John 7:14-36 Teaching at the Festival of Tabernacles

Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript

From the Pulpit

Commentary

14 Not until halfway through the festival did Jesus go up to the temple courts and begin to teach. 15 The Jews there were amazed and asked, “How did this man get such learning without having been taught?”

  1. “Not until halfway through the festival…”

    1. Jesus came to the Festival of Tabernacles as a devout Jew following God’s commands, not as a public figure intending to do teachings or miracles, but he could not tolerate hearing falsehoods being taught.

    2. One can imagine all of the different sects of Judaism there that might have frustrated Jesus to the point that he had to speak up:

      1. The Sadducees and their denial of the afterlife.

      2. The Pharisees and their hyper-fixation on the law.

      3. The Essenes and their ritualistic apocalypticism.

      4. The Zealots and their anti-Roman fervor.

      5. Some would-be political messiah trying to drum up support.

    3. Truth was so important to Jesus that he had to speak, even when the world longed for him to be silent.

  2. “How did this man get such learning…”

    1. Jesus’s teachings were profound to the crowd.  Given their location, there’s no doubt that they had heard other highly-educated rabbis speak, but Jesus’s teachings seem to have made all others look like little children in comparison.

    2. Unlike other rabbis in his era like Rabbi Hillel and Rabbi Shammai, Jesus did not cite others at length.  He taught with authority because he was God, the ultimate source of truth.  Who could he have possibly quoted that would add even an ounce of authority to the divine “I am?”

    3. Some did seem concerned that Jesus did not possess a traditional rabbinic education.  Typically, there was a lengthy apprenticeship (up to ten years) under an established rabbi.

    4. There can be no doubt that education is valuable, but the purpose of any education is to find truth, which is more important than any formal credentials or accolades.  Jesus himself was the truth.  Nothing could add to what he already embodied.

16 Jesus answered, “My teaching is not my own. It comes from the one who sent me. 17 Anyone who chooses to do the will of God will find out whether my teaching comes from God or whether I speak on my own. 18 Whoever speaks on their own does so to gain personal glory, but he who seeks the glory of the one who sent him is a man of truth; there is nothing false about him. 19 Has not Moses given you the law? Yet not one of you keeps the law. Why are you trying to kill me?”

Jesus proves that his knowledge is legitimate in three different ways

  1. Scripture: “My teaching is not my own…”

    1. The Israelites had the word of God with them in the Old Testament Scriptures.  To verify Jesus’s teachings, they could literally check to see if Christ’s words were his own, or if they aligned with the word of God.

    2. Early Christians constantly pointed to the Old Testament for evidence of God’s coming work in Christ.

      1. In his famous Dialogue with Trypho, Justin Martyr (a Christian) debates a Jew named Trypho and uses the Old Testament extensively to persuade him of Christ’s divinity.

      2. “If I undertook to prove this by doctrines or arguments of man, you should not bear with me. But if I quote frequently Scriptures, and so many of them, referring to this point, and ask you to comprehend them, you are hard-hearted in the recognition of the mind and will of God.” -Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho, Ch. 68.
      1. The ultimate authority for teaching is Scripture, not any degree or certification

        1. “In the Bible we have a perfect library, and he who studies it thoroughly will be a better scholar than if he had devoured the Alexandrian Library entire”. -Charles Spurgeon, Lectures to my Students, Lecture XIII.

  1. Action: “Anyone who chooses to do the will of God will find out whether my teaching comes from God.”

    1. He tied knowledge to lived experience, asserting real knowledge changes one’s life.  In embodying his teachings, you could feel the power of God.

    2. Many people carry strange pet conspiracy theories about the world, but these theories go unacted on.  They aren’t real enough to affect a life, and so they are not really real at all.”

    3. Choosing to pray, to read Scripture, and to ask God for help are often significant moments where someone who is only theorizing about being a Chrisitan sees the power of God.  Living like a Chrisitan shows the power of God in your life.

    4. Wesley famously emphasized the value of living the will of God to understand it better.  In his commentary, he notes on this verse: “This is a universal rule, with regard to all persons and doctrines. He that is thoroughly willing to do it, shall certainly know what the will of God is.”

  2. Personal Witness- “He who seeks the glory of the one who sent him is a man of truth. There is nothing false about him.”

    1. Jesus’s motivations are selfless.  He’s putting himself at risk to teach, rather than others who taught for personal glory.

    2. Christ’s life was so blameless and obviously beyond reproach.  He’s so confident in this fact that he asks the crowd why they dare to attack him when they all break the law.

20 “You are demon-possessed,” the crowd answered. “Who is trying to kill you?”

21 Jesus said to them, “I did one miracle, and you are all amazed. 22 Yet, because Moses gave you circumcision (though actually it did not come from Moses, but from the patriarchs), you circumcise a boy on the Sabbath. 23 Now if a boy can be circumcised on the Sabbath so that the law of Moses may not be broken, why are you angry with me for healing a man’s whole body on the Sabbath? 24 Stop judging by mere appearances, but instead judge correctly.”

  1. “You are demon-possessed…Who is trying to kill you?”
    1. In this particular instance of Scripture, “are you demon possessed,” might translate to something like, “Are you crazy?”  They’re saying that Jesus is wildly inconsistent with reality.

    2. In verse 13, they deliberately stayed quiet about Jesus because they were afraid of the leaders that wanted to kill him.  They know.

    3. The crowd would rather be comfortable than brave.  Openly admitting that the leaders are corrupt would be life-shattering, so they claim Jesus is crazy rather than affirming what their hearts know is true.

  1. “…you circumcise a boy on the Sabbath.”
    1. Circumcision is a ritual that does a small amount of damage to someone to keep the law of God.  This was allowable on a Sunday.

    2. Jesus healed someone on a Sunday and got in trouble.  If a small amount of pain is tolerable for God’s sake on the Sabbath, why is a miraculous healing inappropriate?  The logic is inconsistent.

    3. “By this example he defends his action, although he does not merely argue from what is similar, but draws a comparison between the greater and the less. There was this similarity between circumcision and the cure of the paralytic, that both were works of God; but Christ maintains that the latter is more excellent, because the benefit of it extends to the whole man. Now if he had merely cured the man of bodily disease, the comparison would not have been applicable; for circumcision would have greater excellence as to the cure of the soul. Christ, therefore, connects the spiritual advantage of the miracle with the outward benefit granted to the body; and on this account he justly prefers to circumcision the entire cure of a man.” -John Calvin, Commentary on John, Ch. 7, 188.

25 At that point some of the people of Jerusalem began to ask, “Isn’t this the man they are trying to kill? 26 Here he is, speaking publicly, and they are not saying a word to him. Have the authorities really concluded that he is the Messiah? 27 But we know where this man is from; when the Messiah comes, no one will know where he is from.”

28 Then Jesus, still teaching in the temple courts, cried out, “Yes, you know me, and you know where I am from. I am not here on my own authority, but he who sent me is true. You do not know him, 29 but I know him because I am from him and he sent me.”

30 At this they tried to seize him, but no one laid a hand on him, because his hour had not yet come. 31 Still, many in the crowd believed in him. They said, “When the Messiah comes, will he perform more signs than this man?”

  1. “Have the authorities really concluded that he is the Messiah?”

    1. Some in Jerusalem wondered if the authorities believed Jesus was the Messiah since he spoke publicly unhindered.

    2. They dismissed this based on a folk belief that the Messiah’s origin would be unknown, while they knew Jesus was born in Bethlehem, failing to search the Scriptures, which do prophesy his birthplace (Micah 5:2 )

  2. “Yes, you know me, and you know where I am from…”

    1. “Therefore Christ asks in a tone of sarcasm: “‘You know where I come from?  How well you know it!  For because you do not know him who sent me, how could you know me and know where I come from?  To be sure, you know that I was to come from Nazareth, from Galilee and Judea, and that is true; but that is not enough to know about my origin.’” -Martin Luther, The Fifth Sermon on John 7, (1531).

  3. “no one laid a hand on him, because his hour had not yet come.”

    1. When the crowd finally grasped beyond a doubt that Jesus was climbing to be the Son of God from Heaven, they dashed to seize him!  Their logic had failed at every turn, and so they resorted to force.  There was no room for convenient ignorance about his claimed title and purpose.

  4. “Still, many in the crowd believed in him.”

    1.  “There was a certain crowd of people which quickly saw its own sickness, and without delay recognized His remedy.” -Augustine of Hippo, Tractate 31, 7.

32 The Pharisees heard the crowd whispering such things about him. Then the chief priests and the Pharisees sent temple guards to arrest him.

33 Jesus said, “I am with you for only a short time, and then I am going to the one who sent me. 34 You will look for me, but you will not find me; and where I am, you cannot come.”

35 The Jews said to one another, “Where does this man intend to go that we cannot find him? Will he go where our people live scattered among the Greeks, and teach the Greeks? 36 What did he mean when he said, ‘You will look for me, but you will not find me,’ and ‘Where I am, you cannot come’?”

  1. Will he go where our people live scattered among the Greeks…”

    1. The leaders ensure that willful ignorance returns to the crowd.  Despite Jesus talking about divine realms, they immediately pivot the conversation back to the earthly and interpret a meaning that isn’t at all rational in the conversation.

    2. “The Lord was indeed about to go to the Gentiles, not by His bodily presence, but still with His feet. What were His feet? Those which Saul desired to trample upon by persecution, when the Head cried out to him, ‘Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?’ (Acts 9:4).” -Augustine of Hippo, Tractate 31, 7.

Full Transcript

Last week, we saw Jesus getting ready to go to the Festival of Tabernacles. He was going down to Jerusalem, and this week he is there. He is not going in public ministry; that is not his goal. He is not going there to officially try to teach, show off, or do miracles. He is just going to be an observant Jew. God said to go to the Festival of Tabernacles at Jerusalem, and so that is exactly what he did. Now, we are picking up here, and he is going to teach because he just can’t help himself.

As we go through, really pay attention to knowledge in this passage. I think a lot of people don’t necessarily associate knowledge with faith. They kind of think of them as different, separate things. People don’t often recognize that Jesus was brilliant. It is easy to imagine Jesus as a moral teacher—someone who came to teach people to be kind and to change the way they act. That is true. Sometimes people think he was just a peasant, a carpenter, a guy who was really folksy, and that is not necessarily untrue either. But this is also the one through whom everything was made; the whole world was made by him. He was brilliant. He knew it all because he made it all. There is no greater authority than him. Pay attention to the way he addresses knowledge throughout this passage, and the way he weaves it in with faith in a constructive way that I think can help a lot of us.

Verse 14 says, “Not until halfway through the festival did Jesus go up to the temple courts and begin to teach.” I think this is kind of a funny little passage, just the way it is worded. It is almost like saying he didn’t go there to teach, but would you believe it? He made it halfway through the festival before he got up there. They are surprised it took him that long. Jesus may not have come here to teach, but he could not stand by and listen as some of the nonsense being told at the temple went on.

This festival was on the temple mount. There would have been thousands of people from all over the place. Anyone who was a devout Jew would go to Jerusalem for this festival. While they were there, they would have encountered some of the religious sects of this timeframe who served as priests at this location, like the Pharisees, Sadducees, and the like. We see Jesus argue with the Pharisees all the time, so we will look at the Sadducees this time just as a thought exercise.

Let’s say there was a Sadducee priest there—and there certainly would have been. Imagine Jesus overhearing a conversation where someone goes up to this priest and says, “Excuse me, I just want to know how I can get to heaven.” The Sadducees didn’t believe in life after death, so they probably would have said something like, “Oh, you sweet summer child. There is no heaven. You’ve been taught incorrectly. Let me help explain how things really are. We’re just trying to live well in this life. Don’t worry about heaven.” Imagine Jesus standing over there, his eye twitching because he knows there is a heaven, he has seen it, and he is from there. Hearing incorrect teaching being taught to the people he came to help was more than he could bear. He makes it halfway through before he gets up and starts teaching, essentially saying, “All right, I’m going to have to set some of you straight because there are some things being said that are not so.”

Verse 15 says the Jews were amazed and asked, “How did this man get such learning without having been taught?” Notice first off that Jesus was a good teacher. The things he was saying were profound. The priests at the temple were no slouches; these were some of the foremost intellectuals of the entire society. They were spiritual leaders, but they were also responsible for the collective wisdom of their culture. The Greeks had their philosophers. Today, we have college professors as our foremost intellectuals. In Israel, they had the priests. If you had a question, the priests in Jerusalem were some of the most highly educated people you could possibly ask.

Jesus starts teaching at the temple and people listen to him, and he makes the leaders look like little children. Imagine if you were at a college lecture and one of the students stood up and said, “Professor, I think you’ve got a few details wrong. Let me just walk you through this.” Then they start writing formulas on the board, and sure enough, they know infinitely more than the professor does. That is what it was like. Jesus is brilliant. His teachings are profound in a way that others’ are not, and the way he teaches is different, too.

In this timeframe, the way rabbis taught was by pointing to all of the people who came in that tradition before them. If you were listening to a rabbi, they would say, “Well, on this matter Rabbi Hillel says this, but you also need to keep in mind Rabbi Shammai, who has a disagreeing opinion and would say this.” They were showing that they knew everyone who came before them and understood the conversation as it had gone thus far in their culture. That is not a bad way to teach. I do that. This morning I have a quote from Martin Luther for you. Why? Because he knows more than I do. I am not the authority. There are smarter, wiser people than me whom I lean on to try to make sure I am going in the right direction, and I try to show you when I am doing that.

Jesus didn’t need to do that. Jesus didn’t need to name-drop all of these other people he had learned from because he was God. He could teach with authority. He didn’t need to say, “Well, on this matter Rabbi Shammai says this, and Rabbi Hillel says this.” He could just say, “This is the way it is. Source: me. I’m telling you, that’s the way it is.” He taught with authority, and the things he said immediately rang true to people.

You see their response. They are amazed, but they also ask, “How did this man get such learning without being taught? Where are his credentials?” There was a formal education process to become a rabbi. You would need to apprentice under a pre-existing rabbi, a process that could take up to 10 years. If you really wanted to become a rabbi, you found a good one, asked to become their apprentice, and served under them until they felt you were ready. It could take a long time. Jesus did not do that. He had no formal education.

I am not one to deride education; there is no glory in ignorance. But at the same time, education is intended for a purpose. You need it to know what is true. That is the goal. If someone has 18 diplomas on their wall but they think one plus one is three, it doesn’t matter what their accolades are or how many years they spent studying. You are not looking for someone who has good credentials; you are looking for someone who can teach you what is true. Jesus didn’t have a formal education, but he knew what was true, which is infinitely more important.

Jesus shows the crowd that his knowledge and teaching are legitimate with three moves in this coming paragraph. He starts, “My teaching is not my own; it comes from the one who sent me.” They are wondering where he is getting this stuff, who he learned from, and how they can trust him. Jesus clarifies, “I am not teaching you things that are just my random opinion. I am teaching you what God says on this. That’s what I’m interested in. Here’s what God says. You don’t believe me? Go look at the scriptures. Go pore through what has been recorded by the prophets, look at what I’m saying, and match it up to see if it makes sense.”

He immediately invites them to do that, and that is the way many early Christians would evangelize. You have to keep in mind that the New Testament took some time to put together. After Jesus ascended into heaven, it is not like everything was right there. The last book, Revelation, was written sometime just before the year 100. There was a period of years where the documents were not even completed, much less canonized. What did Christians do before those were available? They would use the Old Testament. They would say, “Let’s open this up, and I’m going to show you how this is all about Jesus. Here’s this passage in Isaiah; Jesus fulfilled that. Here’s a passage in Jeremiah; this is about Jesus. Here’s a passage in Malachi; this is about Jesus.” They showed that Jesus was not some random new thing. He was doing exactly what was in line with what God had foretold. His whole ministry was not his own thing; it was what God had promised from the beginning, and you could check the scriptures to be sure of that. Jesus didn’t just want to teach his own opinions; he was teaching what God had proclaimed, and he invited people to verify that.

That makes me think a little bit about those of you who have been in my office before. I have my diploma hanging up behind my desk from Duke University. It feels wrong to mention the Blue Devil during a sermon in church, so I won’t, but it was a good experience. I hesitated before I hung that on the wall, though. Ultimately, I did it because when you pay that much for a piece of paper, you want to put it somewhere. It is expensive paper.

At the end of the day, that is not the cornerstone of my ministry. I don’t want people to listen to me just because I have a fancy paper on my wall. There are a lot of other people who have fancy papers on their walls; some of what they teach is good, and some of what they teach is not good. Ultimately, sound doctrine and good knowledge do not come from a random person’s teaching just because they have a diploma. It comes from scripture. Insofar as knowledge is rooted in scripture, it is good. That is the source of real authority when you are teaching, not a diploma. Good though it may be, and though it may indicate that you have studied, the truth of legitimacy is rooted here. That makes all the difference: knowing that teaching is not just coming from some random person, but is rooted in what God said.

I think that is true for all disciplines, too. It is not just a pastor thing. Every discipline imaginable comes from God. What is math but the logic that underpins God’s creation? What is biology but an expression of the way he created everything? What is agriculture but the continuing work that was laid out in Genesis when God gave Adam the Garden of Eden to take care of? All of these pieces of knowledge are not just random pieces of trivia that don’t matter. All of them are things that were set forth by God when he made all of this, and all of them point to him. The end of every piece of knowledge points back to God. Insofar as it does that, it is good knowledge. Insofar as it doesn’t, it is trivia and nothing more.

