himself, it is likely he wanted his disciples exposed to the same tempting thought patterns.

    2. The crowd preferred the gift to the giver.  The disciples left their company, assuring that their thoughts would not start to drift towards their way of thinking.

  2. “A strong wind was blowing and the waters grew rough.”

    1. The Sea of Galilee, 600 feet below sea level and surrounded by mountains, is prone to sudden, strong winds and storms.

    2. “Darkness was increasing, discernment was diminishing, iniquity was growing. When, therefore, they had rowed about twenty-five or thirty furlongs. Meanwhile they struggled onward, kept advancing; nor did those winds and storms, and waves and darkness effect either that the ship should not make way, or that it should break in pieces and founder; but amid all these evils it went on.” -Augustine, Tractates on the Gospel of John, 25, 6.

  3. …they had rowed about three or four miles…”

    1. The disciples rowed all night (six to eight hours) in a brutal storm and only reached halfway across the sea (about three to four miles).

    2. This struggle wasn’t some sort of punishment; Jesus Himself sent them into the storm.  He has something to teach them here.

    3. Even though the disciples couldn’t see Jesus, Mark 6:48 explicitly says that Jesus was watching them straining at the oars from the top of the mountain and praying for them.  He never took his eyes off them.

they saw Jesus approaching the boat, walking on the water; and they were frightened. 20 But he said to them, “It is I; don’t be afraid.” 21 Then they were willing to take him into the boat, and immediately the boat reached the shore where they were heading.

  1. “It is I; don’t be afraid.”

    1. Strangely, they are afraid of the very thing that can save them.  The glory of Christ on the water is a sight they can’t fully comprehend at this point in their lives.

    2. “[T]he interior effect was fear; and therefore the fear of the disciples, conceived from Christ’s sudden appearance, is set forth when it says: ‘and they were afraid’ — either with a good fear, because it was caused by humility; ‘Do not be haughty, but fear’ (Romans 11:20). Or with an evil fear, because, as is said in Matthew 14:26, they thought him to be a ghost. ‘They trembled with fear where there was no fear’ (Psalm 13:5 [Vulgate numbering]). For fear especially belongs to carnal people, who shrink back from spiritual things.” -Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on John, Ch. 6, 882.

  2. Here, Matthew’s Gospel mention’s Peter’s attempt to walk on water (Matt. 14:22-33), which is an incredible act of faith, even though he faltered.

  3. “Then they were willing to take him into the boat, and immediately the boat reached the shore where they were heading.”
    1. Jesus waited until the disciples were willing to take Him into the boat. He doesn’t force His way in; He waits for an invitation.

    2. The moment Jesus entered the boat, they “immediately” reached the shore.  This is a second miracle, which shows the the power of letting Jesus take control.

22 The next day the crowd that had stayed on the opposite shore of the lake realized that only one boat had been there, and that Jesus had not entered it with his disciples, but that they had gone away alone. 23 Then some boats from Tiberias landed near the place where the people had eaten the bread after the Lord had given thanks. 24 Once the crowd realized that neither Jesus nor his disciples were there, they got into the boats and went to Capernaum in search of Jesus.

  1. “Our Lord, though He did not actually shew Himself to the multitude walking on the sea, yet gave them the opportunity of inferring what had taken place; The day following, the people which stood on the other side of the sea saw that there was none other boat there, save that one whereinto His disciples were entered, and that Jesus went not with His disciples into the boat, but that His disciples were gone away alone. What was this but to suspect that He had walked across the sea, on His going away? For He could not have gone over in a ship, as there was only one there, that in which His disciples had entered; and He had not gone in with them.” -Chrysostom, Hom. xliii. 2.

25 When they found him on the other side of the lake, they asked him, “Rabbi, when did you get here?”

  1. Realizing Jesus didn’t board the disciples’ boat, the crowd searches both shores and eventually finds Him teaching in the synagogue at Capernaum (John 6:59). They may not fully understand what Jesus is trying to teach them, but there’s no doubt as to their zeal!  They’ve come a long way to find Jesus.

26 Jesus answered, “Very truly I tell you, you are looking for me, not because you saw the signs I performed but because you ate the loaves and had your fill. 27 Do not work for food that spoils, but for food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. For on him God the Father has placed his seal of approval.”

  1. “Rabbi, when did you get here?”

    1. Jesus doesn’t answer the question with any of the expected data (what, when, where, why).  He gives an answer that’s entirely different from the question they asked!

    2. Sometimes, God leaves questions unanswered, even as He reveals himself to us.  There are always details that we won’t quite understand on this side of eternity, no matter how hard we search for them.

    3. When he was on his deathbed passing away, Thomas Aquinas, one of the most famed theologians in Christian history, said, “Everything I have written is but straw!”  If one of the deepest thinkers of God knew he knew nothing compared to the fullness of God’s revelation, how much can we claim to truly know the depths of God?

    4. We can’t understand everything, but we can be humble enough to accept what we’ve been given and trust it given its source.

  2. “Very truly I tell you, you are looking for me, not because you saw the signs I performed but because you ate the loaves and had your fill.”

    1. Jesus explains their motive to them: they seek Him because his miracle gave them full bellies, not because they grasped the miracle’s meaning. They’re stopping so far short of what they could get!

    2. The problem isn’t wanting too much but too little.  They avoided hunger for an evening and are excited about that, when they could avoid death for an eternity.

    3. “It would seem that Our Lord finds our desires not too strong, but too weak. We are half-hearted creatures, fooling about with drink and sex and ambition when infinite joy is offered us, like an ignorant child who wants to go on making mud pies in a slum because he cannot imagine what is meant by the offer of a holiday at the sea. We are far too easily pleased.” -C.S. Lewis, The Weight of Glory

    4. “Not that he forbids his followers to labor that they may procure daily food; but he shows that the heavenly life ought to be preferred to this earthly life, because the godly have no other reason for living here than that, being sojourners in the world, they may travel rapidly towards their heavenly country.” -John Calvin, Commentary on John, 6.

28 Then they asked him, “What must we do to do the works God requires?”

29 Jesus answered, “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.”

  1. “What must we do…
      1. [T]hey said this, not that they might learn, and do them, but to obtain from Him another exhibition of His bounty. -Chrysostom, Homily xIv. 1.

  1. “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent”
    1. The belief that Jesus is talking about isn’t just an acknowledgement that he exists or any other sort of intellectual affirmation of the facts.  It’s trust.  This kind of belief is the kind that we mean when we tell someone we love, “I believe in you.”

    2. Laws are important, but they aren’t the core of the Christian life.  You don’t become a member of God’s family because you followed the rules well enough.  We’re adopted into the family of God through Christ.  We follow the law because we love our Father and trust him, not because it earns us our spot in his family..  

30 So they asked him, “What sign then will you give that we may see it and believe you? What will you do? 31 Our ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written: ‘He gave them bread from heaven to eat.’”

32 Jesus said to them, “Very truly I tell you, it is not Moses who has given you the bread from heaven, but it is my Father who gives you the true bread from heaven. 33 For the bread of God is the bread that comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.”

  1. “What sign then will you give that we may see it and believe you?”
     
    1. Even after they witnessed one of Christ’s miracles firsthand, they insist that they should get to see an even greater miracle so that Jesus can earn their trust.  Their ancestors saw this miracle!  It’s too old!  What’s something better that Jesus can offer up?

    2. They want to stay in control, rather than yield to Jesus.  Belief is less about evidence than most people think.  The inclination of the heart is more influential than any amount of evidence.

    3. Romans 1:20 explains that we’ve all seen enough evidence of God’s existence just by looking around creation: “For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.”  Even with more miracles, a resistant heart reinterprets signs as coincidence and asks for more.

  2. “it is not Moses who has given you the bread from heaven,”

    1. Jesus corrects an important detail: Moses didn’t give anyone bread from heaven.  God gave them bread from heaven, and he’s offering it to them again right now.

    2. “Therefore, both that manna signified this meat, and all those signs were signs of me. You have longed for signs of me; do ye despise Him that was signified? Not Moses then gave bread from heaven: God gives bread. But what bread? Manna, perhaps? No, but the bread which manna signified, namely, the Lord Jesus Himself. My Father gives you the true bread.” – Augustine, Tractate 25, 13.

    3. “‘But was it not true bread that their ancestors had in the desert?’
      I answer: If we define the true as defined against the false, then that bread was true, for the miracle of the manna was not false; but if we define the true as defined against the symbolic, then that bread was not true, but a symbol pointing to the spiritual bread, namely, our Lord Jesus Christ, whom the manna signified, as the Apostle says, 1 Cor. c. 10, 3: ‘all ate the same spiritual food.’” -Aquinas, Commentary on John, Lecture 4, 908

34 “Sir,” they said, “always give us this bread.”

35 Then Jesus declared, “I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never go hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty. 36 But as I told you, you have seen me and still you do not believe. 37 All those the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never drive away. 38 For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me. 39 And this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose none of all those he has given me, but raise them up at the last day. 40 For my Father’s will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day.”

  1. “I am the bread of life.”

    1. “He does not say, I am the bread of nourishment, but of life, for, whereas all things brought death, Christ hath quickened us by Himself. But the life here is not our common life, but that which is not cut short by death: He that cometh to Me shall never hunger; and He that believeth on Me shall never thirst.” -Theophylact, Commentary on John, Ch. 6

  2. “I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me.”
    1. Jesus isn’t there to do the crowd’s will or even his own will!  He lives to do the Father’s will.  And what is that will?  Giving eternal life to those given to him.

    2. God’s number one objective is solving the biggest problems: sin and death.  Daily issues matter, but they’re not nearly as big and don’t matter nearly as much as we think they do.

  3. “I shall lose none of all those he has given me, but raise them up at the last day.”

    1. “They therefore who by God’s unerring providence are foreknown, and predestined, called, justified, glorified, even before their new birth, or before they are born at all, are already the sons of God, and cannot possibly perish; these are they who truly come to Christ. By Him there is given also perseverance in good unto the end; which is given only to those who will not perish. Those who do not persevere will perish.” -Augustine, de Cor. et Gratia, c. ix.

    2. Life constantly throws new problems at us.  Even today’s solutions lead to tomorrow’s problems!  Bread today requires bread tomorrow.  Most problems and solutions are temporary.  Only God endures.

41 At this the Jews there began to grumble about him because he said, “I am the bread that came down from heaven.” 42 They said, “Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How can he now say, ‘I came down from heaven’?”

  1. The crowd doubted the evidence first, insisting that Jesus owed them a better miracle since their ancestors ate bread from Moses.  Now, they move from attacking the evidence to attacking his identity.

  2. “Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know?
    1. They grumble at Jesus’s claim to be the bread from heaven, questioning his origins: “Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph… How can he now say, I came down from heaven?”

    2. “These Jews were far off from the bread of heaven, and knew not how to hunger after it. They had the jaws of their heart languid; with open ears they were deaf, they saw and stood blind.” -Augustine, Tractate 26, 1.

