Video Teaching
Verse-by-Verse Commentary
Full Transcript
From the Pulpit
Commentary
14 Not until halfway through the festival did Jesus go up to the temple courts and begin to teach. 15 The Jews there were amazed and asked, “How did this man get such learning without having been taught?”
- “Not until halfway through the festival…”
- Jesus came to the Festival of Tabernacles as a devout Jew following God’s commands, not as a public figure intending to do teachings or miracles, but he could not tolerate hearing falsehoods being taught.
- One can imagine all of the different sects of Judaism there that might have frustrated Jesus to the point that he had to speak up:
- The Sadducees and their denial of the afterlife.
- The Pharisees and their hyper-fixation on the law.
- The Essenes and their ritualistic apocalypticism.
- The Zealots and their anti-Roman fervor.
- Some would-be political messiah trying to drum up support.
- The Sadducees and their denial of the afterlife.
- Truth was so important to Jesus that he had to speak, even when the world longed for him to be silent.
- Jesus came to the Festival of Tabernacles as a devout Jew following God’s commands, not as a public figure intending to do teachings or miracles, but he could not tolerate hearing falsehoods being taught.
- “How did this man get such learning…”
- Jesus’s teachings were profound to the crowd. Given their location, there’s no doubt that they had heard other highly-educated rabbis speak, but Jesus’s teachings seem to have made all others look like little children in comparison.
- Unlike other rabbis in his era like Rabbi Hillel and Rabbi Shammai, Jesus did not cite others at length. He taught with authority because he was God, the ultimate source of truth. Who could he have possibly quoted that would add even an ounce of authority to the divine “I am?”
- Some did seem concerned that Jesus did not possess a traditional rabbinic education. Typically, there was a lengthy apprenticeship (up to ten years) under an established rabbi.
- There can be no doubt that education is valuable, but the purpose of any education is to find truth, which is more important than any formal credentials or accolades. Jesus himself was the truth. Nothing could add to what he already embodied.
- Jesus’s teachings were profound to the crowd. Given their location, there’s no doubt that they had heard other highly-educated rabbis speak, but Jesus’s teachings seem to have made all others look like little children in comparison.
16 Jesus answered, “My teaching is not my own. It comes from the one who sent me. 17 Anyone who chooses to do the will of God will find out whether my teaching comes from God or whether I speak on my own. 18 Whoever speaks on their own does so to gain personal glory, but he who seeks the glory of the one who sent him is a man of truth; there is nothing false about him. 19 Has not Moses given you the law? Yet not one of you keeps the law. Why are you trying to kill me?”
Jesus proves that his knowledge is legitimate in three different ways
- Scripture: “My teaching is not my own…”
- The Israelites had the word of God with them in the Old Testament Scriptures. To verify Jesus’s teachings, they could literally check to see if Christ’s words were his own, or if they aligned with the word of God.
- Early Christians constantly pointed to the Old Testament for evidence of God’s coming work in Christ.
- In his famous Dialogue with Trypho, Justin Martyr (a Christian) debates a Jew named Trypho and uses the Old Testament extensively to persuade him of Christ’s divinity.
- “If I undertook to prove this by doctrines or arguments of man, you should not bear with me. But if I quote frequently Scriptures, and so many of them, referring to this point, and ask you to comprehend them, you are hard-hearted in the recognition of the mind and will of God.” -Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho, Ch. 68.
- In his famous Dialogue with Trypho, Justin Martyr (a Christian) debates a Jew named Trypho and uses the Old Testament extensively to persuade him of Christ’s divinity.
- The Israelites had the word of God with them in the Old Testament Scriptures. To verify Jesus’s teachings, they could literally check to see if Christ’s words were his own, or if they aligned with the word of God.
-
-
- The ultimate authority for teaching is Scripture, not any degree or certification
- “In the Bible we have a perfect library, and he who studies it thoroughly will be a better scholar than if he had devoured the Alexandrian Library entire”. -Charles Spurgeon, Lectures to my Students, Lecture XIII.
- “In the Bible we have a perfect library, and he who studies it thoroughly will be a better scholar than if he had devoured the Alexandrian Library entire”. -Charles Spurgeon, Lectures to my Students, Lecture XIII.