Jesus says, “You want to see if my teachings are legitimate? Check them against God. See if they’re in line. See if my teachings align with the Scriptures.”

Then he moves on to a second point: “Anyone who chooses to do the will of God will find out whether my teaching comes from God or whether I speak on my own.” Notice the way he is moving here. The second way he invites verification is by looking at your actions. He knows that knowledge is not just random theory floating out there in the ether. Real knowledge is something that is lived, something that makes a difference in our lives. That is real knowledge.

Sometimes people divorce those things entirely. They have these wild theories, but then you look at their lives and they live the same as anybody else. I know some people who have wildly conspiratorial ideas. They have crazy theories, but they live just like everyone else. They get you one-on-one and say, “Did you know that the pigeons are government drones sent to do surveillance on us?” and you just say, “Okay.” Then you get back in public, and they live just like anybody else. They have these weird pet theories, but they don’t live any differently. If they really believed that pigeons were government drones, wouldn’t they try to smack one out of the sky? Then they would see, “Oh, shoot. This isn’t a robot. I was wrong; I just killed a random pigeon.” They could verify this if they tried to live it, but they don’t. To them, it is just a theory, a fun experiment to think about in their spare time.

If you really believe something, it changes the way you live because you can test it. You can see: Is this true? Does this work? Is it honest? Is it real? Jesus says it is the same thing with his doctrine. He says if you want to understand it, if you want to get it, live it. Try to please God and see if what I am teaching is true.

I can personally verify that. I know when I was still a sort of “proto-Christian,” I started to think about Christianity but thought the Bible had a lot wrong with it. I thought Jesus was a nice guy, but wrong about a fair amount—though still pretty admirable in the grand scheme of things. I thought there was a bunch of stuff that made no sense. Prayer? Nonsense. It doesn’t work. Scripture? Full of errors. It couldn’t possibly be worth too much of my time. What changed me was trying it. Jesus said I should do this, so I thought maybe I should try it and see what happens. I started studying scripture more, and it wasn’t what I thought it was; there was more to it than I understood. I tried praying. It didn’t make any sense to me, and I thought it was crazy. How would closing my eyes, folding my hands, and saying some things make a difference? But I tried it. It was not what I thought it was; there was more to this than I realized. The more I tried to live what I found in the scriptures, the more I found them to be true. By trying to live something, you can see if it makes sense.

Jesus invites people to live in a God-honoring way, and you will understand his doctrine more than ever. It will blossom right in front of you. If you have some part of the Bible, some book, or some doctrine that you think is crazy—where you like the rest of it, but not that one because it is just out there—maybe a way to start making some headway is to look at your life. Look at your life and ask, “Am I trying to honor God? Where are the places that I’m not willing to trust God yet? And what would it look like to start living in a way that honors God?” If you address that sin, sometimes when you come back to those things that made no sense before, it is like a veil has been lifted. You will understand them in ways that you didn’t think were possible previously.

Jesus began by saying, “Look at what God said. See if what I’m saying lines up.” Then he moves on and says, “Try to live a righteous life. You will see that my teachings are true.” Now he moves to his third and final validation that his knowledge is legitimate. He says in verse 18, “Whoever speaks on their own does so to gain personal glory, but he who seeks the glory of the one who sent him is a man of truth.” There is nothing false about him.

Jesus says, “Look at my personal witness. Look at my life. See if my life is worthy of your time.” He says it pretty boldly. He points out that there are a lot of people out there who are just trying to sell you something. There are a lot of people who want to get famous and build their own careers, so they are trying to convince you of something for their own sake. Jesus, on the other hand, says, “I have no reason to be doing this unless I cared about you. I am at risk talking to you here. The leaders hate me. They’re waiting for something like this, but I need to tell you this. I am teaching you selflessly. Look at my life! There is nothing false about me!”

Can you imagine saying that in front of a group of people? If you are full of it and just making things up, someone is going to say something, right? Can you imagine if I stood up and said, “You can trust me because I’ve never done a thing wrong in my life”? If my wife were here, she would be able to tell you a few things. I do not have a perfect track record. Jesus says he does: “Look at my life.”

Then he compares and contrasts that with the people who are in charge. He says in verse 19, “Has not Moses given you the law? Yet not one of you keeps the law.” You are listening to these people who teach you that the law is good enough, and that if you can keep the law well enough, that is going to be good for you. How is it working? Are you keeping it? Are they keeping it? No. They are living lives that fall short, but you are listening to them, while I am living a life beyond repute. What are you doing? Why are you listening to them and not me? Why are you trying to kill me?

The crowd responds in verse 20, which can be a little confusing for some people. They say, “You are demon-possessed! Who’s trying to kill you?” In context here, it clearly means, “You’re crazy! What are you talking about? No one’s trying to kill you.” Part of what is confusing is that if we look back at verse 13, just a little way ahead, we know that the crowd was quiet about Jesus because they knew that the leaders were trying to kill him. They didn’t want to talk about him because they didn’t want to get in trouble.

How do we resolve this? There are a couple of different ways. The most popular view, which is not what I agree with but is what a lot of commentators accept, is that the Feast of Tabernacles drew Jews from all over the world. They were all over the Roman Empire—people from the furthest reaches of Latin-speaking areas and Greek-speaking areas. Not all of them had heard of Jesus. A lot of them had never heard of him before because they weren’t from there. When they see this guy saying, “They’re trying to kill me,” they are just confused. It is legitimate ignorance: “No one’s trying to kill you! You’re up there talking, and no one’s doing anything!”

That is possible. However, I think a better way to resolve it is to acknowledge that the crowd is simply being inconsistent. Rather than attributing it to them being from out of town, why don’t we just acknowledge they are being hypocritical? They were afraid to talk about Jesus earlier because they knew people were trying to kill him. When Jesus points out that the system is rotten, that he is teaching truth, and that the leaders are teaching falsehoods, he asks, “Why are you okay with this?” What do they do? They go back to what is comfortable: “Who’s trying to kill you? Our leaders are trustworthy. You’re crazy. I don’t know what you’re talking about.” Is that true? No.

How much would it totally shatter the lives they were living if they acknowledged, “Yeah, the leaders are corrupt. They are on a campaign of censorship. The things they’re teaching are wrong, and this random rabbi they’re persecuting is right”? That would change everything. That would be a deeply uncomfortable, life-shattering truth to accept. So some of them say what is comfortable: “Nah, I’m pretty sure it’s okay. Pretty sure it’s fine. They’re fine. You’re crazy, Jesus. It couldn’t possibly be true.” They know it is true; they just don’t want to confront it.

In verse 21, Jesus says to them, “I did one miracle, and you are all amazed. Yet, because Moses gave you circumcision (though it did not come from Moses, but from the patriarchs), you circumcise a boy on the Sabbath. Now if a boy can be circumcised on the Sabbath so that the law of Moses may not be broken, why are you angry at me for healing a man’s whole body on the Sabbath? Stop judging by mere appearances. Instead, judge correctly.”

You are comfortable with the status quo. You are comfortable with the way things have always been, and that is all you want. Think it through. Think logically about what is happening here. Look at this: your leaders will circumcise a boy on the Sabbath. According to the book of Leviticus, a boy should be circumcised on the eighth day after he is born. If that fell on the Sabbath, that was the eighth day, so they would do it. Does the process of circumcision hurt? Sure, it is certainly not a pleasant one. They hurt someone on a small scale. Jesus is not saying the ritual is unhelpful or illegitimate; he is just pointing out that it hurts. He says, “You’re willing to hurt someone on that day, but when I healed someone’s whole body on the Sabbath…”

He is talking about when he healed the man by the pool at Bethesda, which was the last time he was in Jerusalem. That act made the authorities very angry at him. He says, “The last time I did this, everyone was angry at me. So it’s okay to hurt someone on the Sabbath, but not to heal them? Does that make sense? Is that logical?” No. Stop judging by what is comfortable, by what is easy, and by what you are used to. Instead, judge correctly.

He turns it back over to the people, and they are almost on the cusp of something here. At that point, the people of Jerusalem began to ask, “Isn’t this the man they’re trying to kill? Here he is speaking publicly, and they’re not saying a word to him. Have the authorities concluded that he’s the Messiah? But we know where this man is from. When the Messiah comes, there will be no one who will know where he’s from.”

This was a common folk teaching in that timeframe. There were a lot of people who believed this, and there are small scriptural passages that hint at it. There are verses in the book of Malachi and the book of Isaiah that say things like suddenly the Messiah appeared and went about his business. They took those passages to mean that you can’t know where the real Messiah is from because he just drops out of heaven at the temple, does his thing, and that is it. They believed that was how it really worked. If they had sincerely searched the Scriptures, they would know that is not the case because the prophecies about Jesus being born are right there. If they had really looked, they would know that everything laid out in Scripture—the whole of Jesus’s incarnation and life—is also there in a way that resolves that tension. But they didn’t look. They were comfortable with what was normal, with the standard, and with what other people told them the Bible said. They didn’t feel the need to look for themselves: “I hear the Scriptures say this. That’s fine. That’s close enough. I think that’s probably right.”

Jesus responds, “Yes, you know me, and you know where I am from. But I am not here on my own authority. He who sent me is true. You do not know him, but I know him because I am from him and he sent me.”

Martin Luther, the father of Protestantism, gave some really good insight on this. He says there is sarcasm in Christ’s voice as he asks, “You know me and you know where I am from, do you? You don’t know the one who sent me, so how could you really know me and where I am from?” Jesus is telling them, “You don’t know nearly as much as you think you know. I am from heaven. My Father is God. That’s where I am really from.”

At this point, people know what he is saying. This is not lost on them. The claims he is making—the claim to not only be the Messiah but the Son of God from heaven—cause the alarm bells in their heads to go off. Verse 30 says, “At this they tried to seize him.” They tried to reason with him, and they repeatedly found different ways to remain comfortable, but Jesus has not let them stay comfortable. Now that their logic has failed, they resort to force. They tried to seize him, but no one laid a hand on him because his hour had not yet come. Still, many in the crowd believed in him. They said, “When the Messiah comes, will he perform more signs than this man?” There are some people who look at Jesus, listen to him, reason through his teachings, and realize they cannot imagine someone better than this. They can’t imagine a Messiah coming who somehow does all of this even better. This is the best it could possibly be; he must be right, in spite of the fact that most of the crowd is furious.

Now the leaders get involved. From here on out, we see the leaders step in. Verse 32 says, “The Pharisees heard the crowd whispering such things about him. Then the chief priests and the Pharisees sent temple guards to arrest him.”

Jesus said, “I am with you only for a short time, and then I am going to the one who sent me. You will look for me, but you will not find me; and where I am, you cannot come.”

The Jews said to one another, “Where does this man intend to go that we cannot find him? Will he go where our people live scattered among the Greeks, and teach the Greeks? What did he mean when he said, ‘You will look for me and you will not find me; and where I am you cannot come’?”

This immediately follows his clear claim: “I’m from God. I am from heaven,” which people literally tried to attack him for because they found it blasphemous. Following this up, he tells the leaders that he is only here for a short time, that he is going back to where he came from, and they won’t be able to follow. The leaders are even more ignorant than the people. The people were uncomfortable and frustrated by what he said, but they knew what it meant. The leaders seem unable to even make sense of it. They ask, “What is he talking about? Do you think he’s going on vacation to Greece? Is that what he means?” No, that obviously isn’t what he was talking about. Most of us in this room can see pretty plainly what he is saying, and most of the people in the crowd could see it, too. But the leaders are so attached to the way they think things ought to be that they are not willing to reexamine them or sincerely listen.

Looking at the way different people reacted takes us back to what we were discussing a couple of weeks ago regarding Augustine and Faustus. Why wasn’t Faustus able to see the truth clearly? Because he did not come sincerely to Jesus. If you want to understand Jesus, a level of sincerity is necessary. In this passage, we have a crowd where some people just wanted what was easy and comfortable. They wanted the same old routine. Jesus is teaching this profound, incredible truth, but they don’t want it; they just want what they know. We have to avoid that mindset, because if you just go with what is easy and familiar, you will miss the Messiah.

Then there are the leaders—people who are so attached to their pet theories on how things work that even when they are taught basic truths directly and clearly, they can’t make heads or tails of it. When you get too attached to your own ideas and your own teachings, you miss what the Messiah is bringing.

There is only a small group of people in the crowd who listen to Jesus and think it through. They ask: Is what he is teaching compatible with scripture? Is it a pure expression of what God has said? Yes. As I live a righteous life, does it make sense with what this guy says? Yes. As I continue to try to work through this, does this make sense? How could there be someone better than this? They look at his behavior, and it is beyond reproach. Here is someone who embodies what God is doing. How could there be a Messiah more loving than this? How could there be one who works greater miracles than this? How could there be a Messiah better than this? They sincerely listen to Jesus, and they find the Messiah.

As we continue to look at the questions we bring, the things that confuse us, the knowledge we have, and the knowledge we hope to gain, bring it sincerely before Jesus. Listen to him, and you will find the truth of his teachings. Amen.

John 7:1-13 Preparing for The Festival of Tabernacles

Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript

From the Pulpit

Commentary

7 After this, Jesus went around in Galilee. He did not want to go about in Judea because the Jewish leaders there were looking for a way to kill him. 2 But when the Jewish Festival of Tabernacles was near, 3 Jesus’ brothers said to him, “Leave Galilee and go to Judea, so that your disciples there may see the works you do. 4 No one who wants to become a public figure acts in secret. Since you are doing these things, show yourself to the world.” 5 For even his own brothers did not believe in him.

  1. “After this, Jesus went around in Galilee…”
    1. Jerusalem was an urban, high-population density area, but Galilee was a rural region.  The tendrils of the Jewish leaders were much less likely to strike at Jesus while he was in this peripheral area.

    2. Jesus didn’t go to this region out of cowardice.  To the contrary, he knew he was headed towards the cross, but it wasn’t time for that yet.  Jesus knew that God’s appointed timing (referred to as kairos in Greek) didn’t always follow the first given opportunity in linear, human time (chronos in Greek).  This is a strategic and obedient waiting, not a fearful retreat.

    3. “He withdrew too now to Galilee, because the hour of His passion was not yet come; and He thought it useless to stay in the midst of His enemies, when the effect would only have been to irritate them the more.” -Theophylact, Explanation on the Gospel of John, Ch. 7.

  1. “…the Jewish Festival of Tabernacles was near…”

    1. The Festival of Tabernacles, known in Hebrew as Sukkot, was one of the three great festivals where Jewish men were commanded to make a pilgrimage to Jerusalem. There are several important aspects to this festival:

      1. Harvest Celebration– It was a joyous harvest festival, occurring after the crops had been gathered. This timing meant people had the resources and the time to make the pilgrimage.

      2. Historical Commemoration The festival commemorated the 40 years the Israelites spent wandering in the wilderness after the Exodus from Egypt. During this time, they were sustained directly by God’s provision, such as manna from heaven.

      3. Ritual Practices To remember that time of wandering and reliance on God, participants would build and dwell in temporary booths (sukkot) for the duration of the festival. This act of “camping” was a tangible reminder of God’s faithfulness despite their disloyalty.

      4. These themes all give a symbolic backdrop as Jesus, the ultimate fulfillment of God’s presence and provision, has come.

    2. “At the present time… we acknowledge that we are journeying in the wilderness… What is it to be in the wilderness? In the desert waste. Why in the desert waste? Because in this world, we thirst in a way that no water could quench. But yet, let us still thirst that we may be filled. For, “Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after righteousness, for they shall be filled,” (Matthew 5:6). And our thirst is quenched from the rock in the wilderness: for the Rock was Christ, and it was smitten with a rod that the water might flow.” -Augustine, Tractate 28, 9.

  2. Jesus’s Family and Siblings

    1. John 7:3-5 shows Jesus had brothers who did not believe in him during his ministry. His most prominent brother was James, later author of the Epistle of James in the Bible.
    2. Protestants and Catholics read this section very differently.  Protestants say that Jesus had brothers, whereas Catholics say that they were only Jesus’s cousins.
      1. The Catholic Interpretation 
        1. Doctrinally, Catholics believe in the perpetual virginity of Mary.
        2. This doctrine was formed in the late-second to early-third century, partially to defend the virgin birth from people who insisted that Mary probably had relations with Joseph or other men to have Jesus.

        3. Some early Christian myths dating from the same timeframe assert that Joseph married Mary at God’s request specifically to defend her and take care of her.  He was much older than her and never actually consummated their marriage.

        4. Note that this interpretation evolved to counter the claims of non-Christians against the Bible, but it goes beyond the Bible’s claims to defend the Bible.

      2. Protestant Interpretation

        1. The Greek word used in this instance is adelphoi (ἀδελφοί ), literally “brothers.” Etymologically, the word comes from a (together with) and delphys (womb) to create a word that would literally be something like, “from the same womb.”

        2. While adelphoi can be metaphorical (Paul uses it in this sense throughout his epistles), the context here doesn’t fit a metaphor; these “brothers” taunt and doubt Jesus.  They certainly aren’t acting like comrades in any sense of the word.
        3. Another Greek word, anepsios (ἀνεψιός), specifically means “cousin.” It isn’t an uncommon word.  It appears in Colossians 4:10 (“Mark, the cousin of Barnabas”), in the Septuagint (Numbers 36:11), and in Josephus’s histories. If these men were Jesus’s cousins, John would have used that word to describe them.