43 “Stop grumbling among yourselves,” Jesus answered. 44 “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them, and I will raise them up at the last day. 45 It is written in the Prophets: ‘They will all be taught by God.’ Everyone who has heard the Father and learned from him comes to me. 46 No one has seen the Father except the one who is from God; only he has seen the Father. 47 Very truly I tell you, the one who believes has eternal life. 48 I am the bread of life. 49 Your ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness, yet they died. 50 But here is the bread that comes down from heaven, which anyone may eat and not die. 51 I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats this bread will live forever. This bread is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.”

  1. Christ’s Response

    1. Jesus answers their attack on his identity by explaining their doubt.  Why can’t they come to him?  Because the Father has not drawn them.  All of this is in the Father’s plan.

    2. Jesus is the only one able to see God.  He has knowledge in a way nobody else has.  Even Moses could only see God by hiding in a rock and seeing his back (Exodus 33:21-22).  Jesus is God and can see God in His fullness.

    3. He reiterates his promise: those who believe have eternal life.  Previous bread only delayed death.  Christ’s flesh will end it.

  2. “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them,”

    1. “[H]ave I not myself heard you say in your heart, ‘Jesus, Jesus, my whole trust Is in thee: I know that no righteousness of my own can save me, but only thou, O Christ, sink or swim, I cast myself on thee?’ Oh, my brother, thou art drawn by the Father, for thou couldst not have come unless he had drawn thee. Sweet thought! And if he has drawn thee, dost thou know what is the delightful inference? Let me repeat one text, and may that comfort thee: ‘The Lord hath appeared of old unto me, saying, I have loved thee with an everlasting love: therefore with lovingkindness have I drawn thee.’ Yes, my poor weeping brother, inasmuch as thou art now coming to Christ, God has drawn thee; and inasmuch as he has drawn thee, it is a proof that he has loved thee from before the foundation of the world. Let thy heart leap within thee, thou art one of his.” -Charles Spurgeon, “Human Inability,” Mar. 7, 1858.

52 Then the Jews began to argue sharply among themselves, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”

53 Jesus said to them, “Very truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. 54 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day. 55 For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. 56 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in them. 57 Just as the living Father sent me and I live because of the Father, so the one who feeds on me will live because of me. 58 This is the bread that came down from heaven. Your ancestors ate manna and died, but whoever feeds on this bread will live forever.” 59 He said this while teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum.

  1. First, they doubted the evidence, telling Jesus that their ancestors got bread from Moses and they deserved a better miracle.  Second, they doubted his identity, insisting that he was just the son of Joseph, not anyone from heaven.  Now, they doubt his message, claiming that he’s not even coherent.

  2. “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”

    1. The crowd fixates on a highly literal objection: “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” even though Jesus speaks in a metaphor that points towards a profound spiritual reality.

      1. This rejection is very similar to when Nicodemos objected to Jesus’s language about being “born again” in John 3:4.
          
  3. Jesus doesn’t back down; he doubles down: “Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you… my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink.”  He has no interest in slowly chipping away at his message to accommodate people who have no real interest in it.

    1. “Unless ye eat the flesh of the Son of man – Spiritually: unless ye draw continual virtue from him by faith. Eating his flesh is only another expression for believing.”  -John Wesley, John Wesley’s Explanatory Notes of the NT, Jn 6.

    2. “It should be noted that this can refer either to spiritual eating or to sacramental eating. If it refers to spiritual eating, there is no doubt about the application… However, if it is applied to sacramental eating, a problem arises… since in the one receiving the Eucharist actual reverence and devotion are required, which those who do not have the full use of reason, such as children and the mentally ill, do not have, and therefore it is in no way to be given to them.” -Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on John, Lecture 7, 969.

60 On hearing it, many of his disciples said, “This is a hard teaching. Who can accept it?”

61 Aware that his disciples were grumbling about this, Jesus said to them, “Does this offend you? 62 Then what if you see the Son of Man ascend to where he was before! 63 The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you—they are full of the Spirit and life. 64 Yet there are some of you who do not believe.” For Jesus had known from the beginning which of them did not believe and who would betray him. 65 He went on to say, “This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless the Father has enabled them.”

  1. “This is a hard teaching. Who can accept it?”

    1. Often, so called “hard teachings” are less about comprehension and more about acceptance.

      1. One of the top defenses against countercultural commands is “I don’t understand this part.”  Verses like Mark 10:2-12 (Jesus on Divorce) and 1 Timothy 1:10 (Paul on sexuality) are more than clear as they’re worded, but many still claim that they can’t understand what the Bible says on these topics.

      2. Often “I’m confused” masks unwillingness to accept teachings that challenge personal preferences. The Christian life asks, “Do we trust that God knows more than we do and that his ways are good?”

    2. Jesus asks, “Does this offend you?” and warns that if they stumble here, they will be further confounded by future events like his ascension.

    3. Jesus does not water down his teaching or chase those leaving; he invites trust beyond comfortable words, preparing disciples for wild things to come.

  2. “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them… no one can come to me unless the Father has enabled them.”

    1. Jesus knew from the beginning who did not believe and who would betray him.

  3. “Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you—they are full of the Spirit and life.”

    1. Jesus’s words are “full of Spirit and life;” understanding and embracing them relies on divine action, not just human effort.

  4. Augustine famously wrote about this struggle to know God and approach him by drawing on Romans 10:14 in Confessions.

    1. “Lord, what comes first: asking for your help or praising you?  Do we start a life with you by asking for your help?  Or do we need to know who you are before we can do that?  How could we ask for your help if we don’t know who you are?  We might start talking to you like you were some totally different being!  Or do we start out by asking for your help so that we can know you?  But how could we ask for help from a god that we don’t believe in?  And how could we believe in that god if nobody brought the Gospel to us?  In the end, people who seek the Lord always end up praising him, because anyone who seeks will find, and anyone who finds will praise.  I’m seeking you, Lord, by asking for your help.  I’m calling on your name while believing completely in you because the Gospel was brought to me.  You gave me faith, and now that faith is crying out to you.” -Augustine, Confessions, Ch. 1.

    2. If you can’t see God, pray to Him.  “Knock and the door will be opened.” (Matt. 7:7)

66 From this time many of his disciples turned back and no longer followed him.

67 “You do not want to leave too, do you?” Jesus asked the Twelve.

68 Simon Peter answered him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. 69 We have come to believe and to know that you are the Holy One of God.”

70 Then Jesus replied, “Have I not chosen you, the Twelve? Yet one of you is a devil!” 71 (He meant Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot, who, though one of the Twelve, was later to betray him.)

  1. “You do not want to leave too, do you?

    1. As people leave due to his “hard teaching, Jesus asks the Twelve if they also wish to leave.  It had to have been an emotionally-charged moment as thousands left and he turned to his closest friends.

    2. Peter’s confession: “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life…” isn’t just a buddy cheering up a sad friend.  Peter sincerely believes in everything that Jesus is said.  He’s seen the evidence, he acknowledges Jesus’s identity, and he believes in the message.

  2. “Yet one of you is a devil!”
    1. Jesus repeatedly forewarns about Judas’s betrayal, which does not change Judas’s course.  What God has destined will not be changed by human will, even if Judas has every opportunity to do otherwise.

    2. The disciples were tested through all of this.  The crowd left, but they stayed despite how unpopular it was.  This wasn’t the end of the testing.  Their faith would continue to be tested throughout their lives, and not everyone would pass in the end.

    3. “Mark the wisdom of Christ: He neither, by exposing him, makes him shameless and contentious; nor again emboldens him, by allowing him to think himself concealed.” -Chrysostom, Hom. xlvii. 4.

 

John 5 Commentary

From the Pulpit—Video & Full Transcript

John 5:1-14 The Healing at the Pool
John 5:15-47 The Authority of the Son

Commentary

5 Some time later, Jesus went up to Jerusalem for one of the Jewish festivals. 

  1. Christians disagree on which unnamed festival Jesus was going to Jerusalem for in this instance.  Passover or Shavuot tend to be the ones most gravitate towards.
    1. If it was Passover (which Jesus also goes up for in John 2:13, 6:4, and 11:55) it would reasonably fit into Jesus’s 3.5 year period of public ministry.  Symbolically, healing during Passover would show that Jesus is liberating people today, just as Moses liberated in the past, painting him as the greater Moses.
    2. Passover happened at harvest, but John 4:35 says harvest was still four months away.  Shavuot was a festival that happened around that time.  It was a celebration of Moses receiving the law at Sinai.  Symbolically, healing on the Sabbath (a violation of the law, strictly interpreted) and then lecturing the Jewish leaders about the law afterwards would be fitting for a festival about God’s law.

2 Now there is in Jerusalem near the Sheep Gate a pool, which in Aramaic is called Bethesda and which is surrounded by five covered colonnades. 3 Here a great number of disabled people used to lie—the blind, the lame, the paralyzed.

  1. The pool was located in Jerusalem near the Sheep Gate, a gate used primarily for moving sheep and other livestock in and out of the city.
  2. The covered colonnades were a beautiful work of Roman architecture, but here it had been essentially turned into a homelessness camp by the poor and desperate who were hoping to find healing in the waters.  This was a place of immense suffering.
  3. The pool of Bethesda was a local legend, not widely known throughout the empire. It was almost forgotten by history until archaeologists found it. Its modern remembrance is primarily because Jesus visited it.

—and they waited for the moving of the waters. 4 From time to time an angel of the Lord would come down and stir up the waters. The first one into the pool after each such disturbance would be cured of whatever disease they had.

  1. This addition to verse three and the entirety of verse four is subject to scholarly debate.  It does not appear in some of the earliest version of the text.  It may have been a scribe’s explanatory note that was later incorporated into the text.
  2. Regardless of its scriptural authenticity, the verse is helpful because it explains that people were waiting and watching for the water to bubble, at which point there would be a “mad dash” to be the first one in.
  3. This intense focus on the pool caused the people to miss Jesus, a great healer, when He came.
  4. “Their eyes were fixed on the water, expecting it to be troubled; they were so taken up with their own chosen way that the true way was neglected.” -Charles Spurgeon, “Jesus at Bethesda; or, Waiting Changed for Believing”, April 7 1867.

 5 One who was there had been an invalid for thirty-eight years. 6 When Jesus saw him lying there and learned that he had been in this condition for a long time, he asked him, “Do you want to get well?”

  1. The man Jesus approached had been an invalid for 38 years.  His whole life defined by his condition.
  2. When Jesus asks him, “Do you want to get well,” it is not a silly question.  Being healed would be hard!  It would completely change the man’s life. He would lose his means of getting charity, have to find a trade, and possibly lose the community he knew by the pool.

7 “Sir,” the invalid replied, “I have no one to help me into the pool when the water is stirred. While I am trying to get in, someone else goes down ahead of me.”