- The ultimate authority for teaching is Scripture, not any degree or certification
-
- Action: “Anyone who chooses to do the will of God will find out whether my teaching comes from God.”
- He tied knowledge to lived experience, asserting real knowledge changes one’s life. In embodying his teachings, you could feel the power of God.
- Many people carry strange pet conspiracy theories about the world, but these theories go unacted on. They aren’t real enough to affect a life, and so they are not really real at all.”
- Choosing to pray, to read Scripture, and to ask God for help are often significant moments where someone who is only theorizing about being a Chrisitan sees the power of God. Living like a Chrisitan shows the power of God in your life.
- Wesley famously emphasized the value of living the will of God to understand it better. In his commentary, he notes on this verse: “This is a universal rule, with regard to all persons and doctrines. He that is thoroughly willing to do it, shall certainly know what the will of God is.”
- He tied knowledge to lived experience, asserting real knowledge changes one’s life. In embodying his teachings, you could feel the power of God.
- Personal Witness- “He who seeks the glory of the one who sent him is a man of truth. There is nothing false about him.”
- Jesus’s motivations are selfless. He’s putting himself at risk to teach, rather than others who taught for personal glory.
- Christ’s life was so blameless and obviously beyond reproach. He’s so confident in this fact that he asks the crowd why they dare to attack him when they all break the law.
- Jesus’s motivations are selfless. He’s putting himself at risk to teach, rather than others who taught for personal glory.
20 “You are demon-possessed,” the crowd answered. “Who is trying to kill you?”
21 Jesus said to them, “I did one miracle, and you are all amazed. 22 Yet, because Moses gave you circumcision (though actually it did not come from Moses, but from the patriarchs), you circumcise a boy on the Sabbath. 23 Now if a boy can be circumcised on the Sabbath so that the law of Moses may not be broken, why are you angry with me for healing a man’s whole body on the Sabbath? 24 Stop judging by mere appearances, but instead judge correctly.”
- “You are demon-possessed…Who is trying to kill you?”
-
- In this particular instance of Scripture, “are you demon possessed,” might translate to something like, “Are you crazy?” They’re saying that Jesus is wildly inconsistent with reality.
- In verse 13, they deliberately stayed quiet about Jesus because they were afraid of the leaders that wanted to kill him. They know.
- The crowd would rather be comfortable than brave. Openly admitting that the leaders are corrupt would be life-shattering, so they claim Jesus is crazy rather than affirming what their hearts know is true.
- In this particular instance of Scripture, “are you demon possessed,” might translate to something like, “Are you crazy?” They’re saying that Jesus is wildly inconsistent with reality.
- “…you circumcise a boy on the Sabbath.”
-
- Circumcision is a ritual that does a small amount of damage to someone to keep the law of God. This was allowable on a Sunday.
- Jesus healed someone on a Sunday and got in trouble. If a small amount of pain is tolerable for God’s sake on the Sabbath, why is a miraculous healing inappropriate? The logic is inconsistent.
- “By this example he defends his action, although he does not merely argue from what is similar, but draws a comparison between the greater and the less. There was this similarity between circumcision and the cure of the paralytic, that both were works of God; but Christ maintains that the latter is more excellent, because the benefit of it extends to the whole man. Now if he had merely cured the man of bodily disease, the comparison would not have been applicable; for circumcision would have greater excellence as to the cure of the soul. Christ, therefore, connects the spiritual advantage of the miracle with the outward benefit granted to the body; and on this account he justly prefers to circumcision the entire cure of a man.” -John Calvin, Commentary on John, Ch. 7, 188.
- Circumcision is a ritual that does a small amount of damage to someone to keep the law of God. This was allowable on a Sunday.
25 At that point some of the people of Jerusalem began to ask, “Isn’t this the man they are trying to kill? 26 Here he is, speaking publicly, and they are not saying a word to him. Have the authorities really concluded that he is the Messiah? 27 But we know where this man is from; when the Messiah comes, no one will know where he is from.”
28 Then Jesus, still teaching in the temple courts, cried out, “Yes, you know me, and you know where I am from. I am not here on my own authority, but he who sent me is true. You do not know him, 29 but I know him because I am from him and he sent me.”