      3. Theological Significance

        1. It matters whether Jesus had siblings because it shapes our understanding of holiness and Jesus’s life. Mary’s holiness is shown in being a normal wife and mother whom God used, ordinary people can be holy. You don’t need to go to a monastery and take a vow of celibacy to be holy.

        2. Jesus having unbelieving siblings who frustrated him means he experienced family conflict and can relate to those torn down by family rather than built up.

      4. [E]ven his brethren did not believe in him. Hence we infer how small is the value of carnal relationship…So much the more ridiculous is the superstition of Papists, who, disregarding everything else in the Virgin Mary, extol her only on the ground of relationship, bestowing on her the title of the Mother of God, as if Christ himself had not reproved the woman who exclaimed from the midst of the crowd, “‘Blessed is the womb that bore thee, and the breasts that suckled thee;’ for Christ replied, ‘Nay, rather, blessed are they who hear the word of God,’” (Luke 11:27-28)” -John Calvin, Commentary on John, John 7, 5.

6 Therefore Jesus told them, “My time is not yet here; for you any time will do. 7 The world cannot hate you, but it hates me because I testify that its works are evil. 8 You go to the festival. I am not going up to this festival, because my time has not yet fully come.” 9 After he had said this, he stayed in Galilee.

  1. “My time is not here yet…”

    1. Despite his brother’s taunting, Jesus prioritizes God’s timing over public or relational pressure.

    2. “[H]alf the power of: a Christian life depends upon its being timely. The bringing forth of fruit in due season is one of the marks of the tree planted by the rivers of water; and one of the signs of the Son of man, who delighted in the law of the Lord, was that he said, “My time is not yet full come.” When it did come, then he went.” -Charles Spurgeon, Spurgeon’s Verse Expositions on the Bible, John 7.
    3. Jesus’s response is unambiguous about the world’s evil and even implies that his brothers are complicit in it.  Why is he so fierce?  Because the conversation concerned his identity and work, which are critically important.

      1. Jesus models being both a “lamb” (gentle) and a “lion” (fierce and combative when necessary).

      2. Most of us naturally favor one role; we should learn from Jesus’s example to embody both.

10 However, after his brothers had left for the festival, he went also, not publicly, but in secret. 11 Now at the festival the Jewish leaders were watching for Jesus and asking, “Where is he?”

12 Among the crowds there was widespread whispering about him. Some said, “He is a good man.”

Others replied, “No, he deceives the people.” 13 But no one would say anything publicly about him for fear of the leaders.

  1. “…he went also, not publicly, but in secret…”
    1. Jesus chose to go to the festival secretly, but not because he was afraid.  He wanted to fulfill God’s command for devout Jews to go to Jerusalem, but he also wanted to honor God’s timing first and foremost.  Making a public statement to his brothers or to Jewish leadership would have pushed the timetable in an unhelpful way.

    2. By contrast, the crowds in Jerusalem are very afraid.  They whisper about Jesus, but they don’t dare to do it publicly because they’re worried about what the leaders might do.

    3. Do not let fear keep you from doing what God has commanded, but also don’t rush in recklessly.  If you feel unprepared, it may be a sign to wait for God’s timing.

    4. Pray, prepare, and gather the things that you need while you discern the right time to act.  Jesus didn’t ignore his mission while he waited on the Father’s timing.  He walked closely with the Father and understood when the time was right.

  1. “But who were those that did not speak of Him for fear of the Jews? Undoubtedly those who said, ‘He is a good man,’ not those who said, ‘He deceives the people.’ As for those who said ‘He deceives the people,’ their whispers were heard like the noise of dry leaves. ‘He deceives the people,’ they sounded more and more loudly.  ‘He is a good man,’ was whispered more and more quietly. But now, brothers, in spite of the fact that glory of Christ which will give us immortality has not yet come, but now I say, His Church so increases, He has clearly decided to spread his Gospel abroad throughout the whole world, so that it is now ‘He deceives the people,’ is only whispered, and and more and more loudly it sounds forth, ‘He is a good man.’” -Augustine, Tractate 28, 11.

Full Transcript

Fall has begun. The kids are going off to school, and we’re back in the book of John. I think this has a timely word for us. August, when school starts, that is one of two times in a calendar year that people tend to really sit down and think about what they want to accomplish in the coming 12 months. In a calendar year, you have January and the New Year, where everybody makes their resolutions and thinks about the next 12 months. Then you also have the fall when school starts—a time that is built into our schedule from our earliest days as the time to get things underway. So, we think about what we want to accomplish.

That also means you have to wonder: what does God want you to accomplish in the coming 12 months? Not just what are your plans, but what are His plans for you? What has He put on your heart? You don’t want to waste time getting through a year where you’re not doing what God would have you do. Thinking about how to incorporate that into your life well and how to plan on it—that is what so much of the beginning of chapter seven has.

Let’s dig in. We are at chapter 7, verse 1: “After this, Jesus went around in Galilee. He did not want to go about in Judea because the Jewish leaders were there looking for a way to kill him.” Galilee was a more rural region, and it is where Jesus spent most of his time. Judea was the more urban area; it had the capital, it had Jerusalem, and it was where a lot of stuff happened. It is the difference between Hardin County and Franklin County. Jesus spent his time in the rural area because he knew that the people in Judea were waiting there to kill him. He knew he was up against deep resistance in his life. There were priests and kings that stood against him. Jesus was someone who had some powerful enemies.

Yet, he didn’t just rush in and confront them. It’s kind of weird to think about because we know how the story ends. Jesus does eventually go to Jerusalem. He does face all of the men who want to kill him, and they do kill him. He dies on a cross and conquers death. We know that time is coming, but it’s not yet. Why isn’t Jesus going to Judea? He’s not afraid to go up against powerful people, but he knows that not every opportunity requires you to run in and start a fight. He’s waiting for the right time. He’s not just doing things on his timeline; he’s doing things on God’s timeline.

Verse 2 tells us, “When the Jewish Festival of Tabernacles was near…” That’s kind of a strange reference for us because we don’t celebrate it. The Festival of Tabernacles was one of the big ones as far as Jewish festivals go. You would go into Jerusalem, the capital, for what was in many ways a harvest festival. This was after you had harvested all of your crops, so you had a little extra time on your hands to go into Jerusalem to celebrate. Not only was it a harvest festival, but it was also a time to remember the forty years that the Israelites walked through the wilderness and were sustained by manna from God. It was a time to remember that they lived in tents and ate whatever God gave them. They were sustained by Him even though they were disloyal; God stayed with them even in the wilderness. To remember what their ancestors had done and the situations they were in, people would go to Jerusalem, bring a tent, and spend some time camping. That’s what the Festival of Tabernacles was.

As the festival approached, verse 3 says, Jesus’ brothers said to him, “Leave Galilee and go to Judea so that your disciples there may see the works you do. No one who wants to become a public figure acts in secret. Since you are doing these things, show yourself to the world.” For even his own brothers did not believe in him.

There is a lot to talk about right here. First off, Jesus had brothers. I don’t know how often you think about that, but it’s a little strange to consider. They don’t appear in a ton of stories in the Bible, which makes sense since we don’t have a lot of details about Jesus’ childhood. He’s already older at this point in time, but he had siblings. The most prominent of them was James, the writer of the epistle of James, but there were others. None of them believed in him during his lifetime, though they came to faith after.

Now, if you have a Roman Catholic background, or maybe you’ve talked about this with a Catholic friend, you might think something sounds off here. You may have heard from a priest at some point that Jesus did not have siblings. Catholics believe in a doctrine called the perpetual virginity of Mary. In other words, she was not just a virgin before Jesus, but she remained a virgin her whole life long. Consequently, they believe this passage would be better translated as “cousins.”

Why do Protestants and Catholics believe something different here? To put it succinctly, we believe Jesus had siblings because that’s what the Bible says. The word used here for brothers in the original Greek is adelphoi, and adelphoi does not mean cousins; it means brothers. The etymology of the word shows this, as it is made up of a prefix meaning “connected” and delphus, which means “womb”—connected by the womb.

In English, when we use the word “brother,” we can use it literally or metaphorically. For example, if I came in this morning, saw Jim, and said, “Jim, brother, how’s it going?” you guys wouldn’t sit around and think, “Oh, they’re related! I didn’t know they were brothers.” You would know it just means they are close, on the same page, or comrades in arms. The same was true in Greek. The word adelphoi can be used literally or figuratively. The apostle Paul uses it many times in the epistles metaphorically, such as when he writes, “Brothers, I do not want you to be ignorant of this.” Anytime he uses that term, he is using adelphoi.

In this instance, we have to look at the context. Were these individuals on the same page as Jesus? Were they comrades in arms? Would it make sense for this to be a metaphorical use of the word? No. They are making fun of Jesus and doubting him. This would not be a good use of the term metaphorically; it would make no sense. So, we have to assume it’s literal: brothers of the same womb.

They had a completely different word for cousin in Greek—anepsio. It’s not like they didn’t have a word for it. Paul actually uses the word anepsio in the book of Colossians, chapter 4 verse 10, when he talks about Mark, the cousin of Barnabas. Right there, we can see Paul certainly knew the word for cousin. Furthermore, the people who translated the Old Testament into Greek around the time Jesus was alive used anepsio as well. Because not every person throughout the Roman Empire spoke perfect Hebrew, they translated the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek, and you can see instances of the word cousin there—such as in the book of Numbers, chapter 36 verse 11. Secular sources, like the histories of Josephus (the premier historian of that era), also commonly used this word to mean cousin. So, why didn’t the Gospel writer use the word cousin if these were Jesus’s cousins? Because they weren’t his cousins; they were his brothers.

That brings up a different question: why would Catholics believe that Jesus did not have brothers if the text uses that word? For that, you have to dig into the history of doctrine. Very early in the Christian Church, all the way back in the late second and early third centuries, there were people who did not believe that Jesus was miraculously born of a virgin. People have been making arguments against Christianity for hundreds of years; we haven’t invented new ones. Back then, critics said, “Hold on, Mary, a virgin, had a child? That doesn’t make sense. You have to have a guy in the mix.” They insisted that Jesus must have been born from an earthly father and that Mary wasn’t a virgin after all.

In response, some of the early Christians argued against those critics by taking it a step further. They said, “You don’t think Mary was a virgin? Let me tell you, she was the ultimate virgin. She never knew a man before she had Jesus, and she never knew one after, her whole life long.” From a Protestant perspective, we appreciate the spirit of what they were trying to do in defending the fact that Jesus had a heavenly Father. However, the argument itself is flawed. You shouldn’t have to claim something beyond the Bible to prove the Bible. Scripture is sufficient in and of itself.

We disagree with that doctrine because the biblical evidence doesn’t suggest Mary was a nun; it suggests she was a person like us. Why does this matter? Why spend so much time on this piece of history? You should care because it makes a difference in the way you think about what a holy person looks like, and it changes how you view the life of Jesus. What made Mary so special is that she participated in the most miraculous thing that God did in all of history. But was she holy because she lived like a nun, had a husband but was never intimate with him, and spent all her time in prayer? Or was she holy because God chose to work through a regular person? Mary was not so different from a lot of us.

It also highlights the reality of Jesus’s everyday experience. He had brothers and sisters, and they were at odds with him. I bet some of you have older siblings who were a bit of a goody-two-shoes in your eyes, and it can be frustrating to follow after them. Imagine if your older sibling was literally Jesus Christ. You can see why they might get frustrated. You would go to school, and on the first day, the teacher would say, “Oh, you’re Jesus’ sibling. He was great. I’m glad you’re in this class.” You would get home, and you’d constantly be compared to him. We compare ourselves to Jesus and know we don’t meet his perfect standard, but to live with that every day in your own home must have been incredibly hard.

You can also imagine it from Jesus’s perspective. Here is a man who is perfect, and he’s not living a perfect life just to show someone up—he’s living it for them. He is living a perfect life for his siblings, for his parents, and for the world. Yet, they didn’t understand or appreciate it. They thought he was a little full of himself. When he started talking about being the Messiah, they essentially said, “All right buddy, whatever.” Jesus faced resistance not only from kings and priests, but within his own home.

I am very blessed. When I have a hard day and everything feels like it’s against me, I get to go home to a wife who is so supportive, children who are cute as a button, parents I can call, and a sister I can talk with. I have an incredible support network in my family. That’s one of the reasons churches should strive to support families. You want to help families live well because that’s what God wants. God wants the family to be a blessing. He wants husbands to help disciple their wives, wives to help disciple their children, and families to hold each other together. That is a massive blessing, but not everyone enjoys that luxury.If you ever feel that way—if you say, “Sometimes my family tears me apart more than they build me up”—Jesus knows. Jesus endured that too. You are not alone.

Look at what his brothers say specifically in verse 3: “Leave Galilee and go to Judea so that your disciples there may see the works you do. No one who wants to become a public figure acts in secret. Since you are doing these things, show yourself to the world.” In other words, they are saying, “You think you’re a hot shot? Mr. Big Fish in a small pond out here in Galilee? Go into Judea and show everyone your miracles. They’re going to love it.”

How does Jesus respond? My temptation when someone is spouting off like that would be to avoid getting into it—just give one of those fake laughs, try to move on, and not make things awkward. But Jesus makes it a little bit awkward. He goes right there, leaving some tension in the room when they are done. He tells them to go on to the festival, but adds, “I am not going up to this festival because my time has not yet fully come. Of course, you’re comfortable with the world; they’ll love you. The world is evil, and I am against the world.”

Why is Jesus having this conversation? Why doesn’t he just laugh it off and move on? Jesus was gentle, but he was also fierce. He could be a lamb, and he could be a lion, depending on the circumstances. Here, he is talking about something of the utmost importance: who he is and what his work is. He is not going to make light of that. He is not going to be gentle when something that vital is on the line, and that is a lesson we could all learn from.

Naturally, very few people, if any, are born being equally comfortable as both the lion and the lamb. We are rarely naturally adept at being combative when the time calls for it and gentle when the situation demands it; usually, we are comfortable with one or the other. Some people are deeply comfortable in conflict, but when the time comes to relax afterward and build one another up, they feel awkward and don’t know what to do because they are just waiting for the next fight. Other people are naturally gentle, but when the time comes to stand up and confront a situation, they get clumsy and hesitant. Jesus is perfectly both lion and lamb. He is gentle and he is fierce, and we need to learn from him. It is not easy, but it is important.

This is where the narrative can get a little confusing if you aren’t looking closely. In verse 8, Jesus says he is not going to the festival, but then verse 10 says, “However, after his brothers had left for the festival, he went also, not publicly, but in secret.” Why is Jesus going if he just said he wasn’t going to?

Jesus was simply refusing to go in the way his brothers demanded. He was not going to use the festival as a public PR opportunity to aggressively declare who he was. However, devout Jews were commanded by God to attend the Festival of Tabernacles. God didn’t say, “Hey, if you’ve got some spare time, it would be real great if you could roll into Jerusalem.” If you were a follower of God, this is what you did. Jesus wasn’t about to take the year off from obedience. If the Father commanded it, he was going to do it. So, sure enough, he went—not to prove a point to his siblings, but privately, to be a keeper of the law and to fulfill what God required.

Verse 11 continues: “Now at the festival the Jewish leaders were watching for Jesus and asking, ‘Where is he?’ Among the crowds there was widespread whispering about him. Some said, ‘He is a good man.’ Others replied, ‘No, he deceives the people.’ But no one would say anything publicly about him for fear of the leaders.”

Contrast the crowd’s silence with what we have seen from Jesus. Jesus was avoiding a public confrontation with the leaders because it wasn’t the right time; he was listening and waiting for God’s perfect timing. But the crowds in Jerusalem who wanted to talk weren’t staying quiet out of a structured sense of divine timing—they were just afraid. They didn’t want to get into a conflict with the leaders.

As you look ahead at these next 12 months and think about what you want to accomplish, I would bet God has put something specific on your heart. There is likely something you feel called to do for Him in this coming calendar year. And maybe you are a little afraid of it. Maybe you think to yourself that there is a personal cost associated with it that you don’t want to pay. Maybe your schedule is already packed, you don’t have time for one more thing, and you’re wondering if God can just wait another year. Maybe you don’t want to come off as weird to the people around you, and you aren’t interested in looking strange or paying that price.

Whatever the reason, if you are afraid, don’t be. If God is with you, who can stand against you? Why would you know what God wants for you and choose not to do it? What a tragic way to waste a year of your life. Do you think God put you on this earth and said, “Well, they have a set number of years, but this upcoming one doesn’t really matter. They can just fritter that one away with whatever they feel like because I don’t have any work for them this year”? You are a servant of God, and He has work for you.

Do not be afraid. That doesn’t mean you should leave today feeling like you have to run blindly right into the fire. Maybe it isn’t the exact time yet. Pray about it. If you feel unprepared, maybe you are. There is a proper season for the work He has for you. Pray to Him, think deeply about it, and discern the right timing. What do you need to gather? What is the right moment to step out into what He is asking?

When Jesus came to this earth, he didn’t say, “Well, I’m not sure when the Father wants me to die on that cross, so I’m just not even going to worry about it.” No, Jesus lived in an intimate, constant relationship with the Father, waiting and preparing. He didn’t wait because he was kicking the can down the road; he waited because he knew there was an exact right time for everything.

Pray to God about what He has put on your heart for this coming year. Prepare yourself, and trust that He is entirely sufficient for the work He has laid out for you. Amen.

John 6:41-71: Who Can Accept It?

Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript

From the Pulpit

Commentary

41 At this the Jews there began to grumble about him because he said, “I am the bread that came down from heaven.” 42 They said, “Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How can he now say, ‘I came down from heaven’?”

  1. The crowd doubted the evidence first, insisting that Jesus owed them a better miracle since their ancestors ate bread from Moses.  Now, they move from attacking the evidence to attacking his identity.

  2. “Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know?
    1. They grumble at Jesus’s claim to be the bread from heaven, questioning his origins: “Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph… How can he now say, I came down from heaven?”

    2. “These Jews were far off from the bread of heaven, and knew not how to hunger after it. They had the jaws of their heart languid; with open ears they were deaf, they saw and stood blind.” -Augustine, Tractate 26, 1.

43 “Stop grumbling among yourselves,” Jesus answered. 44 “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them, and I will raise them up at the last day. 45 It is written in the Prophets: ‘They will all be taught by God.’ Everyone who has heard the Father and learned from him comes to me. 46 No one has seen the Father except the one who is from God; only he has seen the Father. 47 Very truly I tell you, the one who believes has eternal life. 48 I am the bread of life. 49 Your ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness, yet they died. 50 But here is the bread that comes down from heaven, which anyone may eat and not die. 51 I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats this bread will live forever. This bread is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.”

  1. Christ’s Response

    1. Jesus answers their attack on his identity by explaining their doubt.  Why can’t they come to him?  Because the Father has not drawn them.  All of this is in the Father’s plan.

    2. Jesus is the only one able to see God.  He has knowledge in a way nobody else has.  Even Moses could only see God by hiding in a rock and seeing his back (Exodus 33:21-22).  Jesus is God and can see God in His fullness.

    3. He reiterates his promise: those who believe have eternal life.  Previous bread only delayed death.  Christ’s flesh will end it.

  2. “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them,”

    1. “[H]ave I not myself heard you say in your heart, ‘Jesus, Jesus, my whole trust Is in thee: I know that no righteousness of my own can save me, but only thou, O Christ, sink or swim, I cast myself on thee?’ Oh, my brother, thou art drawn by the Father, for thou couldst not have come unless he had drawn thee. Sweet thought! And if he has drawn thee, dost thou know what is the delightful inference? Let me repeat one text, and may that comfort thee: ‘The Lord hath appeared of old unto me, saying, I have loved thee with an everlasting love: therefore with lovingkindness have I drawn thee.’ Yes, my poor weeping brother, inasmuch as thou art now coming to Christ, God has drawn thee; and inasmuch as he has drawn thee, it is a proof that he has loved thee from before the foundation of the world. Let thy heart leap within thee, thou art one of his.” -Charles Spurgeon, “Human Inability,” Mar. 7, 1858.

52 Then the Jews began to argue sharply among themselves, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”

53 Jesus said to them, “Very truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. 54 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day. 55 For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. 56 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in them. 57 Just as the living Father sent me and I live because of the Father, so the one who feeds on me will live because of me. 58 This is the bread that came down from heaven. Your ancestors ate manna and died, but whoever feeds on this bread will live forever.” 59 He said this while teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum.

  1. First, they doubted the evidence, telling Jesus that their ancestors got bread from Moses and they deserved a better miracle.  Second, they doubted his identity, insisting that he was just the son of Joseph, not anyone from heaven.  Now, they doubt his message, claiming that he’s not even coherent.

  2. “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”

    1. The crowd fixates on a highly literal objection: “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” even though Jesus speaks in a metaphor that points towards a profound spiritual reality.

      1. This rejection is very similar to when Nicodemos objected to Jesus’s language about being “born again” in John 3:4.
          
  3. Jesus doesn’t back down; he doubles down: “Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you… my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink.”  He has no interest in slowly chipping away at his message to accommodate people who have no real interest in it.

    1. “Unless ye eat the flesh of the Son of man – Spiritually: unless ye draw continual virtue from him by faith. Eating his flesh is only another expression for believing.”  -John Wesley, John Wesley’s Explanatory Notes of the NT, Jn 6.

    2. “It should be noted that this can refer either to spiritual eating or to sacramental eating. If it refers to spiritual eating, there is no doubt about the application… However, if it is applied to sacramental eating, a problem arises… since in the one receiving the Eucharist actual reverence and devotion are required, which those who do not have the full use of reason, such as children and the mentally ill, do not have, and therefore it is in no way to be given to them.” -Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on John, Lecture 7, 969.

60 On hearing it, many of his disciples said, “This is a hard teaching. Who can accept it?”

61 Aware that his disciples were grumbling about this, Jesus said to them, “Does this offend you? 62 Then what if you see the Son of Man ascend to where he was before! 63 The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you—they are full of the Spirit and life. 64 Yet there are some of you who do not believe.” For Jesus had known from the beginning which of them did not believe and who would betray him. 65 He went on to say, “This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless the Father has enabled them.”

  1. “This is a hard teaching. Who can accept it?”

    1. Often, so called “hard teachings” are less about comprehension and more about acceptance.

      1. One of the top defenses against countercultural commands is “I don’t understand this part.”  Verses like Mark 10:2-12 (Jesus on Divorce) and 1 Timothy 1:10 (Paul on sexuality) are more than clear as they’re worded, but many still claim that they can’t understand what the Bible says on these topics.

      2. Often “I’m confused” masks unwillingness to accept teachings that challenge personal preferences. The Christian life asks, “Do we trust that God knows more than we do and that his ways are good?”

    2. Jesus asks, “Does this offend you?” and warns that if they stumble here, they will be further confounded by future events like his ascension.

    3. Jesus does not water down his teaching or chase those leaving; he invites trust beyond comfortable words, preparing disciples for wild things to come.

  2. “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them… no one can come to me unless the Father has enabled them.”

    1. Jesus knew from the beginning who did not believe and who would betray him.

  3. “Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you—they are full of the Spirit and life.”

    1. Jesus’s words are “full of Spirit and life;” understanding and embracing them relies on divine action, not just human effort.

  4. Augustine famously wrote about this struggle to know God and approach him by drawing on Romans 10:14 in Confessions.

    1. “Lord, what comes first: asking for your help or praising you?  Do we start a life with you by asking for your help?  Or do we need to know who you are before we can do that?  How could we ask for your help if we don’t know who you are?  We might start talking to you like you were some totally different being!  Or do we start out by asking for your help so that we can know you?  But how could we ask for help from a god that we don’t believe in?  And how could we believe in that god if nobody brought the Gospel to us?  In the end, people who seek the Lord always end up praising him, because anyone who seeks will find, and anyone who finds will praise.  I’m seeking you, Lord, by asking for your help.  I’m calling on your name while believing completely in you because the Gospel was brought to me.  You gave me faith, and now that faith is crying out to you.” -Augustine, Confessions, Ch. 1.

    2. If you can’t see God, pray to Him.  “Knock and the door will be opened.” (Matt. 7:7)

66 From this time many of his disciples turned back and no longer followed him.

67 “You do not want to leave too, do you?” Jesus asked the Twelve.

68 Simon Peter answered him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. 69 We have come to believe and to know that you are the Holy One of God.”

70 Then Jesus replied, “Have I not chosen you, the Twelve? Yet one of you is a devil!” 71 (He meant Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot, who, though one of the Twelve, was later to betray him.)

  1. “You do not want to leave too, do you?

    1. As people leave due to his “hard teaching, Jesus asks the Twelve if they also wish to leave.  It had to have been an emotionally-charged moment as thousands left and he turned to his closest friends.

    2. Peter’s confession: “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life…” isn’t just a buddy cheering up a sad friend.  Peter sincerely believes in everything that Jesus is said.  He’s seen the evidence, he acknowledges Jesus’s identity, and he believes in the message.

  2. “Yet one of you is a devil!”
    1. Jesus repeatedly forewarns about Judas’s betrayal, which does not change Judas’s course.  What God has destined will not be changed by human will, even if Judas has every opportunity to do otherwise.

    2. The disciples were tested through all of this.  The crowd left, but they stayed despite how unpopular it was.  This wasn’t the end of the testing.  Their faith would continue to be tested throughout their lives, and not everyone would pass in the end.

    3. “Mark the wisdom of Christ: He neither, by exposing him, makes him shameless and contentious; nor again emboldens him, by allowing him to think himself concealed.” -Chrysostom, Hom. xlvii. 4.

 

Full Transcript

For weeks we have talked about this question: If God is all-powerful, why doesn’t he give us everything we want? We have looked at wrong answer after wrong answer, haven’t we? We’ve looked at the prosperity gospel—this claim that God wants to give you everything you could possibly imagine, and the only thing holding him back is you! You don’t have the faith. If you did, you’d have that new car. That doesn’t align with scripture. The apostles were not promised health or wealth, and they did not get it.

We looked at the claims that God deals with spiritual stuff, that he doesn’t deal with earthly stuff because that’s beneath him. Don’t go to him for stuff like food or money; it’s beneath him. He deals with spiritual things. Also, not true. Throughout this chapter, we saw God dealing with very physical things. He multiplied bread and fish; He helped His apostles get across a sea. These are all very physical, worldly things going on, and he deals with each of them without being disgusted. God made the world; he certainly doesn’t hate it. It’s not beneath him.

Then last week, we even looked at the classic atheist response: if God’s all-powerful, why doesn’t he give us everything we want? They would say, because he can’t, because he’s not real. We see bad things happen every day. If there was an all-powerful, good God, wouldn’t he stop those bad things from happening? Of course he would, but he doesn’t—because he can’t, because he’s not real. The atheists would have us dead to rights if that’s the God the Bible described. If the Bible said there is an all-powerful God, and he’s good, and no bad things will ever happen to you, what would we say in response?

That’s not what the Bible says. The Bible never says that you’re not going to suffer. As a matter of fact, many people in the Bible do suffer despite following God. The true biblical answer to this that we finally get to dwell on now is this: God won’t always give us what we want, but He’ll give us what we need. God’s miracles are not at our beck and call. There it is, and he has told us what his will is. He’s told us in no uncertain terms what he wants to do. He said, “I want you to live eternally. I want to destroy sin and death.” Part of the problem is we are still addicted in many ways to sin and death.

Giving us what we want would actually go against what he wants in many cases. God has to find a way to rehabilitate us, to help us seek what is good in an eternal sense, not just in a temporary sense. Sometimes that won’t be easy. The question is, can we trust him? Knowing what he said he’s going to do, knowing what his goals are, and knowing that they don’t always align with ours, do we trust him?

We’re going to look at that even more today as we continue on from where we left off. Let’s briefly refresh our memories. We began chapter six four weeks ago. All the way back then, where did we start? Jesus was teaching and he was healing by the Sea of Galilee, and there were all these people—five thousand or more. They didn’t have anything to eat. Jesus turns to Philip, “Hey, we need to feed these people.” Philip says, “Impossible! Can’t be done!” Meanwhile, a boy offers Jesus some bread and some fish, and Jesus starts handing it out. He just keeps going and going. There is not only enough; there is more than enough. At this point, the crowd gets to thinking and they say, “Hey, if he can do that with bread, what else can he do? I want this guy working for me. Let’s make him our king whether he wants to be king or not. He’s going to solve our problems.” Jesus goes up a mountain to pray, and he tells his disciples to go across the sea.

That night there is a horrible storm, and they are paddling and paddling, trying to get across the sea. All night they only get halfway. Muscles aching, blisters on their hands, not getting where they want to go, but Jesus comes to them over the water. The second they trust him and let him onto their boat, they’re right where they want to be. They have learned a lesson, but the crowd has not. The next day they wake up and say, “Hey, where’d Jesus go? I can’t find him anywhere.” So after searching, they get on some boats. They go across the Sea of Galilee, and they start searching on the other side. Finally, they go into Capernaum. They find Jesus teaching there in a synagogue, and they start asking him questions. They say, “Jesus, where have you been?” He says, “You’re here because you want bread and fish. You want something that’s going to be good for a day. I want to give you something that’s good for eternity. Believe in me. Believe in me and you will have eternal life.”

They immediately start to doubt him. The first doubt they throw out there is they doubt whether he’s given them sufficient evidence to believe in him. They say, “Okay, so you gave us some bread once. Not a big deal. Moses did that. He did the bread thing. You’re going to have to do better than bread if you want us to believe in you.” Which is pretty ironic. They came all this way because of the bread. Obviously, they were impressed, but the second Jesus says, “Trust in me, not in yourselves,” then they start to bristle. Then they start to take a step back. Hold on! I don’t know if I am ready to trust you. I liked the bread trick, but that’s not enough. They’re going to continue to take steps back. They’re going to doubt Jesus three times throughout the course of this, moving from doubting whether he’s given them enough evidence, to doubting who he is next, and then finally they are going to doubt whether his message even makes sense at all.

That is where we pick up after the first doubt, and Jesus has reaffirmed that he does indeed offer eternal life. He gets a little wordier this time, a little fuller. Pay attention to that. We pick up at verse forty-one. At this, the Jews began to grumble about him because he said, “I am the bread that came down from heaven.” They said, “Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How can he now say, ‘I came down from heaven’?” This guy’s not so special. I know his dad. That’s Joe’s kid. This is not a big deal. Now he’s acting like he’s all special. “I’m from heaven. You’re not.” I know where you’re from. I know your parents. Again, strange, isn’t it?

Just yesterday, they called him the prophet in the line of Moses and wanted to force him to be their king. They obviously knew there was something special about this guy, but the second Jesus tries to acknowledge that and explain it to them, they take another step back. Jesus responds to their second doubt saying, “Stop grumbling among yourselves. No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them, and I will raise them up at the last day. It is written in the prophets, ‘They will all be taught by God.’ Everyone who has heard the Father and has learned comes to me. No one has seen the Father except the one who is from God; only he has seen the Father. Very truly I tell you, the one who believes has eternal life. I am the bread of life. Your ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness, yet they died. But here is the bread that comes down from heaven, which anyone may eat and not die. I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats this bread will live forever. This bread is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.”

Notice again—he’s gotten even more complicated. Jesus doesn’t water it down when people object. If anything, He seems to get a little more intense. He’ll explain why. But notice also here he’s gotten more complex, but he hasn’t gotten insanely, unfollowably complex. The core of his message that he said all the way back in verse twenty-nine is still there, and we know how he got there. He said, “You are here for bread. You were impressed by loaves and fishes. You wanted bread for a day. I want to give you bread that will last for eternity. Believe in me.” He’s gotten a little more complex, but that’s still there, and they’ve seen the argument kind of develop. I don’t think it’s unfollowable. I don’t think at this point there is any rational reason to believe that Jesus is saying, “Hey, come up here and take a bite out of my arm. It’s going to do something for you.” No, obviously he’s not.

The crowd goes in that direction anyway. They argue sharply among themselves and say, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” Suddenly, Jesus doesn’t make sense to them anymore. We saw this all the way back in John chapter 3 with Nicodemus. Jesus told Nicodemus, “You must be born again.” And what did Nicodemus say? “Jesus, come on. That’s ridiculous. What, you want me to crawl back inside my mother’s womb? You don’t make any sense.” Jesus did not invent metaphor. It was around; it was well-established since the beginning of time. Nicodemus knew that Jesus was not proposing what he said, in the same way that this crowd understands that Jesus does not literally want them to go up and tear him to pieces with their teeth. They know what he’s asking for. They just don’t want to do it. The confusion with the crowd is not up here. It’s not that they don’t understand; it’s that they’re not willing to accept it, and that’s a different thing.

I’ve seen this many times in the church. I remember, for example, there was one church where they would read two scriptures every Sunday, and it was from the lectionary, so they were all pre-chosen for the entire year. The first scripture would always be read by a member of the congregation. The second scripture would always be read by the pastor, and the pastor would preach from the second passage. One day, the congregation member gets up to read their first one. She stands up there and she reads the Mark passage—Mark chapter ten, verses two through twelve:

Some Pharisees came and tested him by asking, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?” “What did Moses command you?” he replied. They said, “Moses permitted a man to write a certificate of divorce and send her away.” “It was because your hearts were hard that Moses wrote you this law,” Jesus replied. “But at the beginning of creation, God made them male and female. For this reason, a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh. So that they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore, what God has joined together, let no one separate.” And when they were in the house again, the disciples asked Jesus about this. He answered, “Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her. And if she divorces her husband and marries another man, she commits adultery.”

Sure enough, they read this. Then they followed it up with this in front of the whole church. They said, “And as a divorced person, I’m confused. I’m so confused by this. I hope the pastor’s about to tell us what this means because I don’t understand it. I sure hope they have some answers.” It was uncomfortable. The pastor got up there and disarmed the situation. They said, “I’m actually going to preach on the second passage. But if anyone’s confused and would like to talk about the first passage you heard, come to my office hours. Delighted to talk about that or anything else you’re confused about.” I think the uncomfortable thing wasn’t necessarily the combativeness; it wasn’t that as much as the fact that the passage isn’t really that unclear. She knew what it said; she just didn’t like it. She wasn’t willing to accept it, and again, that can happen in so many places.

I remember with the split of the United Methodist Church, I can remember a colleague coming to me and saying, “I am wrestling with this because one of the things people seem to disagree on is same-sex marriage. And I just don’t understand. I read this morning in First Timothy, chapter one, verse ten. It says, ‘Those who practice homosexuality will not enter the kingdom of God.’ That’s what it says, but I don’t know what that means. That doesn’t make any sense because we don’t know what Paul was dealing with. That could mean any number of things. I mean, maybe he’s talking about prostitution. Maybe he’s talking about pedophilia. We just can’t know what Paul meant. We can’t know. I’m too confused. I don’t understand what he was trying to say. If only he would have left a second letter explaining his first letter, maybe we could have known what he meant, but we just can’t. It’s so confusing.”