8 Then Jesus said to him, “Get up! Pick up your mat and walk.” 9 At once the man was cured; he picked up his mat and walked.

  1. The man responded with an excuse, explaining that he has no one to help him into the pool. Jesus doesn’t ask for or need an explanation or justification.
  2. Jesus commands him, “Get up. Pick up your mat and walk.” This healing requires the man to take initiative and trust Jesus, even though it may have seemed irrational or been physically difficult.
    1. Notice that Jesus ignores the pool entirely.  A whole ecosystem has evolved around waiting for the pool to bubble up and heal someone.  This system is broken.  Jesus doesn’t need the things of this world to heal.  His power is sufficient.
    2. If you want to be healed from the unhealthy things in your life, don’t wait on the world around you to heal you.  Pick up your mat and walk, trusting that Jesus’s power, mercy, and grace are available if you take the initiative.

The day on which this took place was a Sabbath, 10 and so the Jewish leaders said to the man who had been healed, “It is the Sabbath; the law forbids you to carry your mat.”

11 But he replied, “The man who made me well said to me, ‘Pick up your mat and walk.’ ”

12 So they asked him, “Who is this fellow who told you to pick it up and walk?”

13 The man who was healed had no idea who it was, for Jesus had slipped away into the crowd that was there.

  1. After being healed, the man is confronted by authorities who are upset that he is carrying his mat on the Sabbath. They want him to preserve the status quo and effectively “go back where he came from.”
    1. These leaders are the enforcers of the culture that Jesus just shook up.  In their minds, people like this man are supposed to stay at the pool, especially on Sundays. 
    2. Jesus showed that their order was not God’s intention.  This man is living proof that their system was fragile.
  2. When we experience healing in Christ, some people may be frustrated and want to drag us back to our old, unhealthy ways.

14 Later Jesus found him at the temple and said to him, “See, you are well again. Stop sinning or something worse may happen to you.” 15 The man went away and told the Jewish leaders that it was Jesus who had made him well.

  1. Healing is not a “one and done” event. One must continually choose to live as a new creation and not slip back into sin or brokenness.
  2. “Nothing was farther from his intention than to make Christ an object of their hatred, and nothing was farther from his expectation than that they would rage so furiously against Christ. His intention, therefore, was pious; for he wished to render to his Physician the honor which was justly due to him.” -John Calvin, Commentary on John 4

16 So, because Jesus was doing these things on the Sabbath, the Jewish leaders began to persecute him. 

  1. Historical Context of Sabbath Observance
    1. The leaders’ legalistic view is informed by history. The Sabbath is one of the Ten Commandments, and the Old Testament penalty for breaking it was death (Exo. 31:14-15 and 35:2)
    2. Israel’s failure to keep the Sabbath contributed to their 70 years in exile (2 Chron. 36:20-21, Lev. 26:33-35, Jer. 25:11-12)
    3. The exile ended about 500  years before the time of Christ, but it was a massive event in Israelite history.  A significant part of their communal self-understanding was wrapped up in that period of exile.
    4. This led to taking the law so seriously that they created a series of laws concerning what activities were allowable and which ones weren’t that were so complex that they even dictated what could and couldn’t carry on the Sabbath.
      1. In the Babylonian Talmud (b. Shabbat 94b), there is a series of laws concerning Muktzeh (laws concerning whether items should be handled at all) and Hotza’ah (laws concerning the carrying of items) on the Sabbath. Some items, like a hoe, are Muktzeh (translated: set aside) because they are tools of labor and have no Sabbath-appropriate purpose. Other items, like a sleeping mat, are permitted for use but are subject to Hotza’ah laws, which prevent you from moving the items from a private dwelling into a public area. The mat had a Sabbath-appropriate purpose (sitting or lying down), but the man was carrying it in the streets, so it was a violation of law.

17 In his defense Jesus said to them, “My Father is always at his work to this very day, and I too am working.” 18 For this reason they tried all the more to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.

  1. “My Father is always at his work to this very day, and I too am working.”
    1. Jesus equates himself to God with this statement, which the leaders recognize and are infuriated by.
  2. …not only was he breaking the Sabbath,
    1. Jesus consistently taught the Sabbath’s purpose was misunderstood. 
      1. His disciples plucking grain on the Sabbath (Matthew 12:3-8).
      2. Teaching that one would rescue a child or a donkey from a well on the Sabbath (Luke 14:5).
      3. Jesus teaches, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath,” and that He is the “Lord of the Sabbath.” (Mark 2:27-28)
    2. The Sabbath is a means to draw closer to God, not an end. It was established at creation to teach humans to rest in God.
  3. Christian Sabbath (Sunday)
    1. The Christian Sabbath moved from Saturday to Sunday, as seen in Acts 20:7.
    2. The logic: the old Sabbath represented rest in the old creation, while Sunday—the day of Jesus’s resurrection—signifies the start of the new creation.
    3. Modern Christians are more at risk of neglecting the Sabbath than of taking it too seriously.  Many have redefined Sabbath away from a particular day or to include any sort of rest, rather than rest specifically intended to grow closer to God.
    4. There’s an opportunity to value the Sabbath not just as a brief moment of rest in a busy day or a random vacation, but as a day that God intended for us as a tool and means for our benefit—a day of worshipful rest in God.

19 Jesus gave them this answer: “Very truly I tell you, the Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees his Father doing, because whatever the Father does the Son also does. 20 For the Father loves the Son and shows him all he does. Yes, and he will show him even greater works than these, so that you will be amazed. 21 For just as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, even so the Son gives life to whom he is pleased to give it. 22 Moreover, the Father judges no one, but has entrusted all judgment to the Son, 23 that all may honor the Son just as they honor the Father. Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father, who sent him.

  1. After the Sabbath conflict, Jesus explains His relationship with God the Father.
    1. This section uses a large amount of classic Trinitarian language, affirming that Jesus and the Father are distinct persons yet one being—both are God.  To honor one is to honor both.
    2. “To believe and love the Trinity is to possess the key of theology.” -Charles Spurgeon, “Bread Enough and to Spare,” July 16, 1871.

24 “Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life. 25 Very truly I tell you, a time is coming and has now come when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God and those who hear will live. 26 For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself. 27 And he has given him authority to judge because he is the Son of Man.

  1. And he has given him authority…
    1. Jesus asserts His authority in response to earthly authorities challenging Him. He speaks with perfect judgment and discernment as God.
    2. When we encounter teachings or actions of Jesus we don’t understand or prefer, we must remember His divine authority. Our disagreement is our problem, not His.

28 “Do not be amazed at this, for a time is coming when all who are in their graves will hear his voice 29 and come out—those who have done what is good will rise to live, and those who have done what is evil will rise to be condemned. 30 By myself I can do nothing; I judge only as I hear, and my judgment is just, for I seek not to please myself but him who sent me.

31 “If I testify about myself, my testimony is not true. 32 There is another who testifies in my favor, and I know that his testimony about me is true.

33 “You have sent to John and he has testified to the truth. 34 Not that I accept human testimony; but I mention it that you may be saved. 35 John was a lamp that burned and gave light, and you chose for a time to enjoy his light.

36 “I have testimony weightier than that of John. For the works that the Father has given me to finish—the very works that I am doing—testify that the Father has sent me. 37 And the Father who sent me has himself testified concerning me. You have never heard his voice nor seen his form, 38 nor does his word dwell in you, for you do not believe the one he sent. 39 You study[c] the Scriptures diligently because you think that in them you have eternal life. These are the very Scriptures that testify about me, 40 yet you refuse to come to me to have life.

  1. “If I testify about myself, my testimony is not true…”
    1. Jesus admits that His own testimony would not be sufficient to prove anything, so he points to external witnesses.
      1. Deut. 19:15 and Num. 35:30 require two or three witnesses to establish any charge or execute judgment. 
  2. “I have testimony weightier than that of John…”
    1. John the Baptist testified to the truth, which was helpful, but Jesus relies on a weightier testimony: God Himself.  God’s testimony is expressed in two ways:
      1. Miracles: Jesus’s works, given by the Father, testify that the Father sent Him.
      2. Scripture: The Old Testament points to Jesus constantly.
  3. Jesus tells scripture experts that they study diligently thinking they have eternal life, but miss the point.
  4. “These are the very scriptures that testify about me…”
    1. “Again, we are taught by this passage, that if we wish to obtain the knowledge of Christ, we must seek it from the Scriptures; for they who imagine whatever they choose concerning Christ will ultimately have nothing instead of him but a shadowy phantom.” -John Calvin, Calvin’s Commentary on John  
    2. Scripture is a means to an end (knowing God), not an end in itself. The words matter, like in a love letter, but their value lies in pointing to the author, God.
  5. There are many people that claim to know a lot about Scripture, but they haven’t found God in spite of all of their so-called knowledge.
    1. Bart Ehrman is a famous professor and atheist that uses his knowledge of early Christian documents to try to debunk Christianity.
    2. Amy Jill-Levine is a professor of the New Testament that is Jewish and does not believe in Jesus.  In spite of that, she produces resources about Jesus to be used in churches.
    3. People inside the church today can also miss the point by treating scripture reading as a checklist item.
    4. When opening scripture, expect to encounter God, regardless of feelings. The goal is to seek God through it.

41 “I do not accept glory from human beings, 42 but I know you. I know that you do not have the love of God in your hearts. 43 I have come in my Father’s name, and you do not accept me; but if someone else comes in his own name, you will accept him. 44 How can you believe since you accept glory from one another but do not seek the glory that comes from the only God[d]?

45 “But do not think I will accuse you before the Father. Your accuser is Moses, on whom your hopes are set. 46 If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me. 47 But since you do not believe what he wrote, how are you going to believe what I say?”

  1. God is the intended endpoint of everything we see.
    1. “I know that you do not have the love of God in your hearts…”
      1. Everything in our lives is intended to point us to God, whether it be prayer, a walk in the park, or time with a friend.  God is the ultimate end of everything that’s created.  It’s should draw our attention to Him.
    2. “How can you believe since you accept glory from one another but do not seek the glory that comes from the only God?”
      1. We are called to be means through which others see God’s goodness.  Just as everything should draw our attention to God, we should draw other people’s attention to God, not to ourselves.
      2. “Our hearts are restless until they rest in you” -Augustine of Hippo, Confessions, Bk. 1.
  2. “…for he wrote about me.”
    1. “Indeed had they attended to His words, they ought and would have tried to learn from Him, what the things were which Moses had written of Him. But they are silent. For it is the nature of wickedness to defy persuasion. Do what you will, it retains its venom to the last.” -John Chrysostom, Hom. xli. 2.

John 4 Commentary

From the Pulpit—Video & Full Transcript

John 4:1-26: The Samaritan Woman
John 4:27-42: Reap!
John 4:43-55: Jesus Heals an Official’s Son

Commentary

4 Now Jesus learned that the Pharisees had heard that he was gaining and baptizing more disciples than John— 2 although in fact it was not Jesus who baptized, but his disciples. 