30 At this they tried to seize him, but no one laid a hand on him, because his hour had not yet come. 31 Still, many in the crowd believed in him. They said, “When the Messiah comes, will he perform more signs than this man?”
- “Have the authorities really concluded that he is the Messiah?”
- Some in Jerusalem wondered if the authorities believed Jesus was the Messiah since he spoke publicly unhindered.
- They dismissed this based on a folk belief that the Messiah’s origin would be unknown, while they knew Jesus was born in Bethlehem, failing to search the Scriptures, which do prophesy his birthplace (Micah 5:2 )
- Some in Jerusalem wondered if the authorities believed Jesus was the Messiah since he spoke publicly unhindered.
- “Yes, you know me, and you know where I am from…”
- “Therefore Christ asks in a tone of sarcasm: “‘You know where I come from? How well you know it! For because you do not know him who sent me, how could you know me and know where I come from? To be sure, you know that I was to come from Nazareth, from Galilee and Judea, and that is true; but that is not enough to know about my origin.’” -Martin Luther, The Fifth Sermon on John 7, (1531).
- “Therefore Christ asks in a tone of sarcasm: “‘You know where I come from? How well you know it! For because you do not know him who sent me, how could you know me and know where I come from? To be sure, you know that I was to come from Nazareth, from Galilee and Judea, and that is true; but that is not enough to know about my origin.’” -Martin Luther, The Fifth Sermon on John 7, (1531).
- “no one laid a hand on him, because his hour had not yet come.”
- When the crowd finally grasped beyond a doubt that Jesus was climbing to be the Son of God from Heaven, they dashed to seize him! Their logic had failed at every turn, and so they resorted to force. There was no room for convenient ignorance about his claimed title and purpose.
- When the crowd finally grasped beyond a doubt that Jesus was climbing to be the Son of God from Heaven, they dashed to seize him! Their logic had failed at every turn, and so they resorted to force. There was no room for convenient ignorance about his claimed title and purpose.
- “Still, many in the crowd believed in him.”
- “There was a certain crowd of people which quickly saw its own sickness, and without delay recognized His remedy.” -Augustine of Hippo, Tractate 31, 7.
32 The Pharisees heard the crowd whispering such things about him. Then the chief priests and the Pharisees sent temple guards to arrest him.
33 Jesus said, “I am with you for only a short time, and then I am going to the one who sent me. 34 You will look for me, but you will not find me; and where I am, you cannot come.”
35 The Jews said to one another, “Where does this man intend to go that we cannot find him? Will he go where our people live scattered among the Greeks, and teach the Greeks? 36 What did he mean when he said, ‘You will look for me, but you will not find me,’ and ‘Where I am, you cannot come’?”
- “Will he go where our people live scattered among the Greeks…”
- The leaders ensure that willful ignorance returns to the crowd. Despite Jesus talking about divine realms, they immediately pivot the conversation back to the earthly and interpret a meaning that isn’t at all rational in the conversation.
- “The Lord was indeed about to go to the Gentiles, not by His bodily presence, but still with His feet. What were His feet? Those which Saul desired to trample upon by persecution, when the Head cried out to him, ‘Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?’ (Acts 9:4).” -Augustine of Hippo, Tractate 31, 7.
- The leaders ensure that willful ignorance returns to the crowd. Despite Jesus talking about divine realms, they immediately pivot the conversation back to the earthly and interpret a meaning that isn’t at all rational in the conversation.
Full Transcript
Last week, we saw Jesus getting ready to go to the Festival of Tabernacles. He was going down to Jerusalem, and this week he is there. He is not going in public ministry; that is not his goal. He is not going there to officially try to teach, show off, or do miracles. He is just going to be an observant Jew. God said to go to the Festival of Tabernacles at Jerusalem, and so that is exactly what he did. Now, we are picking up here, and he is going to teach because he just can’t help himself.