I responded and said, “Well, what if he meant what he said? What if the two thousand years of Christians who all believed that he meant what he said were right, and it’s exactly what it looks like? I think your concerns are because the ethics that are often practiced today suggest that if you have any restrictions on sexuality, you must hate someone. Jesus never tells us to hate anyone—by no means. We’re supposed to love people, but there are certain ways that God tells us to shepherd our sexuality. That’s what the church has traditionally held. That’s what makes sense in the passage. What if Paul meant what he said?” He just responded, “That’s ridiculous. You’re being ridiculous. You can’t know what he meant. You can’t know. It’s impossible to know.” He knew what it said. He just wasn’t willing to accept it.

I don’t say this as someone who always is willing to accept what the Bible says immediately. We’ve all had those instances, haven’t we, where we read something—something that touches a nerve, something that calls us out, something that makes us say, “Jesus is going too far here. That’s not… I’m confused. I don’t understand what this means.” Often the confusion is not up here; it’s here. God has shared something that isn’t the way we would have done it. Do we trust him? Do we trust that he knows more than we do, and that his ways are good?

The crowd doesn’t. The crowd thinks he’s too baffling. They’re not ready to trust him. In verse fifty-three, Jesus responds again and again. Notice he will not make it even a little bit easier; he will get more intense again. He says, “Very truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day. For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me and I in them. Just as the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so the one who feeds on me will live because of me.”

“This is the bread that came down from heaven. Your ancestors ate manna and died, but whoever feeds on this bread will live forever.” He said this while teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum. Really intense. He’s just gone right out there. They’ve said, “I object on this premise,” and he says, “Let’s talk about that premise. I’m going to go with it. I’m going to run with it.” Why is he doing this? He’s about to explain. Verse 60: On hearing it, many of his disciples said, “This is a hard teaching. Who can accept it?” Notice what they say there. They don’t say, “This is a hard teaching. Who can understand it?” They understand. This is a hard teaching. Who can accept it? Aware that his disciples were grumbling about this, Jesus said to them, “Does this offend you? Then what if you see the Son of Man ascend to where He was before?”

Here he’s explaining why he is getting more intense. If he was chasing people down saying, “No, don’t walk away. Hear me out. Let’s work through this together”—Jesus doesn’t do that, though, and that’s consistent throughout the scripture. Think about the story of the rich young ruler who came to Jesus and said, “Jesus, I need you. I want to follow you. What do I need to do?” Jesus said, “Sell everything, give the money to the poor, and come follow me.” The man leaves sad because he’s not willing to do that. Jesus doesn’t chase him down; he lets him go. That seems to be the same spirit Jesus has here. He gets more intense. He doesn’t water it down. He says, “Does this offend you? Then what if you see the Son of Man ascend to where he was before?”

If you can’t believe this, this is just a starting place. This is nothing. Just wait, things get crazier from here. If you can’t accept this, there are going to be things to come that will utterly confound you. You are going to see the miraculous and balk. You are going to see things like me ascending—I’m going to leave. What are you going to do? You’re going to panic! Why? Because right now you’re counting on me making it easy, coming to you, and constantly making things easier. I don’t want you to trust my pretty words. I want you to trust me. Do you trust me? Because if you do, you will be able to weather anything that comes—all the wild stuff. That’s good for us today, too. God isn’t done doing wild things. If we can’t trust him in the little stuff, how can we trust him with things that haven’t even happened yet?

“The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you—they are full of Spirit and life. Yet there are some of you who do not believe.” For Jesus had known from the beginning which of them did not believe and would betray him. He went on to say, “This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless the Father has enabled them.”

When we see Jesus getting more intense and not chasing people down, it can feel like he must hate them or that he doesn’t care about them. We think if he really cared, he would make it easier. Jesus says, no. Everything I have spoken is spirit and life. Those who are enabled by the Father will get it. What does that mean? Here, we’ve got a group of thousands of people that we know are genuinely interested in Jesus. They have followed him to both sides of a sea and hunted for him on either side. They care, but they’re looking by their own power, not by God’s power. When humanity sinned and fell away from God, we became incapable of doing good.

We were meant to function hand in hand with God. The Holy Spirit is supposed to be our fuel, keeping us going and drawing us closer to God. When we cut ourselves off from God, how are we supposed to do good without the Holy Spirit? We’re capable of no good without God, and that includes things like knowing God. Even just knowing God is a good thing, and without God, we’re not even capable of that.

So what’s the solution? We have to ask God for help in knowing God. That seems a little crazy, I know. It’s a bit of a mind-bender. Even in his seminal work, Confessions, Augustine of Hippo admits that this is incredibly confusing. How do I do that? How do I call on a God that I don’t know yet? I have to know Him to call on Him, don’t I? And yet, when a preacher brings that word, it provides enough information to help us call on Him. You are loyal, God. You listen, and you allow us to draw on you to know you better. The only real way to know God is through God. We need His help to even know Him.

That is applicable to us today as well. If you are in a place where you can’t see God—you are looking and you just can’t see Him in the world around you—ask him for help. Just pray a simple prayer: God, reveal yourself to me. Help me to see you in this world. Help me to know you better. Knock and the door will be opened.

Verse 66: From this time, many of his disciples turned back and no longer followed him. “You do not want to leave too, do you?” Jesus asked the twelve. We know Jesus knows the answer to this. That’s been one of the focuses throughout John chapter six. Every time there has been a question, the text tells us that Jesus already knew. It said just a few verses ago that Jesus already knew who was going to follow him and who wasn’t. He knows. But you have to imagine this is an emotionally charged question, because watching thousands of people turn away—thousands of people he loved, thousands of people he came here to save and to die for—watching them walk away must have broken his heart. He turns to the twelve: “You don’t want to leave me too, do you?” Simon Peter responds, “Lord, to whom shall we go?” What a beautiful response. Peter gets a lot of things wrong, but this is beautiful. Lord, to whom shall we go? Where else could we go? Jesus, this is home. We belong with you. We wouldn’t know where else to go. Of course, we’re going to be here.

Is Jesus your hope? Could you say that? Who else would we go to? There is nowhere else. I’ll be here no matter what; it’s where I belong. “You have the words of eternal life. We have come to believe and to know that you are the Holy One of God.” He doesn’t say, “We have come to believe that we believe in you,” or, “We’ve come to believe that it’s possible that you are the way.” He doesn’t say, “We have come to believe that we have faith that you are the one.” He says, “We believe and we know.” The witness of God opened his eyes. He doesn’t just theorize; he knows. The evidence is sufficient. He knows.

The Holy Spirit can do that. You can know who God is. Wouldn’t this be a perfect place to end? Honestly, for a while, I thought it ended there. Isn’t it a nice triumphal ending? Everyone leaves, but the disciples stay and they’re not going anywhere. It doesn’t end there, though; it goes on just a little more. Jesus replies, “Have I not chosen you, the twelve? Yet one of you is a devil.” He meant Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot, who, though one of the twelve, was later to betray him.

This is not the only time Jesus says something like this. There are multiple instances in Scripture where Jesus, in front of Judas, foretells that Judas will betray him. It doesn’t seem to change Judas’s mind. Judas does not seem to be someone who is particularly open to meditating on the words of Jesus. We’ve all known that person who, whenever they hear criticism, looks at everyone else. I imagine Judas is like that. If Judas were around today and working in an office, and the boss came out and said, “All right guys, this quarter we’re going to have to work extra hard. I know some people have been slacking. I need you to buckle down,” Judas would be there saying, “Yeah! I know you guys have been slacking. Time to get serious.” Meanwhile, Judas is the one sleeping at his desk. He doesn’t even recognize it. He just looks at everyone else and says they’re the problem.

I imagine Judas is in just the same place here. Judas unapologetically is the one who is going to betray Jesus, and yet when Jesus says, “One of you is going to betray me,” I imagine Judas looking really severely at everyone else, maybe even looking at Peter. But it’s Judas. He’s a hypocrite. He doesn’t think these things through.

The passage ends on a note of telling them that it’s not done. They have faith here and they’ve learned, but it’s not over. There is more to come. There are new challenges that they will have to learn to trust God through. They’ve learned to trust Jesus even when the crowd turns away, but now there is a new circumstance: one of the twelve will turn away. There’s something new that they will go through, and they will need a new depth of trust in Jesus because even one of the ones that he chose will turn away.

The Christian life is always one of new challenges. There’s never a moment where you just say, “I have faith in Jesus,” and you’re done, you’re finished, and you never have to worry about it again because you trust Him and that’s good forever. You will still be concerned, you will still be afraid, and you will still be confused. The Christian life continually involves gaining a new, deeper faith. There are always new things that you will wrestle with and new challenges that life throws at you. Can you trust Jesus there? Can you trust him in what’s next? That development of faith doesn’t end after you just do it once. Continually, we are invited to know him better and to trust him even more.

Here at the end, let’s ask our question one last time: If God is all-powerful, why doesn’t he give me what I want? Why doesn’t he guarantee health and wealth? God’s miracles are not at our beck and call; they’re at His. We can ask him for help, and sometimes we’ll get it, and sometimes we won’t. Ultimately, a big part of this is trusting his will. He’s made his will known to us; he’s told us what he’s seeking. He is seeking the end of sin and death itself. He is seeking something wonderful, and he’s trying to help us. He’s told us that.

Can we trust him? Can we trust him when things are easy and when things are hard, when we get the miracle and when we don’t? God has not promised us anything in this life; he’s promised us everything in the next. Do we believe that? Can we trust him? The disciples learned to trust him. The crowd did not; they found every excuse in the book. Can we trust him? We have to learn to trust if we really want to be followers of God—to trust that in all circumstances he is seeking our good, our wellness, and that he loves us immensely.

Amen.

John 6:25-40 The Bread of Life

Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript

From the Pulpit

Commentary

25 When they found him on the other side of the lake, they asked him, “Rabbi, when did you get here?”

  1. Realizing Jesus didn’t board the disciples’ boat, the crowd searches both shores and eventually finds Him teaching in the synagogue at Capernaum (John 6:59). They may not fully understand what Jesus is trying to teach them, but there’s no doubt as to their zeal!  They’ve come a long way to find Jesus.

26 Jesus answered, “Very truly I tell you, you are looking for me, not because you saw the signs I performed but because you ate the loaves and had your fill. 27 Do not work for food that spoils, but for food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. For on him God the Father has placed his seal of approval.”

  1. “Rabbi, when did you get here?”
    1. Jesus doesn’t answer the question with any of the expected data (what, when, where, why).  He gives an answer that’s entirely different from the question they asked!

       

    2. Sometimes, God leaves questions unanswered, even as He reveals himself to us.  There are always details that we won’t quite understand on this side of eternity, no matter how hard we search for them.

       

    3. When he was on his deathbed passing away, Thomas Aquinas, one of the most famed theologians in Christian history, said, “Everything I have written is but straw!”  If one of the deepest thinkers of God knew he knew nothing compared to the fullness of God’s revelation, how much can we claim to truly know the depths of God?

       

    4. We can’t understand everything, but we can be humble enough to accept what we’ve been given and trust it given its source.

       

  1. “Very truly I tell you, you are looking for me, not because you saw the signs I performed but because you ate the loaves and had your fill.”

     

    1. Jesus explains their motive to them: they seek Him because his miracle gave them full bellies, not because they grasped the miracle’s meaning. They’re stopping so far short of what they could get!

       

    2. The problem isn’t wanting too much but too little.  They avoided hunger for an evening and are excited about that, when they could avoid death for an eternity.

       

    3. “It would seem that Our Lord finds our desires not too strong, but too weak. We are half-hearted creatures, fooling about with drink and sex and ambition when infinite joy is offered us, like an ignorant child who wants to go on making mud pies in a slum because he cannot imagine what is meant by the offer of a holiday at the sea. We are far too easily pleased.” -C.S. Lewis, The Weight of Glory

       

    4. “Not that he forbids his followers to labor that they may procure daily food; but he shows that the heavenly life ought to be preferred to this earthly life, because the godly have no other reason for living here than that, being sojourners in the world, they may travel rapidly towards their heavenly country.” -John Calvin, Commentary on John, 6.

28 Then they asked him, “What must we do to do the works God requires?”

29 Jesus answered, “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.”

  1. “What must we do…
      1. [T]hey said this, not that they might learn, and do them, but to obtain from Him another exhibition of His bounty. -Chrysostom, Homlily xIv. 1.

         

  1. “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent”
    1. The belief that Jesus is talking about isn’t just an acknowledgement that he exists or any other sort of intellectual affirmation of the facts.  It’s trust.  This kind of belief is the kind that we mean when we tell someone we love, “I believe in you.”

       

    2. Laws are important, but they aren’t the core of the Christian life.  You don’t become a member of God’s family because you followed the rules well enough.  We’re adopted into the family of God through Christ.  We follow the law because we love our Father and trust him, not because it earns us our spot in his family..  

30 So they asked him, “What sign then will you give that we may see it and believe you? What will you do? 31 Our ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written: ‘He gave them bread from heaven to eat.’”

32 Jesus said to them, “Very truly I tell you, it is not Moses who has given you the bread from heaven, but it is my Father who gives you the true bread from heaven. 33 For the bread of God is the bread that comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.”

  1. “What sign then will you give that we may see it and believe you?”
     
    1. Even after they witnessed one of Christ’s miracles firsthand, they insist that they should get to see an even greater miracle so that Jesus can earn their trust.  Their ancestors saw this miracle!  It’s too old!  What’s something better that Jesus can offer up?

       

    2. They want to stay in control, rather than yield to Jesus.  Belief is less about evidence than most people think.  The inclination of the heart is more influential than any amount of evidence.

       

    3. Romans 1:20 explains that we’ve all seen enough evidence of God’s existence just by looking around creation: “For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.”  Even with more miracles, a resistant heart reinterprets signs as coincidence and asks for more.

       

  2. “it is not Moses who has given you the bread from heaven,”

     

    1. Jesus corrects an important detail: Moses didn’t give anyone bread from heaven.  God gave them bread from heaven, and he’s offering it to them again right now.

       

    2. “Therefore, both that manna signified this meat, and all those signs were signs of me. You have longed for signs of me; do ye despise Him that was signified? Not Moses then gave bread from heaven: God gives bread. But what bread? Manna, perhaps? No, but the bread which manna signified, namely, the Lord Jesus Himself. My Father gives you the true bread.” – Augustine, Tractate 25, 13.

       

    3. “‘But was it not true bread that their ancestors had in the desert?’
      I answer: If we define the true as defined against the false, then that bread was true, for the miracle of the manna was not false; but if we define the true as defined against the symbolic, then that bread was not true, but a symbol pointing to the spiritual bread, namely, our Lord Jesus Christ, whom the manna signified, as the Apostle says, 1 Cor. c. 10, 3: ‘all ate the same spiritual food.’” -Aquinas, Commentary on John, Lecture 4, 908

34 “Sir,” they said, “always give us this bread.”

35 Then Jesus declared, “I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never go hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty. 36 But as I told you, you have seen me and still you do not believe. 37 All those the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never drive away. 38 For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me. 39 And this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose none of all those he has given me, but raise them up at the last day. 40 For my Father’s will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day.”

  1. “I am the bread of life.”
    1. “He does not say, I am the bread of nourishment, but of life, for, whereas all things brought death, Christ hath quickened us by Himself. But the life here is not our common life, but that which is not cut short by death: He that cometh to Me shall never hunger; and He that believeth on Me shall never thirst.” -Theophylact, Commentary on John, Ch. 6

       

  1. “I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me.”

     

    1. Jesus isn’t there to do the crowd’s will or even his own will!  He lives to do the Father’s will.  And what is that will?  Giving eternal life to those given to him.

       

    2. God’s number one objective is solving the biggest problems: sin and death.  Daily issues matter, but they’re not nearly as big and don’t matter nearly as much as we think they do.

       

  2. “I shall lose none of all those he has given me, but raise them up at the last day.”
    1. “They therefore who by God’s unerring providence are foreknown, and predestined, called, justified, glorified, even before their new birth, or before they are born at all, are already the sons of God, and cannot possibly perish; these are they who truly come to Christ. By Him there is given also perseverance in good unto the end; which is given only to those who will not perish. Those who do not persevere will perish.” -Augustine, de Cor. et Gratia, c. ix.

       

  1. Life constantly throws new problems at us.  Even today’s solutions lead to tomorrow’s problems!  Bread today requires bread tomorrow.  Most problems and solutions are temporary.  Only God endures.

 

Full Transcript

We’ve been going through John chapter 6 here. The big question we’ve had on our minds as we go through is: if God is all-powerful, why doesn’t he give us what we want? Why doesn’t he give us health and wealth? We’ve thought of some different ways that people today answer that question.

The first week, we thought about prosperity gospel preachers—the people who say, “Why doesn’t God give you everything you want? He wants to! He wants to give you a million dollars. He wants to give you a new car. The problem is you. You don’t have enough faith. If you had more faith, God would be able to give you everything he wants to give you.” But when we look in John chapter 6, sometimes Jesus does say no. Sometimes Jesus puts people through difficult trials. Jesus doesn’t always give us an easy life. Not only that, but as we look through Christian history, there have been a lot of Christians who were very good, devout, and faithful, but were neither particularly healthy nor particularly wealthy. God doesn’t always give us everything we want.