  1. Note that the Bible explicitly clarifies that Jesus was not baptizing people.  Even though it was a part of his ministry, he didn’t personally do the baptizing.  He only oversaw the process.
  2. Why didn’t Jesus baptize?
    1. Some suggest that Jesus was more concerned with inspiring faith over baptizing each individual person, so he left the follow-up to the disciples.
    2. Some suggest Jesus prioritized inspiring faith over personally baptizing, leaving the act to disciples, though there’s not textual support for this.
    3. A stronger reason for Jesus’s reluctance to personally baptism is that He is the one who is supposed to baptize with the Holy Spirit (Acts 1:5).  Since the Holy Spirit had not yet been given by Jesus, the fullness of Christ’s baptism was not available.  This was more akin to John’s baptism for repentance, which only involved water.
  3. “The reason why He baptized not Himself, had been already declared by John, He shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire. (Luke 3:16) Now He had not yet given the Holy Spirit: it was therefore fitting that He should not baptize.” -John Chrysostom, Hom. xxxi. 1

3 So he left Judea and went back once more to Galilee.

  1. Jesus’s rising fame created tension with the Pharisees.  Rather than allowing his ministry to the “anti-Pharisee” ministry, Jesus moved on to continue focusing on the truth that he needed to share, rather than just arguing in an increasingly hostile environment.   HE wasn’t afraid of the Pharisees.  He would engage with them again later, but he refused to allow himself to be reduced to their opposition.
  2. “He was showing an example to them who were to believe in Him (that any one servant of God sins not if he retire into another place, when he sees, it may be, the rage of his persecutors, or of them that seek to bring his soul into evil; but if a servant of God did this he might appear to commit sin, had not the Lord led the way in doing it), that good Master did this to teach us, not because He feared it.” -Augustine of Hippo, Tractate 15 on John

4 Now he had to go through Samaria. 

  1. Jesus traveled from Judea to Galilee and “had to” go through Samaria. While the route made geographical sense (Samaria lies near Israel’s borders; Galilee is an outlying enclave), most Jews would have found a way around it.  There was severe tension between the Jews and the Samaritans.
  2. Sources of Tension between Israelites and Samaritans
    1. Similarity can create friction; groups that live in the same area with competing claims and identities often clash more easily than groups that are obviously different.
    2. Competing Religious Claims:
      1. Both the Jews and the Samaritans claimed to be true worshipers of God and the true Israel, considering the other’s claim illegitimate.
      2. The Samaritans only accepted the Pentateuch (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy) as Scripture, denying later prophetic books, which increased conflict with the Jews who affirmed other books as divinely inspired.
    3. Competing Identity Claims
      1. Samaritans said they were the true Israelites because they stayed in the land during the Assyrian exile.  Others were forced to leave because of the Assyrian policies, but the Samaritans found a way to stay and shepherd the area.
      2. The Israelites that returned after the exile saw the Samaritans as people who had compromised themselves by intermarrying and adopting Assyrian culture to appeal to the dominant culture, losing their real identity while others suffered exile for their faith. 

5 So he came to a town in Samaria called Sychar, near the plot of ground Jacob had given to his son Joseph.

 6 Jacob’s well was there, and Jesus, tired as he was from the journey, sat down by the well. It was about noon.

  1. “Jacob’s well was there,”
    1. Jacob’s well is not particularly famous.  There is nothing mentioned in Scripture about it.  Its importance comes from its owner, not any event that happened at it.  
    2. A modern equivalent might be something like “George Washington’s cornfield.”  Assuming such a place exists somewhere, nothing noteworthy happened there, but it’s notable because of the owner.
    3. “And what more proper place than Jacob’s well, for exposing the unlawful husband, i. e. the perverse law? For the Samaritan woman is meant to figure to us a soul, that has subjected itself to a hind of law of its own, not the divine law. And our Saviour wishes to marry her to a lawful husband, i. e. Himself; the Word of truth which was to rise from the dead, and never again to die.” -Origen, tom. xiii. c. 8
  2. “It was about noon.”
    1. In first century Israel, women typically drew water in the morning to avoid heat and to catch up with one another at the well.
    2. The Samaritan woman arriving at noon likely indicates that she’s avoiding others.  As Jesus unfolds her story in the coming verses, it becomes increasingly obvious that she may be a social outcast and subject of gossip.

7 When a Samaritan woman came to draw water, Jesus said to her, “Will you give me a drink?”8 (His disciples had gone into the town to buy food.)

9 The Samaritan woman said to him, “You are a Jew and I am a Samaritan woman. How can you ask me for a drink?” (For Jews do not associate with Samaritans.[a])

10 Jesus answered her, “If you knew the gift of God and who it is that asks you for a drink, you would have asked him and he would have given you living water.”

  1. “Jesus said to her, “Will you give me a drink?”
    1. Jesus spoke directly to her, which broke social norms on several levels.  Firstly, Jews didn’t associate with Samaritans.  Secondly, men didn’t tend to speak to women alone without a husband, father or brother present to witness the propriety of the interaction.
    2. He asks her for a drink—a deliberate request for a favor.  Sociologists say that this is a good way to build rapport in a new environment.  By asking for help, you show that you see value in the other person and are vulnerable, which prevents you from appearing as some sort of social threat.
  2. “living water”
    1. Jesus offers “living water,” a phrase carrying dual meanings in Greek: flowing, fresh water (spring/river) and spiritually vivifying water pointing to eternal life.
    2. English translations prefer “living water” to preserve the spiritual resonance; the woman initially interprets it as literal fresh water, focusing on convenience (not having to return to draw water).

11 “Sir,” the woman said, “you have nothing to draw with and the well is deep. Where can you get this living water? 12 Are you greater than our father Jacob, who gave us the well and drank from it himself, as did also his sons and his livestock?”

13 Jesus answered, “Everyone who drinks this water will be thirsty again, 14 but whoever drinks the water I give them will never thirst. Indeed, the water I give them will become in them a spring of water welling up to eternal life.”

15 The woman said to him, “Sir, give me this water so that I won’t get thirsty and have to keep coming here to draw water.”

16 He told her, “Go, call your husband and come back.”

17 “I have no husband,” she replied.

Jesus said to her, “You are right when you say you have no husband. 18 The fact is, you have had five husbands, and the man you now have is not your husband. What you have just said is quite true.”

  1. Transition from physical thirst to spiritual thirst
    1. Jesus contrasts water that only provides for earthly needs (“whoever drinks this water will be thirsty again”) with the spiritual benefit of the water he gives, which becomes “a spring of water welling up to eternal life.”
    2. He reveals awareness of her personal life: she has had five husbands and lives with a man who is not her husband. She’s been seeking fulfillment in relationships with men.  Not only has it not gone well, but it hasn’t quenched the thirst for meaning in her life.
    3. In the Jesus revolution of the 1970s, many young people that had sought their fulfillment in drugs or hippie counterculture found lasting fulfillment in Jesus.

19 “Sir,” the woman said, “I can see that you are a prophet. 20 Our ancestors worshiped on this mountain, but you Jews claim that the place where we must worship is in Jerusalem.”

21 “Woman,” Jesus replied, “believe me, a time is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem. 22 You Samaritans worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews. 23 Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. 24 God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.”

    1. “I can see that you are a prophet. Our ancestors worshiped on this mountain…”
      1. The woman shifts the whole conversation towards “religious” questions, shifting the tone from an honest conversation about her life to theoretical doctrinal debates.
      2. “From the truth which was becoming inconveniently personal she flew to that natural resort of the carnal mind, namely, to religions discourse upon points of outward observance”. -Spurgeon, Verse Expositions of the Bible
  • “true worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth”
    1. Jesus reframes the issue away from ethnicity, tradition, and location: “A time is coming…when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem.”
    2. He isn’t vague on doctrine.  He acknowledges “salvation is from the Jews” but moves towards that bigger picture that he’s inviting her to participate in where people “worship the Father in spirit and in truth,” because “God is spirit.”
    3. Ethnic lineage and traditional sites are not the path to God; the Holy Spirit’s indwelling and truth-seeking are essential. He invites her to abandon religious formalism and be honest about what she really needs.  He knows her thirst and how she longs for God in her life.

25 The woman said, “I know that Messiah” (called Christ) “is coming. When he comes, he will explain everything to us.”

26 Then Jesus declared, “I, the one speaking to you—I am he.”

  1. Conversion doesn’t come from superior religious theory being explained well or being so nice for so long that someone just goes with it.  Conversion comes from a person encountering Jesus and knowing his power and his person directly.
  2. This encounter gives us some key principles for evangelism.
    1. Talk to someone, even if it’s uncomfortable or seemingly strange.
    2. Build and honest rapport by letting yourself be vulnerable and seeing their gifts.
    3. Connect things that people know to what they don’t know yet.
    4. Lovingly help people see what they’re looking for can be found in Jesus.
    5. Avoid getting trapped in debates over little things.  Emphasize the big picture of what God is doing.
    6. Introduce people to Jesus personally.  His power is sufficient.

27 Just then his disciples returned and were surprised to find him talking with a woman. But no one asked, “What do you want?” or “Why are you talking with her?”

  1. The disciples return to find Jesus speaking with a Samaritan woman, which was socially unacceptable and potentially scandalous, but there’s no interrogation.  Instead, they trust that Jesus is up to something, and they can learn.
    1. We have to trust people that we hope to learn from.  A student learning algebra might be baffled at the sudden appearance of letters in a math equation, but if they accuse the teacher of making a mistake, they’ll miss an opportunity to learn.
    2. God knows everything and is the ultimate teacher, but how often do we really trust him when our life differs from what we expect?  If we accuse Him, we will miss what he’s doing. 

28 Then, leaving her water jar, the woman went back to the town and said to the people, 29 “Come, see a man who told me everything I ever did. Could this be the Messiah?” 30 They came out of the town and made their way toward him.

  1. Notice that she’s excited that he knew what she did, even though the knowledge he had was about how she had fallen short and failed to find what she wanted.  This potential messiah knew what she did, but still wanted to talk to her.  He was not only powerful, but he was merciful.
  2. It’s likely the town knew her history well.  There’s no way she could have kept her messy marriages secret.  Drawing attention to herself in this way was a risk, but she’s willing to take it because of what Jesus means to her.
  3. “The woman is almost turned into an Apostle. So forcible are His words, that she leaves her waterpot to go to the city, and tell her townsmen of them. The woman then left her waterpot, i. e. gave up low bodily cares, for the sake of benefitting others. Let us do the same. Let us leave off caring for things of the body, and impart to others of our own.” -Origen

31 Meanwhile his disciples urged him, “Rabbi, eat something.”

32 But he said to them, “I have food to eat that you know nothing about.”

33 Then his disciples said to each other, “Could someone have brought him food?”

34 “My food,” said Jesus, “is to do the will of him who sent me and to finish his work. 