As we go through, really pay attention to knowledge in this passage. I think a lot of people don’t necessarily associate knowledge with faith. They kind of think of them as different, separate things. People don’t often recognize that Jesus was brilliant. It is easy to imagine Jesus as a moral teacher—someone who came to teach people to be kind and to change the way they act. That is true. Sometimes people think he was just a peasant, a carpenter, a guy who was really folksy, and that is not necessarily untrue either. But this is also the one through whom everything was made; the whole world was made by him. He was brilliant. He knew it all because he made it all. There is no greater authority than him. Pay attention to the way he addresses knowledge throughout this passage, and the way he weaves it in with faith in a constructive way that I think can help a lot of us.
Verse 14 says, “Not until halfway through the festival did Jesus go up to the temple courts and begin to teach.” I think this is kind of a funny little passage, just the way it is worded. It is almost like saying he didn’t go there to teach, but would you believe it? He made it halfway through the festival before he got up there. They are surprised it took him that long. Jesus may not have come here to teach, but he could not stand by and listen as some of the nonsense being told at the temple went on.
This festival was on the temple mount. There would have been thousands of people from all over the place. Anyone who was a devout Jew would go to Jerusalem for this festival. While they were there, they would have encountered some of the religious sects of this timeframe who served as priests at this location, like the Pharisees, Sadducees, and the like. We see Jesus argue with the Pharisees all the time, so we will look at the Sadducees this time just as a thought exercise.
Let’s say there was a Sadducee priest there—and there certainly would have been. Imagine Jesus overhearing a conversation where someone goes up to this priest and says, “Excuse me, I just want to know how I can get to heaven.” The Sadducees didn’t believe in life after death, so they probably would have said something like, “Oh, you sweet summer child. There is no heaven. You’ve been taught incorrectly. Let me help explain how things really are. We’re just trying to live well in this life. Don’t worry about heaven.” Imagine Jesus standing over there, his eye twitching because he knows there is a heaven, he has seen it, and he is from there. Hearing incorrect teaching being taught to the people he came to help was more than he could bear. He makes it halfway through before he gets up and starts teaching, essentially saying, “All right, I’m going to have to set some of you straight because there are some things being said that are not so.”
Verse 15 says the Jews were amazed and asked, “How did this man get such learning without having been taught?” Notice first off that Jesus was a good teacher. The things he was saying were profound. The priests at the temple were no slouches; these were some of the foremost intellectuals of the entire society. They were spiritual leaders, but they were also responsible for the collective wisdom of their culture. The Greeks had their philosophers. Today, we have college professors as our foremost intellectuals. In Israel, they had the priests. If you had a question, the priests in Jerusalem were some of the most highly educated people you could possibly ask.
Jesus starts teaching at the temple and people listen to him, and he makes the leaders look like little children. Imagine if you were at a college lecture and one of the students stood up and said, “Professor, I think you’ve got a few details wrong. Let me just walk you through this.” Then they start writing formulas on the board, and sure enough, they know infinitely more than the professor does. That is what it was like. Jesus is brilliant. His teachings are profound in a way that others’ are not, and the way he teaches is different, too.
In this timeframe, the way rabbis taught was by pointing to all of the people who came in that tradition before them. If you were listening to a rabbi, they would say, “Well, on this matter Rabbi Hillel says this, but you also need to keep in mind Rabbi Shammai, who has a disagreeing opinion and would say this.” They were showing that they knew everyone who came before them and understood the conversation as it had gone thus far in their culture. That is not a bad way to teach. I do that. This morning I have a quote from Martin Luther for you. Why? Because he knows more than I do. I am not the authority. There are smarter, wiser people than me whom I lean on to try to make sure I am going in the right direction, and I try to show you when I am doing that.
Jesus didn’t need to do that. Jesus didn’t need to name-drop all of these other people he had learned from because he was God. He could teach with authority. He didn’t need to say, “Well, on this matter Rabbi Shammai says this, and Rabbi Hillel says this.” He could just say, “This is the way it is. Source: me. I’m telling you, that’s the way it is.” He taught with authority, and the things he said immediately rang true to people.
You see their response. They are amazed, but they also ask, “How did this man get such learning without being taught? Where are his credentials?” There was a formal education process to become a rabbi. You would need to apprentice under a pre-existing rabbi, a process that could take up to 10 years. If you really wanted to become a rabbi, you found a good one, asked to become their apprentice, and served under them until they felt you were ready. It could take a long time. Jesus did not do that. He had no formal education.