Then we looked at another way people might try to answer that question, one that falls short of Christian orthodoxy. We thought about the people who kind of spiritualize it. They say, “Why doesn’t God give us everything we want? Because that’s not really what He does. That’s not what God’s interested in. God is not a god of earthly things; He’s a god of heavenly things. Go to Him with problems that are on your heart, problems that you know are on your mind, and problems that are about salvation, courage, and the things you can’t see and touch. That’s what God deals with. He doesn’t deal with stuff like food or money; that’s too earthly. It’s not good to go to him with things like that.”

But again, looking at John chapter 6, God does work that way. God works in ways that definitely impact the earth and earthly things. He multiplies food for hungry people. When his disciples are struggling to get across the Sea of Galilee, he helps them get to the other side. Not only does he repeatedly find ways to change the world, but he uses things that people actually do. He takes this offering of bread and fish from a boy and multiplies it. He takes the hard work that the disciples have put in and gets them all the way across. God does care not only about the physical world, but about what we do in it. He wants to see our work and magnify it. God’s not just a God of the heart; he’s the God over everything.

Today I want to introduce one more kind of answer to that question. The two we’ve looked at at least have a Christian framework. Today we’re going to look at one that does not: “Why doesn’t God give me everything I want if he’s all-powerful?” Some people respond, “Because he’s not real. If God were a person, we would not suffer the way we do.” People who have this answer very often have a wound they’re dealing with—some personal frustration or some hurt that is real. They ask things like, “If God’s real, why did my mom get sick? If God is all-powerful, why did my child die? If God is real, why did I suffer the way that I did while He didn’t lift a finger to help me? If God is all-powerful, He’s not good. Frankly, I don’t even think He’s real.”

That alone, I think, makes some of us hesitate. We see the woundedness and we don’t want to be insensitive, but I think we still need to acknowledge that that’s a wrong way of thinking. It’s easier to identify it when it’s in the positive. It’s easier to say, “God isn’t going to give you a million dollars just because you want it,” than it is to say, “God won’t always make your life easy, even when important things are on the line—even when you’re asking for someone you deeply care about to be healed, or even when you’re dealing with basic household economics and things aren’t coming out in the positive.” God doesn’t guarantee that everything is always going to go your way. Even when you aren’t just trying to get something actively positive, but are enduring something negative, there’s not always a miracle that comes in and sweeps you off your feet, hard as that is to acknowledge.

But it’s not that God doesn’t care. God cares. His plans are often hard for us to understand, but he cares. Do we trust him? That’s what’s at stake, and that’s what we’re going to be engaging with throughout these passages: trusting God even when we don’t get the things that seem like an obvious good, things that He knows are good.

Let’s engage here in chapter 6, starting at verse 22. Remember, we started at the beginning of the chapter. Thousands of people go around the Sea of Galilee to listen to Jesus speak and to have Him heal people for them. Jesus turns to Philip and says, “How are we going to feed all these people?” This is a test; he knows what he’s going to do. Philip says, “We can’t. Too many people. Can’t afford it.” Then the boy offers up his bread and fish. Jesus starts handing it out and just keeps handing it out. He just keeps going and going, handing out more than enough from this tiny little meal of a kid. The crowd sees that, and they get to thinking, “All right, if this guy can make bread and fish, what else can he do? I want this guy solving all my problems. Let’s get him working for us. Let’s make him the king. I don’t care what he thinks, I want him to be working for me.”

Jesus sees this happening. He sends the disciples across the Sea of Galilee, and he himself goes up on a mountain to pray. It’s a stormy day, and a storm kicks up over the sea. The disciples row all night, from evening until the dawn breaks, muscles aching and blisters forming on their hands, and they’re only halfway after all those hours. Jesus sees them, comes to them over the water, and they accept him onto their boat. Immediately, they’re where they need to be. I’m not saying that in an abstract way; they are at the other side. The second they take Jesus into their boat, they reach the other side.

Now we pick up, but we’re going to go back. We’re going to be with the crowd—the same crowd that saw Jesus do the loaves and fishes. They’re waking up the next morning and figuring things out. The next day, the crowd that had stayed on the opposite side of the lake realized that only one boat had been there, and that Jesus had not entered it with his disciples, but that they had gone away alone. Then some boats from Tiberias landed near the place where the people had eaten the bread after the Lord had given thanks. Once the crowd realized that neither Jesus nor his disciples were there, they got into the boats and went to Capernaum in search of Jesus.

They wake up and they realize, after enduring this night of storms—I don’t know how they slept, if they brought tents, or what their sleeping arrangement was—but they wake up and wonder, “Where’d the disciples go?” Gone. They took a boat last night. “Where’s Jesus?” Nobody knows. Nobody saw him. Maybe they even went up that mountain. Maybe someone saw him going up there. They’re peeking around for him. This is thousands of people; you can imagine how chaotic it would be to figure out what’s going on! So they spend all morning trying to figure it out. They don’t find him, and they don’t find any of the disciples, so they go on a search for Jesus.

Here’s just a little detail. I don’t think it has any deep spiritual or symbolic meaning, but I just think it’s a good thing to remember. Did you notice that boats come? The disciples were the only ones with a boat last night. There were no other boats—thousands of people, no boats. Now there are boats landing to take them. Why were there no boats the night before? Because there was a storm coming! Everyone else had taken their boats in. The disciples were the only ones crazy enough to get in their boat and try to cross the sea when there was a storm of that magnitude, and even then, it was only because Jesus told them to. Little details like that are helpful. It reminds us that this is not Aesop’s fables. Boats don’t just appear and disappear at random. These are real people in the real world. There are reasons for things. When the boats weren’t there, it’s because conditions were bad and the storm might damage them. When they are there, there is a rationale to it.

Verse 25 says, “When they found him on the other side of the lake…” This is another moment where I think it would be easy to misimagine what’s going on. It’s helpful to skip ahead a little bit to get the setting. Verse 59 tells us where they find Jesus; it says Jesus was speaking to them while teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum. So, this does not unfold on the beach. We don’t just go hang out on the beach with the crowd while Jesus and his disciples sit quietly, waiting for everyone to catch up with them. They’ve got places to be. They’re trying to make it to Capernaum. They get there, Jesus goes to the synagogue, and he starts teaching. He doesn’t just sit there quietly while the crowd catches up. So, that’s where they are; you can keep that in your mind.

This crowd is so eager to see Jesus that they not only walk around the sea and then boat over it, but they search for him on one side and then search for him on the other side, all the way to the point where they find him teaching in a synagogue in Capernaum. As much as they don’t get Jesus, you can’t doubt that they want to. They’re trying. These are people who are really, genuinely attempting to get it—crossing the sea twice and searching for him on both sides.

When they found him on the other side, they asked him, “Rabbi, when did you get here?” Can you imagine if he answered that? “Oh yeah, I was up on the mountain praying, but then I saw down in the storm that my disciples were having a hard time. So I just kind of strolled down and walked across the water to help them out. Then I used a little bit of miraculous power to teleport them the rest of the way. We took a break that morning while you were searching, strolled into Capernaum, and I started teaching.” He doesn’t say that. You have to wonder if they would even believe it if they heard it. They’ve seen Him multiply loaves and fishes, but would they believe He can walk across water? Would they believe he can teleport boats? You have to wonder if they would be able to believe any of those things. They don’t even have a framework to think about it properly.

But we don’t get to find out because Jesus doesn’t tell them. They ask this question, and Jesus never answers it. They don’t need to know. He just moves on. God does that to us sometimes, doesn’t he? We have questions that are burning on our hearts, and we ask God, “Why, God?” And He doesn’t answer them—sometimes not for days, sometimes not for months, and sometimes we just never know. That’s not because God doesn’t want us to know Him. Scripture as a whole is a revelation of God telling us who He is, what He’s about, and what He’s doing. But there are still these things that we just don’t know.

That’s frustrating. I think it’s frustrating. I am someone who wants to know everything I possibly can, so to know that there are some things I will never know is deeply frustrating, and I know some of you have certainly endured that same frustration. But the question is: can we trust God even when we don’t know all the answers? Can we trust Him even when we lack the framework to understand them, even if He did give them to us?

Thomas Aquinas, one of the greatest Christian theologians from the Middle Ages, wrote big commentaries on Scripture. He wrote giant, weighty tomes that are still read to this day, and he was one of the foremost Christian scholars of his era. When he was passing away, kind of drifting in and out of consciousness on his way to be with his Lord, his final words were, “Everything I have written is but straw.” His life’s work—some of the greatest Christian writings that we still look to—he called nothing. I don’t think he was saying that they are useless, but I do think that compared to eternity, compared to what we will know when that veil is lifted and everything is made clear to us, what we have now is so small in comparison. There are some things we just won’t know this side of eternity.

Can we trust God? Can we trust God even when He doesn’t give us the answer that we’re looking for? Jesus doesn’t give this crowd the answer they’re looking for. Instead, He says, “Very truly I tell you, you are looking for me, not because you saw the signs I performed, but because you ate the loaves and had your fill. Do not work for food that spoils, but for food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. For on him God the Father has placed his seal of approval.”

First off, he immediately knows their hearts, right? Jesus knows why they’re there. There is no fooling him. He knew when they wanted to make him king, and now he knows exactly what got them there. He says, “Oh, I know why you’re here. You want more bread.” And they want more than that too, right? They want all kinds of things. They want the solution to every problem. They want to make him king so that he can execute their vision. But does Jesus scold them? Does he say, “Shame on you for wanting more bread”? Does he say, “Shame on you for wanting solutions to your problems?”  Does he say, “It doesn’t really work like that. I’m kind of tired. I can only do so many miracles a day, so I’m kind of in my cool-down period. You’ve got to understand”? He doesn’t say any of that. Instead, Jesus says, “You’re not asking for enough. You are focusing on things that are too small. You want the solution to the problem right in front of you, but you know what’s going to happen after that? Another problem. And after that, there’s going to be another problem, because that’s the way life is. There’s always something, isn’t there? There’s always something new that draws your attention.”

Jesus tells them, “I don’t just want to give you the solution to one problem. I want to give you the solution for all of your problems—the biggest solution there is. Think bigger! You’re getting distracted by the bread. I want to solve death! That’s the problem I want to solve. You are going to die someday, and I want to solve that. I want eternal life for you. I want to take away the biggest thing that is stressing everything, the thing that causes every other problem. I want to address that.”

Think bigger! Address the biggest problem there is. I think C.S. Lewis said it really well: “It would seem that our Lord finds our desires not too strong, but too weak. We are half-hearted creatures, fooling about with drink and sex and ambition when infinite joy is offered us, like an ignorant child who wants to go on making mud pies in a slum because he cannot imagine what is meant by the offer of a holiday at sea. We are far too easily pleased.” Jesus offers them more than they asked for.

It is worth addressing because I think to many people, just reading that Jesus is offering them the bread of life—this eternal life thing—feels like, “Okay, but that’s a spiritual thing. That’s not something genuinely real that I can touch and have, and that’s not the kind of solution I’m interested in. That’s a luxury.” For people who already have food, money, and their whole lives figured out, then they can dabble in things like eternal life and these theoretical problems.

Maslow’s hierarchy of needs comes to mind—this idea that you can’t really focus on self-actualization until you’ve addressed a million other things, and once you get those in place, then finally you can start to think about things like spirituality and eternal life. But here’s the thing: Jesus is addressing a concrete problem, which is death.

Think about Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. In many ways, it’s anti-poor. It assumes that if you don’t have the physical stuff you need, you will have no interest in addressing questions like, “Why do I exist? How do I live a good life?” There can be no bigger question than that. How are you going to live a good life if you don’t know what one is? How are you going to reach the end of your life and say, “I’m glad that I lived the way I did,” unless you know what the point was? Spirituality is not a trifle to be toyed with by people who already have life figured out. It’s the biggest question there is: why do you exist, and how do you live well? That’s what Jesus is addressing. He says, “Seek eternal life. Solve the death problem.”

Then they ask him, “What must we do to do the works God requires?” Verse 29: “Jesus answered, ‘The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.'” Look at their question: “What must we do to do the works God requires?” They’re thinking quid pro quo. “What do I have to do? You won’t give me this stuff; I get it. Maybe I’m not good enough. What do I have to do to get to a place where you will give me the things that I am seeking?” And what does Jesus say? “Believe in me.”

When he says “believe,” he’s not saying to theoretically affirm his existence. He’s saying it in a way that means loving trust—the same way you might say, “I believe in you” to a friend that you love. If you turned to someone and said, “I believe in you,” you certainly wouldn’t be saying, “I affirm that you exist.” You’d be saying, “I trust you. I know you’ve got this.” That’s what Jesus is talking about. That’s what he’s looking for—not just adhering to a law, and not just behaving in a way that’s acceptable. Not that laws are bad; there are a lot of laws in the Bible. They are good things, and they are intended to get you on track, but that is not the core of our relationship with God. The core of our relationship with God is trusting Him, loving Him, and believing in Him.

Can you imagine a family that functioned strictly based on rules? There was no affection at all, but all of the kids did exactly what they were told the whole time. The way that family functioned would be bizarre! It would be really weird. I know some of you who have kids are probably like, “I don’t know, I might be able to deal with that a little bit.” But that’s not what a family is about. It’s not about marching orders and strictly adhering to the rules. Love is the core of a family. The rules and laws are good; you hope your kids follow the rules because you love them and want what’s best for them, and you hope that they trust you enough to do what you ask. God wants us to be members of his family. He’s not just looking for us to take marching orders strictly. He says, “I want you to believe in me.” That’s the starting place, and we can go from there.

The crowd’s not thrilled with this answer. They respond, “What sign will you give us that we may see it and believe in you? What will you do? You want us to believe in you? What are you going to give us? Our ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written, ‘He gave them bread from heaven to eat.'”

Our other passage touched on this: the Jews are seeking signs. Isn’t it interesting that they’re seeking signs even though they were already given one? They literally saw Jesus multiply bread and fish right in front of their eyes. But when Jesus says, “Trust me. You’re worrying about the little stuff. Trust me and stop worrying,” the first thing they say is, “Well, hold on. You haven’t given us enough evidence to trust you yet. You’re jumping the gun. Sure, you did the bread thing—that was interesting—but let’s be honest, the people in Moses’ day got bread from heaven. We’ve seen that one before. You’re going to have to do better than that if you want us to really trust in you.” They flip it around so that rather than putting their faith in Jesus, giving him agency, and following him, they want to be the ones in the driver’s seat. They say, “Jesus, you do what we say.” Jesus says, “Trust me,” and they say, “You haven’t given me reason to yet. Give me a little more evidence. Give me something bigger.”

That, again, I think is something many people wrestle with. I wrestled with that for a long time. Is there enough evidence? Has God given us sufficient evidence? This group had the advantage of literally seeing the multiplication of bread and fish, but even after that, did they think it was sufficient? No.

God gives us all the evidence we could possibly want. The book of Romans says that in chapter 1: all of the world has sufficient evidence to know that God exists and is good. Just by looking around, just by looking outside, we can see the universe is so intricately and carefully designed. The beauty around us alone is testimony to the fact that God exists and loves us. Who could look at the eclipse and say there’s no evidence? Who could look outside at a field and say there’s no evidence? There’s evidence all around us. God has given us evidence after evidence.

When we say there’s not enough evidence, very often God has already given it to us. But even when we get the evidence—even when God gives us a special revelation, or even when he does a miracle to show us that he’s there, he loves us, and he’s seeking us—if our heart is not in a place where we are able to trust him, there’s no amount of evidence that will be sufficient. God could give us more and more up until eternity, and it wouldn’t be enough. You get one thing and say, “God, if you give me this, I’ll believe in you.” Then you get it and say, “Eh, that’s just a coincidence. I’m going to need another one.” Then something else happens and you think, “I’m not sure. It would need to be bigger.” Being able to believe in Jesus is much less an evidence problem than some people make it out to be. It’s much less about evidence and much more about the heart. Can we trust that someone else is seeking what’s best for us, or are we unwilling to get out of the driver’s seat and trust someone else?

Jesus said to them, “Very truly I tell you, it is not Moses who has given you the bread from heaven, but it is my Father who gives you the true bread from heaven. For the bread of God is the bread that comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.”

“Sir,” they said, “always give us this bread.”

We’re back to bread talk. They like that—something physical, something they can wrap their minds around. “Give us that.”

Jesus declared, “I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never be hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty. But as I told you, you have seen me and still you do not believe. All those the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never drive away. For I have come from heaven not to do my will but the will of him who sent me. And this is the will of him who sent me, that I should not lose anything, but raise them up at the last day. For my Father’s will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day.”

“I’m not here to do your will. I’m not here to do my will. I’m here to do the Father’s will.” And he makes the Father’s will clear in no uncertain terms. What does God want? Eternal life for us. That’s what He is seeking. He wants to solve the biggest problem there is.

As we go through life, there are a million problems that catch our eye. We are not so very different from the people who kept chasing Jesus all over the place, trying to get more miracles out of him. We face problems about where we are going to get our meals, problems about governance, and problems about economics. There are a million and one problems constantly bearing down on us. Can we trust God? Can we trust God even when we don’t get what we want all the time? That’s the question we have to endure.