  1. We’ve seen this from Jesus earlier in this chapter.  For the woman who was new to God, he took the example of water, something physical that she knew, to talk about what she was really thirsty for: a relationship with God.  Now, he talks to the disciples in a similar way about food.
    1. Water was eternal life, but food is doing the will of God and joining in that mission in the day to day.
    2. Many people think that metaphorical water is enough for their journey with God.  They KNOW that Jesus died for them, but then they don’t apply that knowledge to their daily life.  Life seems meaningless, trapped in routines, waiting for Jesus to come.  God invites us to daily mission and purpose to fill our hunger for meaning in this world.
  2. “What wonder that the woman did not understand about the water? Lo, the disciples do not understand about the food!” -Augustine

35 Don’t you have a saying, ‘It’s still four months until harvest’? I tell you, open your eyes and look at the fields! They are ripe for harvest. 36 Even now the one who reaps draws a wage and harvests a crop for eternal life, so that the sower and the reaper may be glad together. 37 Thus the saying ‘One sows and another reaps’ is true. 38 I sent you to reap what you have not worked for. Others have done the hard work, and you have reaped the benefits of their labor.”

  1. To a person who has done little farming, harvest might seem like the payoff at the end.  This is the chance to finally get the fruits of your labor!  But remember that the harvest season is one of the most labor-intensive parts of farming.  Farmers spend a lot of time rushing against the clock, working in the fields during harvest.
  2. ‘One sows and another reaps’
    1. “This was a common proverb, by which he showed that many men frequently receive the fruit of the labor of others, though there was this difference, that he who has labored is displeased at seeing the fruit carried away by another, whereas the Apostles have the Prophets for the companions of their joy.” -John Calvin
  3. This truth is not only true individually, but corporately.  Think about all the people at your local church that planted seeds so that you could harvest!  Decades of people worked hard so you can stand where you are.

39 Many of the Samaritans from that town believed in him because of the woman’s testimony, “He told me everything I ever did.” 40 So when the Samaritans came to him, they urged him to stay with them, and he stayed two days. 41 And because of his words many more became believers.

42 They said to the woman, “We no longer believe just because of what you said; now we have heard for ourselves, and we know that this man really is the Savior of the world.”

  1. The least likely people in the least likely place provide the first real example of people being excited and hungry for what Jesus is doing.
  2. When we feel discouraged, we sometimes assume that Christ has done his best work in the past and there is nothing left to look forward to.  If Jesus can cause such a stir in Samaria through a woman with little social capital, what can he do in our lives?

43 After the two days he left for Galilee. 44 (Now Jesus himself had pointed out that a prophet has no honor in his own country.) 

45 When he arrived in Galilee, the Galileans welcomed him. They had seen all that he had done in Jerusalem at the Passover Festival, for they also had been there.

  1. “no honor in his own country.” 
    1. Jesus grew up in Galilee.   The people who live there are excited to see him again!  They’ve heard about his miracles and teachings!  They’ve seen the impact he’s making on the world!  They want to talk to him, but not to know him.  They think they already know him.  He’s Joseph’s boy!  What’s left to know?  They’re interested in what he does and what he offers, but they aren’t interested in him. 
  2. A lot of people approach God with imperfect motives.  They often want good things (community, relationships, moral guidance, structure) that aren’t the best thing.  These searches for little goods can lead to the greatest good: God himself and eternal life with Him.
  3. Cyril of Jerusalem, a great teacher of the Church, told a group of people that were hoping to join the Church: “[You may have] come on another pretext. It is possible that a man is wishing to pay court to a woman, and came hither on that account. The remark applies in like manner to women also in their turn. A slave also perhaps wishes to please his master, and a friend his friend. I accept this bait for the hook, and welcome you, though you came with an evil purpose, yet as one to be saved by a good hope. Perhaps you knew not whither you were coming, nor in what kind of net you are taken. You have come within the Church’s nets : be taken alive, flee not: for Jesus is angling for you.”  -Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lectures, Prologue

46 Once more he visited Cana in Galilee, where he had turned the water into wine. And there was a certain royal official whose son lay sick at Capernaum. 47 When this man heard that Jesus had arrived in Galilee from Judea, he went to him and begged him to come and heal his son, who was close to death.

  1. This is an official that is a part of Herod’s royal court.  He would have been powerful and very wealthy.  He would certainly have had ample opportunity to see any doctors and miracle workers that he could have wanted.  He likely had seen others already!  In spite of all that the world has given him, here he begs at the feet of Jesus.

48 “Unless you people see signs and wonders,” Jesus told him, “you will never believe.”

  1. The official’s motivation is good (he is a good father that wants to save his son) but just like the others, he’s more interested in Jesus’s power than on Jesus himself.
  2. Jesus first replies with a seeming rebuke: “Unless you people see signs and wonders, you will never believe.” This targets the crowd’s (and the official’s) desire for miracles over genuine relationship.
  3. Jesus also does not act with the urgency the man expects. Is it any surprise that the one who created life is not going to be bothered over something little like death? Is it any surprise that the Lord over all of eternity is not bothered by something like time? Jesus isn’t concerned because he’s in control. 
  4. In our lives as well, God works on His own schedule. God’s goal is to make us holy, though not necessarily happy.  Things can be long and uncomfortable, even if we’d prefer otherwise.  Sometimes we need to be melted down to be forged into something beautiful.

49 The royal official said, “Sir, come down before my child dies.”

  1. In spite of his power, the official offers real sincerity here.  There’s no threat or bribe.  He sets himself aside and gives an honest, sincere, heartbreaking plea to help his child.  
  2. “He thought it possible that his son could be freed from sickness and disease, but not that he could be raised up after he was dead; and therefore he urges Christ to make haste, that his son’s recovery may not be prevented by his death. Accordingly, when Christ pardons both, we may conclude from it how highly he values even a small measure of faith.”  -Calvin’s Commentary, John 4

50 “Go,” Jesus replied, “your son will live.”

The man took Jesus at his word and departed.

  1. Jesus tests the man’s faith by telling him, “Go. Your son will live,” rather than accompanying him to his house to do the healing.
  2. By healing in this way, the man has to trust that Jesus is who he says he is over the pure spectacle of a live miracle.  He has to give up his control and give total control over to Jesus.
  3. This man came for a miracle, but stumbles onto something (shockingly) even better. 
    1. He came with nothing but hope, but he leaves with faith in Christ. 
    2. He came wanting the life of someone else, but he is going to stumble into his own eternal life. 
    3. He came to protect a relationship with someone that he helped create, and he is about to gain a relationship with the One who created him.

51 While he was still on the way, his servants met him with the news that his boy was living. 52 When he inquired as to the time when his son got better, they said to him, “Yesterday, at one in the afternoon, the fever left him.”

53 Then the father realized that this was the exact time at which Jesus had said to him, “Your son will live.” So he and his whole household believed.

  1. The journey from Cana to Capernaum is about 25 miles, roughly an 8-hour walk.   He could have arrived home in the evening the same day he spoke to Jesus, but instead, he finds the servant on the road the next day!  He believed so strongly that Jesus was who He said He was that he chose to sleep at an inn along the way. 
  2. As a result, the official and his “whole household believed.” This took courage for someone who worked for King Herod, who was instrumental in Jesus’s crucifixion.  It likely cost him socially and professionally. He arrived with faith in one king (Herod) and departed with faith in a new King (Jesus).

54 This was the second sign Jesus performed after coming from Judea to Galilee.

  1. “The second miracle, he says markedly. The Jews had not come to the more perfect faith of the Samaritans, who saw no miracle.” – John Chrysostom, Homily 36, 1.
  2. “His teachings were the explanation of his doings his doings confirmations of his teachings. Jesus Christ had never occasion to any, ‘Do as I say, but not as I do.’ His words and his actions were in perfect harmony with one another. You might be sure that he was honest in what he said, because what he did forced that conviction upon your mind.” -Charles Spurgeon, “Characteristics of Faith,” May 27th, 1860.

John 3 Commentary

From the Pulpit—Video & Full Transcript

John 3:1-21: Born Again
John 3:22-36: John’s Final Testimony

Commentary

3 Now there was a Pharisee, a man named Nicodemus who was a member of the Jewish ruling council.

  1. Profile of Nicodemus
    1. “A Pharisee”- Nicodemus was a Pharisee, part of a Jewish group that was known for zealous, legalistic teaching of God’s law, often missing its true meaning.
    2. “A member of the Jewish ruling council”- He was a member of the Sanhedrin, the Jewish ruling council.  There were traditionally only 71 scholars in the Sanhedrin, so his influence and power were exceptional.
    3. “Nicodemus”- His name is Greek, not Hebrew.  Jews with Greek names in this timeframe were influenced from the Greek culture that spread throughout the region during Alexander the Great’s reign.  Jews that spoke Greek were disproportionately likely to be from urban centers, have access to wealth and travel, and have had access to quality education.
    4. Given these details, Nicodemos was someone who likely thought he knew everything!  He had a good education on how to think incorrectly.  It’s very likely that he was arrogant, given how many worldly accolades he had.

 2 He came to Jesus at night and said, “Rabbi, we know that you are a teacher who has come from God. For no one could perform the signs you are doing if God were not with him.”

  1. Despite his background and influence, something compelled Nicodemus to seek Jesus.  There was something about this “Jesus” teacher that evaded him, and he had to know what it was.
  2. He met Jesus at night, indicating a desire for secrecy to protect his reputation.
  3. He addressed Jesus as “Rabbi,” a title he also held, approaching the meeting as a peer-to-peer discussion (“teacher to teacher”) to explore “finer points of religious philosophy.”

3 Jesus replied, “Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again.”

  1. In response to Nicodemus’s formal introduction, Jesus immediately and authoritatively declares, “Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they’re born again.”
    1. “Truly, truly” (amen amen) is a doubled emphatic in Greek—an exclamation, not filler.  Jesus isn’t theorizing!  He’s making a serious, decisive statement.
  2. Jesus’s directness is tailored to Nicodemus’s arrogant, know-it-all demeanor.  He wants to shake him out of his stupor!
  3. “Take away whatsoever seemeth thee good, reputation, fortune, friends, health, only give me this, to be born of the Spirit, to be received among the children of God!” -John Wesley

4 “How can someone be born when they are old?” Nicodemus asked. “Surely they cannot enter a second time into their mother’s womb to be born!”

  1. Nicodemus’s question isn’t sincere.  Metaphor long before Jesus’s time.  To ask this question in a way that implies that Jesus is literally demanding someone to go back into their mother’s womb is intentionally obtuse, misunderstanding on purpose to suggest that Jesus is being absurd.

5 Jesus answered, “Very truly I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless they are born of water and the Spirit. 