I am not one to deride education; there is no glory in ignorance. But at the same time, education is intended for a purpose. You need it to know what is true. That is the goal. If someone has 18 diplomas on their wall but they think one plus one is three, it doesn’t matter what their accolades are or how many years they spent studying. You are not looking for someone who has good credentials; you are looking for someone who can teach you what is true. Jesus didn’t have a formal education, but he knew what was true, which is infinitely more important.
Jesus shows the crowd that his knowledge and teaching are legitimate with three moves in this coming paragraph. He starts, “My teaching is not my own; it comes from the one who sent me.” They are wondering where he is getting this stuff, who he learned from, and how they can trust him. Jesus clarifies, “I am not teaching you things that are just my random opinion. I am teaching you what God says on this. That’s what I’m interested in. Here’s what God says. You don’t believe me? Go look at the scriptures. Go pore through what has been recorded by the prophets, look at what I’m saying, and match it up to see if it makes sense.”
He immediately invites them to do that, and that is the way many early Christians would evangelize. You have to keep in mind that the New Testament took some time to put together. After Jesus ascended into heaven, it is not like everything was right there. The last book, Revelation, was written sometime just before the year 100. There was a period of years where the documents were not even completed, much less canonized. What did Christians do before those were available? They would use the Old Testament. They would say, “Let’s open this up, and I’m going to show you how this is all about Jesus. Here’s this passage in Isaiah; Jesus fulfilled that. Here’s a passage in Jeremiah; this is about Jesus. Here’s a passage in Malachi; this is about Jesus.” They showed that Jesus was not some random new thing. He was doing exactly what was in line with what God had foretold. His whole ministry was not his own thing; it was what God had promised from the beginning, and you could check the scriptures to be sure of that. Jesus didn’t just want to teach his own opinions; he was teaching what God had proclaimed, and he invited people to verify that.
That makes me think a little bit about those of you who have been in my office before. I have my diploma hanging up behind my desk from Duke University. It feels wrong to mention the Blue Devil during a sermon in church, so I won’t, but it was a good experience. I hesitated before I hung that on the wall, though. Ultimately, I did it because when you pay that much for a piece of paper, you want to put it somewhere. It is expensive paper.
At the end of the day, that is not the cornerstone of my ministry. I don’t want people to listen to me just because I have a fancy paper on my wall. There are a lot of other people who have fancy papers on their walls; some of what they teach is good, and some of what they teach is not good. Ultimately, sound doctrine and good knowledge do not come from a random person’s teaching just because they have a diploma. It comes from scripture. Insofar as knowledge is rooted in scripture, it is good. That is the source of real authority when you are teaching, not a diploma. Good though it may be, and though it may indicate that you have studied, the truth of legitimacy is rooted here. That makes all the difference: knowing that teaching is not just coming from some random person, but is rooted in what God said.
I think that is true for all disciplines, too. It is not just a pastor thing. Every discipline imaginable comes from God. What is math but the logic that underpins God’s creation? What is biology but an expression of the way he created everything? What is agriculture but the continuing work that was laid out in Genesis when God gave Adam the Garden of Eden to take care of? All of these pieces of knowledge are not just random pieces of trivia that don’t matter. All of them are things that were set forth by God when he made all of this, and all of them point to him. The end of every piece of knowledge points back to God. Insofar as it does that, it is good knowledge. Insofar as it doesn’t, it is trivia and nothing more.
Jesus says, “You want to see if my teachings are legitimate? Check them against God. See if they’re in line. See if my teachings align with the Scriptures.”
Then he moves on to a second point: “Anyone who chooses to do the will of God will find out whether my teaching comes from God or whether I speak on my own.” Notice the way he is moving here. The second way he invites verification is by looking at your actions. He knows that knowledge is not just random theory floating out there in the ether. Real knowledge is something that is lived, something that makes a difference in our lives. That is real knowledge.