God recognizes that even in spite of the individual problems stacked up against us, there’s a bigger problem bearing down on us. All of these problems that we see are only problems for a day. They are problems for a day that we will endure, we will get past, and we will continue to work through. But everything we see is passing away. None of it is permanent. The little problems aren’t permanent, and the solutions aren’t permanent. We get a bag of bread, and then we need a new bag of bread. There’s only one permanent thing, and that permanent thing is God. He lives forever, he endures, and he wants us to endure too. Put your faith in me. He says, “I will not just solve the little problems; I’m going to solve all of them. I’ve got a plan. Do you trust me?”

Do you trust him?

John 6:16-24 Jesus Walks on Water

Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript

From the Pulpit

Commentary

16 When evening came, his disciples went down to the lake, 17 where they got into a boat and set off across the lake for Capernaum. By now it was dark, and Jesus had not yet joined them. 18 A strong wind was blowing and the waters grew rough. 19 When they had rowed about three or four miles, 

  1. “…they got into a boat and set off…”
    1. Why did Jesus send his disciples away from the crowd while he went to the mountain? Knowing that the crowd had differed from Christ’s teachings so much that he had to remove himself, it is likely he wanted his disciples exposed to the same tempting thought patterns.

    2. The crowd preferred the gift to the giver.  The disciples left their company, assuring that their thoughts would not start to drift towards their way of thinking.

  1. “A strong wind was blowing and the waters grew rough.”

    1. The Sea of Galilee, 600 feet below sea level and surrounded by mountains, is prone to sudden, strong winds and storms.

    2. “Darkness was increasing, discernment was diminishing, iniquity was growing. When, therefore, they had rowed about twenty-five or thirty furlongs. Meanwhile they struggled onward, kept advancing; nor did those winds and storms, and waves and darkness effect either that the ship should not make way, or that it should break in pieces and founder; but amid all these evils it went on.” -Augustine, Tractates on the Gospel of John, 25, 6.

  2. …they had rowed about three or four miles…”

    1. The disciples rowed all night (six to eight hours) in a brutal storm and only reached halfway across the sea (about three to four miles).

    2. This struggle wasn’t some sort of punishment; Jesus Himself sent them into the storm.  He has something to teach them here.

    3. Even though the disciples couldn’t see Jesus, Mark 6:48 explicitly says that Jesus was watching them straining at the oars from the top of the mountain and praying for them.  He never took his eyes off them.

they saw Jesus approaching the boat, walking on the water; and they were frightened. 20 But he said to them, “It is I; don’t be afraid.” 21 Then they were willing to take him into the boat, and immediately the boat reached the shore where they were heading.

  1. “It is I; don’t be afraid.”

    1. Strangely, they are afraid of the very thing that can save them.  The glory of Christ on the water is a sight they can’t fully comprehend at this point in their lives.

    2. “[T]he interior effect was fear; and therefore the fear of the disciples, conceived from Christ’s sudden appearance, is set forth when it says: ‘and they were afraid’ — either with a good fear, because it was caused by humility; ‘Do not be haughty, but fear’ (Romans 11:20). Or with an evil fear, because, as is said in Matthew 14:26, they thought him to be a ghost. ‘They trembled with fear where there was no fear’ (Psalm 13:5 [Vulgate numbering]). For fear especially belongs to carnal people, who shrink back from spiritual things.” -Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on John, Ch. 6, 882.

  2. Here, Matthew’s Gospel mention’s Peter’s attempt to walk on water (Matt. 14:22-33), which is an incredible act of faith, even though he faltered.

  3. “Then they were willing to take him into the boat, and immediately the boat reached the shore where they were heading.”

    1. Jesus waited until the disciples were willing to take Him into the boat. He doesn’t force His way in; He waits for an invitation.

    2. The moment Jesus entered the boat, they “immediately” reached the shore.  This is a second miracle, which shows the the power of letting Jesus take control.

22 The next day the crowd that had stayed on the opposite shore of the lake realized that only one boat had been there, and that Jesus had not entered it with his disciples, but that they had gone away alone. 23 Then some boats from Tiberias landed near the place where the people had eaten the bread after the Lord had given thanks. 24 Once the crowd realized that neither Jesus nor his disciples were there, they got into the boats and went to Capernaum in search of Jesus.

  1. “Our Lord, though He did not actually shew Himself to the multitude walking on the sea, yet gave them the opportunity of inferring what had taken place; The day following, the people which stood on the other side of the sea saw that there was none other boat there, save that one whereinto His disciples were entered, and that Jesus went not with His disciples into the boat, but that His disciples were gone away alone. What was this but to suspect that He had walked across the sea, on His going away? For He could not have gone over in a ship, as there was only one there, that in which His disciples had entered; and He had not gone in with them.” -Chrysostom, Hom. xliii. 2.

Full Transcript

“Sow a financial seed on your MasterCard, Visa, or Discover and watch the heavens open up and the blessings of the Lord come down on you.”

Last week, we started talking about John chapter 6 with a conversation about what’s known as the prosperity gospel—this idea that God wants you to have everything you could possibly want. He wants you to have a million dollars; he wants you to get that raise at work; he wants you to have an attractive spouse. He wants you to have health, wealth, and prosperity—everything you could ever dream of. The problem, according to this view, is you. You don’t have enough faith. If you just had a little more, he would give you everything you wanted.

Now, that’s not true. You can tell because even the people in the biblical era didn’t have big hordes of cash. The apostles were poor. Jesus was poor. Throughout history, there have been a lot of great Christians who have not been particularly wealthy or healthy. Your faith does not directly correlate to you getting everything you’ve ever wanted.

The prosperity gospel is not true, but I do want to clarify something here. I think we can go in the opposite direction pretty easily and end up in a bad place. We can say, “Oh, God doesn’t like us talking about money. Maybe he can’t handle money. Maybe I should never pray about money or health. Maybe God’s a spiritual God and he only handles spiritual things.” We might think that when we pray to God, we should only bring the spiritual stuff, but for the real world—for this life—we shouldn’t go to God because that’s too worldly.

I think of a monk from a long, long time ago named Evagrius. Isn’t that a great name? Evagrius. He sounds like a wizard. Evagrius the monk was someone who wrote about prayer. He wrote a lot of good stuff and a lot of bad stuff—it was kind of a toss-up. In his writing on prayer, he said that if you’re a really mature Christian, you should only have to pray one prayer: “Thy will be done.” That’s it. You don’t need to pray for anything else because you should just be able to trust God. Don’t worry about the details; just one prayer: “Thy will be done.” I can see what he was trying to get at, and I don’t want to be uncharitable—there is some wisdom to that—but I can’t help but notice that it doesn’t sound very much like what Jesus said.

In Matthew chapter 7, verses 7 through 11, Jesus said, “Which of you, if your son asks for bread, will give him a stone? Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a snake? If you then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give good gifts to those who ask him?” You can ask God about food and worldly things. It is interesting that Jesus gives the specific examples of bread and fish. Those are two things he brings up that someone might ask for.

Isn’t that exactly what Jesus dealt with last week? We saw that he was dealing with bread and fish in the feeding of the five thousand. Remember, there were probably more than five thousand men, and we don’t know how many women and children. “The feeding of the five thousand” sounds really cool, so we just go with that. Jesus did this miracle, and while there were certainly symbolic and spiritual elements to it, keep in mind the primary reason he did it: people were hungry. They needed something to eat.

Our God is not just the God of the spiritual realm. He’s not someone you can’t go to about your real physical needs. Jesus cares about all of it, and he’s the God over all of it. So don’t fall into that opposite trap of thinking Jesus doesn’t care about physical stuff. He does. The problem with the prosperity gospel isn’t that God can’t give us whatever we ask for—God can do whatever he wants; he’s God. The problem is that sometimes we’re more interested in the gifts than the Giver.

Sometimes we forget to seek God and trust that he knows more than we do. Sometimes the things he is trying to help us with are things we don’t even know about. We think our biggest problem might be that we don’t have a million dollars, but God can see other things. Sometimes he’s working on our character or teaching us to trust him. He is teaching us lessons that are really important in the face of eternity. If we only lived 100 years, that would definitely change our needs, but we know we’re eternal beings. There are things really important beyond this life that God might be working on in us. We need to be open to God, trust him, and let him work on what we need. We must trust that he knows what we need and not get angry and say, “Well, God hasn’t given me all the stuff I want. God, you owe me some stuff.”

This is one of those things we’re going to keep hearing about as we continue. If God has all this power, why doesn’t he give me all this stuff? Last week at the beginning of chapter six, we looked at the feeding of the five thousand. We saw how Jesus turned to Philip and said, “Hey, we need to feed all these people.” Philip said he didn’t know how they were going to do that because they didn’t have the money or the logistics. It didn’t make sense to him. Jesus was testing him, and Philip failed the test because he relied on what was in his control. He didn’t rely on Jesus or trust him; he tried to solve it by himself.

Andrew, a different disciple, introduced the young boy who gave Jesus his lunch of bread and fish. Jesus took that lunch and started handing it out. He just kept going and going. Not only was he able to feed everyone who had gathered, there were actually whole baskets of food left over. It wasn’t just enough for everyone to have their fill; it was more than enough.

Then those people got to thinking: “If Jesus can do this, what else can he give me?” They wanted to force Jesus to become their king. It didn’t matter what he wanted; they wanted him in charge so he could solve all their problems. This is something I didn’t talk about last week, but I wanted to touch on it because they say, “Surely this is the prophet who has come into the world.” From that, we learn that Jesus knew their intent was to force him to become king.

Why would they say that? It seems like an odd, random thing to say, but it’s a reference to Deuteronomy chapter 18, verse 15. That is where Moses is speaking to the Israelites and says, “The Lord will raise up a prophet like me from among you.” Moses was the greatest prophet of all time. David was a great king, but Moses was the one—the Ten Commandments guy who got them out of Egypt. You can’t do better than Moses, and Moses said there would be a prophet like him. People were waiting on that guy who was going to be as incredible as Moses.

Now here comes Jesus. Moses led them into the wilderness and fed them bread from heaven to sustain them for forty years. Jesus leads them into the wilderness and doesn’t just give them enough bread to sustain them; he gives them more than enough. This guy’s not only like Moses, he’s even better. That’s where that phrase connects.

They want to make him king, but Jesus has had this offer before. At the beginning of his ministry, Jesus went into the wilderness where he was tempted by Satan. One of the temptations was to bow down, and everything he saw would be his. Of course, Jesus said no. Jesus does not need the approval of the world. He has authority of his own. He doesn’t need an earthly crown; he has a heavenly one. Jesus said no to Satan, and here is this crowd hoping he will seize a crown for himself. Jesus leaves and goes to a mountain by himself.

This morning, I am going to rely on a few different passages. This story of Jesus walking on the water appears in three of the gospels: Mark, Matthew, and John. The only one that does not contain it is Luke. I’m going to rely on all of them. Normally, I don’t always do this. I think there is wisdom in looking at individual passages and letting them stand on their own. But as I read the other two accounts, I couldn’t help but notice that they all add something really important. Mark tells us so many details about motivations, Matthew tells us about the reactions of the disciples, and John tells us some of the more miraculous elements.

At the end of the day, I am not just looking at this passage because I want to know the words John chose. I am learning about it because I want to know what happened that day with Jesus and the disciples. If you want to look at them in the coming week, I encourage you to—they are well worth it. The other two are Mark chapter 6, verses 45 through 52, and Matthew chapter 14, verses 22 to 33. It is really interesting to read them all next to each other and see how those elements interact.

Mark tells us a little more about the motivation of why Jesus left. John just says, “And Jesus left and went to a mountain by himself.” Mark tells us he went to the mountain to pray. Now we know what Jesus is doing: he is spending time with his Father in heaven. While Jesus is on that mountain praying, see verse 16: “When that evening came, his disciples went down to the lake, where they got into a boat and set off across the lake for Capernaum.”

Again, we can rely on Mark to tell us why. Why are these disciples getting into a boat and going across a lake when Jesus is going up the mountain? Why don’t they follow him? Mark tells us Jesus told them to do that. Before he went up the mountain, Jesus turned to them and said, “Hey, get in the boat. Go across the lake. I’ll catch up.”

Isn’t it interesting that he tells his disciples to get out of here in a way that’s difficult for people to follow? The crowd wants Jesus to become king. They are so hopeful he will solve all of their problems after seeing his divine power. Don’t you think the disciples might have been a little tempted to do the same? They already believe in Jesus and think he’s incredible. They don’t always understand him, but they know he’s an impressive guy. With all these people wanting him to be king, there would be that temptation to say, “Maybe Jesus doesn’t know what’s best. Maybe he should be king. Maybe he doesn’t believe in himself enough, and I believe in him more than he does. Jesus, yes, we’re going to make you king. The crowd is right.”

Rather than stay and allow them to be continually tempted, Jesus tells them to get out of there. That is a good reminder for all of us. How often do we put ourselves in situations where we are tempted to do something we know God wouldn’t want us to do? Rather than leave, we stay and see how long we can make it, continually fending off that temptation. Don’t do that. Get out.

Maybe you’re in a situation where you’re working with someone who’s just irritating. They’re driving you nuts, they’re getting everything wrong, and they’re saying crazy things. You’re about to give them a piece of your mind—get out of there. If you need to talk, come back later when you’ve cooled down. Don’t allow yourself to be continually tempted. Remove yourself from the situation.

Or maybe you’re with a friend and you’re enjoying your evening, but suddenly you start talking about things that aren’t very edifying. Suddenly, you start sniffing around some gossip. You might say, “Oh, we shouldn’t talk about that,” but then you come around for another pass. You just keep getting closer and closer. Don’t do that! Get out of there. Change your environment. When you see yourself being tempted in an environment where it’s continually coming at you, move. Maybe Jesus is telling you, “Get out of there! Go!” That’s what he tells the disciples.

So they get on this boat and they go. A strong wind was blowing and the waters grew rough. There seem to be an awful lot of storms on the Sea of Galilee, don’t there? This is not the only miracle about a storm on that sea. I am sure you remember another one where the storm is raging and Jesus is sleeping. The disciples tell him, “Jesus, we need help,” and he quiets the storm.

The Sea of Galilee has a lot of storms because of a geographical feature. Galilee is a mountainous region, and the Sea of Galilee is six hundred feet below sea level. When a wind comes whipping down off those mountains, it becomes very easy for the weather to get rough. It’s just a region given to storms because of its geography. Now, these disciples knew this well; some of them were experienced fishermen.This was not their first rodeo. It wasn’t that they’d never seen a storm before, but this one was especially brutal. John tells us that they had rowed about three or four miles, which is about halfway through the Sea of Galilee. They were at the halfway point, and Mark tells us how long it took them to reach that spot: he says it was about dawn.

They left the night before, meaning they had been rowing all night and were still only halfway. That would be brutal. Just imagine being in that boat. Imagine the darkness around you and the wind howling. Imagine the thunder and lightning. Imagine sweat dripping down your brow, interspersed with seawater. You are straining at those oars, and blisters are forming on your hands because you’ve been at it for hours and hours. It’s three or four in the morning at this point, and you’re still going.

But when they had made it about three or four miles, they saw Jesus approaching the boat, walking on the water. Now, you have to admire where they’d been until this point. They worked hard, didn’t they? The venerable Bede, one of the most prolific commentators in the Middle Ages, wrote regarding this passage: “The ship does not carry a lazy crew.” They were all stout rowers. The Church is not lazy or fragile; we are tireless, constantly persevering in good works, eager to reach the harbor of everlasting salvation. These were men who worked hard. Jesus told them to do it, so they did it—even though he sent them right into a storm.

Some of you might be in storms right now. I know several of you have told me about the storms you’re facing. This week, more than usual, I feel like a lot of people are facing some hard stuff. If you are in a storm, just remember: that is not evidence that you are doing something wrong or something that Jesus doesn’t want you to do. There is that prosperity gospel thinking that says, “If God wants me to do it, it will be easy.” That’s really tempting. We think, “Oh man, this is getting hard; God must not want me doing this.” That is not necessarily true.

Here, Jesus sent these men into something very difficult because he was teaching them something. There was value to this. Going into something hard was not worthless; it was important. If you are in a storm, stay with it. You never know when you are right on the brink of something. You never know when Jesus is going to come walking to you over the waters.

Where was Jesus to these disciples? They didn’t know. They couldn’t see him. We know he was up on a mountain, and the book of Mark provides those little details: he was watching them and praying. He saw them straining at the oars. He knew they were having a hard time, and he was praying for them. They were never out of the sight of Jesus. They may not have been able to see him, but Jesus never took his eyes off them.

When he saw it was time, he came down off that mountain. I don’t know what that looked like. Did he just zoom down? Did he make a trek? We only know that he made his way over those stormy waters. These were not still, gentle pond waters, either. I imagine it would be harder to walk on storm waters—that’s just my hot take.

Jesus comes walking over the storm waters, and they are terrified. Verse 19 says: “When they had rowed three or four miles, they saw Jesus approaching the boat, walking on the water, and they were frightened. But he said to them, ‘It is I; don’t be afraid.'” Maybe that is something Jesus is saying to you. If you are in a storm, if you are having a hard time, if you are facing something that’s frustrating and just beating you down, Jesus is saying to you: “Do not be afraid.”

Matthew tells us the part where Peter gets out of the boat and tries to walk to Jesus. He makes it a couple of steps across those waters, but then he ultimately falls in because he does not have enough faith. Usually, that is a lesson about how Peter should have had more faith. But I have to give Peter a little bit of credit. Even making one step on the water is more than I’ve made. That’s impressive—to have so much faith you could even take one step on water. We should all try to have as much faith as we can.