  1. Many interpreters assume that Jesus is referring to baptism, but Nicodemus wouldn’t have understood what Jesus meant if that was the intended analogy since Christian baptism doesn’t exist yet. Jesus’s words needed to be comprehensible, and they would have been to someone who knew Scripture as well as Nicodemos.  Water and the Spirit are both well-established symbolically throughout Scripture.
    1. Water: Symbolizes repentance and cleansing (Psalm 51:7: “Wash me and I will be whiter than snow”; Ezekiel 36:25: “I will sprinkle clean water on you and you shall be clean”).
    2. The Spirit: Represents God’s creative power at work in the world and in people (Genesis 1: Spirit hovering over the waters; Judges 6:34: Spirit coming upon Gideon; 2 Samuel 23:2: Spirit speaking through David).

6 Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit. 

7 You should not be surprised at my saying, ‘You must be born again.’ 8 The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit.”

  1. Jesus compares the Spirit’s work to the wind: “The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going.”
  2. This illustrates that one can experience and feel the effects of God’s Spirit without fully grasping the “finer points” of doctrine.

9 “How can this be?” Nicodemus asked.

10 “You are Israel’s teacher,” said Jesus, “and do you not understand these things? 11 Very truly I tell you, we speak of what we know, and we testify to what we have seen, but still you people do not accept our testimony. 12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things? 13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man. 14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the wilderness, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, 15 that everyone who believes may have eternal life in him.”

16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 

  1. This particular verse is an elemental part of the Christian faith.  It’s the most commonly-known verse in the entire  Bible.  Rather than approach it with the assumption that we know it, it’s good to think through it slowly.  Having come so far, do we still align with the very basics that we set out with?
    1. “For God”: In a world like ours, it is a bold claim to know something true about God.  Who can say what is true or false about God?  But the core of Christianity is to know who God is… and who he isn’t.
    2. “so loved”: God’s primary motive is love, not anger or sadness.
    3. “the world”: God’s love extends to all creation—plants, animals, and people—not just humanity.
      1. Dostoyevsky discussed true love for the world beautifully in his novel, The Brothers Karamazov: “Love all God’s creation, the whole of it and every grain of sand in it. Love every leaf, every ray of God’s light. Love the animals, love the plants, love everything. If you love everything, you will perceive the divine mystery in things. Once you have perceived it, you will begin to comprehend it better every day, and you will come at last to love the world with an all-embracing love…. Treasure this ecstasy, however absurd people may think it.” -Dostoyevsky
    4. “that he gave”: God has not begun this relationship with us by demanding anything, but by freely giving to us grace upon grace.
    5. “His one and only son”: his most precious possession.
    6. “that whoever”: A universal invitation open to anyone from a beggar in India to a bureaucrat in China and everyone in between
    7. “believes in Him”: Belief means full, trusting surrender of one’s life to Jesus, not just intellectual assent.
    8. “shall not perish”: God intervenes to save us from the perishing caused by our own sin.
    9. “but have eternal life”: New life that begins now, not only after death.
  2. “Men who love much will give much, and you may usually measure the truth of love by its self-denials and sacrifices. That love which spares nothing, but spends itself to help and bless its object, is love indeed, and not the mere name of it. Little love forgets to bring water for the feet, but great love breaks its box of alabaster and lavishes its precious ointment.  Consider, then, what this gift was that God gave.” -Charles Spurgeon

17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. 

  1. It can be uncomfortable to acknowledge that God openly condemns those who don’t believe in his Son, but we need to address this uncomfortable reality.  If we don’t acknowledge that we’re condemned without Jesus, how can he be a savior?  What is he saving us from? 
  2. Some people say God is stingy for not giving us multiple ways to be saved.  That isn’t reasonable.
    1. Imagine a person $5 million in debt who complains that a blank check from a benefactor requires them to walk a block to the bank.
    2. Or imagine a person falling off a cliff who criticizes their rescuer for offering a hand instead of a rope or a helicopter.
    3. In both cases, the one needing salvation is entitled; the savior is not stingy.

19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20 Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. 21 But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God.

  1. Evil-doers “hate the light” and avoid exposure. US Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis said, “Sunlight is the best disinfectant,” in reference to the simple fact that corruption grows where there is no visibility and accountability.
  2. Belief must be embodied in deeds; evidence of new birth should be visible.

22 After this, Jesus and his disciples went out into the Judean countryside, where he spent some time with them, and baptized. 

  1. Note that according to John 4:2, Jesus didn’t personally baptize anyone.  His disciples did it for him while he oversaw it.

23 Now John also was baptizing at Aenon near Salim, because there was plenty of water, and people were coming and being baptized. 24 (This was before John was put in prison.) 25 An argument developed between some of John’s disciples and a certain Jew over the matter of ceremonial washing. 26 They came to John and said to him, “Rabbi, that man who was with you on the other side of the Jordan—the one you testified about—look, he is baptizing, and everyone is going to him.”

  1. John’s disciples are worried that Jesus is now stealing John’s ministry!  Not only is he baptizing people, something that John literally has a title about, but he’s drawing bigger crowds!
  2. Ministries built on ego or a sense of territory do not reflect the kingdom of Heaven.  Many such “ministries” exist to this day, much to the sadness of God.

27 To this John replied, “A person can receive only what is given them from heaven. 28 You yourselves can testify that I said, ‘I am not the Messiah but am sent ahead of him.’ 29 The bride belongs to the bridegroom. The friend who attends the bridegroom waits and listens for him, and is full of joy when he hears the bridegroom’s voice. That joy is mine, and it is now complete. 30 He must become greater; I must become less.”

  1. In his response, John submits to the authority of Jesus.
    1. John’s response to his disciples reveals a fundamental truth about the prophets: prophets are people who submit.  
      1. The image of a prophet being a wild man standing at the edge of society, unwilling to submit to church authorities isn’t accurate.  They only refuse to submit to authorities who have abandoned God’s word.  
      2. When leaders stop submitting to God, they lose their authority, and prophets arise as God’s true spokesmen.
    2. Conversations about “submitting” to anyone in our culture can be very jarring and even offensive!  Submission seems as though it’s against our core expectations to live as free people in this world!
      1. Modernity tends to defines freedom via “negative freedom”–you’re free from external obligations when making choices.
      2. The Bible presents a definition of freedom that might be called positive or teleological freedom–you’re free to live well and be what you were made to be through the grace of God.
      3. We can only understand how submission can lead to freedom if we understand freedom on God’s terms.  Through modern expectations, submission to anyone would seem tyrannical, but on Biblical terms, freedom requires you to submit to God and to others in your life.
    3. The willingness to submit that John models is important for every Christian today as well.  The Bible speaks often about submission.  
      1. Colossians 3:20: “Children, obey your parents in everything, for this pleases the Lord,” 
        1. Notice that there is no age limit specified in the text.
      2. Colossians 3:18-19 reads “Wives, submit yourselves to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.  Husbands, love your wives and do not be harsh with them.”
        1. Uncomfortably enough, the passage doesn’t advocate for mutual submission.  The language for each gender is intentionally different.
        2. Ephesians 5 explains the husband’s role in greater detail: “Love your wives as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her.” This is servant leadership—putting his wife first, himself second. To exploit this authority is to abuse one’s spouse.
      3. Colossians 3:22: “Slaves, obey your earthly masters in everything… work at it with all your heart, as working for the Lord, not for human masters.”
        1. The idea of getting rid of slavery would have been ridiculous to most people in the ancient world.
        2. Athenaus’s comedy, “The Banqueting Sophists” includes a section where people theorize about a world without slaves, but it would require automata, or items that move themselves.  They imagine a world where you could just tell objects, “Table, lay yourself! … Cup, pour yourself!”
          1. Depressingly enough, this seems to be somewhat prophetic–slavery in our world mostly ended with the advent of the Industrial Revolution
        3. For Christian slaves, the question would have been, should we stage a violent uprising?  That’s what is being addressed in submission.  The answer is no.
        4. For Christian slaveholders, The Book of Philemon shows that slavery is incompatible with Christianity as Paul encourages a master to treat his runaway slave both as a brother, a partner, and as he would treat Paul himself (v. 16-17)
      4. Many other examples can be found throughout the Bible, in reference to civil authority, religious authority, and so forth.  If it does not disobey God to submit, Christians are encouraged to submit
  2. “He must become greater; I must become less.”
    1. This especially sums up the way John has completely submitted to God.  He knows that his authority must give way to Christ’s. He doesn’t sabotage Jesus–he makes room.
    2. As God becomes greater in us, we don’t become less ourselves but more truly ourselves, the people we were made to be, freed from sin’s distortion. This is good, though it may frighten us at first.
      1. “Imagine turning a tin soldier into a real little man. It would involve turning the tin into flesh. And suppose the tin soldier did not like it? He is not interested in flesh: all he sees is that the tin is being spoilt. He thinks you are killing him” -CS Lewis

31 The one who comes from above is above all; the one who is from the earth belongs to the earth, and speaks as one from the earth. The one who comes from heaven is above all. 32 He testifies to what he has seen and heard, but no one accepts his testimony. 33 Whoever has accepted it has certified that God is truthful. 

  1. John’s witness to Jesus affirms God’s truth; whoever accepts Jesus’s testimony isn’t doing anything wild!  They’re just certifying that God is doing exactly what he said he would do.
    1. Affirming God’s truthfulness in worship and Scripture reading is a daily opportunity.

34 For the one whom God has sent speaks the words of God, for God gives the Spirit without limit. 35 The Father loves the Son and has placed everything in his hands. 36 Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God’s wrath remains on them.

  1. Submission to the authorities we can see helps us submit to the authorities we can’t see until they’re fully revealed in their glory
    1. IfJesus entered the room, radiant with heavenly rays, wearing an otherworldly crown and the finest robes imaginable, the ONLY response would be to kneel and submit.  To do anything else would be absurd!  But if we don’t prepare our hearts for that moment, we’ll miss it.
  2. “[H]e who denies God the glory of redemption, in addition to his folly, has robbed the Lord of the choicest jewel of his regalia, and aimed a deadly blow at the divine honor. I may say of him who despises the great salvation, that, in despising Christ, he touches the apple of God’s eye. “This is my beloved Son,” saith God, “hear ye him.” Out of heaven he saith it, and yet men stop their ears and say, “We will not have him.” Nay, they wax wrath against the cross, and turn away from God’s salvation. Do you think that God will always bear this?” -Charles Spurgeon

John 2 Commentary

From the Pulpit—Video & Full Transcript

John 2:1-12: Water into Wine

Commentary

On the third day a wedding took place at Cana in Galilee. Jesus’ mother was there,

  1. Weddings were major, joyous feasts (see Song of Songs for more on the topic).  The presence of Jesus and his disciples implies they were joyful, welcomed guests who enhanced celebrations.

2 and Jesus and his disciples had also been invited to the wedding. 3 When the wine was gone, Jesus’ mother said to him, “They have no more wine.”

  1. The shortage threatened severe social embarrassment for the hosts: in a culture where weddings were grand, hospitality was important, and emotions ran high, guests could feel insulted if provisions fell short, harming the young couple’s social relationships and reputation.