Sometimes people divorce those things entirely. They have these wild theories, but then you look at their lives and they live the same as anybody else. I know some people who have wildly conspiratorial ideas. They have crazy theories, but they live just like everyone else. They get you one-on-one and say, “Did you know that the pigeons are government drones sent to do surveillance on us?” and you just say, “Okay.” Then you get back in public, and they live just like anybody else. They have these weird pet theories, but they don’t live any differently. If they really believed that pigeons were government drones, wouldn’t they try to smack one out of the sky? Then they would see, “Oh, shoot. This isn’t a robot. I was wrong; I just killed a random pigeon.” They could verify this if they tried to live it, but they don’t. To them, it is just a theory, a fun experiment to think about in their spare time.
If you really believe something, it changes the way you live because you can test it. You can see: Is this true? Does this work? Is it honest? Is it real? Jesus says it is the same thing with his doctrine. He says if you want to understand it, if you want to get it, live it. Try to please God and see if what I am teaching is true.
I can personally verify that. I know when I was still a sort of “proto-Christian,” I started to think about Christianity but thought the Bible had a lot wrong with it. I thought Jesus was a nice guy, but wrong about a fair amount—though still pretty admirable in the grand scheme of things. I thought there was a bunch of stuff that made no sense. Prayer? Nonsense. It doesn’t work. Scripture? Full of errors. It couldn’t possibly be worth too much of my time. What changed me was trying it. Jesus said I should do this, so I thought maybe I should try it and see what happens. I started studying scripture more, and it wasn’t what I thought it was; there was more to it than I understood. I tried praying. It didn’t make any sense to me, and I thought it was crazy. How would closing my eyes, folding my hands, and saying some things make a difference? But I tried it. It was not what I thought it was; there was more to this than I realized. The more I tried to live what I found in the scriptures, the more I found them to be true. By trying to live something, you can see if it makes sense.
Jesus invites people to live in a God-honoring way, and you will understand his doctrine more than ever. It will blossom right in front of you. If you have some part of the Bible, some book, or some doctrine that you think is crazy—where you like the rest of it, but not that one because it is just out there—maybe a way to start making some headway is to look at your life. Look at your life and ask, “Am I trying to honor God? Where are the places that I’m not willing to trust God yet? And what would it look like to start living in a way that honors God?” If you address that sin, sometimes when you come back to those things that made no sense before, it is like a veil has been lifted. You will understand them in ways that you didn’t think were possible previously.
Jesus began by saying, “Look at what God said. See if what I’m saying lines up.” Then he moves on and says, “Try to live a righteous life. You will see that my teachings are true.” Now he moves to his third and final validation that his knowledge is legitimate. He says in verse 18, “Whoever speaks on their own does so to gain personal glory, but he who seeks the glory of the one who sent him is a man of truth.” There is nothing false about him.
Jesus says, “Look at my personal witness. Look at my life. See if my life is worthy of your time.” He says it pretty boldly. He points out that there are a lot of people out there who are just trying to sell you something. There are a lot of people who want to get famous and build their own careers, so they are trying to convince you of something for their own sake. Jesus, on the other hand, says, “I have no reason to be doing this unless I cared about you. I am at risk talking to you here. The leaders hate me. They’re waiting for something like this, but I need to tell you this. I am teaching you selflessly. Look at my life! There is nothing false about me!”
Can you imagine saying that in front of a group of people? If you are full of it and just making things up, someone is going to say something, right? Can you imagine if I stood up and said, “You can trust me because I’ve never done a thing wrong in my life”? If my wife were here, she would be able to tell you a few things. I do not have a perfect track record. Jesus says he does: “Look at my life.”
Then he compares and contrasts that with the people who are in charge. He says in verse 19, “Has not Moses given you the law? Yet not one of you keeps the law.” You are listening to these people who teach you that the law is good enough, and that if you can keep the law well enough, that is going to be good for you. How is it working? Are you keeping it? Are they keeping it? No. They are living lives that fall short, but you are listening to them, while I am living a life beyond repute. What are you doing? Why are you listening to them and not me? Why are you trying to kill me?
The crowd responds in verse 20, which can be a little confusing for some people. They say, “You are demon-possessed! Who’s trying to kill you?” In context here, it clearly means, “You’re crazy! What are you talking about? No one’s trying to kill you.” Part of what is confusing is that if we look back at verse 13, just a little way ahead, we know that the crowd was quiet about Jesus because they knew that the leaders were trying to kill him. They didn’t want to talk about him because they didn’t want to get in trouble.