After that incident, they were willing to take him into the boat. Now, Jesus had just walked across the water; if he wanted on that boat, there wasn’t a thing anyone could do to stop him. But Jesus doesn’t just jump onto the boat. He waits. He waits until they want him on the boat.

I’m not going to say Jesus always follows this rule, because sometimes he does things that are unexpected. For example, Paul, who wrote so many of the epistles in the New Testament, was someone who persecuted the church, and Jesus blinded him so that he would see the truth. Sometimes things happen in unexpected ways. But as much as that is true, more often than not, Jesus does not go around blinding people on a regular basis. Most of the time, he waits. He waits just outside the boat, waiting for someone to let him in. He stands at the door and knocks, waiting for someone to answer.

Is there an instance in your life where Jesus is waiting just outside of it? You haven’t let him in yet. You’re trying to do it on your own, working by your own power, and Jesus is just waiting for the invitation to come in. Look what happens when he is on the boat: it says that immediately the boat reached the shore where they were heading.

This passage doesn’t get enough credit. A lot of people don’t notice that this right here is a miracle. It doesn’t say, “And the storm subsided and they got there pretty quickly.” It says immediately the boat reached the shore where they were heading. They were exactly where they needed to go. The minute Jesus got on the boat, they were there.

How many of you need to learn the same lesson that Philip learned: that if you are trying to make it through something on your own power, it’s going to be hard? It might not be enough. Maybe there is a storm in your life, a challenge that you are facing. You are straining at the oars and working hard, giving it all of your effort, but making little to no headway. Jesus is coming to you across the water. He is waiting. Let go of those oars, let him into the boat, and trust that he will get you where you need to go.

The Historic Challenge of Christian Parenting

I just ran across this quote from the famous 4th century Christian preacher, John Chrysostom:

We spare neither labors nor means in order to teach our children secular sciences, so that they can serve well the earthly authorities. Only the knowledge of the holy Faith, the service of the Heavenly King are a matter of indifference to us. We allow them to attend spectacles but we care little whether they go to Church and stand within it reverently. We demand an account from them of what they learned in their secular institutes—why do we not demand an account from them of what they heard in the Lord’s house? 

as cited by Theophan the Recluse, The Path to Salvation, trans. Fr. Seraphim Rose, 331

It was kind of a shock to read! Here’s a man in our heralded Christian past, preaching in an era which I all too readily assume was full of devotion and piety, and he’s addressing the same thing that we face today: parents often care more about secular education than they do the Christian faith. After all, life is long! A child has a whole lifetime to think about God. The window for getting into a good school? That’s approaching fast. So should their child attend church or piano lessons? Wake up early on Sunday for an entry-level job, or head over to worship? The piano lessons and job look better on a college application than anything the Church has to offer. A good application means a good school. A good school means a good job. A good job means a stable income and a higher chance of job satisfaction. Job satisfaction means a higher chance of being happy! And what more could a person ask for than a happy child? Conversion can happen anytime; the road to happiness is happening now. Children need to get on or get left behind.

It’s easy to suggest that this is a phenomenon that only really effects nominal Christians that attend church on Christmas and Easter, but it’s not quite as simple as that. Even the great Augustine of Hippo, bishop and theologian extraordinaire, had parents that prioritized his academic education before his faith journey. When he took a concubine (or started living with his girlfriend, to try to translate a weird ancient idea into a modern one), his Christian mom was surprisingly calm about the whole thing. If anything, she was glad they weren’t getting married:

The reason why she showed no such concern was that she was afraid that the hope she placed in me could be impeded by a wife. This was not the hope which my mother placed in you for the life to come, but the hope which my parents entertained for my career that I might do well out of the study of literature. Both of them, as I realized, were very ambitious for me: my father because he hardly gave a thought to you at all, and his ambitions for me were concerned with mere vanities; my mother because she thought it would do no harm and would be a help to set me on the way towards you, if I studied the traditional pattern of a literary education. That at least is my conjecture as I try to recall the characters of my parents.

Augustine, Confessions, trans. Chadwick, p. 27

In Confessions, Augustine almost NEVER says anything bad about his momma. She is the shining pinnacle of saintliness that follows him around, praying for his conversion and hoping that her son might know God! But even SHE buys in to the theory that he needs to put his studies first while he’s young and then maybe someday he can convert when he’s nice and settled. This isn’t just a thought pattern for nominal Christians; this is a pervasive way of thinking for a lot of Christian parents.

Andrew Root talks extensively about this in his book, The End of Youth Ministry. He suggests that each society has a different vision of what a parent is supposed to be. Obviously, a good parent produces happy children. That tends to be universal. But what does it mean to be happy? Is happiness luxury? Elevated social standing? Religious identity? What does the culture say that happiness is? Because regardless of whether or not you personally affirm it, you’re going to find yourself influenced by it:

It would be super weird for even me (the theologian and husband of a pastor) to say [to my next-door neighbor], “Yes, [my children are] doing very good. Owen fasted all week and saw two visions. And Maisy felt the deep conviction of the Holy Spirit and has entered a time of confession and penance. She wore our family hair shirt to school today. It made gym class difficult, but that’s the point: doing penance for sin isn’t easy!” There was a time in history when this might have been exactly how a person would respond. But not today. The moral imagination has changed, and if I did respond like this, even a churchgoing neighbor would make all sorts of moral interpretations about me… My neighbor might even call social services, assuming that I’m some crazy religious freak, because my sense of the good feels wrong to her. And what would give her the moral high ground is her assumption that my poor kids are being kept from living a full life.

Andrew Root, The End of Youth Ministry, p. 25

So what is good parenting today? What is that thing that our society strives to achieve? For people in the eras of Augustine and Chrysostom, it was clearly tied to an increase in wealth and standing. Are things so different today? Not to suggest that the core of all goodness is located in a person’s pocketbook, but we clearly assume that more money will lead to better opportunities for happiness. Augustine’s parents got all kinds of admiration for saving up and sending him off to a top-notch school! That made them good parents in the eyes of the world. Good parents just like that were being lectured by Chrysostom: don’t let material success take priority over faith, regardless of how good it makes you look in the eyes of the world. If we want to avoid being good parents and be godly parents, it’s going to be a challenge that we can’t embark on alone.

I have no kids. It’s easy for me to say that Christians need to find ways to push back against the presiding social imaginary and put faith first when raising children. That being said, I’m still a church member. I’m responsible for helping raise children within my church community, and I’m responsible for supporting their parents. I hope I can can help them on that difficult journey, and I hope I can find a community to help me when that time comes. Raising children faithfully been a challenge for thousands of years, and the lure of defining parenting by the measure of secular success isn’t going away anytime soon.

THE NEPHILIM! A Word Study and History of Interpretation

Be there giants?

2 Timothy 3:16 famously says that all scripture is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness.  Unfortunately, not all of it is easy to understand.  So let’s pick out a really weird verse and see what God has to say in it!  We’ll take a good look at the verse itself, explore the history of its interpretation, and see what we can make of it.

Genesis 6:1-8

6 When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, 2 the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. 3 Then the Lord said, “My Spirit will not contend with humans forever, for they are mortal; their days will be a hundred and twenty years.”

4 The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.

5 The Lord saw how great the wickedness of the human race had become on the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of the human heart was only evil all the time. 6 The Lord regretted that he had made human beings on the earth, and his heart was deeply troubled. 7 So the Lord said, “I will wipe from the face of the earth the human race I have created—and with them the animals, the birds and the creatures that move along the ground—for I regret that I have made them.”8 But Noah found favor in the eyes of the Lord.

What on earth is happening in this passage?  For me, the pinnacle of weirdness is in verse 4: “The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.” What the heck?

To make heads or tails of this passage, we have to be able to identify 3 different groups: the sons of God, the daughters of man, and the Nephilim.  Unfortunately, it’s incredibly hard to translate the Hebrew here with any level of certainty.  Not only are the words and phrases vague enough that they leave several interpretive possibilities on the table, but exact phrases like these are used so rarely in the Bible that we don’t have a lot of clues to help us out.

First, we have the sons of God or “bene haelohim”.  The phrase appears two other times in the Bible (Job 1:6 and Job 2:1) and in each instance it clearly means “angels.”  That being said, Genesis and Job weren’t written at the same time, and there are several other translations that would be well within the bounds of reason.  It could mean something like “men who follow God” or “men who are like God,” (aka godly men).  To add even more confusion to the matter, the word “elohim” can mean “God” or it can be used to refer to any being that’s particularly impressive.  It could mean “king.”  It could mean “angel.”  You get the picture.  Bene haelohim could easily mean “sons of kings” or “sons of warlords.”

Clearly the “daughters of humans” (a phrase uncommon in Scripture and more clearly rendered “daughters of man” in Hebrew) are intended to be the opposite of whatever the sons of God are.  If we say that the sons of God are angels, then thinking of them as human women makes the most sense.  If the sons of God are godly men, the daughters of man are intended to be worldly women.  If we say that the sons of God are the sons of kings or warlords, then they are intended to be peasant women.

Finally, we have the Nephilim.  You know a word is bad when Bible translators don’t even touch the thing.  There’s a few options here as well.  The literal translation from the Hebrew is “the fallen ones,”  It appears in two other places in the Bible: once in Numbers when the Hebrew spies look over at Canaan to see if it is safe to inhabit and they see nephilim (usually rendered “giants” in English) and again in Ezekiel 32 to describe warriors that have fallen on the battlefield.  In a battlefield context, the word could also be used to talk about strong attackers, or those who “fall upon” their opponents with attack after attack.  The giants idea might seem out of left field, given the English translation, but an ancient Greek manuscript grants us a little insight.  The Septuagint (a Greek translation of the Old Testament from the 3rd century BC) has Nephilim translated as “gigantes” or giants, so there’s some kind of cultural or linguistic link there, even if it’s not immediately apparent.

Where does that leave us?  Well, we have three story options starting to emerge.  This could be a story about angels coming to earth, having children with humans, and giants being born as a result of that union.  It could be a story about righteous men of God having children with worldly women, leading to a slow compromise of faith over the generations.  Then there’s the option that it could be about the sons of rich merchants mistreating peasant women and raising a generation of fierce warriors.  Each of these seems viable.

So what now?  Well, time to look at tradition.

The oldest interpretation I could find was from the Book of Enoch.  This little apocryphal book (book that didn’t make it into the Bible) was probably written between 200 and 300 BC.  And obviously Enoch didn’t write it.  Enoch is the guy who was famously “taken away” by God in Genesis 5:24 (and there’s much speculation about what THAT means, but that’s a story for another time), so someone else must have written it and popped his name on it.  The book is basically an attempt to retell the story of Genesis more thoroughly, filling in all the plot holes that the original has.  In the retelling of this story, the sons of God are DEFINITELY angels that come to Earth to have children with human women:

And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied, in those days were born unto them beautiful and comely daughters. And the angels, the children of heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: ‘Come, let us choose wives from among the children of men and beget us children.’

1 Enoch 6:1-2

Not only do they have children with human women; they give humans science and technology!  Unfortunately for them, God is not best pleased with this development:

Bind Azazel hand and foot, and cast him into darkness: and make an opening in the desert, which is in Dudael, and cast him therein. And place upon him rough and jagged rocks, and cover him with darkness, and let him abide there for ever, and cover his face that he may not see light. And on the great day of judgment he shall be cast into the fire.

1 Enoch 10:4-6

Bad times for Azazel.

Does the story sound familiar to you?  It sounds suspiciously like the Greek myth of Prometheus to me!  A lesser divine being comes to Earth, hands out some tech, and gets banished to torment in a barren wasteland for their sin against the divine being/beings in charge.  I don’t think it’s any coincidence that this book starts showing up around 200-300 BC considering that Alexander the Great did his grand crusade of the world between 356 BC and 323 BC.  Would it be so crazy if an Israelite that heard the Greek myth was looking for greater clarity in their Scriptures and took a little inspiration from the Greeks?  I don’t think so.  Mind you, that’s a disputed point, but the dates and the narratives are too similar for me to dismiss.

In any case, we’ve got the angels and giants theory on the table.  How does mainstream Judaism react in the coming years?  They don’t seem to care for it much.  Not only is the Book of Enoch never canonized, but a majority of rabbinic writings that emerge tend to favor readings that cast the sons of God as tyrants and the Nephilim as powerful warriors.  These readings gain more and more momentum over time.  Nonetheless, the apocryphal books have their supporters.  There are certainly people, especially at the fringes, that strongly support a supernatural reading.

When Christians start popping up, they’re a little more interested in the whole angels and giants thing.  After all, a lot of early Christians were on the fringes of Judaism.  Apocalyptic Judaism was a fringe movement that focused heavily on the coming of the messiah, and the Book of Enoch was very popular with them.  If mainstream groups didn’t like the Book of Enoch, it was because they were scared of its prophecies concerning the messiah!  And so early Christians inherited the angels/giants theory from some of their earliest supporters.

Mind you, its momentum didn’t last long.  After about the year 300, the angel/giant theory seems to take a nosedive in popularity within the Christian community.  Not only did they slowly accept 1 Enoch as “not legit,” but they started asking questions.  What is an angel?  What can an angel do?  Are angels all male?  When did angels fall?  Why does the term say “angels” when clearly disobedient angels are devils?  Jesus said specifically in Mark 12 that Angels have no interest in procreation.  Why did the angels do that?  What happened to them? And what happened to the giants, because if you render that word “giants” to resolve their appearance in Numbers, you need them to survive a world-ending flood that the Bible deliberately says they would not have survived.  The whole interpretation is just incredibly bizarre and doesn’t make logical or narrative sense. So theologians started speaking out against it.  You have heavy hitters like Clement and Augustine weighing in against it.  Chrysostom goes so far as to call the theory “blasphemous.” 

To read the passage well, Christians looked back at what happened previously in Genesis and tried to think about how this puzzle piece fit.  Genesis 5 is highly interested in genealogies.  Seth is born to Adam “in his image and likeness.”  Genesis 1:26 previously established that Adam was made in God’s image and likeness.  To some interpreters, this was a symbolic passing of the torch.  Seth inherited his godliness from his father, and his people would continue to strive for godliness in the coming generations.  There became two types of people on the Earth: the children of Seth, and the children of Cain.  These two branches seem to be symbolic, more than biological.  The devout and the worldly both lived on the earth, though living in very different ways.  This, then, is a story in which people of faith decide to compromise their beliefs to intermingle with the attractive people of the Earth.  As Eve tempted Adam, so now the daughters of man tempt the children of God.  The resulting offspring are fallen; they do not know God, even though they know the ways of the world quite well.  The only truly devout man left is Noah.  You know how the story goes from there.

By the time the reformation rolls around, there seems to be broad consensus that this view is correct.  Martin Luther presents it as the obvious meaning.  John Calvin only brings up the angels and giants thing only to ponder why ancient thinkers would possibly have thought something so odd:

That ancient figment, concerning the intercourse of angels with women, is abundantly refuted by its own absurdity; and it is surprising that learned men should formerly have been fascinated by ravings so gross and prodigious.

Calvin’s Commentary on Genesis 6:2

The matter seems settled.  But lo and behold, the angels and giants make their way back into popular Christian thought around the 18th century.  At this point, modernists (a group that considered their Bibles to likely contain large amounts of mythology) started re-investigating the issue.  If the Bible is full of myths that aren’t literally true, why can’t this be a story about angels and giants?  Ironically, some fundamentalists reached the same conclusion, but through very different methodology.  If the Bible is always true and you don’t need tradition to understand it, then why shouldn’t you be willing to believe a fantastical story about angels and giants?  It’s one of those weird points in history where really conservative people go one way and really liberal people go another, and somehow they end up making a giant loop and meeting up at the same point.

But now we’ve looked at all the interpretive options and poked around all the major strands of tradition.  What do I believe?  Well, you ought to know that I’d rather be wrong with the likes of Augustine, Aquinas, Luther, and Calvin than right with anybody else.  Not only is their interpretation the most well-represented in Christian tradition, but it just makes sense.  It’s logical.  It fits the Biblical narrative leading from genealogy to flood, and it addresses a constant theme in the Bible: don’t compromise your faith to fit into this world more comfortably (Deut 7:3, 2 Corinth. 6:14, Deut 16:21, etc).  To be a true disciple of Christ, you can’t afford to compromise any part of the truth.  You have to live your whole life in constant worship and obedience.  Not only do I think this is a good interpretation, but I think it’s something that’s an important reminder as we try to live out our faith today.  We live in a world that’s increasingly secular.  Our culture is more than happy to accommodate Christians that are willing to compromise on the things that they believe.  If you’re willing to make a few concessions, you’ll fit in easier.  You’ll be the “right kind” of Christian. Your life will be significantly attractive on the outside.  If you don’t?  Well, things might get difficult. 

As people made in the image and likeness of God, we can’t afford to compromise truth for temporary gain.  After all, we know truth itself in the person of Jesus Christ. The only way for us to live well is to hold fast to truth and to continually honor God, rather than ourselves.

That’s my take!  But rather than end on a dramatic note, I’ll end with some humility.  It’s a tough passage!  If you think I missed something or want to dig around on your own, check out some of the resources below!  See what you think!   Either way, wrestle with those tough verses when you find them.  If all Scripture is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness, sometimes we have to do a little bit of wrestling to see what God is saying.

Great articles if you want to know more:
https://www.biblicalcyclopedia.com/B/bene-elohim.html
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/genesis/6.htm
https://lutheranreformation.org/get-involved/bible-study-luther-genesis-61-8/