4 “Woman, why do you involve me?” Jesus replied. “My hour has not yet come.”

  1. Jesus calls Mary “woman,” rather than “mom.”  There’s some distance here that’s appropriate for his public ministry.  He’s not about to do a chore for his mom!  He’s acting by the will of his heavenly Father. 
  2. Jesus frames his timing (“my hour”) as divinely set.  The miracle will proceed on God’s terms, not anyone else’s.

5 His mother said to the servants, “Do whatever he tells you.”

  1. Mary tells the servants, “Do whatever he tells you,” showing her absolute confidence that Jesus will act.  It’s also good advice for discipleship today: do whatever Jesus tells you.

6 Nearby stood six stone water jars, the kind used by the Jews for ceremonial washing, each holding from twenty to thirty gallons.

7 Jesus said to the servants, “Fill the jars with water”; so they filled them to the brim.

  1. Notice that Jesus offers no explanation for what he’s asking for, but the servants still fill the jars to the brim!  Their faith is impressive, given that what Jesus is asking for appears to make no sense.
  2. Jesus involves the servants and water in this miracle, rather than producing wine ex nihilo (out of nothing) for spectacle; their actions and resources become the ordinary material he transforms into the extraordinary.  For the disciple, any action can be a part of the miraculous work of God.  Many are, if we pay attention.

8 Then he told them, “Now draw some out and take it to the master of the banquet.”

They did so, 9 and the master of the banquet tasted the water that had been turned into wine. He did not realize where it had come from, though the servants who had drawn the water knew. Then he called the bridegroom aside 10 and said, “Everyone brings out the choice wine first and then the cheaper wine after the guests have had too much to drink; but you have saved the best till now.”

  1. There is no singular “alakazam” moment where the water miraculously changes in a puff of smoke.  Instead, the miracle just happens without anyone quite being able to pinpoint the exact moment, much like the mercy of God is not always clear at first when it enters into our life, but it is not long before it is recognized.
  2. The first person to notice is the master of the banquet.  He is not a follower of Jesus, nor is he someone that Jesus seems to be particularly familiar yet, and yet he can verify the goodness of the miracle.  Real miracles don’t need to be hidden, nor do they require believers to see their goodness.  Their goodness is evidenced by all.
  3. Jesus ensures that joy does not run out.  As Fyodor Dostoevsky puts it in The Brothers Karamazov, “He has made himself like one of us and shares our joy and turns our water into wine, so that the joy of the guests shall not cease.”

11 What Jesus did here in Cana of Galilee was the first of the signs through which he revealed his glory; and his disciples believed in him.

12 After this he went down to Capernaum with his mother and brothers and his disciples. There they stayed for a few days.

  1. Wedding as metaphor for the soul’s relationship to God
    1. Throughout Scripture, weddings symbolize preparation, purity, and lifelong union with God; Cana’s setting connects Jesus’s mission to restoring and binding souls to God.
  2. Banquet as eschatological celebration
    1. Jesus often uses banquet imagery in parables to depict the grand celebration at the end of time when the faithful rejoice with God.
    2. Cana anticipates this eschatological joy: not dour or harsh, but celebratory.
  3. Wine as joy and Jesus’s gift
    1. Wine frequently symbolizes joy (Psalm 104:15; Judges 9:13). At Cana, Jesus ensures joy where circumstances were turning shameful.
    2. Jesus’s first miracle establishes him as the bringer of joy, transforming scarcity into abundance and elevating ordinary water into superior wine.

13 When it was almost time for the Jewish Passover, Jesus went up to Jerusalem. 14 In the temple courts he found people selling cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money. 15 So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple courts, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. 16 To those who sold doves he said, “Get these out of here! Stop turning my Father’s house into a market!” 17 His disciples remembered that it is written: “Zeal for your house will consume me.”

18 The Jews then responded to him, “What sign can you show us to prove your authority to do all this?”

19 Jesus answered them, “Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days.”

20 They replied, “It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and you are going to raise it in three days?” 21 But the temple he had spoken of was his body. 22 After he was raised from the dead, his disciples recalled what he had said. Then they believed the scripture and the words that Jesus had spoken.

23 Now while he was in Jerusalem at the Passover Festival, many people saw the signs he was performing and believed in his name. 24 But Jesus would not entrust himself to them, for he knew all people. 25 He did not need any testimony about mankind, for he knew what was in each person.

John 1 Commentary

From the Pulpit—Video & Full Transcript

John 1:1-18: Prologue
John 1:19-24: Baptism
John 1:35-51: Reaching Out

Commentary

Introduction

  1. John is one of the four Gospels
    1. Matthew emphasizes fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies; 
    2. Mark emphasizes Jesus as servant who suffers;
    3. Luke emphasizes Jesus’s humanity; 
    4. John emphasizes Christ’s divinity
  2. John is often recommended for new Bible readers alongside Philippians, but just because it’s good for beginners doesn’t mean there’s not tremendous depth for everyone.
    1. “Consider, then, brethren, if perchance John is not one of those mountains concerning whom we sang a little while ago, I have lifted up my eyes to the mountains, from whence shall come my help. Therefore, my brethren, if you would understand, lift up your eyes to this mountain, that is, raise yourselves up to the evangelist, rise to his meaning.”  -Augustine of Hippo, Tractates on John, Tractate 1
  3. The depth of God reflected in John’s prologue helps address a common critique of Christianity: “It’s about a magical guy in the sky that grants wishes.”
  4. John’s opening, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God,” immediately displays the complexity and depth of the Christian understanding of God, which even language strains to fully express.
  5. “John is symbolized by an eagle. The other three Evangelists, concerned with those things which Christ did in his flesh, are symbolized by animals which walk on the earth, namely, by a man, a bull calf, and a lion. But John flies like an eagle above the cloud of human weakness and looks upon the light of unchanging truth with the most lofty and firm eyes of the heart.” -Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on John, Prologue, 11

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 

  1. John 1:1 parallels Genesis 1:1 (“In the beginning…”).  John is retelling the story, but answering a question that haunted mankind from the beginning: who is “us?”
    1. Genesis 1:26: “Let us make mankind…” 
    2. Many answers that people have proposed (God is talking to angels (not creators) or humanity (not existent) or the Earth (an object, not a being)) are deeply inadequate.
    3. John reveals “the Word” (Jesus pre-incarnate) as with God and as God—revealing the foundation of the Trinity.
  2. “The Word” refers to Jesus before His incarnation.
    1. In the original Greek that John was writing in, “The Word” is “Logos.”  That word carried important and distinct meanings for both Jewish and Greek audiences:
    2. For a Jewish reader: “Logos” meant “the word,” resonating with the Old Testament’s emphasis on knowing and keeping God’s word.
    3. For a Greek audience: “Logos” meant the “plan,” “blueprint,” or “wisdom” behind the universe—what philosophers sought to understand.
    4. By using “Logos,” John tells both groups that the thing they loved and were looking for had come to find them: Jesus. 
  3. “A word is always something that proceeds from an intellect existing in act; and furthermore, that a word is always a notion (ratio) and likeness of the thing understood.” -Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on John, Lecture 1, 25

3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 

  1. By using that term, “logos,” John affirmed that Jesus was both the creative word of God (the spoken word in Genesis) and the blueprint of creation.

4 In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.

  1. “The darkness has not overcome it” can also be translated “the darkness has not understood it.” Both are good translations.
  2. The world’s darkness (frustration, cruelty) persists because people haven’t understood Jesus. But that darkness can’t overcome the light and hope that is Jesus.

6 There was a man sent from God whose name was John. 7 He came as a witness to testify concerning that light, so that through him all might believe. 8 He himself was not the light; he came only as a witness to the light.

  1. The John in verse 6 is John the Baptist, not the Gospel’s author. Throughout the book of John, the author doesn’t refer to himself by name.  Instead, he calls himself, “the disciple whom Jesus loved.”
  2. John the Baptist’s role was to witness to the light (Jesus), serving as a herald announcing the King’s arrival.
  3. A herald prepares people to receive the king properly. The fact that Jesus’s herald was a crazy guy on society’s fringe shows how little the world understood God or was ready to receive Him.

9 The true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world. 10 He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. 11 He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 

  1. Imagine a parent visiting their child, only for the child not to recognize them at all.  That’s what it was like for God coming to us.

12 Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— 13 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s will, but born of God.

  1. Some might object that we’re all “children of God” because God made us.  
    1. God doesn’t just want to be our father in the smallest sense!  He wants to be our father in the fullest sense!  He wants to be the one we count on in every situation
    2. A good father isn’t just the person who helps us to exist, but the one who nurtures us, protects us, and cares for us.
    3. God invites us to be in a personal relationship with him so we can be His child in the fullest sense.

14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

15 (John testified concerning him. He cried out, saying, “This is the one I spoke about when I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.’”) 

  1. In Hebrew culture, older writers received greater respect.  By conceding to Jesus’s age, John the Baptist is showing that Jesus is the ultimate authority that he doesn’t can’t give any credibility to.  He already has ultimate credibility.

16 Out of his fullness we have all received grace in place of grace already given. 17 For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. 18 No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is himself God and is in closest relationship with the Father, has made him known.

  1. In Exodus 33:20, God says, “you cannot see my face, for no one may see me and live.”
    1. This is because He is utterly holy and beyond comprehension.  Our sinful, mortal minds couldn’t handle it
    2. Even though it’s incomprehensible, God made Himself knowable by coming down to our level as Jesus to restore our broken relationship with Him.
    3. This prologue is highly abstract!  Not everyone is comfortable with abstract thought.  If you’re not, here’s the core takeaway: seek a relationship with God.  In spite of your smallness and his vastness, he wants to know you.  Pray to him.

19 Now this was John’s testimony when the Jewish leaders in Jerusalem sent priests and Levites to ask him who he was. 20 He did not fail to confess, but confessed freely, “I am not the Messiah.”

  1. The narrative shifts back chronologically from the opening eighteen verses (which served as an overview of the Book of John) to the beginning of Jesus’s public ministry.
  2. What is happening to John in this verse is a public interrogation, not a respectful inquiry. Their goal was to discredit John. If he denied having authority, people might stop following him. If he claimed authority, they could report him to the Romans as a troublemaker. 

21 They asked him, “Then who are you? Are you Elijah?”

He said, “I am not.”

“Are you the Prophet?”

He answered, “No.”

  1. The authoritative figures that are being addressed here are all in Scripture.  The second coming of Elijah is in Malachi 4:5, the coming of the prophet is in Deuteronomy 18:15, and prophecies about the coming messiah are found throughout the Old Testament (especially Isaiah).

22 Finally they said, “Who are you? Give us an answer to take back to those who sent us. What do you say about yourself?”