How do we resolve this? There are a couple of different ways. The most popular view, which is not what I agree with but is what a lot of commentators accept, is that the Feast of Tabernacles drew Jews from all over the world. They were all over the Roman Empire—people from the furthest reaches of Latin-speaking areas and Greek-speaking areas. Not all of them had heard of Jesus. A lot of them had never heard of him before because they weren’t from there. When they see this guy saying, “They’re trying to kill me,” they are just confused. It is legitimate ignorance: “No one’s trying to kill you! You’re up there talking, and no one’s doing anything!”
That is possible. However, I think a better way to resolve it is to acknowledge that the crowd is simply being inconsistent. Rather than attributing it to them being from out of town, why don’t we just acknowledge they are being hypocritical? They were afraid to talk about Jesus earlier because they knew people were trying to kill him. When Jesus points out that the system is rotten, that he is teaching truth, and that the leaders are teaching falsehoods, he asks, “Why are you okay with this?” What do they do? They go back to what is comfortable: “Who’s trying to kill you? Our leaders are trustworthy. You’re crazy. I don’t know what you’re talking about.” Is that true? No.
How much would it totally shatter the lives they were living if they acknowledged, “Yeah, the leaders are corrupt. They are on a campaign of censorship. The things they’re teaching are wrong, and this random rabbi they’re persecuting is right”? That would change everything. That would be a deeply uncomfortable, life-shattering truth to accept. So some of them say what is comfortable: “Nah, I’m pretty sure it’s okay. Pretty sure it’s fine. They’re fine. You’re crazy, Jesus. It couldn’t possibly be true.” They know it is true; they just don’t want to confront it.
In verse 21, Jesus says to them, “I did one miracle, and you are all amazed. Yet, because Moses gave you circumcision (though it did not come from Moses, but from the patriarchs), you circumcise a boy on the Sabbath. Now if a boy can be circumcised on the Sabbath so that the law of Moses may not be broken, why are you angry at me for healing a man’s whole body on the Sabbath? Stop judging by mere appearances. Instead, judge correctly.”
You are comfortable with the status quo. You are comfortable with the way things have always been, and that is all you want. Think it through. Think logically about what is happening here. Look at this: your leaders will circumcise a boy on the Sabbath. According to the book of Leviticus, a boy should be circumcised on the eighth day after he is born. If that fell on the Sabbath, that was the eighth day, so they would do it. Does the process of circumcision hurt? Sure, it is certainly not a pleasant one. They hurt someone on a small scale. Jesus is not saying the ritual is unhelpful or illegitimate; he is just pointing out that it hurts. He says, “You’re willing to hurt someone on that day, but when I healed someone’s whole body on the Sabbath…”
He is talking about when he healed the man by the pool at Bethesda, which was the last time he was in Jerusalem. That act made the authorities very angry at him. He says, “The last time I did this, everyone was angry at me. So it’s okay to hurt someone on the Sabbath, but not to heal them? Does that make sense? Is that logical?” No. Stop judging by what is comfortable, by what is easy, and by what you are used to. Instead, judge correctly.
He turns it back over to the people, and they are almost on the cusp of something here. At that point, the people of Jerusalem began to ask, “Isn’t this the man they’re trying to kill? Here he is speaking publicly, and they’re not saying a word to him. Have the authorities concluded that he’s the Messiah? But we know where this man is from. When the Messiah comes, there will be no one who will know where he’s from.”
This was a common folk teaching in that timeframe. There were a lot of people who believed this, and there are small scriptural passages that hint at it. There are verses in the book of Malachi and the book of Isaiah that say things like suddenly the Messiah appeared and went about his business. They took those passages to mean that you can’t know where the real Messiah is from because he just drops out of heaven at the temple, does his thing, and that is it. They believed that was how it really worked. If they had sincerely searched the Scriptures, they would know that is not the case because the prophecies about Jesus being born are right there. If they had really looked, they would know that everything laid out in Scripture—the whole of Jesus’s incarnation and life—is also there in a way that resolves that tension. But they didn’t look. They were comfortable with what was normal, with the standard, and with what other people told them the Bible said. They didn’t feel the need to look for themselves: “I hear the Scriptures say this. That’s fine. That’s close enough. I think that’s probably right.”
Jesus responds, “Yes, you know me, and you know where I am from. But I am not here on my own authority. He who sent me is true. You do not know him, but I know him because I am from him and he sent me.”
Martin Luther, the father of Protestantism, gave some really good insight on this. He says there is sarcasm in Christ’s voice as he asks, “You know me and you know where I am from, do you? You don’t know the one who sent me, so how could you really know me and where I am from?” Jesus is telling them, “You don’t know nearly as much as you think you know. I am from heaven. My Father is God. That’s where I am really from.”
At this point, people know what he is saying. This is not lost on them. The claims he is making—the claim to not only be the Messiah but the Son of God from heaven—cause the alarm bells in their heads to go off. Verse 30 says, “At this they tried to seize him.” They tried to reason with him, and they repeatedly found different ways to remain comfortable, but Jesus has not let them stay comfortable. Now that their logic has failed, they resort to force. They tried to seize him, but no one laid a hand on him because his hour had not yet come. Still, many in the crowd believed in him. They said, “When the Messiah comes, will he perform more signs than this man?” There are some people who look at Jesus, listen to him, reason through his teachings, and realize they cannot imagine someone better than this. They can’t imagine a Messiah coming who somehow does all of this even better. This is the best it could possibly be; he must be right, in spite of the fact that most of the crowd is furious.
Now the leaders get involved. From here on out, we see the leaders step in. Verse 32 says, “The Pharisees heard the crowd whispering such things about him. Then the chief priests and the Pharisees sent temple guards to arrest him.”
Jesus said, “I am with you only for a short time, and then I am going to the one who sent me. You will look for me, but you will not find me; and where I am, you cannot come.”
The Jews said to one another, “Where does this man intend to go that we cannot find him? Will he go where our people live scattered among the Greeks, and teach the Greeks? What did he mean when he said, ‘You will look for me and you will not find me; and where I am you cannot come’?”
This immediately follows his clear claim: “I’m from God. I am from heaven,” which people literally tried to attack him for because they found it blasphemous. Following this up, he tells the leaders that he is only here for a short time, that he is going back to where he came from, and they won’t be able to follow. The leaders are even more ignorant than the people. The people were uncomfortable and frustrated by what he said, but they knew what it meant. The leaders seem unable to even make sense of it. They ask, “What is he talking about? Do you think he’s going on vacation to Greece? Is that what he means?” No, that obviously isn’t what he was talking about. Most of us in this room can see pretty plainly what he is saying, and most of the people in the crowd could see it, too. But the leaders are so attached to the way they think things ought to be that they are not willing to reexamine them or sincerely listen.
Looking at the way different people reacted takes us back to what we were discussing a couple of weeks ago regarding Augustine and Faustus. Why wasn’t Faustus able to see the truth clearly? Because he did not come sincerely to Jesus. If you want to understand Jesus, a level of sincerity is necessary. In this passage, we have a crowd where some people just wanted what was easy and comfortable. They wanted the same old routine. Jesus is teaching this profound, incredible truth, but they don’t want it; they just want what they know. We have to avoid that mindset, because if you just go with what is easy and familiar, you will miss the Messiah.
Then there are the leaders—people who are so attached to their pet theories on how things work that even when they are taught basic truths directly and clearly, they can’t make heads or tails of it. When you get too attached to your own ideas and your own teachings, you miss what the Messiah is bringing.
There is only a small group of people in the crowd who listen to Jesus and think it through. They ask: Is what he is teaching compatible with scripture? Is it a pure expression of what God has said? Yes. As I live a righteous life, does it make sense with what this guy says? Yes. As I continue to try to work through this, does this make sense? How could there be someone better than this? They look at his behavior, and it is beyond reproach. Here is someone who embodies what God is doing. How could there be a Messiah more loving than this? How could there be one who works greater miracles than this? How could there be a Messiah better than this? They sincerely listen to Jesus, and they find the Messiah.
As we continue to look at the questions we bring, the things that confuse us, the knowledge we have, and the knowledge we hope to gain, bring it sincerely before Jesus. Listen to him, and you will find the truth of his teachings. Amen.