  1. The Pharisees’ may be villains in these passages, but they were also people with real, legitimate concerns.
    1. The Roman-Jewish historian Josephus recorded four individuals in the first century who claimed to be the Messiah, raised armies, and fought the Romans, all of whom understood the Messiah as a military figure.
    2. A later false messiah, Simon Ben Kosiba, led a rebellion in the early second century that resulted in the Romans destroying Israel, renaming it Syria Palestine, and scattering the Jewish people. Israel did not reappear on maps until after World War II.
    3. The Pharisees were justifiably worried that a false messiah would bring destruction, but while trying to prevent this, they tragically overlooked the true Messiah.

23 John replied in the words of Isaiah the prophet, “I am the voice of one calling in the wilderness, ‘Make straight the way for the Lord.’”

  1. John seems surprisingly comfortable given the circumstances! He knew he wasn’t “the one.”  He was just there to point to the person who was.  
    1. How often do we carry the burden of having to be “the one” rather than pointing to the person who genuinely is?
  2. He identifies himself using Isaiah’s words: “I am the voice of one calling in the wilderness: ‘Make straight the way for the Lord.’” (Isa 40:3)
    1. Untying sandals was considered such a lowly task that even rabbis were forbidden from asking their disciples to do it (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Ketubot 96a)  John’s statement signifies his profound sense of unworthiness compared to the greatness of Jesus.

24 Now the Pharisees who had been sent 25 questioned him, “Why then do you baptize if you are not the Messiah, nor Elijah, nor the Prophet?”

26 “I baptize with water,” John replied, “but among you stands one you do not know. 27 He is the one who comes after me, the straps of whose sandals I am not worthy to untie.”

  1. The practice of baptism existed before John, rooted in Old Testament purification rituals, such as priests washing in a basin before approaching the altar in the tabernacle and later bathing in the temple.
  2. John brought this practice to the people, applying the principle of purification to prepare for God’s approach in the form of Jesus.
  3. John’s baptism was a symbolic act. He explicitly states, “I baptize with water,” indicating it was just water and held no special divine power. It was a good thing to do, encouraging people to recognize their sinfulness and need for God’s purification.
  4. “John answered, I baptize with water. As if to say: You should not be disturbed, if I, who am not the Messiah, nor Elijah, nor the Prophet, baptize; because my baptism is not completive but imperfect. For the perfection of baptism requires the washing of the body and of the soul; and the body, by its nature, is indeed washed by water, but the soul is washed by the Spirit alone.” -Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on John, Lecture 13, 244.

28 This all happened at Bethany on the other side of the Jordan, where John was baptizing.

29 The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, “Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world! 

  1. The title “Lamb of God” connects Jesus to a rich scriptural history of lambs being sacrificed so that others might live: the ram that died in Isaac’s place, the Passover lamb whose blood protected the Israelites, and the lambs sacrificed for forgiveness in the temple.
  2. John identifies Jesus as “the” ultimate Lamb who will provide the final sacrifice.
  3. The use of the singular “sin” (not “sins”) is significant. Sins are the symptoms (wrong actions), but “sin” is the underlying disease or “rot in our soul” that began with Adam and Eve. Jesus came to eliminate the root cause, not just the symptoms.

30 This is the one I meant when I said, ‘A man who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.’ 31 I myself did not know him, but the reason I came baptizing with water was that he might be revealed to Israel.”

  1. Why would the sinless Jesus need to be baptized? Common reasons for baptism (joining the church, receiving the Holy Spirit, washing away sin) do not apply to Him.  Surely Jesus could have revealed himself to John the Baptist in other ways.  Why was this way fitting?
    1. John’s baptism was purely symbolic, which means a lot of the answers (the bestowal of the Holy Spirit, joining the Body of Christ, etc.) don’t apply here.  It really is a matter of symbols: why would a sinless person symbolically ask for purification?
    2. The 18th-century monk Nikodemos of Athos speaks to this in his prayers: “Jesus, being God, had no need for purification, but he suffered purification for me,” (Prayers to Our Lord Jesus Christ).
    3. Jesus gained nothing from baptism; it was an act of humility. His glory is repeatedly revealed through such humble acts: the infinite God being born in a small human body, in a manger; and ultimately dying a humiliating death on a cross.
    4. “And why must the Lord be baptized? Because many there would be to despise baptism, that they might appear to be endowed with greater grace than they saw other believers endowed with…. [T]he Lord was willing to be baptized by a servant, as if addressing His chief sons: Why do you extol yourselves? Why lift yourselves up because you have, one prudence, another learning, another chastity, another the courage of patience? Can you possibly have as much as I who gave you these? And yet I was baptized by a servant, you disdain to be baptized by the Lord.”  -Augustine of Hippo

32 Then John gave this testimony: “I saw the Spirit come down from heaven as a dove and remain on him. 33 And I myself did not know him, but the one who sent me to baptize with water told me, ‘The man on whom you see the Spirit come down and remain is the one who will baptize with the Holy Spirit.’ 

  1. What was once a purely symbolic, natural act became more than natural, now carrying the power of the Holy Spirit to bestow grace, unite a person with the body of Christ, and wash away sin.
  2. Note that there is no reason to expect two baptisms.  Some traditions insist that you need one “water baptism” and one “baptism of the Spirit” (generally identified by strong feelings in the believer), but Ephesians 4 is explicit that there is only one baptism. Jesus has transformed baptism, not added a second baptism.

34 I have seen and I testify that this is God’s Chosen One.

  1. Matthew 11:11”Truly I tell you, among those born of women there has not risen anyone greater than John the Baptist; yet whoever is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.”
    1. John was the greatest of “those born of women,” or those born by purely natural means.
    2. Through baptism, believers are made part of the “Kingdom of Heaven” and are greater than John the Baptist
  2. Just as Jesus transformed water and a human body into something more than natural, He transforms believers into more than natural people by giving them the Holy Spirit.

Four Accounts of Calling

  1. These next four stories all show different disciples being called into ministry by Christ:
    1. Andrew and Peter join Jesus through intellectual inquiry 
    2. Peter follows Jesus because of a personal invitation from someone he trusts
    3. Philip joins Philip abruptly because of his experience meeting Jesus
    4. Nathanael overcomes his skepticism after seeing a miracle
  2. The close proximity of the stories help illustrate the diverse ways that people come to faith in Christ

35 The next day John was there again with two of his disciples.

  1. In the ancient world, discipleship was immersive—students followed a teacher to observe how they lived and embodied their teachings. This approach emphasizes that profound truths should transform one’s whole life, not remain abstract. The speaker contrasts this with modern education’s focus on fact acquisition and suggests discipleship offers a valuable lesson in witnessing wisdom lived out.

36 When he saw Jesus passing by, he said, “Look, the Lamb of God!”

  1. John refrains from retaining disciples for personal benefit (labor, prestige). Instead, he directly points them to Jesus, modeling ministry that prioritizes others’ growth over personal gain.
  2. This contrasts with common tendencies of leaders to hoard followers; John advocates sending people to the best source for their development.

37 When the two disciples heard him say this, they followed Jesus. 38 Turning around, Jesus saw them following and asked, “What do you want?”

They said, “Rabbi” (which means “Teacher”), “where are you staying?”

39 “Come,” he replied, “and you will see.”

So they went and saw where he was staying, and they spent that day with him. It was about four in the afternoon.

  1. “It was about four in the afternoon” (verse forty) is a pretty specific detail.  This, along with the fact that John never names himself in his gospel and this particular disciple is unnamed, suggests this unnamed disciple was John.

40 Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother, was one of the two who heard what John had said and who had followed Jesus. 41 The first thing Andrew did was to find his brother Simon and tell him, “We have found the Messiah” (that is, the Christ). 

  1. In his book The Inviting Church, church growth expert Roy Oswald asked a number of congregants why they worshipped at the church they did if they weren’t raised there. 
    1. 86% started attending because a friend or family member invited them; 
    2. 6% came because of a program; 
    3. 6% were invited by a pastor, 
    4. 2% due to advertising.
  2. Peter’s journey is statistically common!  So many people relate to Peter, but the Church needs more Andrews to invite others.
  3. Peter (originally Simon) comes to Jesus through his brother Andrew’s invitation: “We have found the Messiah!” Andrew is only mentioned twelve times in the Bible, and four of those are just in lists!  Of the remaining eight narrative mentions of Andrew, he’s bringing people to Jesus in three of them. He has a gift for connection and evangelism. The Church needs its Peters and Pauls, but we also need our Andres!

42 And he brought him to Jesus.

Jesus looked at him and said, “You are Simon son of John. You will be called Cephas” (which, when translated, is Peter).

  1. Jesus renames Simon to Cephas (Aramaic for “stone”; translated into Greek and then English as “Peter”), signaling a break from old to new identity and commissioning him as a “rock” on which Jesus will build his ministry. This affirms Peter’s gifts and shows that Jesus is giving him meaningful work.
    1. Everyone wants to make a difference in the world!  We are not just called to sit in pews for Jesus, but change the world for Him.

43 The next day Jesus decided to leave for Galilee. Finding Philip, he said to him, “Follow me.”

  1. Philip’s calling is incredibly abrupt! Jesus says, “Follow me,” and Philip does just that. The abruptness suggests an immediate, vivid experience with Jesus that was enough to get Nathaniel to worship Jesus without a prior relationship.  For some, a direct encounter is decisive.

44 Philip, like Andrew and Peter, was from the town of Bethsaida. 45 Philip found Nathanael and told him, “We have found the one Moses wrote about in the Law, and about whom the prophets also wrote—Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.”

46 “Nazareth! Can anything good come from there?” Nathanael asked.

“Come and see,” said Philip.

  1. Nathanael resists at first, ignoring the ties that Philip makes to the prophets and Moses.  fixating on the detail that he’s from Nazareth, and that’s not a particularly reputable town.  Philip wisely avoids debating issues that don’t really matter and instead invites him to “come and see.”  His goal is not to win a debate, but to win Nathanael over to Christ by introducing them.

47 When Jesus saw Nathanael approaching, he said of him, “Here truly is an Israelite in whom there is no deceit.”

48 “How do you know me?” Nathanael asked.

Jesus answered, “I saw you while you were still under the fig tree before Philip called you.”

49 Then Nathanael declared, “Rabbi, you are the Son of God; you are the king of Israel.”

  1. Jesus greets Nathanael as “an Israelite in whom there is no deceit,” showing that he knows his character, and says that he saw him under the fig tree before Philip called him.  Given Nathanael’s reaction, obviously this wasn’t a mere overhearing of someone else’s conversation; it was miraculous!

50 Jesus said, “You believe because I told you I saw you under the fig tree. You will see greater things than that.” 51 He then added, “Very truly I tell you, you will see ‘heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending on’ the Son of Man.”

  1. In verse 51, Jesus is referencing Genesis 28 (Jacob’s ladder) to declare himself the bridge between Heaven and Earth.  If knowing a name is so impressive to Nathanael, he should be ready to see the full nature of the Son of Man, which is infinitely more miraculous.